-
Weller, K.: Anforderungen an die Wissensrepräsentation im Social Semantic Web (2010)
0.00
0.0032422296 = product of:
0.04863344 = sum of:
0.048019137 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048019137 = score(doc=4061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10548963 = queryWeight, product of:
5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.45520246 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
6.14305E-4 = product of:
0.001842915 = sum of:
0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.001842915 = score(doc=4061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Dieser Artikel gibt einen Einblick in die aktuelle Verschmelzung von Web 2.0-und Semantic Web-Ansätzen, die als Social Semantic Web beschrieben werden kann. Die Grundidee des Social Semantic Web wird beschrieben und einzelne erste Anwendungsbeispiele vorgestellt. Ein wesentlicher Schwerpunkt dieser Entwicklung besteht in der Umsetzung neuer Methoden und Herangehensweisen im Bereich der Wissensrepräsentation. Dieser Artikel stellt vier Schwerpunkte vor, in denen sich die Wissensrepräsentationsmethoden im Social Semantic Web weiterentwickeln müssen und geht dabei jeweils auf den aktuellen Stand ein.
- Type
- a
-
Voß, J.: Vom Social Tagging zum Semantic Tagging (2008)
0.00
0.0020880597 = product of:
0.031320892 = sum of:
0.030706586 = weight(_text_:medien in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030706586 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.3640099 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
6.14305E-4 = product of:
0.001842915 = sum of:
0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.001842915 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Series
- Medien in der Wissenschaft; Bd.47
- Type
- a
-
McGuinness, D.L.: Ontologies come of age (2003)
0.00
0.0020094546 = product of:
0.020094546 = sum of:
0.00612587 = product of:
0.01225174 = sum of:
0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01225174 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0045597646 = product of:
0.009119529 = sum of:
0.009119529 = weight(_text_:online in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009119529 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009408911 = product of:
0.014113366 = sum of:
0.0018616254 = weight(_text_:a in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0018616254 = score(doc=3084,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01225174 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.1 = coord(3/30)
- Abstract
- Ontologies have moved beyond the domains of library science, philosophy, and knowledge representation. They are now the concerns of marketing departments, CEOs, and mainstream business. Research analyst companies such as Forrester Research report on the critical roles of ontologies in support of browsing and search for e-commerce and in support of interoperability for facilitation of knowledge management and configuration. One now sees ontologies used as central controlled vocabularies that are integrated into catalogues, databases, web publications, knowledge management applications, etc. Large ontologies are essential components in many online applications including search (such as Yahoo and Lycos), e-commerce (such as Amazon and eBay), configuration (such as Dell and PC-Order), etc. One also sees ontologies that have long life spans, sometimes in multiple projects (such as UMLS, SIC codes, etc.). Such diverse usage generates many implications for ontology environments. In this paper, we will discuss ontologies and requirements in their current instantiations on the web today. We will describe some desirable properties of ontologies. We will also discuss how both simple and complex ontologies are being and may be used to support varied applications. We will conclude with a discussion of emerging trends in ontologies and their environments and briefly mention our evolving ontology evolution environment.
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:16:49
- Type
- a
-
Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004)
0.00
0.0012839084 = product of:
0.019258624 = sum of:
0.0073510436 = product of:
0.014702087 = sum of:
0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014702087 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01190758 = product of:
0.01786137 = sum of:
0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003159283 = score(doc=4640,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.014702087 = weight(_text_:29 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014702087 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Ontologies will play a central role in the development of the Semantic Web. It is unrealistic to assume that such ontologies will be developed from scratch. Rather, we assume that existing resources such as thesauri and lexical data bases will be reused in the development of ontologies for the Semantic Web. In this paper we describe a method for converting existing source material to a representation that is compatible with Semantic Web languages such as RDF(S) and OWL. The method is illustrated with three case studies: converting Wordnet, AAT and MeSH to RDF(S) and OWL.
