Search (97 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.06 
    0.059843443 = product of:
  0.11968689 = sum of:
    0.11968689 = sum of:
      0.040073443 = weight(_text_:h in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040073443 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10427819 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.07961345 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07961345 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1983, Göttingen, 3.-7.10.1983: Fachinformation und Bildschirmtext. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  2. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.04 
    0.042745322 = product of:
  0.085490644 = sum of:
    0.085490644 = sum of:
      0.02862389 = weight(_text_:h in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02862389 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10427819 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.056866754 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056866754 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  3. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.04 
    0.042745322 = product of:
  0.085490644 = sum of:
    0.085490644 = sum of:
      0.02862389 = weight(_text_:h in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02862389 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10427819 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.056866754 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056866754 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  4. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.04 
    0.042577915 = product of:
  0.08515583 = sum of:
    0.08515583 = sum of:
      0.039662424 = weight(_text_:h in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039662424 = score(doc=261,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.10427819 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.38035205 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.0454934 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0454934 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Bericht in: nfd 53(2002) H.2, S.71
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.7, S.381-392
  5. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.03 
    0.025647191 = product of:
  0.051294383 = sum of:
    0.051294383 = sum of:
      0.017174333 = weight(_text_:h in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017174333 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10427819 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
      0.03412005 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03412005 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.145-156
  6. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.03 
    0.025574796 = sum of:
  0.0113581065 = product of:
    0.068148635 = sum of:
      0.068148635 = weight(_text_:authors in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.068148635 = score(doc=4197,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19134417 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
    0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  0.014216688 = product of:
    0.028433377 = sum of:
      0.028433377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028433377 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) provides a TREC-like platform for evaluating content-oriented XML retrieval systems. Since 2007, INEX has been using a set of precision-recall based metrics for its ad hoc tasks. The authors investigate the reliability and robustness of these focused retrieval measures, and of the INEX pooling method. They explore four specific questions: How reliable are the metrics when assessments are incomplete, or when query sets are small? What is the minimum pool/query-set size that can be used to reliably evaluate systems? Can the INEX collections be used to fairly evaluate "new" systems that did not participate in the pooling process? And, for a fixed amount of assessment effort, would this effort be better spent in thoroughly judging a few queries, or in judging many queries relatively superficially? The authors' findings validate properties of precision-recall-based metrics observed in document retrieval settings. Early precision measures are found to be more error-prone and less stable under incomplete judgments and small topic-set sizes. They also find that system rankings remain largely unaffected even when assessment effort is substantially (but systematically) reduced, and confirm that the INEX collections remain usable when evaluating nonparticipating systems. Finally, they observe that for a fixed amount of effort, judging shallow pools for many queries is better than judging deep pools for a smaller set of queries. However, when judging only a random sample of a pool, it is better to completely judge fewer topics than to partially judge many topics. This result confirms the effectiveness of pooling methods.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:20:56
  7. Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011) 0.02 
    0.021372661 = product of:
  0.042745322 = sum of:
    0.042745322 = sum of:
      0.014311945 = weight(_text_:h in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014311945 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10427819 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
      0.028433377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028433377 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:29:22
  8. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02 
    0.019903362 = product of:
  0.039806724 = sum of:
    0.039806724 = product of:
      0.07961345 = sum of:
        0.07961345 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07961345 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  9. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02 
    0.019903362 = product of:
  0.039806724 = sum of:
    0.039806724 = product of:
      0.07961345 = sum of:
        0.07961345 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07961345 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  10. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02 
    0.019903362 = product of:
  0.039806724 = sum of:
    0.039806724 = product of:
      0.07961345 = sum of:
        0.07961345 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07961345 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  11. Ronthaler, M.; Zillmann, H.: Literaturrecherche mit OSIRIS : ein Test der OSIRIS-Retrievalkomponente (1998) 0.02 
    0.016192116 = product of:
  0.03238423 = sum of:
    0.03238423 = product of:
      0.06476846 = sum of:
        0.06476846 = weight(_text_:h in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06476846 = score(doc=414,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10427819 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.6211123 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 32(1998) H.7, S.1203-1212
  12. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.01 
    0.014216688 = product of:
  0.028433377 = sum of:
    0.028433377 = product of:
      0.056866754 = sum of:
        0.056866754 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056866754 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.22-25
  13. Cooper, M.D.; Chen, H.-M.: Predicting the relevance of a library catalog search (2001) 0.01 
    0.012149893 = sum of:
  0.0064251143 = product of:
    0.038550686 = sum of:
      0.038550686 = weight(_text_:authors in 6519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038550686 = score(doc=6519,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19134417 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 6519, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6519)
    0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  0.005724778 = product of:
    0.011449556 = sum of:
      0.011449556 = weight(_text_:h in 6519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011449556 = score(doc=6519,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10427819 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041972358 = queryNorm
          0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 6519, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6519)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Relevance has been a difficult concept to define, let alone measure. In this paper, a simple operational definition of relevance is proposed for a Web-based library catalog: whether or not during a search session the user saves, prints, mails, or downloads a citation. If one of those actions is performed, the session is considered relevant to the user. An analysis is presented illustrating the advantages and disadvantages of this definition. With this definition and good transaction logging, it is possible to ascertain the relevance of a session. This was done for 905,970 sessions conducted with the University of California's Melvyl online catalog. Next, a methodology was developed to try to predict the relevance of a session. A number of variables were defined that characterize a session, none of which used any demographic information about the user. The values of the variables were computed for the sessions. Principal components analysis was used to extract a new set of variables out of the original set. A stratified random sampling technique was used to form ten strata such that each new strata of 90,570 sessions contained the same proportion of relevant to nonrelevant sessions. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the regression coefficients for nine of the ten strata. Then, the coefficients were used to predict the relevance of the sessions in the missing strata. Overall, 17.85% of the sessions were determined to be relevant. The predicted number of relevant sessions for all ten strata was 11 %, a 6.85% difference. The authors believe that the methodology can be further refined and the prediction improved. This methodology could also have significant application in improving user searching and also in predicting electronic commerce buying decisions without the use of personal demographic data
  14. Ongering, H.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: ¬De ontsluiting in het ADION-systeem : precision en recall (1989) 0.01 
    0.011449556 = product of:
  0.022899112 = sum of:
    0.022899112 = product of:
      0.045798223 = sum of:
        0.045798223 = weight(_text_:h in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045798223 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10427819 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01 
    0.01137335 = product of:
  0.0227467 = sum of:
    0.0227467 = product of:
      0.0454934 = sum of:
        0.0454934 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0454934 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  16. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01 
    0.01137335 = product of:
  0.0227467 = sum of:
    0.0227467 = product of:
      0.0454934 = sum of:
        0.0454934 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0454934 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  17. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.01 
    0.01137335 = product of:
  0.0227467 = sum of:
    0.0227467 = product of:
      0.0454934 = sum of:
        0.0454934 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0454934 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  18. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01 
    0.01137335 = product of:
  0.0227467 = sum of:
    0.0227467 = product of:
      0.0454934 = sum of:
        0.0454934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0454934 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  19. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.01 
    0.01137335 = product of:
  0.0227467 = sum of:
    0.0227467 = product of:
      0.0454934 = sum of:
        0.0454934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0454934 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  20. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.01 
    0.01137335 = product of:
  0.0227467 = sum of:
    0.0227467 = product of:
      0.0454934 = sum of:
        0.0454934 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0454934 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14698005 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041972358 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 63
  • d 26
  • nl 3
  • chi 2
  • f 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 87
  • m 6
  • s 6
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications