Search (87 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.08 
    0.079832435 = product of:
  0.15966487 = sum of:
    0.15966487 = sum of:
      0.089189105 = weight(_text_:t in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.089189105 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.07047576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07047576 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.22-25
  2. Ravana, S.D.; Taheri, M.S.; Rajagopal, P.: Document-based approach to improve the accuracy of pairwise comparison in evaluating information retrieval systems (2015) 0.04 
    0.039916217 = product of:
  0.079832435 = sum of:
    0.079832435 = sum of:
      0.044594552 = weight(_text_:t in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044594552 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
      0.03523788 = weight(_text_:22 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03523788 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a method to have more accurate results in comparing performance of the paired information retrieval (IR) systems with reference to the current method, which is based on the mean effectiveness scores of the systems across a set of identified topics/queries. Design/methodology/approach Based on the proposed approach, instead of the classic method of using a set of topic scores, the documents level scores are considered as the evaluation unit. These document scores are the defined document's weight, which play the role of the mean average precision (MAP) score of the systems as a significance test's statics. The experiments were conducted using the TREC 9 Web track collection. Findings The p-values generated through the two types of significance tests, namely the Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney show that by using the document level scores as an evaluation unit, the difference between IR systems is more significant compared with utilizing topic scores. Originality/value Utilizing a suitable test collection is a primary prerequisite for IR systems comparative evaluation. However, in addition to reusable test collections, having an accurate statistical testing is a necessity for these evaluations. The findings of this study will assist IR researchers to evaluate their retrieval systems and algorithms more accurately.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.04 
    0.038733326 = sum of:
  0.021114388 = product of:
    0.084457554 = sum of:
      0.084457554 = weight(_text_:authors in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.084457554 = score(doc=4197,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01761894 = product of:
    0.03523788 = sum of:
      0.03523788 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03523788 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) provides a TREC-like platform for evaluating content-oriented XML retrieval systems. Since 2007, INEX has been using a set of precision-recall based metrics for its ad hoc tasks. The authors investigate the reliability and robustness of these focused retrieval measures, and of the INEX pooling method. They explore four specific questions: How reliable are the metrics when assessments are incomplete, or when query sets are small? What is the minimum pool/query-set size that can be used to reliably evaluate systems? Can the INEX collections be used to fairly evaluate "new" systems that did not participate in the pooling process? And, for a fixed amount of assessment effort, would this effort be better spent in thoroughly judging a few queries, or in judging many queries relatively superficially? The authors' findings validate properties of precision-recall-based metrics observed in document retrieval settings. Early precision measures are found to be more error-prone and less stable under incomplete judgments and small topic-set sizes. They also find that system rankings remain largely unaffected even when assessment effort is substantially (but systematically) reduced, and confirm that the INEX collections remain usable when evaluating nonparticipating systems. Finally, they observe that for a fixed amount of effort, judging shallow pools for many queries is better than judging deep pools for a smaller set of queries. However, when judging only a random sample of a pool, it is better to completely judge fewer topics than to partially judge many topics. This result confirms the effectiveness of pooling methods.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:20:56
  4. Strzalkowski, T.; Guthrie, L.; Karlgren, J.; Leistensnider, J.; Lin, F.; Perez-Carballo, J.; Straszheim, T.; Wang, J.; Wilding, J.: Natural language information retrieval : TREC-5 report (1997) 0.03 
    0.03153311 = product of:
  0.06306622 = sum of:
    0.06306622 = product of:
      0.12613244 = sum of:
        0.12613244 = weight(_text_:t in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12613244 = score(doc=3100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.6155326 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Kaltenborn, K.-F.: Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Datenbank Medline : T.1: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Nutzungscharakteristika, Bewertung der Rechercheergebnisse und künftige Informationsgewinnung; T.2: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Recherchequalität und Nutzer-Computer/Datenbank-Interaktion (1991) 0.03 
    0.026756732 = product of:
  0.053513464 = sum of:
    0.053513464 = product of:
      0.10702693 = sum of:
        0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10702693 = score(doc=5105,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 42(1991) H.2, S.107-114. (T.1); 42(1991) H.3, S.177-190 (T.2)
  6. Davis, M.; Dunning, T.: ¬A TREC evaluation of query translation methods for multi-lingual text retrieval (1996) 0.03 
    0.026756732 = product of:
  0.053513464 = sum of:
    0.053513464 = product of:
      0.10702693 = sum of:
        0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 1917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10702693 = score(doc=1917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 1917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  7. Strzalkowski, T.; Perez-Carballo, J.: Natural language information retrieval : TREC-4 report (1996) 0.03 
    0.026756732 = product of:
  0.053513464 = sum of:
    0.053513464 = product of:
      0.10702693 = sum of:
        0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10702693 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Strzalkowski, T.; Sparck Jones, K.: NLP track at TREC-5 (1997) 0.03 
    0.026756732 = product of:
  0.053513464 = sum of:
    0.053513464 = product of:
      0.10702693 = sum of:
        0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10702693 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Kuriyama, K.; Kando, N.; Nozue, T.; Eguchi, K.: Pooling for a large-scale test collection : an analysis of the search results from the First NTCIR Workshop (2002) 0.03 
    0.026756732 = product of:
  0.053513464 = sum of:
    0.053513464 = product of:
      0.10702693 = sum of:
        0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 3830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10702693 = score(doc=3830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 3830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Agata, T.: ¬A measure for evaluating search engines on the World Wide Web : retrieval test with ESL (Expected Search Length) (1997) 0.03 
