-
Jacobs, I.: From chaos, order: W3C standard helps organize knowledge : SKOS Connects Diverse Knowledge Organization Systems to Linked Data (2009)
0.02
0.015701305 = product of:
0.03140261 = sum of:
0.027518734 = weight(_text_:processing in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027518734 = score(doc=3062,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.15654145 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
0.0038838773 = product of:
0.011651631 = sum of:
0.011651631 = weight(_text_:science in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011651631 = score(doc=3062,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.101861134 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- SKOS Adapts to the Diversity of Knowledge Organization Systems A useful starting point for understanding the role of SKOS is the set of subject headings published by the US Library of Congress (LOC) for categorizing books, videos, and other library resources. These headings can be used to broaden or narrow queries for discovering resources. For instance, one can narrow a query about books on "Chinese literature" to "Chinese drama," or further still to "Chinese children's plays." Library of Congress subject headings have evolved within a community of practice over a period of decades. By now publishing these subject headings in SKOS, the Library of Congress has made them available to the linked data community, which benefits from a time-tested set of concepts to re-use in their own data. This re-use adds value ("the network effect") to the collection. When people all over the Web re-use the same LOC concept for "Chinese drama," or a concept from some other vocabulary linked to it, this creates many new routes to the discovery of information, and increases the chances that relevant items will be found. As an example of mapping one vocabulary to another, a combined effort from the STITCH, TELplus and MACS Projects provides links between LOC concepts and RAMEAU, a collection of French subject headings used by the Bibliothèque Nationale de France and other institutions. SKOS can be used for subject headings but also many other approaches to organizing knowledge. Because different communities are comfortable with different organization schemes, SKOS is designed to port diverse knowledge organization systems to the Web. "Active participation from the library and information science community in the development of SKOS over the past seven years has been key to ensuring that SKOS meets a variety of needs," said Thomas Baker, co-chair of the Semantic Web Deployment Working Group, which published SKOS. "One goal in creating SKOS was to provide new uses for well-established knowledge organization systems by providing a bridge to the linked data cloud." SKOS is part of the Semantic Web technology stack. Like the Web Ontology Language (OWL), SKOS can be used to define vocabularies. But the two technologies were designed to meet different needs. SKOS is a simple language with just a few features, tuned for sharing and linking knowledge organization systems such as thesauri and classification schemes. OWL offers a general and powerful framework for knowledge representation, where additional "rigor" can afford additional benefits (for instance, business rule processing). To get started with SKOS, see the SKOS Primer.
-
Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010)
0.01
0.011820463 = product of:
0.047281854 = sum of:
0.047281854 = product of:
0.07092278 = sum of:
0.03562161 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03562161 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.035301168 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035301168 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
26.12.2011 13:40:22
-
Knowledge graphs : new directions for knowledge representation on the Semantic Web (2019)
0.01
0.00982812 = product of:
0.03931248 = sum of:
0.03931248 = weight(_text_:processing in 51) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03931248 = score(doc=51,freq=2.0), product of:
0.175792 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 51, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=51)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The increasingly pervasive nature of the Web, expanding to devices and things in everydaylife, along with new trends in Artificial Intelligence call for new paradigms and a new look onKnowledge Representation and Processing at scale for the Semantic Web. The emerging, but stillto be concretely shaped concept of "Knowledge Graphs" provides an excellent unifying metaphorfor this current status of Semantic Web research. More than two decades of Semantic Webresearch provides a solid basis and a promising technology and standards stack to interlink data,ontologies and knowledge on the Web. However, neither are applications for Knowledge Graphsas such limited to Linked Open Data, nor are instantiations of Knowledge Graphs in enterprises- while often inspired by - limited to the core Semantic Web stack. This report documents theprogram and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 18371 "Knowledge Graphs: New Directions forKnowledge Representation on the Semantic Web", where a group of experts from academia andindustry discussed fundamental questions around these topics for a week in early September 2018,including the following: what are knowledge graphs? Which applications do we see to emerge?Which open research questions still need be addressed and which technology gaps still need tobe closed?
