Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Voß, J.: Vom Social Tagging zum Semantic Tagging (2008) 0.02
    0.016545895 = product of:
      0.08272947 = sum of:
        0.047812827 = weight(_text_:medien in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047812827 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13135035 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.3640099 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
        0.018364036 = weight(_text_:und in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018364036 = score(doc=2884,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.061853286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
        0.016552612 = weight(_text_:des in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016552612 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.077284485 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Abstract
    Social Tagging als freie Verschlagwortung durch Nutzer im Web wird immer häufiger mit der Idee des Semantic Web in Zusammenhang gebracht. Wie beide Konzepte in der Praxis konkret zusammenkommen sollen, bleibt jedoch meist unklar. Dieser Artikel soll hier Aufklärung leisten, indem die Kombination von Social Tagging und Semantic Web in Form von Semantic Tagging mit dem Simple Knowledge Organisation System dargestellt und auf die konkreten Möglichkeiten, Vorteile und offenen Fragen der Semantischen Indexierung eingegangen wird.
    Series
    Medien in der Wissenschaft; Bd.47
  2. Baumer, C.; Reichenberger, K.: Business Semantics - Praxis und Perspektiven (2006) 0.01
    0.0067968224 = product of:
      0.050976165 = sum of:
        0.03205889 = weight(_text_:und in 6020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03205889 = score(doc=6020,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.061853286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.51830536 = fieldWeight in 6020, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6020)
        0.018917272 = weight(_text_:des in 6020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018917272 = score(doc=6020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.077284485 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 6020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6020)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Der Artikel führt in semantische Technologien ein und gewährt Einblick in unterschiedliche Entwicklungsrichtungen. Insbesondere werden Business Semantics vorgestellt und vom Semantic Web abgegrenzt. Die Stärken von Business Semantics werden speziell an den Praxisbeispielen des Knowledge Portals und dem Projekt "Knowledge Base" der Wienerberger AG veranschaulicht. So werden die Anforderungen - was brauchen Anwendungen in Unternehmen heute - und die Leistungsfähigkeit von Systemen - was bieten Business Semantics - konkretisiert und gegenübergestellt.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.6/7, S.359-366
  3. Finke, M.; Risch, J.: "Match Me If You Can" : Sammeln und semantisches Aufbereiten von Fußballdaten (2017) 0.01
    0.006134931 = product of:
      0.04601198 = sum of:
        0.027094709 = weight(_text_:und in 3723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027094709 = score(doc=3723,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.061853286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 3723, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3723)
        0.018917272 = weight(_text_:des in 3723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018917272 = score(doc=3723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.077284485 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 3723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3723)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Interviews, Spielstatistiken oder Videoaufzeichnungen sind für Fußballfans zwar zahlreich im Internet verfügbar, aber auf viele verschiedene Websites verstreut. "Semantic Media Mining" verknüpft nun Fußballdaten aus unterschiedlichen Quellen, bereitet sie semantisch auf und führt sie auf einer einzigen Website zusammen. Dadurch dokumentieren und visualisieren wir mehr als 50 Jahre Fußballgeschichte mit über 500 Mannschaften und 40.000 Spielern der Champions League, sowie der 1. und 2. Bundesliga.
    Content
    Gewinnerbeitrag des Marianne-Englert-Preises 2017.
  4. Weller, K.: Anforderungen an die Wissensrepräsentation im Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.01
    0.0056697708 = product of:
      0.04252328 = sum of:
        0.02597067 = weight(_text_:und in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02597067 = score(doc=4061,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.061853286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
        0.016552612 = weight(_text_:des in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016552612 = score(doc=4061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.077284485 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Artikel gibt einen Einblick in die aktuelle Verschmelzung von Web 2.0-und Semantic Web-Ansätzen, die als Social Semantic Web beschrieben werden kann. Die Grundidee des Social Semantic Web wird beschrieben und einzelne erste Anwendungsbeispiele vorgestellt. Ein wesentlicher Schwerpunkt dieser Entwicklung besteht in der Umsetzung neuer Methoden und Herangehensweisen im Bereich der Wissensrepräsentation. Dieser Artikel stellt vier Schwerpunkte vor, in denen sich die Wissensrepräsentationsmethoden im Social Semantic Web weiterentwickeln müssen und geht dabei jeweils auf den aktuellen Stand ein.
    Series
    Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis ; Bd. 14) (DGI-Konferenz ; 1
    Source
    Semantic web & linked data: Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen ; 1. DGI-Konferenz ; 62. Jahrestagung der DGI ; Frankfurt am Main, 7. - 9. Oktober 2010 ; Proceedings / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld
  5. Hausenblas, M.: Anreicherung von Webinhalten mit Semantik : Microformats und RDFa (2009) 0.00
    0.0016156164 = product of:
      0.024234245 = sum of:
        0.024234245 = weight(_text_:und in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024234245 = score(doc=4862,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.061853286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Semantik in Webinhalten wird heftig diskutiert. Teilweise wird es auch schon praktiziert. Dieser Beitrag geht auf semantisches HTML, Microformats und RDFa näher ein und zeigt anhand von praktischen Beispielen, wie und wo diese verwendet werden können.
  6. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.00
    0.0010082887 = product of:
      0.01512433 = sum of:
        0.01512433 = product of:
          0.03024866 = sum of:
            0.03024866 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03024866 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09772735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027907511 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  7. Glimm, B.; Hogan, A.; Krötzsch, M.; Polleres, A.: OWL: Yet to arrive on the Web of Data? (2012) 0.00
    9.4586366E-4 = product of:
      0.014187954 = sum of:
        0.014187954 = weight(_text_:des in 4798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014187954 = score(doc=4798,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.077284485 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 4798, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4798)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Content
    Beitrag des Workshops: Linked Data on the Web (LDOW2012), April 16, 2012 Lyon, France; vgl.: http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2012/.
  8. Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006) 0.00
    7.562165E-4 = product of:
      0.011343247 = sum of:
        0.011343247 = product of:
          0.022686495 = sum of:
            0.022686495 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022686495 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09772735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027907511 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  9. Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015) 0.00
    7.562165E-4 = product of:
      0.011343247 = sum of:
        0.011343247 = product of:
          0.022686495 = sum of:
            0.022686495 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022686495 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09772735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027907511 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
  10. Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008) 0.00
    7.129678E-4 = product of:
      0.010694517 = sum of:
        0.010694517 = product of:
          0.021389034 = sum of:
            0.021389034 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021389034 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09772735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027907511 = queryNorm
                0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Scheir, P.; Pammer, V.; Lindstaedt, S.N.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : does it exist? (2007) 0.00
    7.0683216E-4 = product of:
      0.010602482 = sum of:
        0.010602482 = weight(_text_:und in 4329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010602482 = score(doc=4329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.061853286 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027907511 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4329)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Content
    Enthält einen Überblick über Modelle, Systeme und Projekte
  12. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.00
    6.3018047E-4 = product of:
      0.009452706 = sum of:
        0.009452706 = product of:
          0.018905412 = sum of:
            0.018905412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018905412 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09772735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027907511 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01
  13. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014) 0.00
    5.0414435E-4 = product of:
      0.007562165 = sum of:
        0.007562165 = product of:
          0.01512433 = sum of:
            0.01512433 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01512433 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09772735 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027907511 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22