Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Reasoning Web : Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures (2017) 0.04
    0.03927845 = product of:
      0.1571138 = sum of:
        0.1571138 = weight(_text_:logic in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1571138 = score(doc=3934,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.666278 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    LCSH
    Mathematical logic
    Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages
    Subject
    Mathematical logic
    Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages
  2. Veltman, K.H.: Syntactic and semantic interoperability : new approaches to knowledge and the Semantic Web (2001) 0.02
    0.02221925 = product of:
      0.088877 = sum of:
        0.088877 = weight(_text_:logic in 3883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088877 = score(doc=3883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.37690377 = fieldWeight in 3883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3883)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    At VVWW-7 (Brisbane, 1997), Tim Berners-Lee outlined his vision of a global reasoning web. At VVWW- 8 (Toronto, May 1998), he developed this into a vision of a semantic web, where one Gould search not just for isolated words, but for meaning in the form of logically provable claims. In the past four years this vision has spread with amazing speed. The semantic web has been adopted by the European Commission as one of the important goals of the Sixth Framework Programme. In the United States it has become linked with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). While this quest to achieve a semantic web is new, the quest for meaning in language has a history that is almost as old as language itself. Accordingly this paper opens with a survey of the historical background. The contributions of the Dublin Core are reviewed briefly. To achieve a semantic web requires both syntactic and semantic interoperability. These challenges are outlined. A basic contention of this paper is that semantic interoperability requires much more than a simple agreement concerning the static meaning of a term. Different levels of agreement (local, regional, national and international) are involved and these levels have their own history. Hence, one of the larger challenges is to create new systems of knowledge organization, which identify and connect these different levels. With respect to meaning or semantics, early twentieth century pioneers such as Wüster were hopeful that it might be sufficient to limit oneself to isolated terms and words without reference to the larger grammatical context: to concept systems rather than to propositional logic. While a fascination with concept systems implicitly dominates many contemporary discussions, this paper suggests why this approach is not sufficient. The final section of this paper explores how an approach using propositional logic could lead to a new approach to universals and particulars. This points to a re-organization of knowledge, and opens the way for a vision of a semantic web with all the historical and cultural richness and complexity of language itself.
  3. Baker, T.; Sutton, S.A.: Linked data and the charm of weak semantics : Introduction: the strengths of weak semantics (2015) 0.02
    0.019639226 = product of:
      0.0785569 = sum of:
        0.0785569 = weight(_text_:logic in 2022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0785569 = score(doc=2022,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2358082 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039102852 = queryNorm
            0.333139 = fieldWeight in 2022, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0304604 = idf(docFreq=288, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2022)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Logic and precision are fundamental to ontologies underlying the semantic web and, by extension, to linked data. This special section focuses on the interaction of semantics, ontologies and linked data. The discussion presents the Simple Knowledge Organization Scheme (SKOS) as a less formal strategy for expressing concept hierarchies and associations and questions the value of deep domain ontologies in favor of simpler vocabularies that are more open to reuse, albeit risking illogical outcomes. RDF ontologies harbor another unexpected drawback. While structurally sound, they leave validation gaps permitting illogical uses, a problem being addressed by a W3C Working Group. Data models based on RDF graphs and properties may replace traditional library catalog models geared to predefined entities, with relationships between RDF classes providing the semantic connections. The BIBFRAME Initiative takes a different and streamlined approach to linking data, building rich networks of information resources rather than relying on a strict underlying structure and vocabulary. Taken together, the articles illustrate the trend toward a pragmatic approach to a Semantic Web, sacrificing some specificity for greater flexibility and partial interoperability.
  4. Schneider, R.: Web 3.0 ante portas? : Integration von Social Web und Semantic Web (2008) 0.00
    0.0030904398 = product of:
      0.012361759 = sum of:
        0.012361759 = product of:
          0.037085276 = sum of:
            0.037085276 = weight(_text_:22 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037085276 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039102852 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 10:38:28
  5. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.00
    0.0030904398 = product of:
      0.012361759 = sum of:
        0.012361759 = product of:
          0.037085276 = sum of:
            0.037085276 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037085276 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039102852 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
  6. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.00
    0.0030904398 = product of:
      0.012361759 = sum of:
        0.012361759 = product of:
          0.037085276 = sum of:
            0.037085276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037085276 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13693152 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039102852 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)