Search (59 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.05
    0.052226603 = product of:
      0.104453206 = sum of:
        0.079032205 = weight(_text_:services in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079032205 = score(doc=3572,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
        0.025421001 = product of:
          0.050842002 = sum of:
            0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050842002 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes of 3 searches on the topic of virtual communities done on the WWW using HotBot and traditional databases using LEXIS-NEXIS and ABI/Inform. Concludes that the WWW is a good starting place for a broad concept search but the traditional services are better for more precise topics
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  2. Armstrong, C.J.; Medawar, K.: Investigation into the quality of databases in general use in the UK (1996) 0.03
    0.034753162 = product of:
      0.069506325 = sum of:
        0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048898686 = score(doc=6768,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
        0.02060764 = product of:
          0.04121528 = sum of:
            0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04121528 = score(doc=6768,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) BLRRD funded project which investigated the quality of databases in general use in the UK. Gives a literature review of quality in library and information services. Reports the results of a CIQM questionnaire survey on the quality problems of databases and their affect on users. Carries out databases evaluations of: INSPEC on ESA-IRS, INSPEC on KR Data-Star, INSPEC on UMI CD-ROM, BNB on CD-ROM, and Information Science Abstracts Plus CD-ROM. Sets out a methodology for evaluation of bibliographic databases
  3. Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Using subject headings for online retrieval : theory, practice and potential (1994) 0.03
    0.029788423 = product of:
      0.059576847 = sum of:
        0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041913155 = score(doc=386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
        0.017663691 = product of:
          0.035327382 = sum of:
            0.035327382 = weight(_text_:management in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035327382 = score(doc=386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information processing and management 31(1995) no.3, S.450-451 (R.R. Larson); Library resources and technical services 41(1997) no.1, S.60-67 (B.H. Weinberg)
  4. Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994) 0.02
    0.021425508 = product of:
      0.08570203 = sum of:
        0.08570203 = sum of:
          0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04121528 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
          0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04448675 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
    Source
    Information processing and management. 30(1994) no.2, S.205-221
  5. Losee, R.M.: Determining information retrieval and filtering performance without experimentation (1995) 0.02
    0.021425508 = product of:
      0.08570203 = sum of:
        0.08570203 = sum of:
          0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04121528 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
          0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 3368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04448675 = score(doc=3368,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3368, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3368)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.4, S.555-572
  6. Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995) 0.02
    0.01836472 = product of:
      0.07345888 = sum of:
        0.07345888 = sum of:
          0.035327382 = weight(_text_:management in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035327382 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
          0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038131498 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046906993 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.2, S.173-190
  7. Lancaster, F.W.; Connell, T.H.; Bishop, N.; McCowan, S.: Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs (1991) 0.01
    0.012224671 = product of:
      0.048898686 = sum of:
        0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048898686 = score(doc=2259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 35(1991), S.377-391
  8. Logan, E.: Cognitive styles and online behaviour of novice searchers (1990) 0.01
    0.011775794 = product of:
      0.047103178 = sum of:
        0.047103178 = product of:
          0.094206356 = sum of:
            0.094206356 = weight(_text_:management in 6891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094206356 = score(doc=6891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 6891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.503-510
  9. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.01
    0.0111216875 = product of:
      0.04448675 = sum of:
        0.04448675 = product of:
          0.0889735 = sum of:
            0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0889735 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  10. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.01
    0.0111216875 = product of:
      0.04448675 = sum of:
        0.04448675 = product of:
          0.0889735 = sum of:
            0.0889735 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0889735 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  11. Evans, D.A.; Lefferts, R.G.: CLARIT-TREC experiments (1995) 0.01
    0.01040843 = product of:
      0.04163372 = sum of:
        0.04163372 = product of:
          0.08326744 = sum of:
            0.08326744 = weight(_text_:management in 1912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08326744 = score(doc=1912,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 1912, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1912)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the following elements of the CLARIT system information management system: natural language processing, document indexing, vector space querying and query augmentation. Reports on the processing results carried out as part of the TREC-2 and into system parameterization. Results demonstrate high prescision and excellent recall, but the system is not yet optimized
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.3, S.385-395
  12. TREC-1: The first text retrieval conference : Rockville, MD, USA, 4-6 Nov. 1993 (1993) 0.01
    0.008831846 = product of:
      0.035327382 = sum of:
        0.035327382 = product of:
          0.070654765 = sum of:
