-
Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011)
0.08
0.075100064 = sum of:
0.021385957 = product of:
0.085543826 = sum of:
0.085543826 = weight(_text_:authors in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085543826 = score(doc=4197,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.053714104 = sum of:
0.018023007 = weight(_text_:m in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018023007 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
0.035691097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035691097 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
- Abstract
- The Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) provides a TREC-like platform for evaluating content-oriented XML retrieval systems. Since 2007, INEX has been using a set of precision-recall based metrics for its ad hoc tasks. The authors investigate the reliability and robustness of these focused retrieval measures, and of the INEX pooling method. They explore four specific questions: How reliable are the metrics when assessments are incomplete, or when query sets are small? What is the minimum pool/query-set size that can be used to reliably evaluate systems? Can the INEX collections be used to fairly evaluate "new" systems that did not participate in the pooling process? And, for a fixed amount of assessment effort, would this effort be better spent in thoroughly judging a few queries, or in judging many queries relatively superficially? The authors' findings validate properties of precision-recall-based metrics observed in document retrieval settings. Early precision measures are found to be more error-prone and less stable under incomplete judgments and small topic-set sizes. They also find that system rankings remain largely unaffected even when assessment effort is substantially (but systematically) reduced, and confirm that the INEX collections remain usable when evaluating nonparticipating systems. Finally, they observe that for a fixed amount of effort, judging shallow pools for many queries is better than judging deep pools for a smaller set of queries. However, when judging only a random sample of a pool, it is better to completely judge fewer topics than to partially judge many topics. This result confirms the effectiveness of pooling methods.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:20:56
-
Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996)
0.04
0.042971283 = product of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02883681 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998)
0.04
0.042971283 = product of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02883681 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
-
Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996)
0.04
0.042971283 = product of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02883681 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 7.2002 20:22:46
- Type
- m
-
¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003)
0.04
0.042971283 = product of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.08594257 = sum of:
0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02883681 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057105757 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
- Type
- m
-
Al-Maskari, A.; Sanderson, M.: ¬A review of factors influencing user satisfaction in information retrieval (2010)
0.03
0.03378712 = sum of:
0.021171015 = product of:
0.08468406 = sum of:
0.08468406 = weight(_text_:authors in 3447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08468406 = score(doc=3447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 3447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3447)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.012616104 = product of:
0.025232209 = sum of:
0.025232209 = weight(_text_:m in 3447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025232209 = score(doc=3447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 3447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3447)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors investigate factors influencing user satisfaction in information retrieval. It is evident from this study that user satisfaction is a subjective variable, which can be influenced by several factors such as system effectiveness, user effectiveness, user effort, and user characteristics and expectations. Therefore, information retrieval evaluators should consider all these factors in obtaining user satisfaction and in using it as a criterion of system effectiveness. Previous studies have conflicting conclusions on the relationship between user satisfaction and system effectiveness; this study has substantiated these findings and supports using user satisfaction as a criterion of system effectiveness.
-
Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995)
0.03
0.032228462 = product of:
0.064456925 = sum of:
0.064456925 = sum of:
0.021627607 = weight(_text_:m in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021627607 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.042829316 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042829316 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
-
Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984)
0.02
0.024983767 = product of:
0.049967535 = sum of:
0.049967535 = product of:
0.09993507 = sum of:
0.09993507 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09993507 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20.10.2000 12:22:23
-
Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998)
0.02
0.024983767 = product of:
0.049967535 = sum of:
0.049967535 = product of:
0.09993507 = sum of:
0.09993507 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09993507 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000)
0.02
0.024983767 = product of:
0.049967535 = sum of:
0.049967535 = product of:
0.09993507 = sum of:
0.09993507 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09993507 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 16:22:19
-
Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990)
0.02
0.024983767 = product of:
0.049967535 = sum of:
0.049967535 = product of:
0.09993507 = sum of:
0.09993507 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09993507 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:43:54
-
Toepfer, M.; Seifert, C.: Content-based quality estimation for automatic subject indexing of short texts under precision and recall constraints
0.02
0.024133656 = sum of:
0.015122154 = product of:
0.060488615 = sum of:
0.060488615 = weight(_text_:authors in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060488615 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.009011503 = product of:
0.018023007 = sum of:
0.018023007 = weight(_text_:m in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018023007 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- This is an authors' manuscript version of a paper accepted for proceedings of TPDL-2018, Porto, Portugal, Sept 10-13. The nal authenticated publication is available online at https://doi.org/will be added as soon as available.
