Search (71 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.08
    0.08084841 = product of:
      0.16169682 = sum of:
        0.16169682 = sum of:
          0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09125608 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07044074 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
    Source
    Productivity in the information age : proceedings of the 46th ASIS annual meeting, 1983. Ed.: Raymond F Vondra
  2. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.06
    0.06467873 = product of:
      0.12935746 = sum of:
        0.12935746 = sum of:
          0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073004864 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.05635259 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05635259 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Language
    f
  3. Kilgour, F.: ¬An experiment using coordinate title word searches (2004) 0.05
    0.05283142 = sum of:
      0.020891791 = product of:
        0.083567165 = sum of:
          0.083567165 = weight(_text_:authors in 2065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.083567165 = score(doc=2065,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2065, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2065)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.03193963 = product of:
        0.06387926 = sum of:
          0.06387926 = weight(_text_:f in 2065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06387926 = score(doc=2065,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 2065, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2065)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study, the fourth and last of a series designed to produce new information to improve retrievability of books in libraries, explores the effectiveness of retrieving a known-item book using words from titles only. From daily printouts of circulation records at the Walter Royal Davis Library of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 749 titles were taken and then searched an the 4-million entry catalog at the library of the University of Michigan. The principal finding was that searches produced titles having personal authors 81.4% of the time and anonymous titles 91.5% of the time; these figures are 15 and 5%, respectively, lower than the lowest findings presented in the previous three articles of this series (Kilgour, 1995; 1997; 2001).
  4. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996) 0.05
    0.048509046 = product of:
      0.09701809 = sum of:
        0.09701809 = sum of:
          0.05475365 = weight(_text_:f in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05475365 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
          0.042264443 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042264443 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92
  5. Crestani, F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval by imaging (1996) 0.05
    0.048509046 = product of:
      0.09701809 = sum of:
        0.09701809 = sum of:
          0.05475365 = weight(_text_:f in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05475365 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
          0.042264443 = weight(_text_:22 in 6967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042264443 = score(doc=6967,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6967, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  6. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.04
    0.03871408 = sum of:
      0.021103898 = product of:
        0.08441559 = sum of:
          0.08441559 = weight(_text_:authors in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08441559 = score(doc=4197,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.017610185 = product of:
        0.03522037 = sum of:
          0.03522037 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03522037 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) provides a TREC-like platform for evaluating content-oriented XML retrieval systems. Since 2007, INEX has been using a set of precision-recall based metrics for its ad hoc tasks. The authors investigate the reliability and robustness of these focused retrieval measures, and of the INEX pooling method. They explore four specific questions: How reliable are the metrics when assessments are incomplete, or when query sets are small? What is the minimum pool/query-set size that can be used to reliably evaluate systems? Can the INEX collections be used to fairly evaluate "new" systems that did not participate in the pooling process? And, for a fixed amount of assessment effort, would this effort be better spent in thoroughly judging a few queries, or in judging many queries relatively superficially? The authors' findings validate properties of precision-recall-based metrics observed in document retrieval settings. Early precision measures are found to be more error-prone and less stable under incomplete judgments and small topic-set sizes. They also find that system rankings remain largely unaffected even when assessment effort is substantially (but systematically) reduced, and confirm that the INEX collections remain usable when evaluating nonparticipating systems. Finally, they observe that for a fixed amount of effort, judging shallow pools for many queries is better than judging deep pools for a smaller set of queries. However, when judging only a random sample of a pool, it is better to completely judge fewer topics than to partially judge many topics. This result confirms the effectiveness of pooling methods.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:20:56
  7. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = product of:
          0.09861703 = sum of:
            0.09861703 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09861703 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  8. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = product of:
          0.09861703 = sum of:
            0.09861703 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09861703 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  9. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = product of:
          0.09861703 = sum of:
            0.09861703 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09861703 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  10. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = product of:
          0.09861703 = sum of:
            0.09861703 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09861703 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  11. Crestani, F.; Ruthven, I.; Sanderson, M.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The troubles with using a logical model of IR on a large collection of documents : experimenting retrieval by logical imaging on TREC (1996) 0.02
    0.02281402 = product of:
      0.04562804 = sum of:
        0.04562804 = product of:
          0.09125608 = sum of:
            0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 7522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09125608 = score(doc=7522,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 7522, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7522)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Strzalkowski, T.; Guthrie, L.; Karlgren, J.; Leistensnider, J.; Lin, F.; Perez-Carballo, J.; Straszheim, T.; Wang, J.; Wilding, J.: Natural language information retrieval : TREC-5 report (1997) 0.02
    0.02281402 = product of:
      0.04562804 = sum of:
        0.04562804 = product of:
          0.09125608 = sum of:
            0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09125608 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. López-Ostenero, F.; Peinado, V.; Gonzalo, J.; Verdejo, F.: Interactive question answering : Is Cross-Language harder than monolingual searching? (2008) 0.02
    0.019358339 = product of:
      0.038716678 = sum of:
        0.038716678 = product of:
          0.077433355 = sum of:
            0.077433355 = weight(_text_:f in 2023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077433355 = score(doc=2023,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.37366742 = fieldWeight in 2023, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2023)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Buckland, M.; Gey, F.: ¬The relationship between recall and precision (1994) 0.02
    0.018251216 = product of:
      0.036502432 = sum of:
        0.036502432 = product of:
          0.073004864 = sum of:
            0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 7204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073004864 = score(doc=7204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Jochum, F.; Weissmann, V.: Struktur und Elemente des Information Retrieval Experiments (1985) 0.02
    0.018251216 = product of:
      0.036502432 = sum of:
        0.036502432 = product of:
          0.073004864 = sum of:
            0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073004864 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Chevallet, J.-P.; Bruandet, M.F.: Impact de l'utilisation de multi terms sur la qualité des résponses dùn système de recherche d'information a indexation automatique (1999) 0.02
    0.018251216 = product of:
      0.036502432 = sum of:
        0.036502432 = product of:
          0.073004864 = sum of:
            0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 6253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073004864 = score(doc=6253,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 6253, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6253)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    f
  17. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.02
    0.017610185 = product of:
      0.03522037 = sum of:
        0.03522037 = product of:
          0.07044074 = sum of:
            0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07044074 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  18. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.02
    0.017610185 = product of:
      0.03522037 = sum of:
        0.03522037 = product of:
          0.07044074 = sum of:
            0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07044074 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  19. Debole, F.; Sebastiani, F.: ¬An analysis of the relative hardness of Reuters-21578 subsets (2005) 0.02
    0.016131949 = product of:
      0.032263897 = sum of:
        0.032263897 = product of:
          0.064527795 = sum of:
            0.064527795 = weight(_text_:f in 3456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064527795 = score(doc=3456,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 3456, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3456)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Thresholding the postings lists in information retrieval : experiments on TREC data (1995) 0.02
    0.015969815 = product of:
      0.03193963 = sum of:
        0.03193963 = product of:
          0.06387926 = sum of:
            0.06387926 = weight(_text_:f in 5804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387926 = score(doc=5804,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 5804, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5804)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 63
  • d 5
  • f 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 65
  • s 5
  • m 4
  • el 1
  • More… Less…