-
Wan, T.-L.; Evens, M.; Wan, Y.-W.; Pao, Y.-Y.: Experiments with automatic indexing and a relational thesaurus in a Chinese information retrieval system (1997)
0.04
0.043495193 = product of:
0.086990386 = sum of:
0.086990386 = product of:
0.17398077 = sum of:
0.17398077 = weight(_text_:y in 956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17398077 = score(doc=956,freq=6.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.6446522 = fieldWeight in 956, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=956)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ravin, Y.: ¬The GURU system in TREC-5 (1997)
0.04
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = product of:
0.1721963 = sum of:
0.1721963 = weight(_text_:y in 3094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1721963 = score(doc=3094,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.6380402 = fieldWeight in 3094, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3094)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011)
0.04
0.04175939 = sum of:
0.022763962 = product of:
0.09105585 = sum of:
0.09105585 = weight(_text_:authors in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09105585 = score(doc=4197,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.018995428 = product of:
0.037990857 = sum of:
0.037990857 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037990857 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) provides a TREC-like platform for evaluating content-oriented XML retrieval systems. Since 2007, INEX has been using a set of precision-recall based metrics for its ad hoc tasks. The authors investigate the reliability and robustness of these focused retrieval measures, and of the INEX pooling method. They explore four specific questions: How reliable are the metrics when assessments are incomplete, or when query sets are small? What is the minimum pool/query-set size that can be used to reliably evaluate systems? Can the INEX collections be used to fairly evaluate "new" systems that did not participate in the pooling process? And, for a fixed amount of assessment effort, would this effort be better spent in thoroughly judging a few queries, or in judging many queries relatively superficially? The authors' findings validate properties of precision-recall-based metrics observed in document retrieval settings. Early precision measures are found to be more error-prone and less stable under incomplete judgments and small topic-set sizes. They also find that system rankings remain largely unaffected even when assessment effort is substantially (but systematically) reduced, and confirm that the INEX collections remain usable when evaluating nonparticipating systems. Finally, they observe that for a fixed amount of effort, judging shallow pools for many queries is better than judging deep pools for a smaller set of queries. However, when judging only a random sample of a pool, it is better to completely judge fewer topics than to partially judge many topics. This result confirms the effectiveness of pooling methods.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:20:56
-
Mansourian, Y.; Ford, N.: Web searchers' attributions of success and failure: an empirical study (2007)
0.04
0.041576624 = sum of:
0.012877241 = product of:
0.051508963 = sum of:
0.051508963 = weight(_text_:authors in 840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051508963 = score(doc=840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=840)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028699383 = product of:
0.057398766 = sum of:
0.057398766 = weight(_text_:y in 840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057398766 = score(doc=840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.21268006 = fieldWeight in 840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper reports the findings of a study designed to explore web searchers' perceptions of the causes of their search failure and success. In particular, it seeks to discover the extent to which the constructs locus of control and attribution theory might provide useful frameworks for understanding searchers' perceptions. Design/methodology/approach - A combination of inductive and deductive approaches were employed. Perceptions of failed and successful searches were derived from the inductive analysis of using open-ended qualitative interviews with a sample of 37 biologists at the University of Sheffield. These perceptions were classified into "internal" and "external" attributions, and the relationships between these categories and "successful" and "failed" searches were analysed deductively to test the extent to which they might be explainable using locus of control and attribution theory interpretive frameworks. Findings - All searchers were readily able to recall "successful" and "unsuccessful" searches. In a large majority of cases (82.4 per cent), they clearly attributed each search to either internal (e.g. ability or effort) or external (e.g. luck or information not being available) factors. The pattern of such relationships was analysed, and mapped onto those that would be predicted by locus of control and attribution theory. The authors conclude that the potential of these theoretical frameworks to illuminate one's understanding of web searching, and associated training, merits further systematic study. Research limitations/implications - The findings are based on a relatively small sample of academic and research staff in a particular subject area. Importantly, also, the study can at best provide a prima facie case for further systematic study since, although the patterns of attribution behaviour accord with those predictable by locus of control and attribution theory, data relating to the predictive elements of these theories (e.g. levels of confidence and achievement) were not available. This issue is discussed, and recommendations made for further work. Originality/value - The findings provide some empirical support for the notion that locus of control and attribution theory might - subject to the limitations noted above - be potentially useful theoretical frameworks for helping us better understand web-based information seeking. If so, they could have implications particularly for better understanding of searchers' motivations, and for the design and development of more effective search training programmes.