            0.070654765 = weight(_text_:management in 1315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070654765 = score(doc=1315,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1315, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1315)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.4, S.411-521
  13. Wolfram, D.; Dimitroff, A.: Hypertext vs. Boolean-based searching in a bibliographic database environment : a direct comparison of searcher performance (1998) 0.01
    0.008831846 = product of:
      0.035327382 = sum of:
        0.035327382 = product of:
          0.070654765 = sum of:
            0.070654765 = weight(_text_:management in 6436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070654765 = score(doc=6436,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6436, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6436)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.6, S.669-679
  14. MacCall, S.L.; Cleveland, A.D.; Gibson, I.E.: Outline and preliminary evaluation of the classical digital library model (1999) 0.01
    0.008731907 = product of:
      0.03492763 = sum of:
        0.03492763 = weight(_text_:services in 6541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03492763 = score(doc=6541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 6541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6541)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The growing number of networked information resources and services offers unprecedented opportunities for delivering high quality information to the computer desktop of a wide range of individuals. However, currently there is a reliance on a database retrieval model, in which endusers use keywords to search large collections of automatically indexed resources in order to find needed information. As an alternative to the database retrieval model, this paper outlines the classical digital library model, which is derived from traditional practices of library and information science professionals. These practices include the selection and organization of information resources for local populations of users and the integration of advanced information retrieval tools, such as databases and the Internet into these collections. To evaluate this model, library and information professionals and endusers involved with primary care medicine were asked to respond to a series of questions comparing their experiences with a digital library developed for the primary care population to their experiences with general Internet use. Preliminary results are reported
  15. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01
    0.007944062 = product of:
      0.03177625 = sum of:
        0.03177625 = product of:
          0.0635525 = sum of:
            0.0635525 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0635525 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  16. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.01
    0.007944062 = product of:
      0.03177625 = sum of:
        0.03177625 = product of:
          0.0635525 = sum of:
            0.0635525 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0635525 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  17. Callan, J.; Croft, W.B.; Broglio, J.: TREC and TIPSTER experiments with INQUERY (1995) 0.01
    0.007359871 = product of:
      0.029439485 = sum of:
        0.029439485 = product of:
          0.05887897 = sum of:
            0.05887897 = weight(_text_:management in 1944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05887897 = score(doc=1944,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 1944, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1944)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.3, S.327-343
  18. Borgman, C.L.: Why are online catalogs still hard to use? (1996) 0.01
    0.006985526 = product of:
      0.027942104 = sum of:
        0.027942104 = weight(_text_:services in 4380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027942104 = score(doc=4380,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 4380, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4380)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We return to arguments made 10 years ago that online catalogs are difficult to use because their design does not incorporate sufficient understanding of searching behavior. The earlier article examined studies of information retrieval system searching for their implications for online catalog design; this article examines the implications of card catalog design for online catalogs. With this analysis, we hope to contribute to a better understanding of user behavior and to lay to rest the card catalog design model for online catalogs. We discuss the problems with query matching systems, which were designed for skilled search intermediaries rather than end-users, and the knowledge and skills they require in the information-seeking process, illustrated with examples of searching card and online catalogs. Searching requires conceptual knowledge of the information retrieval process - translating an information need into a searchable query; semantic knowledge of how to implement a query in a given system - the how and when to use system features; and technical skills in executing the query - basic computing skills and the syntax of entering queries as specific search statements. In the short term, we can help make online catalogs easier to use through improved training and documentation that is based on information-seeking bahavior, with the caveat that good training is not a substitute for good system design. Our long term goal should be to design intuitive systems that require a minimum of instruction. Given the complexity of the information retrieval problem and the limited capabilities of today's systems, we are far from achieving that goal. If libraries are to provide primary information services for the networked world, they need to put research results on the information-seeking process into practice in designing the next generation of online public access information retrieval systems
  19. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01
    0.0063552503 = product of:
      0.025421001 = sum of:
        0.025421001 = product of:
          0.050842002 = sum of:
            0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050842002 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  20. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.01
    0.0063552503 = product of:
      0.025421001 = sum of:
        0.025421001 = product of:
          0.050842002 = sum of:
            0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050842002 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046906993 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00

Languages

  • e 58
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 54
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…