Search (177 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Schöne Literatur"
  1. Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994) 0.07
    0.06523932 = sum of:
      0.02393987 = product of:
        0.09575948 = sum of:
          0.09575948 = weight(_text_:authors in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09575948 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.041299447 = product of:
        0.06194917 = sum of:
          0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0054466184 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.05650255 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05650255 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem
    Source
    Toshokan-kai. 46(1994) no.1, S.24-31
  2. DeHart, F.E.; Matthews, K.: French fiction : LCSH applications (1988) 0.04
    0.042775445 = product of:
      0.08555089 = sum of:
        0.08555089 = product of:
          0.12832633 = sum of:
            0.117433086 = weight(_text_:k in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.117433086 = score(doc=3248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
            0.010893237 = weight(_text_:s in 3248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010893237 = score(doc=3248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3248)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.2, S.3-24
  3. Moeller, R.; Becnel, K.: Why on earth would we not genrefy the books? : a study of Reader-Interest Classification in school libraries (2019) 0.04
    0.04169707 = sum of:
      0.01496242 = product of:
        0.05984968 = sum of:
          0.05984968 = weight(_text_:authors in 5266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05984968 = score(doc=5266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5266)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02673465 = product of:
        0.040101975 = sum of:
          0.03669784 = weight(_text_:k in 5266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03669784 = score(doc=5266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 5266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5266)
          0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 5266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0034041367 = score(doc=5266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5266)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Through their work as instructors in a master of library science program, the authors observed a sharp increase in students' desire to adopt the reader-interest classification approach of genrefication for their school libraries' fiction collections. In order to better understand this trend, the researchers interviewed seven school librarians regarding their motivations for genrefying their libraries' fiction collections; the challenges they encountered during or after the genrefication process; and any benefits they perceived as having resulted in the implementation of genrefication. The data suggest that the librarians' interests in genrefication stem mostly from the lack of time they have to help individual students find materials, and the lack of time students are given out of the instructional day to explore the libraries' fiction collections. The participants felt that reclassifying the library's fiction collection by genre gave students more ownership of the fiction collection and allowed them to find ma-terials that genuinely interested them. The significant challenges the librarians faced in the reorganization process speak to challenges regarding the ways in which librarians attempt to provide access to diverse materials for all patrons.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 46(2019) no.3, S.199-208
  4. Guard, A.: ¬An antidote for browsing : subject headings for fiction (1991) 0.04
    0.041299447 = product of:
      0.082598895 = sum of:
        0.082598895 = product of:
          0.12389834 = sum of:
            0.010893237 = weight(_text_:s in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010893237 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
            0.1130051 = weight(_text_:22 in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1130051 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:00
    Source
    Technicalities. 11(1991) no.12, S.10-14
  5. OCLC/LC fiction headings project : too little, too late? (1992) 0.04
    0.041299447 = product of:
      0.082598895 = sum of:
        0.082598895 = product of:
          0.12389834 = sum of:
            0.010893237 = weight(_text_:s in 1298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010893237 = score(doc=1298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1298)
            0.1130051 = weight(_text_:22 in 1298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1130051 = score(doc=1298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1298)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:14
    Source
    Library journal. 117(1992) Feb.1, S.14-15
  6. Knudsen, P.; Mandoee, K.; Moeldrup, L.R.: Hvor blev skoenlitteraturen af? : What happened to fiction? (1984) 0.04
    0.037428513 = product of:
      0.07485703 = sum of:
        0.07485703 = product of:
          0.11228553 = sum of:
            0.10275395 = weight(_text_:k in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10275395 = score(doc=1021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
            0.009531583 = weight(_text_:s in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009531583 = score(doc=1021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotek 70. 1984, H.7, S.181-182
  7. Laakso, J.; Puukko, O.: Classification of fiction by topic in the light of experiments carried out in two public libraries : [Original in Finnisch] (1992) 0.03
    0.030974586 = product of:
      0.06194917 = sum of:
        0.06194917 = product of:
          0.09292375 = sum of:
            0.008169928 = weight(_text_:s in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008169928 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
            0.084753826 = weight(_text_:22 in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084753826 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:39
    Source
    Kirjastotiede ja Informatiika. 11(1992) no.2, S.61-65
  8. Velthoven, A.: 'Heeft u nog een mooi boek voor mij?' : het adviseren van romanlezers (1994) 0.03
    0.0284511 = product of:
      0.0569022 = sum of:
        0.0569022 = product of:
          0.0853533 = sum of:
            0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0054466184 = score(doc=8191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
            0.07990668 = weight(_text_:22 in 8191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07990668 = score(doc=8191,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 8191, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8191)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 22(1994) no.11, S.22-23
  9. Thelwall, M.; Bourrier, M.K.: ¬The reading background of Goodreads book club members : a female fiction canon? (2019) 0.03
    0.027050387 = sum of:
      0.025915675 = product of:
        0.1036627 = sum of:
