Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.01
    0.0069407644 = product of:
      0.041644584 = sum of:
        0.041644584 = product of:
          0.08328917 = sum of:
            0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08328917 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  2. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.01
    0.0069407644 = product of:
      0.041644584 = sum of:
        0.041644584 = product of:
          0.08328917 = sum of:
            0.08328917 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08328917 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  3. Kaltenborn, K.-F.: Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Datenbank Medline : T.1: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Nutzungscharakteristika, Bewertung der Rechercheergebnisse und künftige Informationsgewinnung; T.2: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Recherchequalität und Nutzer-Computer/Datenbank-Interaktion (1991) 0.01
    0.0067406045 = product of:
      0.040443625 = sum of:
        0.040443625 = weight(_text_:und in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040443625 = score(doc=5105,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die Einführung von CD-ROM Datenbanken als neue Informationstechnologie hat die Formen der Informationsgewinnung in bestimmten wissenschaftlichen Fachgebieten grundlegend geändert. Der Beitrag berichtet über Ergebnisse wissenschaftlicher Begleitforschung bei Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Version der Datenbank MEDLINE. Hierzu wurden drei verschiedene Erhebungen durchgeführt. Hiernach ist die überwiegende Zahl der Endnutzer (89,3%) mit dem jeweiligen Rechercheresultat zufrieden, wobei Benutzer mit geringer Rechercheerfahrung eine höhere Zufriedenheitsrate erreichen als Benutzer mit umfangreicheren Recherchekenntnissen. Die Gründe zur Nutzung von CD-ROM-Systemen resultieren voriwegend aus der klinischen Alltagsroutine oder täglichen Forschungspraxis, während vermittelte Online-Literatursuchen tendenziell häufiger im Zusammenhang mit einmaligen Ereignissen der wissenschaftlichen Aus- und Weiterbildung stehen. Die selbständige CD-ROM Literaturrecherche stellt für die befragten Ärzte und Wissenschaftler die bevorzugte Methode der Informationsgewinnung dar. Die analysierten Endnutzerrecherchen weisen allerdings Fehler und Defizite hinsichtlich einer optimalen Suchstrategie auf, die zu unbemerktn Informationsverlusten und zu Fehlbeurteilungen des wissenschaftlichen Kenntnisstandes führen
  4. Knorz, G.: Testverfahren für intelligente Indexierungs- und Retrievalsysteme anhand deutsch-sprachiger sozialwissenschaftlicher Fachinformation (GIRT) : Bericht über einen Workshop am 12. September 1997 im IZ Sozialwissenschaften, Bonn (1998) 0.01
    0.0063551026 = product of:
      0.038130615 = sum of:
        0.038130615 = weight(_text_:und in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038130615 = score(doc=5080,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    A. Die Initiative "GIRT" 1. Vorträge 2. Ziele und Perspektiven des Projektes GIRT (Krause) 3. Generelle Ergebnisse der TREC-Studien, einschließlich TREC-5 (Womser-Hacker) 4. Ergebnisse des GIRT-Pretests (Kluck) 5. Multilingualität in TREC (Schäuble) B. Abschlußdiskussion und Resumee
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.2, S.111-116
  5. Bauer, G.; Schneider, C.: PADOK-II : Untersuchungen zur Volltextproblematik und zur interpretativen Analyse der Retrievalprotokolle (1990) 0.01
    0.0055036806 = product of:
      0.033022083 = sum of:
        0.033022083 = weight(_text_:und in 4164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033022083 = score(doc=4164,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 4164, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4164)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag baut auf dem Bericht über das methodische Konzept, über die Durchführung und die Ergebnisse der PADOK-II-Retrievaltests auf (Krause/Wormser-Hacker). Hier werden die Ergebnisse von Zusatztests zum Einfluß des Umfangs der zugrundeliegenden Dokumente (Volltext vs. Titel+Abstract) beschrieben, die eine deutliche Beeinträchtigung der Recall-Werte bei reduziertem Dokumentenumfang zeigen. Zur interpretativen Analyse der Retrievalprotokolle werden vor allem die methodische Einbindung, Ansatzpunkte der Analyse und erste Ergebnisse vorgestelt.
