Search (64 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Colace, F.; Santo, M. de; Greco, L.; Napoletano, P.: Improving relevance feedback-based query expansion by the use of a weighted word pairs approach (2015) 0.04
    0.042347953 = product of:
      0.084695905 = sum of:
        0.084695905 = product of:
          0.33878362 = sum of:
            0.33878362 = weight(_text_:2223 in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.33878362 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.5313814 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.6375526 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2223-2234
  2. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.04
    0.04114213 = sum of:
      0.022427477 = product of:
        0.08970991 = sum of:
          0.08970991 = weight(_text_:authors in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08970991 = score(doc=4197,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2518828 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.055251822 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01871465 = product of:
        0.0374293 = sum of:
          0.0374293 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0374293 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19348247 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.055251822 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) provides a TREC-like platform for evaluating content-oriented XML retrieval systems. Since 2007, INEX has been using a set of precision-recall based metrics for its ad hoc tasks. The authors investigate the reliability and robustness of these focused retrieval measures, and of the INEX pooling method. They explore four specific questions: How reliable are the metrics when assessments are incomplete, or when query sets are small? What is the minimum pool/query-set size that can be used to reliably evaluate systems? Can the INEX collections be used to fairly evaluate "new" systems that did not participate in the pooling process? And, for a fixed amount of assessment effort, would this effort be better spent in thoroughly judging a few queries, or in judging many queries relatively superficially? The authors' findings validate properties of precision-recall-based metrics observed in document retrieval settings. Early precision measures are found to be more error-prone and less stable under incomplete judgments and small topic-set sizes. They also find that system rankings remain largely unaffected even when assessment effort is substantially (but systematically) reduced, and confirm that the INEX collections remain usable when evaluating nonparticipating systems. Finally, they observe that for a fixed amount of effort, judging shallow pools for many queries is better than judging deep pools for a smaller set of queries. However, when judging only a random sample of a pool, it is better to completely judge fewer topics than to partially judge many topics. This result confirms the effectiveness of pooling methods.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:20:56
  3. Grunder, R.: Qualitätskriterien für Datenbanken : Grundsätzliche Überlegungen und Untersuchung ausgewählter Aspekte am Beispiel bibliographischer Online-Datenbanken (1995) 0.04
    0.0380975 = product of:
      0.076195 = sum of:
        0.076195 = product of:
          0.15239 = sum of:
            0.15239 = weight(_text_:x in 7107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15239 = score(doc=7107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2333109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.65316284 = fieldWeight in 7107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    x
  4. Lohmann, H.: Verbesserung der Literatursuche durch Dokumentanreicherung und automatische Inhaltserschließung : Das Projekt 'KASCADE' an der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf (1999) 0.03
    0.032655 = product of:
      0.06531 = sum of:
        0.06531 = product of:
          0.13062 = sum of:
            0.13062 = weight(_text_:x in 1221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13062 = score(doc=1221,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2333109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.55985385 = fieldWeight in 1221, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    x
  5. Beaulieu, M.M.; Gatford, M.; Huang, X.; Robertson, S.E.; Walker, S.; Williams, P.: Okapi an TREC-5 (1997) 0.03
    0.032655 = product of:
      0.06531 = sum of:
        0.06531 = product of:
          0.13062 = sum of:
            0.13062 = weight(_text_:x in 3097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13062 = score(doc=3097,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2333109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.55985385 = fieldWeight in 3097, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3097)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. King, D.W.; Bryant, E.C.: ¬The evaluation of information services and products (1971) 0.03
    0.027212502 = product of:
      0.054425005 = sum of:
        0.054425005 = product of:
          0.10885001 = sum of:
            0.10885001 = weight(_text_:x in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10885001 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2333109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.4665449 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Isbn
    0-87815-003-x
  7. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.03
    0.026200507 = product of:
      0.052401014 = sum of:
        0.052401014 = product of:
          0.10480203 = sum of:
            0.10480203 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10480203 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19348247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  8. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.03
    0.026200507 = product of:
      0.052401014 = sum of:
        0.052401014 = product of:
          0.10480203 = sum of:
            0.10480203 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10480203 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19348247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  9. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.03
    0.026200507 = product of:
      0.052401014 = sum of:
        0.052401014 = product of:
          0.10480203 = sum of:
            0.10480203 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10480203 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19348247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  10. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.03
    0.026200507 = product of:
      0.052401014 = sum of:
        0.052401014 = product of:
          0.10480203 = sum of:
            0.10480203 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10480203 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19348247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  11. Cross-language information retrieval (1998) 0.02
    0.02153556 = sum of:
      0.00792931 = product of:
        0.03171724 = sum of:
          0.03171724 = weight(_text_:authors in 6299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03171724 = score(doc=6299,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2518828 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.055251822 = queryNorm
              0.12592064 = fieldWeight in 6299, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6299)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.013606251 = product of:
        0.027212502 = sum of:
          0.027212502 = weight(_text_:x in 6299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027212502 = score(doc=6299,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2333109 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                0.055251822 = queryNorm
              0.116636224 = fieldWeight in 6299, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6299)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    The retrieved output from a query including the phrase 'big rockets' may be, for instance, a sentence containing 'giant rocket' which is semantically ranked above 'military ocket'. David Hull (Xerox Research Centre, Grenoble) describes an implementation of a weighted Boolean model for Spanish-English CLIR. Users construct Boolean-type queries, weighting each term in the query, which is then translated by an on-line dictionary before being applied to the database. Comparisons with the performance of unweighted free-form queries ('vector space' models) proved encouraging. Two contributions consider the evaluation of CLIR systems. In order to by-pass the time-consuming and expensive process of assembling a standard collection of documents and of user queries against which the performance of an CLIR system is manually assessed, Páriac Sheridan et al (ETH Zurich) propose a method based on retrieving 'seed documents'. This involves identifying a unique document in a database (the 'seed document') and, for a number of queries, measuring how fast it is retrieved. The authors have also assembled a large database of multilingual news documents for testing purposes. By storing the (fairly short) documents in a structured form tagged with descriptor codes (e.g. for topic, country and area), the test suite is easily expanded while remaining consistent for the purposes of testing. Douglas Ouard and Bonne Dorr (University of Maryland) describe an evaluation methodology which appears to apply LSI techniques in order to filter and rank incoming documents designed for testing CLIR systems. The volume provides the reader an excellent overview of several projects in CLIR. It is well supported with references and is intended as a secondary text for researchers and practitioners. It highlights the need for a good, general tutorial introduction to the field."
