Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.06
    0.06228298 = product of:
      0.18684894 = sum of:
        0.18684894 = sum of:
          0.08985821 = weight(_text_:management in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08985821 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.09699072 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09699072 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36
  2. Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008) 0.02
    0.022243923 = product of:
      0.066731766 = sum of:
        0.066731766 = sum of:
          0.032092217 = weight(_text_:management in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032092217 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
          0.034639545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034639545 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051133685 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
  3. Hersh, W.R.; Over, P.: Interactivity at the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) (2001) 0.01
    0.014976369 = product of:
      0.044929106 = sum of:
        0.044929106 = product of:
          0.08985821 = sum of:
            0.08985821 = weight(_text_:management in 5486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08985821 = score(doc=5486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.365-367
  4. Over, P.: ¬The TREC interactive track : an annotated bibliography (2001) 0.01
    0.014976369 = product of:
      0.044929106 = sum of:
        0.044929106 = product of:
          0.08985821 = sum of:
            0.08985821 = weight(_text_:management in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08985821 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.369-381
  5. Voorhees, E.M.: Variations in relevance judgements and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness (2000) 0.01
    0.014976369 = product of:
      0.044929106 = sum of:
        0.044929106 = product of:
          0.08985821 = sum of:
            0.08985821 = weight(_text_:management in 8710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08985821 = score(doc=8710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 8710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.5, S.697-716
  6. Rao, A.; Lu, A.; Meier, E.; Ahmed, S.; Pliske, D.: Query processing in TREC6 (2000) 0.01
    0.014976369 = product of:
      0.044929106 = sum of:
        0.044929106 = product of:
          0.08985821 = sum of:
            0.08985821 = weight(_text_:management in 6420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08985821 = score(doc=6420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.179-186
  7. Smeaton, A.F.: TREC-6: personal highlights (2000) 0.01
    0.014976369 = product of:
      0.044929106 = sum of:
        0.044929106 = product of:
          0.08985821 = sum of:
            0.08985821 = weight(_text_:management in 6439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08985821 = score(doc=6439,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6439, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.87-94
  8. Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Beaulieu, M.: Experimentation as a way of life : Okapi at TREC (2000) 0.01
    0.0128368875 = product of:
      0.03851066 = sum of:
        0.03851066 = product of:
          0.07702132 = sum of:
            0.07702132 = weight(_text_:management in 6030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07702132 = score(doc=6030,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6030, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6030)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.95-108
  9. Pedersen, J.O.; Silverstein, C.; Vogt, C.C.: Verity at TREC-6 : out-of-the-box and beyond (2000) 0.01
    0.0128368875 = product of:
      0.03851066 = sum of:
        0.03851066 = product of:
          0.07702132 = sum of:
            0.07702132 = weight(_text_:management in 6427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07702132 = score(doc=6427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6427)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.187-196
  10. Cormack, G.V.; Clarke, C.L.A.; Palmer, C.R.; To, S.S.L.: Passage-based refinement : MultiText experiments for TREC-6 (2000) 0.01
    0.0128368875 = product of:
      0.03851066 = sum of:
        0.03851066 = product of:
          0.07702132 = sum of:
            0.07702132 = weight(_text_:management in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07702132 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.133-153
  11. Cole, C.: Intelligent information retrieval : Part IV: Testing the timing of two information retrieval devices in a naturalistic setting (2001) 0.01
    0.0128368875 = product of:
      0.03851066 = sum of:
        0.03851066 = product of:
          0.07702132 = sum of:
            0.07702132 = weight(_text_:management in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07702132 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.1, S.163-182
  12. Park, S.: Usability, user preferences, effectiveness, and user behaviors when searching individual and integrated full-text databases : implications for digital libraries (2000) 0.01
    0.012546628 = product of:
      0.037639882 = sum of:
        0.037639882 = weight(_text_:resources in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037639882 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article addresses a crucial issue in the digital library environment: how to support effective interaction of users with heterogeneous and distributed information resources. In particular, this study compared usability, user preference, effectiveness, and searching behaviors in systems that implement interaction with multiple databases as if they were one (integrated interaction) in a experiment in the TREC environment. 28 volunteers were recruited from the graduate students of the School of Communication, Information & Library Studies at Rutgers University. Significantly more subjects preferred the common interface to the integrated interface, mainly because they could have more control over database selection. Subjects were also more satisfied with the results from the common interface, and performed better with the common interface than with the integrated interface. Overall, it appears that for this population, interacting with databases through a common interface is preferable on all grounds to interacting with databases through an integrated interface. These results suggest that: (1) the general assumption of the information retrieval (IR) literature that an integrated interaction is best needs to be revisited; (2) it is important to allow for more user control in the distributed environment; (3) for digital library purposes, it is important to characterize different databases to support user choice for integration; and (4) certain users prefer control over database selection while still opting for results to be merged