-
Mansourian, Y.; Ford, N.: Search persistence and failure on the web : a "bounded rationality" and "satisficing" analysis (2007)
0.04
0.041576624 = sum of:
0.012877241 = product of:
0.051508963 = sum of:
0.051508963 = weight(_text_:authors in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051508963 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028699383 = product of:
0.057398766 = sum of:
0.057398766 = weight(_text_:y in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057398766 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.21268006 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to examine our current knowledge of how searchers perceive and react to the possibility of missing potentially important information whilst searching the web is limited. The study reported here seeks to investigate such perceptions and reactions, and to explore the extent to which Simon's "bounded rationality" theory is useful in illuminating these issues. Design/methodology/approach - Totally 37 academic staff, research staff and research students in three university departments were interviewed about their web searching. The open-ended, semi-structured interviews were inductively analysed. Emergence of the concept of "good enough" searching prompted a further analysis to explore the extent to which the data could be interpreted in terms of Simon's concepts of "bounded rationality" and "satisficing". Findings - The results indicate that the risk of missing potentially important information was a matter of concern to the interviewees. Their estimations of the likely extent and importance of missed information affected decisions by individuals as to when to stop searching - decisions based on very different criteria, which map well onto Simon's concepts. On the basis of the interview data, the authors propose tentative categorizations of perceptions of the risk of missing information including "inconsequential" "tolerable" "damaging" and "disastrous" and search strategies including "perfunctory" "minimalist" "nervous" and "extensive". It is concluded that there is at least a prima facie case for bounded rationality and satisficing being considered as potentially useful concepts in our quest better to understand aspects of human information behaviour. Research limitations/implications - Although the findings are based on a relatively small sample and an exploratory qualitative analysis, it is argued that the study raises a number of interesting questions, and has implications for both the development of theory and practice in the areas of web searching and information literacy. Originality/value - The paper focuses on an aspect of web searching which has not to date been well explored. Whilst research has done much to illuminate searchers' perceptions of what they find on the web, we know relatively little of their perceptions of, and reactions to information that they fail to find. The study reported here provides some tentative models, based on empirical evidence, of these phenomena.
-
Brown, E.W.; Carmel, D.; Franz, M.; Ittycheriah, A.; Kanungo, T.; Maarek, Y.; McCarley, J.S.; Mack, R.L.; Prager, J.M.; Smith, J.R.; Soffer, A.; Zien, J.Y.; Marwick, A.D.: IBM research activities at TREC (2005)
0.04
0.03587423 = product of:
0.07174846 = sum of:
0.07174846 = product of:
0.14349692 = sum of:
0.14349692 = weight(_text_:y in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14349692 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.53170013 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tonta, Y.: Analysis of search failures in document retrieval systems : a review (1992)
0.03
0.028699383 = product of:
0.057398766 = sum of:
0.057398766 = product of:
0.11479753 = sum of:
0.11479753 = weight(_text_:y in 4611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11479753 = score(doc=4611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.4253601 = fieldWeight in 4611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Balog, K.; Schuth, A.; Dekker, P.; Tavakolpoursaleh, N.; Schaer, P.; Chuang, P.-Y.: Overview of the TREC 2016 Open Search track Academic Search Edition (2016)
0.03
0.028699383 = product of:
0.057398766 = sum of:
0.057398766 = product of:
0.11479753 = sum of:
0.11479753 = weight(_text_:y in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11479753 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.4253601 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984)
0.03
0.026593598 = product of:
0.053187195 = sum of:
0.053187195 = product of:
0.10637439 = sum of:
0.10637439 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10637439 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20.10.2000 12:22:23
-
Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998)
0.03
0.026593598 = product of:
0.053187195 = sum of:
0.053187195 = product of:
0.10637439 = sum of:
0.10637439 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10637439 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000)
0.03
0.026593598 = product of:
0.053187195 = sum of:
0.053187195 = product of:
0.10637439 = sum of:
0.10637439 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10637439 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 16:22:19
-
Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990)
0.03
0.026593598 = product of:
0.053187195 = sum of:
0.053187195 = product of:
0.10637439 = sum of:
0.10637439 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10637439 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:43:54