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
- Type
- a
-
Hausenblas, M.: Anreicherung von Webinhalten mit Semantik : Microformats und RDFa (2009)
0.00
0.0011985583 = product of:
0.017978372 = sum of:
0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016985506 = score(doc=4862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
9.928669E-4 = product of:
0.0029786006 = sum of:
0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 4862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029786006 = score(doc=4862,freq=4.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4862, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Source
- Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
- Type
- a
-
Soergel, D.: SemWeb: Proposal for an Open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to knowledge about concepts and terminology : exploration and development of the concept (1996)
0.00
0.001118391 = product of:
0.016775865 = sum of:
0.00612587 = product of:
0.01225174 = sum of:
0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01225174 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.010649994 = product of:
0.015974991 = sum of:
0.0037232507 = weight(_text_:a in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0037232507 = score(doc=3576,freq=16.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01225174 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a proposal for the long-range development of an open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to many kinds of knowledge about concepts and terminology. The system would draw on existing knowledge bases that are accessible through the Internet or on CD-ROM an on a common integrated distributed knowledge base that would grow incrementally over time. Existing knowledge bases would be accessed through a common interface that would search several knowledge bases, collate the data into a common format, and present them to the user. The common integrated distributed knowledge base would provide an environment in which many contributors could carry out classification and terminological projects more efficiently, with the results available in a common format. Over time, data from other knowledge bases could be incorporated into the common knowledge base, either by actual transfer (provided the knowledge base producers are willing) or by reference through a link. Either way, such incorporation requires intellectual work but allows for tighter integration than common interface access to multiple knowledge bases. Each piece of information in the common knowledge base will have all its sources attached, providing an acknowledgment mechanism that gives due credit to all contributors. The whole system woul be designed to be usable by many levels of users for improved information exchange.
- Content
- Expanded version of a paper published in Advances in Knowledge Organization v.5 (1996): 165-173 (4th Annual ISKO Conference, Washington, D.C., 1996 July 15-18): SemWeb: proposal for an open, multifunctional, multilingual system for integrated access to knowledge about concepts and terminology.
- Date
- 15. 6.2010 19:25:29
- Type
- a
-
Pattuelli, M.C.; Rubinow, S.: Charting DBpedia : towards a cartography of a major linked dataset (2012)
0.00
0.0010911368 = product of:
0.016367052 = sum of:
0.014862318 = weight(_text_:u in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014862318 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
0.0015047337 = product of:
0.004514201 = sum of:
0.004514201 = weight(_text_:a in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004514201 = score(doc=829,freq=12.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- This paper provides an analysis of the knowledge structure underlying DBpedia, one of the largest and most heavily used datasets in the current Linked Data landscape. The study reveals an evolving knowledge representation environment where different descriptive and classification approaches are employed concurrently. This analysis opens up a new area of research to which the knowledge organization community can make a significant contribution.
- Source
- Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
- Type
- a
-
Smith, D.A.; Shadbolt, N.R.: FacetOntology : expressive descriptions of facets in the Semantic Web (2012)
0.00
7.7314035E-4 = product of:
0.011597104 = sum of:
0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010615941 = score(doc=2208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
9.811628E-4 = product of:
0.002943488 = sum of:
0.002943488 = weight(_text_:a in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002943488 = score(doc=2208,freq=10.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The formal structure of the information on the Semantic Web lends itself to faceted browsing, an information retrieval method where users can filter results based on the values of properties ("facets"). Numerous faceted browsers have been created to browse RDF and Linked Data, but these systems use their own ontologies for defining how data is queried to populate their facets. Since the source data is the same format across these systems (specifically, RDF), we can unify the different methods of describing how to quer the underlying data, to enable compatibility across systems, and provide an extensible base ontology for future systems. To this end, we present FacetOntology, an ontology that defines how to query data to form a faceted browser, and a number of transformations and filters that can be applied to data before it is shown to users. FacetOntology overcomes limitations in the expressivity of existing work, by enabling the full expressivity of SPARQL when selecting data for facets. By applying a FacetOntology definition to data, a set of facets are specified, each with queries and filters to source RDF data, which enables faceted browsing systems to be created using that RDF data.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
- Type
- a
-
Davies, J.; Weeks, R.; Krohn, U.: QuizRDF: search technology for the Semantic Web (2004)
0.00
6.4379955E-4 = product of:
0.009656993 = sum of:
0.008492753 = weight(_text_:u in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008492753 = score(doc=4406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
0.0011642396 = product of:
0.0034927188 = sum of:
0.0034927188 = weight(_text_:a in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034927188 = score(doc=4406,freq=22.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.16900843 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Important information is often scattered across Web and/or intranet resources. Traditional search engines return ranked retrieval lists that offer little or no information on the semantic relationships among documents. Knowledge workers spend a substantial amount of their time browsing and reading to find out how documents are related to one another and where each falls into the overall structure of the problem domain. Yet only when knowledge workers begin to locate the similarities and differences among pieces of information do they move into an essential part of their work: building relationships to create new knowledge. Information retrieval traditionally focuses on the relationship between a given query (or user profile) and the information store. On the other hand, exploitation of interrelationships between selected pieces of information (which can be facilitated by the use of ontologies) can put otherwise isolated information into a meaningful context. The implicit structures so revealed help users use and manage information more efficiently. Knowledge management tools are needed that integrate the resources dispersed across Web resources into a coherent corpus of interrelated information. Previous research in information integration has largely focused on integrating heterogeneous databases and knowledge bases, which represent information in a highly structured way, often by means of formal languages. In contrast, the Web consists to a large extent of unstructured or semi-structured natural language texts. As we have seen, ontologies offer an alternative way to cope with heterogeneous representations of Web resources. The domain model implicit in an ontology can be taken as a unifying structure for giving information a common representation and semantics. Once such a unifying structure exists, it can be exploited to improve browsing and retrieval performance in information access tools. QuizRDF is an example of such a tool.
