Alternative arrangement : new approaches to public library stock (1982)
0.03
0.025563473 = product of:
0.06390868 = sum of:
0.023397075 = weight(_text_:m in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023397075 = score(doc=1774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.106374584 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274735 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
0.040511604 = weight(_text_:u in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040511604 = score(doc=1774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13997382 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.04274735 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: ASTIN, J.: Cheshire: Alternative arrangement and beyond; READER, D.: User orientation in a Hertfordshire branch; CHANDLER, D.: Self-service-libraries: providing for the smaller community in Cambridgeshire; BETTS, D.: Reader interest categories in Surrey; DONBROSKI, L.: Categorisation at East Sussex County Library; McCARTHY, A.: Burning issues: stock appeal in Sunderland; MORSON, I. u. M. PERRY: Two-tier and total: stock arrangement in Brent