-
Cooper, M.D.; Chen, H.-M.: Predicting the relevance of a library catalog search (2001)
0.02
0.019306924 = sum of:
0.012097723 = product of:
0.04839089 = sum of:
0.04839089 = weight(_text_:authors in 6519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04839089 = score(doc=6519,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 6519, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6519)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0072092023 = product of:
0.014418405 = sum of:
0.014418405 = weight(_text_:m in 6519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014418405 = score(doc=6519,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 6519, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6519)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Relevance has been a difficult concept to define, let alone measure. In this paper, a simple operational definition of relevance is proposed for a Web-based library catalog: whether or not during a search session the user saves, prints, mails, or downloads a citation. If one of those actions is performed, the session is considered relevant to the user. An analysis is presented illustrating the advantages and disadvantages of this definition. With this definition and good transaction logging, it is possible to ascertain the relevance of a session. This was done for 905,970 sessions conducted with the University of California's Melvyl online catalog. Next, a methodology was developed to try to predict the relevance of a session. A number of variables were defined that characterize a session, none of which used any demographic information about the user. The values of the variables were computed for the sessions. Principal components analysis was used to extract a new set of variables out of the original set. A stratified random sampling technique was used to form ten strata such that each new strata of 90,570 sessions contained the same proportion of relevant to nonrelevant sessions. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the regression coefficients for nine of the ten strata. Then, the coefficients were used to predict the relevance of the sessions in the missing strata. Overall, 17.85% of the sessions were determined to be relevant. The predicted number of relevant sessions for all ten strata was 11 %, a 6.85% difference. The authors believe that the methodology can be further refined and the prediction improved. This methodology could also have significant application in improving user searching and also in predicting electronic commerce buying decisions without the use of personal demographic data
-
TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005)
0.02
0.01859787 = sum of:
0.007561077 = product of:
0.030244308 = sum of:
0.030244308 = weight(_text_:authors in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030244308 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.12592064 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.011036792 = product of:
0.022073584 = sum of:
0.022073584 = weight(_text_:m in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022073584 = score(doc=636,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.16836403 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: 1. The Text REtrieval Conference - Ellen M. Voorhees and Donna K. Harman 2. The TREC Test Collections - Donna K. Harman 3. Retrieval System Evaluation - Chris Buckley and Ellen M. Voorhees 4. The TREC Ad Hoc Experiments - Donna K. Harman 5. Routing and Filtering - Stephen Robertson and Jamie Callan 6. The TREC Interactive Tracks: Putting the User into Search - Susan T. Dumais and Nicholas J. Belkin 7. Beyond English - Donna K. Harman 8. Retrieving Noisy Text - Ellen M. Voorhees and John S. Garofolo 9.The Very Large Collection and Web Tracks - David Hawking and Nick Craswell 10. Question Answering in TREC - Ellen M. Voorhees 11. The University of Massachusetts and a Dozen TRECs - James Allan, W. Bruce Croft and Jamie Callan 12. How Okapi Came to TREC - Stephen Robertson 13. The SMART Project at TREC - Chris Buckley 14. Ten Years of Ad Hoc Retrieval at TREC Using PIRCS - Kui-Lam Kwok 15. MultiText Experiments for TREC - Gordon V. Cormack, Charles L. A. Clarke, Christopher R. Palmer and Thomas R. Lynam 16. A Language-Modeling Approach to TREC - Djoerd Hiemstra and Wessel Kraaij 17. BM Research Activities at TREC - Eric W. Brown, David Carmel, Martin Franz, Abraham Ittycheriah, Tapas Kanungo, Yoelle Maarek, J. Scott McCarley, Robert L. Mack, John M. Prager, John R. Smith, Aya Soffer, Jason Y. Zien and Alan D. Marwick Epilogue: Metareflections on TREC - Karen Sparck Jones
- Footnote
- ... TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval is a reliable and comprehensive review of the TREC program and has been adopted by NIST as the official history of TREC (see http://trec.nist.gov). We were favorably surprised by the book. Well structured and written, chapters are self-contained and the existence of references to specialized and more detailed publications is continuous, which makes it easier to expand into the different aspects analyzed in the text. This book succeeds in compiling TREC evolution from its inception in 1992 to 2003 in an adequate and manageable volume. Thanks to the impressive effort performed by the authors and their experience in the field, it can satiate the interests of a great variety of readers. While expert researchers in the IR field and IR-related industrial companies can use it as a reference manual, it seems especially useful for students and non-expert readers willing to approach this research area. Like NIST, we would recommend this reading to anyone who may be interested in textual information retrieval."
- Type
- m
-
Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997)
0.02
0.017845549 = product of:
0.035691097 = sum of:
0.035691097 = product of:
0.071382195 = sum of:
0.071382195 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071382195 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:55:22
-
Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997)
0.02
0.017845549 = product of:
0.035691097 = sum of:
0.035691097 = product of:
0.071382195 = sum of:
0.071382195 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071382195 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:59:22
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.02
0.017845549 = product of:
0.035691097 = sum of:
0.035691097 = product of:
0.071382195 = sum of:
0.071382195 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071382195 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-25
-
Dillon, M.: Enhanced bibliographic record retrieval experiments (1989)
0.01
0.014418405 = product of:
0.02883681 = sum of:
0.02883681 = product of:
0.05767362 = sum of:
0.05767362 = weight(_text_:m in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05767362 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hofstede, M.: Literatuur over onderwerpen zoeken in de OPC (1994)
0.01
0.014418405 = product of:
0.02883681 = sum of:
0.02883681 = product of:
0.05767362 = sum of:
0.05767362 = weight(_text_:m in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05767362 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ronthaler, M.; Zillmann, H.: Literaturrecherche mit OSIRIS : ein Test der OSIRIS-Retrievalkomponente (1998)
0.01
0.014418405 = product of:
0.02883681 = sum of:
0.02883681 = product of:
0.05767362 = sum of:
0.05767362 = weight(_text_:m in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05767362 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.052685954 = queryNorm
0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
