Search (71 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Schöne Literatur"
  1. Haigh, F.: ¬The subject classification of fiction : an actual experiment (1933) 0.02
    0.0150812585 = product of:
      0.045243774 = sum of:
        0.045243774 = product of:
          0.09048755 = sum of:
            0.09048755 = weight(_text_:classification in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09048755 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  2. Baker, S.L.: Will fiction classification schemes increase use? (1988) 0.02
    0.0150812585 = product of:
      0.045243774 = sum of:
        0.045243774 = product of:
          0.09048755 = sum of:
            0.09048755 = weight(_text_:classification in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09048755 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Burgess, L.A.: ¬A system for the classification and evaluation of fiction (1936) 0.02
    0.0150812585 = product of:
      0.045243774 = sum of:
        0.045243774 = product of:
          0.09048755 = sum of:
            0.09048755 = weight(_text_:classification in 1027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09048755 = score(doc=1027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. DeHart, F.E.; Matthews, K.: French fiction : LCSH applications (1988) 0.02
    0.0150812585 = product of:
      0.045243774 = sum of:
        0.045243774 = product of:
          0.09048755 = sum of:
            0.09048755 = weight(_text_:classification in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09048755 = score(doc=3248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.2, S.3-24
  5. Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Fiction in need of transcending traditional classification (1997) 0.02
    0.0150812585 = product of:
      0.045243774 = sum of:
        0.045243774 = product of:
          0.09048755 = sum of:
            0.09048755 = weight(_text_:classification in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09048755 = score(doc=1808,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Gives an overview of the classes for literature of the Library of Congress Classification scheme, the Dewey Decimal Classification scheme and the Universal Decimal Classification Scheme
  6. Baker, S.L.; Shepherd, G.W.: Fiction classification schemes : the principles behind them and their success (1987) 0.01
    0.014753691 = product of:
      0.04426107 = sum of:
        0.04426107 = product of:
          0.08852214 = sum of:
            0.08852214 = weight(_text_:classification in 5817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08852214 = score(doc=5817,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 5817, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5817)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to see whether any research successfully supports principles of fiction classification that were laid out by early classification theorists. The research shows that there is some evidence to suggest that fiction classification makes it easier for users to find the type of novel desired. At its best, fiction classification should and can expose readers to lesser-known authors within a particular genre, therefore performing a valuable and cost-effective methods of readers' guidance. Finally, evidence suggests that there is still some confusion over which major practical method to use when classifying fiction: simply marking the spines of classified works (but leaving them interfiled with the regular collection) or physically separating classified fiction from the general fiction collection
  7. Shepherd, G.W.; Baker, S.L.: Fiction classification : a brief review of the research (1987) 0.01
    0.013330075 = product of:
      0.039990224 = sum of:
        0.039990224 = product of:
          0.07998045 = sum of:
            0.07998045 = weight(_text_:classification in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07998045 = score(doc=1046,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A literature survey regarding fiction classification in US public libraries indicated that classifying fiction helps users to find the type of book they want. Questions not yet answered by research, including the number of categories of genre subdivisions needed, are noted.
  8. Agger, S.; Jenson, H.: ¬The Book House : Visual Design (1989) 0.01
    0.013196101 = product of:
      0.039588302 = sum of:
        0.039588302 = product of:
          0.079176605 = sum of:
            0.079176605 = weight(_text_:classification in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079176605 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International Classification 18(1991) S.233-235 (C. Begthol)
  9. Walker, R.S.: Problem child : some observations on fiction, with a sketch of a new system of classification (1958) 0.01
    0.013196101 = product of:
      0.039588302 = sum of:
        0.039588302 = product of:
          0.079176605 = sum of:
            0.079176605 = weight(_text_:classification in 5818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079176605 = score(doc=5818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 5818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Beck, H.: Zur Klassifikation der Belletristik (1991) 0.01
    0.013060754 = product of:
      0.03918226 = sum of:
        0.03918226 = product of:
          0.07836452 = sum of:
            0.07836452 = weight(_text_:classification in 5819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07836452 = score(doc=5819,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 5819, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the classification of fiction literature in public libraries its presentation on shelves and its depth analysis in card files or selective bibliographies should supplement each other. In the article some less known traditions in the English-language area of thematical classification schemes in Germany of the twenties and since World War II are investigated. Concludingly some principles in the form of theses are stated which should be observed in the subject analysis of fiction lietrature in order to be able to meet fully the multiplicity of readers' requests
    Source
    International classification. 18(1991), S.205-211
  11. Harrell, G.: ¬The classification and organization of adult fiction in larger American public libraries (1985) 0.01
    0.013060754 = product of:
      0.03918226 = sum of:
        0.03918226 = product of:
          0.07836452 = sum of:
            0.07836452 = weight(_text_:classification in 5829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07836452 = score(doc=5829,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 5829, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5829)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Because classification of fiction has posed a dilemma for librarians for many years, the author conducted a survey of the classification practices of larger llibrary systems in the United States. The majority of libraries physically separate adult fiction from adult nonfiction. A large percentage of libraries use genre categorization to arrange a part of their fiction collection. The author concludes: "We now know what we are doing, but are we sure of the whys?"