          0.1036627 = weight(_text_:authors in 5461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1036627 = score(doc=5461,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 5461, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5461)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0011347122 = product of:
        0.0034041367 = sum of:
          0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 5461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0034041367 = score(doc=5461,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5461, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5461)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Despite the social, educational and therapeutic benefits of book clubs, little is known about which books participants are likely to have read. In response, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the public bookshelves of those that have joined a group within the Goodreads social network site. Design/methodology/approach Books listed as read by members of 50 large English-language Goodreads groups - with a genre focus or other theme - were compiled by author and title. Findings Recent and youth-oriented fiction dominate the 50 books most read by book club members, whilst almost half are works of literature frequently taught at the secondary and postsecondary level (literary classics). Whilst J.K. Rowling is almost ubiquitous (at least 63 per cent as frequently listed as other authors in any group, including groups for other genres), most authors, including Shakespeare (15 per cent), Goulding (6 per cent) and Hemmingway (9 per cent), are little read by some groups. Nor are individual recent literary prize winners or works in languages other than English frequently read. Research limitations/implications Although these results are derived from a single popular website, knowing more about what book club members are likely to have read should help participants, organisers and moderators. For example, recent literary prize winners might be a good choice, given that few members may have read them. Originality/value This is the first large scale study of book group members' reading patterns. Whilst typical reading is likely to vary by group theme and average age, there seems to be a mainly female canon of about 14 authors and 19 books that Goodreads book club members are likely to have read.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 75(2019) no.5, S.1139-1161
  10. Lehmann, K.: 'Z' wie Schöne Literatur (1999) 0.03
    0.026465952 = product of:
      0.052931905 = sum of:
        0.052931905 = product of:
          0.07939786 = sum of:
            0.07265801 = weight(_text_:k in 2728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07265801 = score(doc=2728,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 2728, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2728)
            0.006739847 = weight(_text_:s in 2728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006739847 = score(doc=2728,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 2728, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2728)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die ASB hat Zuwachs bekommen! Lange ging die Arbeitsgruppe 'ASB-Überarbeitung' mit der Idee schwanger, die Hauptgruppenfamilie zu vergrößern. Auf der 16. Sitzung erblickte nun 'Z' das Licht der (ASB-)Welt! Im folgenden weitere Informationen über die Zusammenkunft der Arbeitsgruppe, die vom 3. bis 5. Dezember '98 in der Stadtbücherei Stuttgart stattfand. Schwerpunkte der Sitzung waren die Hauptgruppen R,S,U und V. Darüber hinaus konnten die Gliederungsentwürfe für die Hautpgruppen G, M und Y endgültig abgeschlossen werden. Einige Entscheidungen aus vorangegangenen Beratungsrunden wurden modifiziert - ein Beleg für die Dynamik des Überarbeitungsprozesses und das ungebrochene Engagement aller Beteiligten! Die Veränderungen an bereits veröffentlichten Aussagen (vgl. Lehmann, K.: SSieben auf einen Streich in BuB 50(1998) H.12) sind im folgenden Beitrag besonders hervorgehoben
    Source
    BuB. 51(1999) H.3, S.157-161
  11. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.03
    0.025812155 = product of:
      0.05162431 = sum of:
        0.05162431 = product of:
          0.07743646 = sum of:
            0.0068082735 = weight(_text_:s in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0068082735 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
            0.07062819 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07062819 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
    Pages
    S.146-159
  12. Bell, H.: On the indexability of butterflies (1992) 0.03
    0.02575541 = sum of:
      0.02393987 = product of:
        0.09575948 = sum of:
          0.09575948 = weight(_text_:authors in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09575948 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0018155396 = product of:
        0.0054466184 = sum of:
          0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0054466184 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Most publishers, who are cost-conscious, and the majority of authors, who are creativity-conscious, oppos indexes for fiction. However, maintains, that there is a case to be made for the indexing of serious fiction, whose readers have the same needs for information retrieval with regard to characters, places and events, as readers of biographies and histories
    Source
    Logos. 3(1992) no.3, S.149-152
  13. Bradley, P.: Indexes to works of fiction : the views of producers and users on the need for them (1989) 0.03
    0.02575541 = sum of:
      0.02393987 = product of:
        0.09575948 = sum of:
          0.09575948 = weight(_text_:authors in 5816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09575948 = score(doc=5816,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 5816, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5816)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0018155396 = product of:
        0.0054466184 = sum of:
          0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 5816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0054466184 = score(doc=5816,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5816, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5816)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Over many years there have been occasionally items in The Indexer on the question of whatever fiction needs to be indexed. An attempt is made here to bring together the views of authors, publishers, reviewers, readers, literary societies and indexers in order to see what the various groups of fiction users think of the matter
    Source
    Indexer. 16(1989), S.239-248
  14. Baker, S.L.; Shepherd, G.W.: Fiction classification schemes : the principles behind them and their success (1987) 0.02
    0.022535985 = sum of:
      0.020947387 = product of:
        0.08378955 = sum of:
          0.08378955 = weight(_text_:authors in 5817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08378955 = score(doc=5817,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5817, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5817)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0015885972 = product of:
        0.0047657914 = sum of:
          0.0047657914 = weight(_text_:s in 5817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0047657914 = score(doc=5817,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5817, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5817)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to see whether any research successfully supports principles of fiction classification that were laid out by early classification theorists. The research shows that there is some evidence to suggest that fiction classification makes it easier for users to find the type of novel desired. At its best, fiction classification should and can expose readers to lesser-known authors within a particular genre, therefore performing a valuable and cost-effective methods of readers' guidance. Finally, evidence suggests that there is still some confusion over which major practical method to use when classifying fiction: simply marking the spines of classified works (but leaving them interfiled with the regular collection) or physically separating classified fiction from the general fiction collection
    Source
    RQ. 27(1987), S.245-251
  15. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.02
    0.020649724 = product of:
      0.041299447 = sum of:
        0.041299447 = product of:
          0.06194917 = sum of:
            0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0054466184 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
            0.05650255 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05650255 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  16. Wordell, C.B.: Tales of the town of dreamy dreams : a bibliography of fiction set in New Orleans (1998) 0.02
    0.020649724 = product of:
      0.041299447 = sum of:
        0.041299447 = product of:
          0.06194917 = sum of:
            0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 1636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0054466184 = score(doc=1636,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1636, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1636)
            0.05650255 = weight(_text_:22 in 1636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05650255 = score(doc=1636,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1636, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1636)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:06:22
    Source
    LLA bulletin. 61(1998) no.2, S.72-90
  17. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.02
    0.020649724 = product of:
      0.041299447 = sum of:
        0.041299447 = product of:
          0.06194917 = sum of:
            0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0054466184 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
            0.05650255 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05650255 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
    Pages
    S.39-48
  18. Denham, D.: Back to basics : training and education opportunities for the exploitation of fiction in public libraries (1996) 0.02
    0.020649724 = product of:
      0.041299447 = sum of:
        0.041299447 = product of:
          0.06194917 = sum of:
            0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0054466184 = score(doc=5841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
            0.05650255 = weight(_text_:22 in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05650255 = score(doc=5841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:18:22
    Source
    Public library journal. 11(1996) no.3, S.77-80
  19. Yu, L.; O'Brien, A.: ¬A practical typology of adult fiction borrowers based on their reading habits (1999) 0.02
    0.019316558 = sum of:
      0.017954903 = product of:
        0.07181961 = sum of:
          0.07181961 = weight(_text_:authors in 3879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07181961 = score(doc=3879,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3879, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3879)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0013616546 = product of:
        0.004084964 = sum of:
          0.004084964 = weight(_text_:s in 3879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004084964 = score(doc=3879,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3879, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3879)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study which applied a typological procedure, developed by Lazairsfeld from the social sciences, to a set of qualitative data on fiction reading habits for the purpose of forming a practical typology of fiction borrowers. The data was collected from a sample of 300 readers in 2 medium sized UK public libraries over a 2 month period. The procedure, using an inductive research approach, first mapped readers along 6 dimensions of reading habits which emerged from the data frequencies of borrowing, the numbers of authors currently read, the literary/recreational orientation of reading, searching approaches usually applied, sureness (confidence) in book selection and then proceeded to reduce the number of combinations formed by these dimensions, based on their relationships. A typology of 7 types of fiction borrowers was devised: readers of particularism; readers of frequent literary pluralism; readers of infrequent literary pluralism; readers of frequent recreational pluralism; readers of infrequent recreational pluralism; readers of frequent universalism; and readers of infrequent universalism
    Source
    Journal of information science. 25(1999) no.1, S.35-49
  20. Pejtersen, A.M.: ¬A framework for indexing and representation of information based on work domain analysis : a fiction classification example (1994) 0.02
    0.019316558 = sum of:
      0.017954903 = product of:
        0.07181961 = sum of:
          0.07181961 = weight(_text_:authors in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07181961 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0013616546 = product of:
        0.004084964 = sum of:
          0.004084964 = weight(_text_:s in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.004084964 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval and exploration of work domains through databases and integrated information systems has become increasingly important in many modern work settings (as well as in libraries). The problem space of the users is defined on occasion by the dynamically changing requirements from their tasks and goals. it is argued that IR system design should be based on an analysis of the properties of the work domain, the task situation and the user characteristics. The paper describes a general framework for IR system design that has been used in the design of a library system. A special problem identified from use of the framework in domain analysis of fiction retrieval is treated in more detail: mapping the authors' domain structures to the domain structures expressed in users' needs in indexing and representation of fiction
    Pages
    S.251-263

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 150
  • m 11
  • x 10
  • r 3
  • s 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…