Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.04
    0.039774638 = product of:
      0.09943659 = sum of:
        0.08609679 = weight(_text_:inc in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08609679 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042509552 = queryNorm
            0.33449355 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
        0.013339795 = product of:
          0.02667959 = sum of:
            0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02667959 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  2. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.03
    0.03106705 = product of:
      0.15533525 = sum of:
        0.15533525 = sum of:
          0.07470285 = weight(_text_:management in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07470285 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.0806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0806324 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36
  3. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.02
    0.020663233 = product of:
      0.103316166 = sum of:
        0.103316166 = weight(_text_:inc in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103316166 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042509552 = queryNorm
            0.40139228 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
  4. Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.011095377 = product of:
      0.05547688 = sum of:
        0.05547688 = sum of:
          0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02667959 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
          0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02879729 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
  5. Hersh, W.R.; Over, P.: Interactivity at the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) (2001) 0.01
    0.007470285 = product of:
      0.037351426 = sum of:
        0.037351426 = product of:
          0.07470285 = sum of:
            0.07470285 = weight(_text_:management in 5486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07470285 = score(doc=5486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.365-367
  6. Over, P.: ¬The TREC interactive track : an annotated bibliography (2001) 0.01
    0.007470285 = product of:
      0.037351426 = sum of:
        0.037351426 = product of:
          0.07470285 = sum of:
            0.07470285 = weight(_text_:management in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07470285 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.369-381
  7. Voorhees, E.M.: Variations in relevance judgements and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness (2000) 0.01
    0.007470285 = product of:
      0.037351426 = sum of:
        0.037351426 = product of:
          0.07470285 = sum of:
            0.07470285 = weight(_text_:management in 8710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07470285 = score(doc=8710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 8710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.5, S.697-716
  8. Rao, A.; Lu, A.; Meier, E.; Ahmed, S.; Pliske, D.: Query processing in TREC6 (2000) 0.01
    0.007470285 = product of:
      0.037351426 = sum of:
        0.037351426 = product of:
          0.07470285 = sum of:
            0.07470285 = weight(_text_:management in 6420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07470285 = score(doc=6420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.179-186
  9. Smeaton, A.F.: TREC-6: personal highlights (2000) 0.01
    0.007470285 = product of:
      0.037351426 = sum of:
        0.037351426 = product of:
          0.07470285 = sum of:
            0.07470285 = weight(_text_:management in 6439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07470285 = score(doc=6439,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6439, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.87-94
  10. Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Beaulieu, M.: Experimentation as a way of life : Okapi at TREC (2000) 0.01
    0.006403102 = product of:
      0.03201551 = sum of:
        0.03201551 = product of:
          0.06403102 = sum of:
            0.06403102 = weight(_text_:management in 6030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06403102 = score(doc=6030,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6030, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6030)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.95-108
  11. Pedersen, J.O.; Silverstein, C.; Vogt, C.C.: Verity at TREC-6 : out-of-the-box and beyond (2000) 0.01
    0.006403102 = product of:
      0.03201551 = sum of:
        0.03201551 = product of:
          0.06403102 = sum of:
            0.06403102 = weight(_text_:management in 6427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06403102 = score(doc=6427,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6427, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6427)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.187-196
  12. Cormack, G.V.; Clarke, C.L.A.; Palmer, C.R.; To, S.S.L.: Passage-based refinement : MultiText experiments for TREC-6 (2000) 0.01
    0.006403102 = product of:
      0.03201551 = sum of:
        0.03201551 = product of:
          0.06403102 = sum of:
            0.06403102 = weight(_text_:management in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06403102 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.133-153
  13. Cole, C.: Intelligent information retrieval : Part IV: Testing the timing of two information retrieval devices in a naturalistic setting (2001) 0.01
    0.006403102 = product of:
      0.03201551 = sum of:
        0.03201551 = product of:
          0.06403102 = sum of:
            0.06403102 = weight(_text_:management in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06403102 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.1, S.163-182
  14. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.00
    0.004607566 = product of:
      0.02303783 = sum of:
        0.02303783 = product of:
          0.04607566 = sum of:
            0.04607566 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04607566 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  15. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.00
    0.004607566 = product of:
      0.02303783 = sum of:
        0.02303783 = product of:
          0.04607566 = sum of:
            0.04607566 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04607566 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
  16. Serrano Cobos, J.; Quintero Orta, A.: Design, development and management of an information recovery system for an Internet Website : from documentary theory to practice (2003) 0.00
    0.004527677 = product of:
      0.022638384 = sum of:
        0.022638384 = product of:
          0.04527677 = sum of:
            0.04527677 = weight(_text_:management in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04527677 = score(doc=2726,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A real case study is shown, explaining in a timeline the whole process of design, development and evaluation of a search engine used as a navigational help tool for end users and clients an a content website, e-commerce driven. The nature of the website is a community website, which will determine the core design of the information service. This study will involve several steps, such as information recovery system analysis, comparative analysis of other commercial search engines, service design, functionalities and scope; software selection, design of the project, project management, future service administration and conclusions.
  17. Blair, D.C.: Some thoughts on the reported results of TREC (2002) 0.00
    0.0042687347 = product of:
      0.021343673 = sum of:
        0.021343673 = product of:
          0.042687345 = sum of:
            0.042687345 = weight(_text_:management in 2583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042687345 = score(doc=2583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.3, S.445-451
  18. Wolff, C.: Leistungsvergleich der Retrievaloberflächen zwischen Web und klassischen Expertensystemen (2001) 0.00
    0.0037351425 = product of:
      0.018675713 = sum of:
        0.018675713 = product of:
          0.037351426 = sum of:
            0.037351426 = weight(_text_:management in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037351426 = score(doc=5870,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  19. Savoy, J.: Bibliographic database access using free-text and controlled vocabulary : an evaluation (2005) 0.00
    0.0037351425 = product of:
      0.018675713 = sum of:
        0.018675713 = product of:
          0.037351426 = sum of:
            0.037351426 = weight(_text_:management in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037351426 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.4, S.873-890
  20. Ahlgren, P.; Grönqvist, L.: Evaluation of retrieval effectiveness with incomplete relevance data : theoretical and experimental comparison of three measures (2008) 0.00
    0.0037351425 = product of:
      0.018675713 = sum of:
        0.018675713 = product of:
          0.037351426 = sum of:
            0.037351426 = weight(_text_:management in 2032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037351426 = score(doc=2032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.212-225