  12. Velthoven, A.: 'Heeft u nog een mooi boek voor mij?' : het adviseren van romanlezers (1994) 0.01
    0.012893586 = product of:
      0.03868076 = sum of:
        0.03868076 = product of:
          0.07736152 = sum of:
            0.07736152 = weight(_text_:22 in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07736152 = score(doc=8191,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 22(1994) no.11, S.22-23
  13. Saarti, J.: Fictional literature : classification and indexing (2019) 0.01
    0.011544183 = product of:
      0.03463255 = sum of:
        0.03463255 = product of:
          0.0692651 = sum of:
            0.0692651 = weight(_text_:classification in 5315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0692651 = score(doc=5315,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.43094325 = fieldWeight in 5315, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5315)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Fiction content analysis and retrieval are interesting specific topics for two major reasons: 1) the extensive use of fictional works; and, 2) the multimodality and interpretational nature of fiction. The primary challenge in the analysis of fictional content is that there is no single meaning to be analysed; the analysis is an ongoing process involving an interaction between the text produced by author, the reader and the society in which the interaction occurs. Furthermore, different audiences have specific needs to be taken into consideration. This article explores the topic of fiction knowledge organization, including both classification and indexing. It provides a broad and analytical overview of the literature as well as describing several experimental approaches and developmental projects for the analysis of fictional content. Traditional fiction indexing has been mainly based on the factual aspects of the work; this has then been expanded to handle different aspects of the fictional work. There have been attempts made to develop vocabularies for fiction indexing. All the major classification schemes use the genre and language/culture of fictional works when subdividing fictional works into subclasses. The evolution of shelf classification of fiction and the appearance of different types of digital tools have revolutionized the classification of fiction, making it possible to integrate both indexing and classification of fictional works.
  14. Nielsen, H.J.: ¬The nature of fiction and its significance for classification and indexing (1997) 0.01
    0.011428159 = product of:
      0.034284476 = sum of:
        0.034284476 = product of:
          0.06856895 = sum of:
            0.06856895 = weight(_text_:classification in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06856895 = score(doc=1785,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the nature of fiction in relation to classification and indexing systems. Literary theory today is very heterogeneous. In designing an indexing system a single trend of school should not be chosen. Following a systematic extension and development of the 'how' facet of fictional documents is an useful approach. Themes should be a visible aspect in classification and indexing systems. Aspects of literary history, period, literary movement and influence should be noted
  15. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬The Book House : Modelling user's needs and search strategies as a basis for system design (1989) 0.01
    0.011310944 = product of:
      0.03393283 = sum of:
        0.03393283 = product of:
          0.06786566 = sum of:
            0.06786566 = weight(_text_:classification in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06786566 = score(doc=1033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International Classification 18(1991) S.233-235 (C. Beghtol)
  16. Goodstein, L.P.; Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬The Book House : System functionality and evaluation (1989) 0.01
    0.011310944 = product of:
      0.03393283 = sum of:
        0.03393283 = product of:
          0.06786566 = sum of:
            0.06786566 = weight(_text_:classification in 7626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06786566 = score(doc=7626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 7626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International Classification 18(1991) S. 233-235 (C. Beghtol)
  17. Vernitski, A.; Rafferty, P.: Approaches to fiction retrieval research : from theory to practice? (2011) 0.01
    0.011310944 = product of:
      0.03393283 = sum of:
        0.03393283 = product of:
          0.06786566 = sum of:
            0.06786566 = weight(_text_:classification in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06786566 = score(doc=4720,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter considers fiction retrieval research and initiatives, providing an overview of some of the approaches that have been developed. In particular, it describes two recent approaches to fiction retrieval that have made use of theoretical concepts drawn from literary theory. Fiction is an interesting information domain because it includes documents that serve two purposes, which are reading for pleasure and scholarly study (Beghtol, 1994), but fiction retrieval has not always focused on both aspects. In the 19th century, the approach was to treat fiction from a knowledge perspective within general classification schemes. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) contain classes for literature, with the main subdivision in each case being the language in which it is written. Further subdivision is possible based on literary form, historical period or the works of an individual author (Riesthuis, 1997).
  18. Almeida, P. de; Gnoli, C.: Fiction in a phenomenon-based classification (2021) 0.01
    0.011310944 = product of:
      0.03393283 = sum of:
        0.03393283 = product of:
          0.06786566 = sum of:
            0.06786566 = weight(_text_:classification in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06786566 = score(doc=712,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In traditional classification, fictional works are indexed only by their form, genre, and language, while their subject content is believed to be irrelevant. However, recent research suggests that this may not be the best approach. We tested indexing of a small sample of selected fictional works by Integrative Levels Classification (ILC2), a freely faceted system based on phenomena instead of disciplines and considered the structure of the resulting classmarks. Issues in the process of subject analysis, such as selection of relevant vs. non-relevant themes and citation order of relevant ones, are identified and discussed. Some phenomena that are covered in scholarly literature can also be identified as relevant themes in fictional literature and expressed in classmarks. This can allow for hybrid search and retrieval systems covering both fiction and nonfiction, which will result in better leveraging of the knowledge contained in fictional works.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.5, p.477-491
  19. Harrell, G.; Harrell, E.G.: ¬The classification and organisation of adult fiction in large American public libraries (1985) 0.01
    0.01066406 = product of:
      0.03199218 = sum of:
        0.03199218 = product of:
          0.06398436 = sum of:
            0.06398436 = weight(_text_:classification in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06398436 = score(doc=5825,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch Shepherd, G.W. u. S.L. Baker: Fiction classification: a brief review of the research
  20. Pejtersen, A.M.; Albrechtsen, H.; Sandelin, R.; Lundgren, L.: ¬The Scandinavian Book House : indexing methods and OPAC development for subject access to Scandinavian fiction literature (1995) 0.01
    0.009425786 = product of:
      0.028277358 = sum of:
        0.028277358 = product of:
          0.056554716 = sum of:
            0.056554716 = weight(_text_:classification in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056554716 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05046903 = queryNorm
                0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 6th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 8, 1995, Chicago, IL. Ed.: R.P. Schwartz et al

Languages

  • e 64
  • d 3
  • ? 1
  • fi 1
  • ja 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 64
  • m 2
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…