    Isbn
    0-7923-8122-X
  12. TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005) 0.02
    0.02153556 = sum of:
      0.00792931 = product of:
        0.03171724 = sum of:
          0.03171724 = weight(_text_:authors in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03171724 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2518828 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.055251822 = queryNorm
              0.12592064 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.013606251 = product of:
        0.027212502 = sum of:
          0.027212502 = weight(_text_:x in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027212502 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2333109 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                0.055251822 = queryNorm
              0.116636224 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    ... TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval is a reliable and comprehensive review of the TREC program and has been adopted by NIST as the official history of TREC (see http://trec.nist.gov). We were favorably surprised by the book. Well structured and written, chapters are self-contained and the existence of references to specialized and more detailed publications is continuous, which makes it easier to expand into the different aspects analyzed in the text. This book succeeds in compiling TREC evolution from its inception in 1992 to 2003 in an adequate and manageable volume. Thanks to the impressive effort performed by the authors and their experience in the field, it can satiate the interests of a great variety of readers. While expert researchers in the IR field and IR-related industrial companies can use it as a reference manual, it seems especially useful for students and non-expert readers willing to approach this research area. Like NIST, we would recommend this reading to anyone who may be interested in textual information retrieval."
    Pages
    X, 462 S
  13. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.02
    0.01871465 = product of:
      0.0374293 = sum of:
        0.0374293 = product of:
          0.0748586 = sum of:
            0.0748586 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0748586 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19348247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  14. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.02
    0.01871465 = product of:
      0.0374293 = sum of:
        0.0374293 = product of:
          0.0748586 = sum of:
            0.0748586 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0748586 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19348247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  15. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.02
    0.01871465 = product of:
      0.0374293 = sum of:
        0.0374293 = product of:
          0.0748586 = sum of:
            0.0748586 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0748586 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19348247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  16. Evans, J.E.: Some external and internal factors affecting users of interactive information systems (1996) 0.02
    0.0163275 = product of:
      0.032655 = sum of:
        0.032655 = product of:
          0.06531 = sum of:
            0.06531 = weight(_text_:x in 6262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06531 = score(doc=6262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2333109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 6262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This contribution reports the results of continuing research in human-information system interactions. Following training and experience with an electronic information retrieval system novice and experienced subject groups responded to questions ranking their value assessments of 7 attributes of information sources in relation to 15 factors describing the search process. In general, novice users were more heavily influenced by the process factors (negative influences) than by the positive attributes of information qualities. Experienced users, while still concerned with process factors, were more strongly influenced by the qualitative information attributes. The specific advantages and contributions of this research are several: higher dimensionality of measured factors and attributes (15 x 7); higher granularity of analysis using a 7 value metric in a closed-end Likert scale; development of bi-directional, firced-choice influence vectors; and a larger sample size (N=186) than previously reported in the literature
  17. Zhang, X.: Collaborative relevance judgment : a group consensus method for evaluating user search performance (2002) 0.02
    0.0163275 = product of:
      0.032655 = sum of:
        0.032655 = product of:
          0.06531 = sum of:
            0.06531 = weight(_text_:x in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06531 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2333109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Griesbaum, J.: Evaluierung hybrider Suchsysteme im WWW (2000) 0.02
    0.0163275 = product of:
      0.032655 = sum of:
        0.032655 = product of:
          0.06531 = sum of:
            0.06531 = weight(_text_:x in 2482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06531 = score(doc=2482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2333109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 2482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    x
  19. Meyer, O.C.: Retrievalexperimente mit bibliothekarischen Daten : Historischer Überblick und aktueller Forschungsstand (2022) 0.02
    0.0163275 = product of:
      0.032655 = sum of:
        0.032655 = product of:
          0.06531 = sum of:
            0.06531 = weight(_text_:x in 655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06531 = score(doc=655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2333109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    x
  20. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01
    0.014971719 = product of:
      0.029943438 = sum of:
        0.029943438 = product of:
          0.059886876 = sum of:
            0.059886876 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059886876 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19348247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.055251822 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12

Languages

  • e 53
  • d 9
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 51
  • x 6
  • m 5
  • s 5
  • el 2
  • More… Less…