  13. Hemminger, B.M.; Saelim, B.; Sullivan, P.F.; Vision, T.J.: Comparison of full-text searching to metadata searching for genes in two biomedical literature cohorts (2007) 0.01
    0.012546628 = product of:
      0.037639882 = sum of:
        0.037639882 = weight(_text_:resources in 1327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037639882 = score(doc=1327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18665522 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051133685 = queryNorm
            0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 1327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1327)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Researchers have traditionally used bibliographic databases to search out information. Today, the full-text of resources is increasingly available for searching, and more researchers are performing full-text searches. This study compares differences in the number of articles discovered between metadata and full-text searches of the same literature cohort when searching for gene names in two biomedical literature domains. Three reviewers additionally ranked 100 articles in each domain. Significantly more articles were discovered via full-text searching; however, the precision of full-text searching also is significantly lower than that of metadata searching. Certain features of articles correlated with higher relevance ratings. A significant feature measured was the number of matches of the search term in the full-text of the article, with a larger number of matches having a statistically significant higher usefulness (i.e., relevance) rating. By using the number of hits of the search term in the full-text to rank the importance of the article, performance of full-text searching was improved so that both recall and precision were as good as or better than that for metadata searching. This suggests that full-text searching alone may be sufficient, and that metadata searching as a surrogate is not necessary.
  14. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01
    0.009237211 = product of:
      0.027711634 = sum of:
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  15. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.01
    0.009237211 = product of:
      0.027711634 = sum of:
        0.027711634 = product of:
          0.055423267 = sum of:
            0.055423267 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055423267 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17906146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
  16. Serrano Cobos, J.; Quintero Orta, A.: Design, development and management of an information recovery system for an Internet Website : from documentary theory to practice (2003) 0.01
    0.009077052 = product of:
      0.027231153 = sum of:
        0.027231153 = product of:
          0.054462306 = sum of:
            0.054462306 = weight(_text_:management in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054462306 = score(doc=2726,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A real case study is shown, explaining in a timeline the whole process of design, development and evaluation of a search engine used as a navigational help tool for end users and clients an a content website, e-commerce driven. The nature of the website is a community website, which will determine the core design of the information service. This study will involve several steps, such as information recovery system analysis, comparative analysis of other commercial search engines, service design, functionalities and scope; software selection, design of the project, project management, future service administration and conclusions.
  17. Blair, D.C.: Some thoughts on the reported results of TREC (2002) 0.01
    0.008557925 = product of:
      0.025673775 = sum of:
        0.025673775 = product of:
          0.05134755 = sum of:
            0.05134755 = weight(_text_:management in 2583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05134755 = score(doc=2583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.3, S.445-451
  18. Wolff, C.: Leistungsvergleich der Retrievaloberflächen zwischen Web und klassischen Expertensystemen (2001) 0.01
    0.0074881846 = product of:
      0.022464553 = sum of:
        0.022464553 = product of:
          0.044929106 = sum of:
            0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044929106 = score(doc=5870,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  19. Savoy, J.: Bibliographic database access using free-text and controlled vocabulary : an evaluation (2005) 0.01
    0.0074881846 = product of:
      0.022464553 = sum of:
        0.022464553 = product of:
          0.044929106 = sum of:
            0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044929106 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.4, S.873-890
  20. Ahlgren, P.; Grönqvist, L.: Evaluation of retrieval effectiveness with incomplete relevance data : theoretical and experimental comparison of three measures (2008) 0.01
    0.0074881846 = product of:
      0.022464553 = sum of:
        0.022464553 = product of:
          0.044929106 = sum of:
            0.044929106 = weight(_text_:management in 2032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044929106 = score(doc=2032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17235184 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051133685 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.212-225