- Type
- a
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.00
4.7850295E-4 = product of:
0.014355088 = sum of:
0.014355088 = product of:
0.02153263 = sum of:
0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0021061886 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.019426443 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019426443 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
- Type
- a
-
Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006)
0.00
3.9398036E-4 = product of:
0.01181941 = sum of:
0.01181941 = product of:
0.017729115 = sum of:
0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003159283 = score(doc=2418,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.014569832 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014569832 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- Integrated digital access to multiple collections is a prominent issue for many Cultural Heritage institutions. The metadata describing diverse collections must be interoperable, which requires aligning the controlled vocabularies that are used to annotate objects from these collections. In this paper, we present an experiment where we match the vocabularies of two collections by applying the Knowledge Representation techniques established in recent Semantic Web research. We discuss the steps that are required for such matching, namely formalising the initial resources using Semantic Web languages, and running ontology mapping tools on the resulting representations. In addition, we present a prototype that enables the user to browse the two collections using the obtained alignment while still providing her with the original vocabulary structures.
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
- Type
- a
-
Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015)
0.00
3.845745E-4 = product of:
0.011537234 = sum of:
0.011537234 = product of:
0.017305851 = sum of:
0.0027360192 = weight(_text_:a in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027360192 = score(doc=2024,freq=6.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
0.014569832 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014569832 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- Defined in 1999 and paired with XML, the Resource Description Framework (RDF) has been cast as an RDF Schema, producing data that is well-structured but not validated, permitting certain illogical relationships. When stakeholders convened in 2014 to consider solutions to the data validation challenge, a W3C working group proposed Resource Shapes and Shape Expressions to describe the properties expected for an RDF node. Resistance rose from concerns about data and schema reuse, key principles in RDF. Ideally data types and properties are designed for broad use, but they are increasingly adopted with local restrictions for specific purposes. Resource Shapes are commonly treated as record classes, standing in for data structures but losing flexibility for later reuse. Of various solutions to the resulting tensions, the concept of record classes may be the most reasonable basis for agreement, satisfying stakeholders' objectives while allowing for variations with constraints.
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special section "Linked data and the charm of weak semantics".
- Source
- Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
- Type
- a
-
Zeng, M.L.; Fan, W.; Lin, X.: SKOS for an integrated vocabulary structure (2008)
0.00
3.7546342E-4 = product of:
0.011263902 = sum of:
0.011263902 = product of:
0.016895853 = sum of:
0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003159283 = score(doc=2654,freq=18.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.01373657 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01373657 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
- Type
- a
-
Guns, R.: Tracing the origins of the semantic web (2013)
0.00
3.5465136E-4 = product of:
0.00531977 = sum of:
0.0045597646 = product of:
0.009119529 = sum of:
0.009119529 = weight(_text_:online in 1093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009119529 = score(doc=1093,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 1093, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
7.6000544E-4 = product of:
0.0022800162 = sum of:
0.0022800162 = weight(_text_:a in 1093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0022800162 = score(doc=1093,freq=6.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1093, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1093)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- The Semantic Web has been criticized for not being semantic. This article examines the questions of why and how the Web of Data, expressed in the Resource Description Framework (RDF), has come to be known as the Semantic Web. Contrary to previous papers, we deliberately take a descriptive stance and do not start from preconceived ideas about the nature of semantics. Instead, we mainly base our analysis on early design documents of the (Semantic) Web. The main determining factor is shown to be link typing, coupled with the influence of online metadata. Both factors already were present in early web standards and drafts. Our findings indicate that the Semantic Web is directly linked to older artificial intelligence work, despite occasional claims to the contrary. Because of link typing, the Semantic Web can be considered an example of a semantic network. Originally network representations of the meaning of natural language utterances, semantic networks have eventually come to refer to any networks with typed (usually directed) links. We discuss possible causes for this shift and suggest that it may be due to confounding paradigmatic and syntagmatic semantic relations.
- Type
- a
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.00
3.28317E-4 = product of:
0.009849509 = sum of:
0.009849509 = product of:
0.014774263 = sum of:
0.0026327355 = weight(_text_:a in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026327355 = score(doc=4553,freq=8.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.012141528 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012141528 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- Semantic Web knowledge representation standards, and in particular RDF and OWL, often come endowed with a formal semantics which is considered to be of fundamental importance for the field. Reasoning, i.e., the drawing of logical inferences from knowledge expressed in such standards, is traditionally based on logical deductive methods and algorithms which can be proven to be sound and complete and terminating, i.e. correct in a very strong sense. For various reasons, though, in particular the scalability issues arising from the ever increasing amounts of Semantic Web data available and the inability of deductive algorithms to deal with noise in the data, it has been argued that alternative means of reasoning should be investigated which bear high promise for high scalability and better robustness. From this perspective, deductive algorithms can be considered the gold standard regarding correctness against which alternative methods need to be tested. In this paper, we show that it is possible to train a Deep Learning system on RDF knowledge graphs, such that it is able to perform reasoning over new RDF knowledge graphs, with high precision and recall compared to the deductive gold standard.
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
- Type
- a
-
Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014)
0.00
3.03412E-4 = product of:
0.009102359 = sum of:
0.009102359 = product of:
0.013653539 = sum of:
0.003940318 = weight(_text_:a in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003940318 = score(doc=1634,freq=28.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.19066721 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.009713221 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009713221 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Ontologies are prone to wide semantic variability due to subjective points of view of their composers. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new approach for maximal unification of diverse ontologies for controversial domains by their relations. Design/methodology/approach - Effective matching or unification of multiple ontologies for a specific domain is crucial for the success of many semantic web applications, such as semantic information retrieval and organization, document tagging, summarization and search. To this end, numerous automatic and semi-automatic techniques were proposed in the past decade that attempt to identify similar entities, mostly classes, in diverse ontologies for similar domains. Apparently, matching individual entities cannot result in full integration of ontologies' semantics without matching their inter-relations with all other-related classes (and instances). However, semantic matching of ontological relations still constitutes a major research challenge. Therefore, in this paper the authors propose a new paradigm for assessment of maximal possible matching and unification of ontological relations. To this end, several unification rules for ontological relations were devised based on ontological reference rules, and lexical and textual entailment. These rules were semi-automatically implemented to extend a given ontology with semantically matching relations from another ontology for a similar domain. Then, the ontologies were unified through these similar pairs of relations. The authors observe that these rules can be also facilitated to reveal the contradictory relations in different ontologies. Findings - To assess the feasibility of the approach two experiments were conducted with different sets of multiple personal ontologies on controversial domains constructed by trained subjects. The results for about 50 distinct ontology pairs demonstrate a good potential of the methodology for increasing inter-ontology agreement. Furthermore, the authors show that the presented methodology can lead to a complete unification of multiple semantically heterogeneous ontologies. Research limitations/implications - This is a conceptual study that presents a new approach for semantic unification of ontologies by a devised set of rules along with the initial experimental evidence of its feasibility and effectiveness. However, this methodology has to be fully automatically implemented and tested on a larger dataset in future research. Practical implications - This result has implication for semantic search, since a richer ontology, comprised of multiple aspects and viewpoints of the domain of knowledge, enhances discoverability and improves search results. Originality/value - To the best of the knowledge, this is the first study to examine and assess the maximal level of semantic relation-based ontology unification.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Type
- a
-
Corcho, O.; Poveda-Villalón, M.; Gómez-Pérez, A.: Ontology engineering in the era of linked data (2015)
0.00
5.0157792E-5 = product of:
0.0015047337 = sum of:
0.0015047337 = product of:
0.004514201 = sum of:
0.004514201 = weight(_text_:a in 3293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004514201 = score(doc=3293,freq=12.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3293, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3293)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- Ontology engineering encompasses the method, tools and techniques used to develop ontologies. Without requiring ontologies, linked data is driving a paradigm shift, bringing benefits and drawbacks to the publishing world. Ontologies may be heavyweight, supporting deep understanding of a domain, or lightweight, suited to simple classification of concepts and more adaptable for linked data. They also vary in domain specificity, usability and reusabilty. Hybrid vocabularies drawing elements from diverse sources often suffer from internally incompatible semantics. To serve linked data purposes, ontology engineering teams require a range of skills in philosophy, computer science, web development, librarianship and domain expertise.
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special section "Linked data and the charm of weak semantics".
- Type
- a
-
Suchanek, F.M.; Kasneci, G.; Weikum, G.: YAGO: a large ontology from Wikipedia and WordNet (2008)
0.00
4.9643342E-5 = product of:
0.0014893002 = sum of:
0.0014893002 = product of:
0.0044679004 = sum of:
0.0044679004 = weight(_text_:a in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044679004 = score(doc=3404,freq=16.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- This article presents YAGO, a large ontology with high coverage and precision. YAGO has been automatically derived from Wikipedia and WordNet. It comprises entities and relations, and currently contains more than 1.7 million entities and 15 million facts. These include the taxonomic Is-A hierarchy as well as semantic relations between entities. The facts for YAGO have been extracted from the category system and the infoboxes of Wikipedia and have been combined with taxonomic relations from WordNet. Type checking techniques help us keep YAGO's precision at 95%-as proven by an extensive evaluation study. YAGO is based on a clean logical model with a decidable consistency. Furthermore, it allows representing n-ary relations in a natural way while maintaining compatibility with RDFS. A powerful query model facilitates access to YAGO's data.
- Type
- a
-
Zhang, L.: Linking information through function (2014)
0.00
4.9643342E-5 = product of:
0.0014893002 = sum of:
0.0014893002 = product of:
0.0044679004 = sum of:
0.0044679004 = weight(_text_:a in 1526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044679004 = score(doc=1526,freq=16.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1526, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1526)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- How information resources can be meaningfully related has been addressed in contexts from bibliographic entries to hyperlinks and, more recently, linked data. The genre structure and relationships among genre structure constituents shed new light on organizing information by purpose or function. This study examines the relationships among a set of functional units previously constructed in a taxonomy, each of which is a chunk of information embedded in a document and is distinct in terms of its communicative function. Through a card-sort study, relationships among functional units were identified with regard to their occurrence and function. The findings suggest that a group of functional units can be identified, collocated, and navigated by particular relationships. Understanding how functional units are related to each other is significant in linking information pieces in documents to support finding, aggregating, and navigating information in a distributed information environment.
- Type
- a
-
Lassalle, E.; Lassalle, E.: Semantic models in information retrieval (2012)
0.00
4.8509988E-5 = product of:
0.0014552996 = sum of:
0.0014552996 = product of:
0.0043658987 = sum of:
0.0043658987 = weight(_text_:a in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0043658987 = score(doc=97,freq=22.0), product of:
0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.017922899 = queryNorm
0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Abstract
- Robertson and Spärck Jones pioneered experimental probabilistic models (Binary Independence Model) with both a typology generalizing the Boolean model, a frequency counting to calculate elementary weightings, and their combination into a global probabilistic estimation. However, this model did not consider indexing terms dependencies. An extension to mixture models (e.g., using a 2-Poisson law) made it possible to take into account these dependencies from a macroscopic point of view (BM25), as well as a shallow linguistic processing of co-references. New approaches (language models, for example "bag of words" models, probabilistic dependencies between requests and documents, and consequently Bayesian inference using Dirichlet prior conjugate) furnished new solutions for documents structuring (categorization) and for index smoothing. Presently, in these probabilistic models the main issues have been addressed from a formal point of view only. Thus, linguistic properties are neglected in the indexing language. The authors examine how a linguistic and semantic modeling can be integrated in indexing languages and set up a hybrid model that makes it possible to deal with different information retrieval problems in a unified way.
- Type
- a