  6. Krause, J.; Womser-Hacker, C.: PADOK-II : Retrievaltests zur Bewertung von Volltextindexierungsvarianten für das deutsche Patentinformationssystem (1990) 0.01
    0.0055036806 = product of:
      0.033022083 = sum of:
        0.033022083 = weight(_text_:und in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033022083 = score(doc=2653,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Vorgestellt werden die Ergebnisse extensiver Retrievaltests von zwei Varianten von Inhalteserschließungen (Freitext und PASSAT) für das deutsche Patentinformationssystem auf der Basis von Volltexten. Die Tests führte die Fachgruppe Linguistische Informationswissenschaft der Universität Regensburg von 1986-1989 in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Deutschen Patentamt, dem Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe und meheren industrieellen Partnern durch. Der Schwerpunkt des Berichts liegt auf dem allgemeinen Ansatz der Bewertung der Ziele des Projekts und auf der Darstellung der statistischen Evaluierungsergebnisse.
  7. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.00
    0.004957689 = product of:
      0.029746132 = sum of:
        0.029746132 = product of:
          0.059492264 = sum of:
            0.059492264 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059492264 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  8. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.00
    0.004957689 = product of:
      0.029746132 = sum of:
        0.029746132 = product of:
          0.059492264 = sum of:
            0.059492264 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059492264 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  9. Kluck, M.: ¬Eine deutschsprachige Testdatenbank für moderne Erschließungs- und Retrievalsysteme : German Indexing and Retrieval Testdatabase - GIRT (1996) 0.00
    0.004766327 = product of:
      0.02859796 = sum of:
        0.02859796 = weight(_text_:und in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02859796 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  10. Bollmann-Sdorra, P.: Probleme der Validität bei Retrievaltests (1990) 0.00
    0.003971939 = product of:
      0.023831634 = sum of:
        0.023831634 = weight(_text_:und in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023831634 = score(doc=5113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09732112 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0439102 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag werden beispielhaft Probleme der Validität bei Retrievaltests behandelt. Die externe Validität wird im Zusammenhang von Ähnlichkeitsmaßen und Bewertungsmaßen diskutiert. Die interne Validität wird am Beispiel der Mittelwertbildung diskutiert. Es zeigt sich, daß die Forderung nach Validität die zur Auswahl stehenden Methoden einschränkt
  11. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.00
    0.003966151 = product of:
      0.023796905 = sum of:
        0.023796905 = product of:
          0.04759381 = sum of:
            0.04759381 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04759381 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  12. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.00
    0.003966151 = product of:
      0.023796905 = sum of:
        0.023796905 = product of:
          0.04759381 = sum of:
            0.04759381 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04759381 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  13. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.00
    0.003966151 = product of:
      0.023796905 = sum of:
        0.023796905 = product of:
          0.04759381 = sum of:
            0.04759381 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04759381 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  14. Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994) 0.00
    0.0034703822 = product of:
      0.020822292 = sum of:
        0.020822292 = product of:
          0.041644584 = sum of:
            0.041644584 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041644584 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
  15. Blair, D.C.: STAIRS Redux : thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after (1996) 0.00
    0.0034703822 = product of:
      0.020822292 = sum of:
        0.020822292 = product of:
          0.041644584 = sum of:
            0.041644584 = weight(_text_:22 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041644584 = score(doc=3002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.4-22
  16. Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.00
    0.0034703822 = product of:
      0.020822292 = sum of:
        0.020822292 = product of:
          0.041644584 = sum of:
            0.041644584 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041644584 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
  17. Brown, M.E.: By any other name : accounting for failure in the naming of subject categories (1995) 0.00
    0.0034703822 = product of:
      0.020822292 = sum of:
        0.020822292 = product of:
          0.041644584 = sum of:
            0.041644584 = weight(_text_:22 in 5598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041644584 = score(doc=5598,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5598, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5598)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    2.11.1996 13:08:22
  18. Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995) 0.00
    0.002974613 = product of:
      0.017847678 = sum of:
        0.017847678 = product of:
          0.035695355 = sum of:
            0.035695355 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035695355 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
  19. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996) 0.00
    0.002974613 = product of:
      0.017847678 = sum of:
        0.017847678 = product of:
          0.035695355 = sum of:
            0.035695355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035695355 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92
  20. Crestani, F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval by imaging (1996) 0.00
    0.002974613 = product of:
      0.017847678 = sum of:
        0.017847678 = product of:
          0.035695355 = sum of:
            0.035695355 = weight(_text_:22 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035695355 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376605 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0439102 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon