-
Günther, M.: Vermitteln Suchmaschinen vollständige Bilder aktueller Themen? : Untersuchung der Gewichtung inhaltlicher Aspekte von Suchmaschinenergebnissen in Deutschland und den USA (2016)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=3068,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Young information scientists. 1(2016), S.13-29
-
Schaer, P.; Mayr, P.; Sünkler, S.; Lewandowski, D.: How relevant is the long tail? : a relevance assessment study on million short (2016)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Behnert, C.; Lewandowski, D.: ¬A framework for designing retrieval effectiveness studies of library information systems using human relevance assessments (2017)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 3700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=3700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3700)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 73(2017) no.3, S.509-527
-
Sarigil, E.; Sengor Altingovde, I.; Blanco, R.; Barla Cambazoglu, B.; Ozcan, R.; Ulusoy, Ö.: Characterizing, predicting, and handling web search queries that match very few or no results (2018)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 4039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=4039,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4039, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4039)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.2, S.256-270
-
Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.23-32
-
Losada, D.E.; Parapar, J.; Barreiro, A.: When to stop making relevance judgments? : a study of stopping methods for building information retrieval test collections (2019)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 4674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=4674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4674)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.1, S.49-60
-
Angelini, M.; Fazzini, V.; Ferro, N.; Santucci, G.; Silvello, G.: CLAIRE: A combinatorial visual analytics system for information retrieval evaluation (2018)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.6, S.1077-1100
-
Losada, D.E.; Parapar, J.; Barreiro, A.: Multi-armed bandits for adjudicating documents in pooling-based evaluation of information retrieval systems (2017)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 5098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=5098,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5098, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5098)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 53(2017) no.5, S.1005-1025
-
White, H.D.: Relevance theory and distributions of judgments in document retrieval (2017)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 53(2017) no.5, S.1080-1102
-
Parapar, J.; Losada, D.E.; Presedo-Quindimil, M.A.; Barreiro, A.: Using score distributions to compare statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation (2020)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 5506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=5506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5506)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.1, S.98-113
-
Saracevic, T.: Effects of inconsistent relevance judgments on information retrieval test results : a historical perspective (2008)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 5585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=5585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5585)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library trends. 56(2008) no.4, S.763-783
-
Vegt, A. van der; Zuccon, G.; Koopman, B.: Do better search engines really equate to better clinical decisions? : If not, why not? (2021)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.2, S.141-155
-
Wartena, C.; Golub, K.: Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext des Information Retrievals (2021)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.325-348
-
Gao, R.; Ge, Y.; Sha, C.: FAIR: Fairness-aware information retrieval evaluation (2022)
0.00
7.520119E-4 = product of:
0.0015040238 = sum of:
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.10, S.1461-1473
-
Cross-language information retrieval (1998)
0.00
6.512615E-4 = product of:
0.001302523 = sum of:
0.001302523 = product of:
0.002605046 = sum of:
0.002605046 = weight(_text_:s in 6299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002605046 = score(doc=6299,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.052015185 = fieldWeight in 6299, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Machine translation review: 1999, no.10, S.26-27 (D. Lewis): "Cross Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) addresses the growing need to access large volumes of data across language boundaries. The typical requirement is for the user to input a free form query, usually a brief description of a topic, into a search or retrieval engine which returns a list, in ranked order, of documents or web pages that are relevant to the topic. The search engine matches the terms in the query to indexed terms, usually keywords previously derived from the target documents. Unlike monolingual information retrieval, CLIR requires query terms in one language to be matched to indexed terms in another. Matching can be done by bilingual dictionary lookup, full machine translation, or by applying statistical methods. A query's success is measured in terms of recall (how many potentially relevant target documents are found) and precision (what proportion of documents found are relevant). Issues in CLIR are how to translate query terms into index terms, how to eliminate alternative translations (e.g. to decide that French 'traitement' in a query means 'treatment' and not 'salary'), and how to rank or weight translation alternatives that are retained (e.g. how to order the French terms 'aventure', 'business', 'affaire', and 'liaison' as relevant translations of English 'affair'). Grefenstette provides a lucid and useful overview of the field and the problems. The volume brings together a number of experiments and projects in CLIR. Mark Davies (New Mexico State University) describes Recuerdo, a Spanish retrieval engine which reduces translation ambiguities by scanning indexes for parallel texts; it also uses either a bilingual dictionary or direct equivalents from a parallel corpus in order to compare results for queries on parallel texts. Lisa Ballesteros and Bruce Croft (University of Massachusetts) use a 'local feedback' technique which automatically enhances a query by adding extra terms to it both before and after translation; such terms can be derived from documents known to be relevant to the query.
- Pages
- VII,182 S
- Type
- s
-
Borgman, C.L.: Why are online catalogs still hard to use? (1996)
0.00
6.016095E-4 = product of:
0.001203219 = sum of:
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 4380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002406438 = score(doc=4380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 4380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4380)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.7, S.493-503
-
Cooper, M.D.; Chen, H.-M.: Predicting the relevance of a library catalog search (2001)
0.00
6.016095E-4 = product of:
0.001203219 = sum of:
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 6519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002406438 = score(doc=6519,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 6519, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6519)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.10, S.813-827
-
Bateman, J.: Modelling the importance of end-user relevance criteria (1999)
0.00
6.016095E-4 = product of:
0.001203219 = sum of:
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 6606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002406438 = score(doc=6606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 6606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.396-406
-
Womser-Hacker, C.: Theorie des Information Retrieval III : Evaluierung (2004)
0.00
6.016095E-4 = product of:
0.001203219 = sum of:
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002406438 = score(doc=2919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.227-235
-
Ruthven, I.; Lalmas, M.; Rijsbergen, K. van: Combining and selecting characteristics of information use (2002)
0.00
6.016095E-4 = product of:
0.001203219 = sum of:
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 5208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002406438 = score(doc=5208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5208)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.5, S.378-396