    0.026756732 = product of:
  0.053513464 = sum of:
    0.053513464 = product of:
      0.10702693 = sum of:
        0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 3892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10702693 = score(doc=3892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 3892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  11. Mandl, T.: Neue Entwicklungen bei den Evaluierungsinitiativen im Information Retrieval (2006) 0.03 
    0.025226487 = product of:
  0.050452974 = sum of:
    0.050452974 = product of:
      0.10090595 = sum of:
        0.10090595 = weight(_text_:t in 5975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10090595 = score(doc=5975,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.49242607 = fieldWeight in 5975, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5975)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  12. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02 
    0.024666514 = product of:
  0.04933303 = sum of:
    0.04933303 = product of:
      0.09866606 = sum of:
        0.09866606 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09866606 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  13. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02 
    0.024666514 = product of:
  0.04933303 = sum of:
    0.04933303 = product of:
      0.09866606 = sum of:
        0.09866606 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09866606 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  14. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02 
    0.024666514 = product of:
  0.04933303 = sum of:
    0.04933303 = product of:
      0.09866606 = sum of:
        0.09866606 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09866606 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  15. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02 
    0.024666514 = product of:
  0.04933303 = sum of:
    0.04933303 = product of:
      0.09866606 = sum of:
        0.09866606 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09866606 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  16. Brown, E.W.; Carmel, D.; Franz, M.; Ittycheriah, A.; Kanungo, T.; Maarek, Y.; McCarley, J.S.; Mack, R.L.; Prager, J.M.; Smith, J.R.; Soffer, A.; Zien, J.Y.; Marwick, A.D.: IBM research activities at TREC (2005) 0.02 
    0.022297276 = product of:
  0.044594552 = sum of:
    0.044594552 = product of:
      0.089189105 = sum of:
        0.089189105 = weight(_text_:t in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089189105 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  17. Becks, D.; Mandl, T.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Spezielle Anforderungen bei der Evaluierung von Patent-Retrieval-Systemen (2010) 0.02 
    0.022073176 = product of:
  0.04414635 = sum of:
    0.04414635 = product of:
      0.0882927 = sum of:
        0.0882927 = weight(_text_:t in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0882927 = score(doc=4667,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.4308728 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  18. Bellardo, T.; Saracevic, T.: Online searching and search output : relationships between overlap, relevance, recall and precision (1987) 0.02 
    0.018919867 = product of:
  0.037839733 = sum of:
    0.037839733 = product of:
      0.075679466 = sum of:
        0.075679466 = weight(_text_:t in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075679466 = score(doc=4150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.36931956 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005) 0.02 
    0.018613702 = sum of:
  0.0074650636 = product of:
    0.029860254 = sum of:
      0.029860254 = weight(_text_:authors in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029860254 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.12592064 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.011148638 = product of:
    0.022297276 = sum of:
      0.022297276 = weight(_text_:t in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.022297276 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05201693 = queryNorm
          0.10881182 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: 1. The Text REtrieval Conference - Ellen M. Voorhees and Donna K. Harman 2. The TREC Test Collections - Donna K. Harman 3. Retrieval System Evaluation - Chris Buckley and Ellen M. Voorhees 4. The TREC Ad Hoc Experiments - Donna K. Harman 5. Routing and Filtering - Stephen Robertson and Jamie Callan 6. The TREC Interactive Tracks: Putting the User into Search - Susan T. Dumais and Nicholas J. Belkin 7. Beyond English - Donna K. Harman 8. Retrieving Noisy Text - Ellen M. Voorhees and John S. Garofolo 9.The Very Large Collection and Web Tracks - David Hawking and Nick Craswell 10. Question Answering in TREC - Ellen M. Voorhees 11. The University of Massachusetts and a Dozen TRECs - James Allan, W. Bruce Croft and Jamie Callan 12. How Okapi Came to TREC - Stephen Robertson 13. The SMART Project at TREC - Chris Buckley 14. Ten Years of Ad Hoc Retrieval at TREC Using PIRCS - Kui-Lam Kwok 15. MultiText Experiments for TREC - Gordon V. Cormack, Charles L. A. Clarke, Christopher R. Palmer and Thomas R. Lynam 16. A Language-Modeling Approach to TREC - Djoerd Hiemstra and Wessel Kraaij 17. BM Research Activities at TREC - Eric W. Brown, David Carmel, Martin Franz, Abraham Ittycheriah, Tapas Kanungo, Yoelle Maarek, J. Scott McCarley, Robert L. Mack, John M. Prager, John R. Smith, Aya Soffer, Jason Y. Zien and Alan D. Marwick Epilogue: Metareflections on TREC - Karen Sparck Jones
    Footnote
    ... TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval is a reliable and comprehensive review of the TREC program and has been adopted by NIST as the official history of TREC (see http://trec.nist.gov). We were favorably surprised by the book. Well structured and written, chapters are self-contained and the existence of references to specialized and more detailed publications is continuous, which makes it easier to expand into the different aspects analyzed in the text. This book succeeds in compiling TREC evolution from its inception in 1992 to 2003 in an adequate and manageable volume. Thanks to the impressive effort performed by the authors and their experience in the field, it can satiate the interests of a great variety of readers. While expert researchers in the IR field and IR-related industrial companies can use it as a reference manual, it seems especially useful for students and non-expert readers willing to approach this research area. Like NIST, we would recommend this reading to anyone who may be interested in textual information retrieval."
  20. Saracevic, T.: Individual differences in organizing, searching and retrieving information (1991) 0.02 
    0.01783782 = product of:
  0.03567564 = sum of:
    0.03567564 = product of:
      0.07135128 = sum of:
        0.07135128 = weight(_text_:t in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07135128 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 73
  • d 10
  • f 1
  • ja 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 79
  • s 6
  • m 5
  • el 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications