-
Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984)
0.06
0.0649084 = product of:
0.1298168 = sum of:
0.1298168 = sum of:
0.02952154 = weight(_text_:d in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02952154 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.29387143 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.10029525 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10029525 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20.10.2000 12:22:23
- Language
- d
-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000)
0.06
0.0649084 = product of:
0.1298168 = sum of:
0.1298168 = sum of:
0.02952154 = weight(_text_:d in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02952154 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.29387143 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.10029525 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10029525 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 16:22:19
-
Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997)
0.05
0.046363138 = product of:
0.092726275 = sum of:
0.092726275 = sum of:
0.021086816 = weight(_text_:d in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021086816 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.20990817 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.07163946 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163946 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:59:22
-
Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001)
0.04
0.04058429 = product of:
0.08116858 = sum of:
0.08116858 = sum of:
0.023857009 = weight(_text_:d in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023857009 = score(doc=261,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.237484 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
0.057311572 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057311572 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
- Language
- d
-
Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996)
0.04
0.04058429 = product of:
0.08116858 = sum of:
0.08116858 = sum of:
0.023857009 = weight(_text_:d in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023857009 = score(doc=789,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.237484 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.057311572 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057311572 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 7.2002 20:22:46
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Managing information 3(1996) no.10, S.49 (D. Bawden); Program 32(1998) no.2, S.190-192 (C. Revie)
-
Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011)
0.04
0.0393729 = sum of:
0.021463035 = product of:
0.08585214 = sum of:
0.08585214 = weight(_text_:authors in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08585214 = score(doc=4197,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017909866 = product of:
0.03581973 = sum of:
0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03581973 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) provides a TREC-like platform for evaluating content-oriented XML retrieval systems. Since 2007, INEX has been using a set of precision-recall based metrics for its ad hoc tasks. The authors investigate the reliability and robustness of these focused retrieval measures, and of the INEX pooling method. They explore four specific questions: How reliable are the metrics when assessments are incomplete, or when query sets are small? What is the minimum pool/query-set size that can be used to reliably evaluate systems? Can the INEX collections be used to fairly evaluate "new" systems that did not participate in the pooling process? And, for a fixed amount of assessment effort, would this effort be better spent in thoroughly judging a few queries, or in judging many queries relatively superficially? The authors' findings validate properties of precision-recall-based metrics observed in document retrieval settings. Early precision measures are found to be more error-prone and less stable under incomplete judgments and small topic-set sizes. They also find that system rankings remain largely unaffected even when assessment effort is substantially (but systematically) reduced, and confirm that the INEX collections remain usable when evaluating nonparticipating systems. Finally, they observe that for a fixed amount of effort, judging shallow pools for many queries is better than judging deep pools for a smaller set of queries. However, when judging only a random sample of a pool, it is better to completely judge fewer topics than to partially judge many topics. This result confirms the effectiveness of pooling methods.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:20:56
-
Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997)
0.04
0.03709051 = product of:
0.07418102 = sum of:
0.07418102 = sum of:
0.016869452 = weight(_text_:d in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016869452 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.057311572 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057311572 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: TREC: the Text REtrieval Conference
-
Wolfram, D.; Volz, A.; Dimitroff, A.: ¬The effect of linkage structure on retrieval performance in a hypertext-based bibliographic retrieval system (1996)
0.03
0.028627703 = sum of:
0.021247318 = product of:
0.08498927 = sum of:
0.08498927 = weight(_text_:authors in 6622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08498927 = score(doc=6622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 6622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6622)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.007380385 = product of:
0.01476077 = sum of:
0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 6622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01476077 = score(doc=6622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 6622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Investigates how linkage environments in a hypertext based bibliographic retrieval system affect retrieval performance for novice and experienced searchers, 2 systems, 1 with inter record linkages to authors and descriptors and 1 that also included title and abstract keywords, were tested. No significant differences in retrieval performance and system usage were found for most search tests. The enhanced system did provide better performance where title and abstract keywords provided the most direct access to relevant records. The findings have implications for the design of bilbiographic information retrieval systems using hypertext linkages
-
Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996)
0.03
0.027817883 = product of:
0.055635765 = sum of:
0.055635765 = sum of:
0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012652089 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042983677 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92
-
Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012)
0.03
0.027817883 = product of:
0.055635765 = sum of:
0.055635765 = sum of:
0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012652089 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042983677 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:25:54
- Language
- d
-
Kelly, D.; Sugimoto, C.R.: ¬A systematic review of interactive information retrieval evaluation studies, 1967-2006 (2013)
0.03
0.02673474 = sum of:
0.021463035 = product of:
0.08585214 = sum of:
0.08585214 = weight(_text_:authors in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08585214 = score(doc=684,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.005271704 = product of:
0.010543408 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- With the increasing number and diversity of search tools available, interest in the evaluation of search systems, particularly from a user perspective, has grown among researchers. More researchers are designing and evaluating interactive information retrieval (IIR) systems and beginning to innovate in evaluation methods. Maturation of a research specialty relies on the ability to replicate research, provide standards for measurement and analysis, and understand past endeavors. This article presents a historical overview of 40 years of IIR evaluation studies using the method of systematic review. A total of 2,791 journal and conference units were manually examined and 127 articles were selected for analysis in this study, based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These articles were systematically coded using features such as author, publication date, sources and references, and properties of the research method used in the articles, such as number of subjects, tasks, corpora, and measures. Results include data describing the growth of IIR studies over time, the most frequently occurring and cited authors and sources, and the most common types of corpora and measures used. An additional product of this research is a bibliography of IIR evaluation research that can be used by students, teachers, and those new to the area. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first historical, systematic characterization of the IIR evaluation literature, including the documentation of methods and measures used by researchers in this specialty.
-
Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998)
0.03
0.025073813 = product of:
0.050147627 = sum of:
0.050147627 = product of:
0.10029525 = sum of:
0.10029525 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10029525 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
-
Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990)
0.03
0.025073813 = product of:
0.050147627 = sum of:
0.050147627 = product of:
0.10029525 = sum of:
0.10029525 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10029525 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:43:54
-
Petrelli, D.: On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval (2008)
0.02
0.023181569 = product of:
0.046363138 = sum of:
0.046363138 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03581973 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.22-38
-
Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997)
0.02
0.017909866 = product of:
0.03581973 = sum of:
0.03581973 = product of:
0.07163946 = sum of:
0.07163946 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163946 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:55:22
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.02
0.017909866 = product of:
0.03581973 = sum of:
0.03581973 = product of:
0.07163946 = sum of:
0.07163946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163946 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-25
-
Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973)
0.01
0.014327893 = product of:
0.028655786 = sum of:
0.028655786 = product of:
0.057311572 = sum of:
0.057311572 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057311572 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19. 3.1996 11:22:12
-
Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996)
0.01
0.014327893 = product of:
0.028655786 = sum of:
0.028655786 = product of:
0.057311572 = sum of:
0.057311572 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057311572 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997)
0.01
0.014327893 = product of:
0.028655786 = sum of:
0.028655786 = product of:
0.057311572 = sum of:
0.057311572 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057311572 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
-
Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998)
0.01
0.014327893 = product of:
0.028655786 = sum of:
0.028655786 = product of:
0.057311572 = sum of:
0.057311572 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057311572 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