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.00
0.0039223526 = product of:
0.01568941 = sum of:
0.01568941 = product of:
0.047068227 = sum of:
0.047068227 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047068227 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (2008)
0.00
0.003463212 = product of:
0.013852848 = sum of:
0.013852848 = product of:
0.04155854 = sum of:
0.04155854 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04155854 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 14:29:06
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.00
0.0034320583 = product of:
0.013728233 = sum of:
0.013728233 = product of:
0.041184697 = sum of:
0.041184697 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041184697 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.; Sigel, A.: Introducing terminology-based ontologies : Papers and Materials presented by the authors at the workshop "Introducing Terminology-based Ontologies" (Poli/Schmitz-Esser/Sigel) at the 9th International Conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), Vienna, Austria, July 6th, 2006 (2006)
0.00
0.0029684675 = product of:
0.01187387 = sum of:
0.01187387 = product of:
0.03562161 = sum of:
0.03562161 = weight(_text_:29 in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03562161 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17. 7.2006 12:29:55
-
Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004)
0.00
0.0029684675 = product of:
0.01187387 = sum of:
0.01187387 = product of:
0.03562161 = sum of:
0.03562161 = weight(_text_:29 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03562161 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15275662 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 7.2011 14:44:56
-
Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018)
0.00
0.0024514701 = product of:
0.0098058805 = sum of:
0.0098058805 = product of:
0.029417641 = sum of:
0.029417641 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029417641 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15206799 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2018 14:22:01
-
Kara, S.: ¬An ontology-based retrieval system using semantic indexing (2012)
0.00
0.0016645187 = product of:
0.006658075 = sum of:
0.006658075 = product of:
0.019974224 = sum of:
0.019974224 = weight(_text_:science in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019974224 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of science in Computer Engineering (XII, 57 S.)
-
Veltman, K.H.: Towards a Semantic Web for culture
0.00
0.0015693232 = product of:
0.006277293 = sum of:
0.006277293 = product of:
0.018831879 = sum of:
0.018831879 = weight(_text_:science in 4040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018831879 = score(doc=4040,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.16463245 = fieldWeight in 4040, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4040)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Today's semantic web deals with meaning in a very restricted sense and offers static solutions. This is adequate for many scientific, technical purposes and for business transactions requiring machine-to-machine communication, but does not answer the needs of culture. Science, technology and business are concerned primarily with the latest findings, the state of the art, i.e. the paradigm or dominant world-view of the day. In this context, history is considered non-essential because it deals with things that are out of date. By contrast, culture faces a much larger challenge, namely, to re-present changes in ways of knowing; changing meanings in different places at a given time (synchronically) and over time (diachronically). Culture is about both objects and the commentaries on them; about a cumulative body of knowledge; about collective memory and heritage. Here, history plays a central role and older does not mean less important or less relevant. Hence, a Leonardo painting that is 400 years old, or a Greek statue that is 2500 years old, typically have richer commentaries and are often more valuable than their contemporary equivalents. In this context, the science of meaning (semantics) is necessarily much more complex than semantic primitives. A semantic web in the cultural domain must enable us to trace how meaning and knowledge organisation have evolved historically in different cultures. This paper examines five issues to address this challenge: 1) different world-views (i.e. a shift from substance to function and from ontology to multiple ontologies); 2) developments in definitions and meaning; 3) distinctions between words and concepts; 4) new classes of relations; and 5) dynamic models of knowledge organisation. These issues reveal that historical dimensions of cultural diversity in knowledge organisation are also central to classification of biological diversity. New ways are proposed of visualizing knowledge using a time/space horizon to distinguish between universals and particulars. It is suggested that new visualization methods make possible a history of questions as well as of answers, thus enabling dynamic access to cultural and historical dimensions of knowledge. Unlike earlier media, which were limited to recording factual dimensions of collective memory, digital media enable us to explore theories, ways of perceiving, ways of knowing; to enter into other mindsets and world-views and thus to attain novel insights and new levels of tolerance. Some practical consequences are outlined.
-
Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.F.; Pan, Y.; Yu, Y.: Semplore: an IR approach to scalable hybrid query of Semantic Web data (2007)
0.00
0.001387099 = product of:
0.005548396 = sum of:
0.005548396 = product of:
0.016645188 = sum of:
0.016645188 = weight(_text_:science in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016645188 = score(doc=231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11438741 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.043425296 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; 4825
