Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Schöne Literatur"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Stünkel, M.: Neuere Methoden der inhaltlichen Erschließung schöner Literatur in öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.03 
    0.02807389 = product of:
  0.05614778 = sum of:
    0.05614778 = product of:
      0.11229556 = sum of:
        0.11229556 = weight(_text_:22 in 5815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11229556 = score(doc=5815,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05180212 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5815, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5815)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 8.2006 21:35:22
  2. Schneider, A.: ¬Die Verzeichnung und sachliche Erschließung der Belletristik in Kaysers Bücherlexikon und im Schlagwortkatalog Georg/Ost (1980) 0.02 
    0.024564654 = product of:
  0.049129307 = sum of:
    0.049129307 = product of:
      0.098258615 = sum of:
        0.098258615 = weight(_text_:22 in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098258615 = score(doc=5309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05180212 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:07:22
  3. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02 
    0.01754618 = product of:
  0.03509236 = sum of:
    0.03509236 = product of:
      0.07018472 = sum of:
        0.07018472 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07018472 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1814022 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05180212 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  4. Bradley, P.: Indexes to works of fiction : the views of producers and users on the need for them (1989) 0.01 
    0.011894777 = product of:
  0.023789555 = sum of:
    0.023789555 = product of:
      0.09515822 = sum of:
        0.09515822 = weight(_text_:authors in 5816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09515822 = score(doc=5816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05180212 = queryNorm
            0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 5816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5816)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Over many years there have been occasionally items in The Indexer on the question of whatever fiction needs to be indexed. An attempt is made here to bring together the views of authors, publishers, reviewers, readers, literary societies and indexers in order to see what the various groups of fiction users think of the matter
  5. Baker, S.L.; Shepherd, G.W.: Fiction classification schemes : the principles behind them and their success (1987) 0.01 
    0.01040793 = product of:
  0.02081586 = sum of:
    0.02081586 = product of:
      0.08326344 = sum of:
        0.08326344 = weight(_text_:authors in 5817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08326344 = score(doc=5817,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23615624 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05180212 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5817, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5817)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Attempts to see whether any research successfully supports principles of fiction classification that were laid out by early classification theorists. The research shows that there is some evidence to suggest that fiction classification makes it easier for users to find the type of novel desired. At its best, fiction classification should and can expose readers to lesser-known authors within a particular genre, therefore performing a valuable and cost-effective methods of readers' guidance. Finally, evidence suggests that there is still some confusion over which major practical method to use when classifying fiction: simply marking the spines of classified works (but leaving them interfiled with the regular collection) or physically separating classified fiction from the general fiction collection

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes