Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Binding, C.; Gnoli, C.; Tudhope, D.: Migrating a complex classification scheme to the semantic web : expressing the Integrative Levels Classification using SKOS RDF (2021) 0.00
    0.0036409218 = product of:
      0.0509729 = sum of:
        0.0509729 = weight(_text_:representation in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0509729 = score(doc=600,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.44023782 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The Integrative Levels Classification (ILC) is a comprehensive "freely faceted" knowledge organization system not previously expressed as SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System). This paper reports and reflects on work converting the ILC to SKOS representation. Design/methodology/approach The design of the ILC representation and the various steps in the conversion to SKOS are described and located within the context of previous work considering the representation of complex classification schemes in SKOS. Various issues and trade-offs emerging from the conversion are discussed. The conversion implementation employed the STELETO transformation tool. Findings The ILC conversion captures some of the ILC facet structure by a limited extension beyond the SKOS standard. SPARQL examples illustrate how this extension could be used to create faceted, compound descriptors when indexing or cataloguing. Basic query patterns are provided that might underpin search systems. Possible routes for reducing complexity are discussed. Originality/value Complex classification schemes, such as the ILC, have features which are not straight forward to represent in SKOS and which extend beyond the functionality of the SKOS standard. The ILC's facet indicators are modelled as rdf:Property sub-hierarchies that accompany the SKOS RDF statements. The ILC's top-level fundamental facet relationships are modelled by extensions of the associative relationship - specialised sub-properties of skos:related. An approach for representing faceted compound descriptions in ILC and other faceted classification schemes is proposed.
  2. Carbonaro, A.; Santandrea, L.: ¬A general Semantic Web approach for data analysis on graduates statistics 0.00
    0.0029727998 = product of:
      0.041619197 = sum of:
        0.041619197 = weight(_text_:representation in 5309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041619197 = score(doc=5309,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.35945266 = fieldWeight in 5309, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5309)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, several datasets released in a Linked Open Data format are available at a national and international level, but the lack of shared strategies concerning the definition of concepts related to the statistical publishing community makes difficult a comparison among given facts starting from different data sources. In order to guarantee a shared representation framework for what concerns the dissemination of statistical concepts about graduates, we developed SW4AL, an ontology-based system for graduate's surveys domain. The developed system transforms low-level data into an enriched information model and is based on the AlmaLaurea surveys covering more than 90% of Italian graduates. SW4AL: i) semantically describes the different peculiarities of the graduates; ii) promotes the structured definition of the AlmaLaurea data and the following publication in the Linked Open Data context; iii) provides their reuse in the open data scope; iv) enables logical reasoning about knowledge representation. SW4AL establishes a common semantic for addressing the concept of graduate's surveys domain by proposing the creation of a SPARQL endpoint and a Web based interface for the query and the visualization of the structured data.
  3. Isaac, A.; Schlobach, S.; Matthezing, H.; Zinn, C.: Integrated access to cultural heritage resources through representation and alignment of controlled vocabularies (2008) 0.00
    0.0029127372 = product of:
      0.04077832 = sum of:
        0.04077832 = weight(_text_:representation in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077832 = score(doc=3398,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.35219026 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To show how semantic web techniques can help address semantic interoperability issues in the broad cultural heritage domain, allowing users an integrated and seamless access to heterogeneous collections. Design/methodology/approach - This paper presents the heterogeneity problems to be solved. It introduces semantic web techniques that can help in solving them, focusing on the representation of controlled vocabularies and their semantic alignment. It gives pointers to some previous projects and experiments that have tried to address the problems discussed. Findings - Semantic web research provides practical technical and methodological approaches to tackle the different issues. Two contributions of interest are the simple knowledge organisation system model and automatic vocabulary alignment methods and tools. These contributions were demonstrated to be usable for enabling semantic search and navigation across collections. Research limitations/implications - The research aims at designing different representation and alignment methods for solving interoperability problems in the context of controlled subject vocabularies. Given the variety and technical richness of current research in the semantic web field, it is impossible to provide an in-depth account or an exhaustive list of references. Every aspect of the paper is, however, given one or several pointers for further reading. Originality/value - This article provides a general and practical introduction to relevant semantic web techniques. It is of specific value for the practitioners in the cultural heritage and digital library domains who are interested in applying these methods in practice.
  4. Stamou, G.; Chortaras, A.: Ontological query answering over semantic data (2017) 0.00
    6.553308E-4 = product of:
      0.00917463 = sum of:
        0.00917463 = product of:
          0.027523888 = sum of:
            0.027523888 = weight(_text_:29 in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027523888 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Pages
    S.29-63
  5. Siwecka, D.: Knowledge organization systems used in European national libraries towards interoperability of the semantic Web (2018) 0.00
    6.553308E-4 = product of:
      0.00917463 = sum of:
        0.00917463 = product of:
          0.027523888 = sum of:
            0.027523888 = weight(_text_:29 in 4815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027523888 = score(doc=4815,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4815, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4815)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    18. 1.2019 18:46:29
  6. Schneider, R.: Web 3.0 ante portas? : Integration von Social Web und Semantic Web (2008) 0.00
    5.6825613E-4 = product of:
      0.007955586 = sum of:
        0.007955586 = product of:
          0.023866756 = sum of:
            0.023866756 = weight(_text_:22 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023866756 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 10:38:28
  7. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.00
    5.6825613E-4 = product of:
      0.007955586 = sum of:
        0.007955586 = product of:
          0.023866756 = sum of:
            0.023866756 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023866756 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18