-
TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005)
0.03
0.02598539 = sum of:
0.0080482755 = product of:
0.032193102 = sum of:
0.032193102 = weight(_text_:authors in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032193102 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.12592064 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017937114 = product of:
0.03587423 = sum of:
0.03587423 = weight(_text_:y in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03587423 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.13292503 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: 1. The Text REtrieval Conference - Ellen M. Voorhees and Donna K. Harman 2. The TREC Test Collections - Donna K. Harman 3. Retrieval System Evaluation - Chris Buckley and Ellen M. Voorhees 4. The TREC Ad Hoc Experiments - Donna K. Harman 5. Routing and Filtering - Stephen Robertson and Jamie Callan 6. The TREC Interactive Tracks: Putting the User into Search - Susan T. Dumais and Nicholas J. Belkin 7. Beyond English - Donna K. Harman 8. Retrieving Noisy Text - Ellen M. Voorhees and John S. Garofolo 9.The Very Large Collection and Web Tracks - David Hawking and Nick Craswell 10. Question Answering in TREC - Ellen M. Voorhees 11. The University of Massachusetts and a Dozen TRECs - James Allan, W. Bruce Croft and Jamie Callan 12. How Okapi Came to TREC - Stephen Robertson 13. The SMART Project at TREC - Chris Buckley 14. Ten Years of Ad Hoc Retrieval at TREC Using PIRCS - Kui-Lam Kwok 15. MultiText Experiments for TREC - Gordon V. Cormack, Charles L. A. Clarke, Christopher R. Palmer and Thomas R. Lynam 16. A Language-Modeling Approach to TREC - Djoerd Hiemstra and Wessel Kraaij 17. BM Research Activities at TREC - Eric W. Brown, David Carmel, Martin Franz, Abraham Ittycheriah, Tapas Kanungo, Yoelle Maarek, J. Scott McCarley, Robert L. Mack, John M. Prager, John R. Smith, Aya Soffer, Jason Y. Zien and Alan D. Marwick Epilogue: Metareflections on TREC - Karen Sparck Jones
- Footnote
- ... TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval is a reliable and comprehensive review of the TREC program and has been adopted by NIST as the official history of TREC (see http://trec.nist.gov). We were favorably surprised by the book. Well structured and written, chapters are self-contained and the existence of references to specialized and more detailed publications is continuous, which makes it easier to expand into the different aspects analyzed in the text. This book succeeds in compiling TREC evolution from its inception in 1992 to 2003 in an adequate and manageable volume. Thanks to the impressive effort performed by the authors and their experience in the field, it can satiate the interests of a great variety of readers. While expert researchers in the IR field and IR-related industrial companies can use it as a reference manual, it seems especially useful for students and non-expert readers willing to approach this research area. Like NIST, we would recommend this reading to anyone who may be interested in textual information retrieval."
-
Munoz, A.M.; Munoz, F.A.: Nuevas areas de conocimiento y la problematica documental : la prospectiva de la paz en la Universidad de Granada (1997)
0.03
0.025111958 = product of:
0.050223917 = sum of:
0.050223917 = product of:
0.10044783 = sum of:
0.10044783 = weight(_text_:y in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10044783 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Huang, M.-h.; Wang, H.-y.: ¬The influence of document presentation order and number of documents judged an users' judgments of relevance (2004)
0.03
0.025111958 = product of:
0.050223917 = sum of:
0.050223917 = product of:
0.10044783 = sum of:
0.10044783 = weight(_text_:y in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10044783 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Song, D.; Wu, Y.: Understanding an enriched multidimensional user relevance model by analyzing query logs (2017)
0.02
0.021524537 = product of:
0.043049075 = sum of:
0.043049075 = product of:
0.08609815 = sum of:
0.08609815 = weight(_text_:y in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08609815 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997)
0.02
0.018995428 = product of:
0.037990857 = sum of:
0.037990857 = product of:
0.075981714 = sum of:
0.075981714 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075981714 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:55:22
-
Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997)
0.02
0.018995428 = product of:
0.037990857 = sum of:
0.037990857 = product of:
0.075981714 = sum of:
0.075981714 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075981714 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:59:22
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.02
0.018995428 = product of:
0.037990857 = sum of:
0.037990857 = product of:
0.075981714 = sum of:
0.075981714 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075981714 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-25
-
Tseng, Y.-H.: Solving vocabulary problems with interactive query expansion (1998)
0.02
0.017937114 = product of:
0.03587423 = sum of:
0.03587423 = product of:
0.07174846 = sum of:
0.07174846 = weight(_text_:y in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07174846 = score(doc=5159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.056080777 = queryNorm
0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
