Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.F.; Pan, Y.; Yu, Y.: Semplore: an IR approach to scalable hybrid query of Semantic Web data (2007) 0.02
    0.02352863 = product of:
      0.04705726 = sum of:
        0.04705726 = product of:
          0.09411452 = sum of:
            0.09411452 = weight(_text_:index in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09411452 = score(doc=231,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.418113 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As an extension to the current Web, Semantic Web will not only contain structured data with machine understandable semantics but also textual information. While structured queries can be used to find information more precisely on the Semantic Web, keyword searches are still needed to help exploit textual information. It thus becomes very important that we can combine precise structured queries with imprecise keyword searches to have a hybrid query capability. In addition, due to the huge volume of information on the Semantic Web, the hybrid query must be processed in a very scalable way. In this paper, we define such a hybrid query capability that combines unary tree-shaped structured queries with keyword searches. We show how existing information retrieval (IR) index structures and functions can be reused to index semantic web data and its textual information, and how the hybrid query is evaluated on the index structure using IR engines in an efficient and scalable manner. We implemented this IR approach in an engine called Semplore. Comprehensive experiments on its performance show that it is a promising approach. It leads us to believe that it may be possible to evolve current web search engines to query and search the Semantic Web. Finally, we briefy describe how Semplore is used for searching Wikipedia and an IBM customer's product information.
  2. Davies, J.; Weeks, R.; Krohn, U.: QuizRDF: search technology for the Semantic Web (2004) 0.02
    0.01630111 = product of:
      0.03260222 = sum of:
        0.03260222 = product of:
          0.06520444 = sum of:
            0.06520444 = weight(_text_:index in 4316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06520444 = score(doc=4316,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 4316, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4316)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An information-seeking system is described which combines traditional keyword querying of WWW resources with the ability to browse and query against RDF annotations of those resources. RDF(S) and RDF are used to specify and populate an ontology and the resultant RDF annotations are then indexed along with the full text of the annotated resources. The resultant index allows both keyword querying against the full text of the document and the literal values occurring in the RDF annotations, along with the ability to browse and query the ontology. We motivate our approach as a key enabler for fully exploiting the Semantic Web in the area of knowledge management and argue that the ability to combine searching and browsing behaviours more fully supports a typical information-seeking task. The approach is characterised as "low threshold, high ceiling" in the sense that where RDF annotations exist they are exploited for an improved information-seeking experience but where they do not yet exist, a search capability is still available.
  3. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01
    0.01395822 = product of:
      0.02791644 = sum of:
        0.02791644 = product of:
          0.05583288 = sum of:
            0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05583288 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  4. Davies, J.; Weeks, R.: QuizRDF: search technology for the Semantic Web (2004) 0.01
    0.013584259 = product of:
      0.027168518 = sum of:
        0.027168518 = product of:
          0.054337036 = sum of:
            0.054337036 = weight(_text_:index in 4320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054337036 = score(doc=4320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 4320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An information-seeking system is described which combines traditional keyword querying of WWW resources with the ability to browse and query against RD annotations of those resources. RDF(S) and RDF are used to specify and populate an ontology and the resultant RDF annotations are then indexed along with the full text of the annotated resources. The resultant index allows both keyword querying against the full text of the document and the literal values occurring in the RDF annotations, along with the ability to browse and query the ontology. We motivate our approach as a key enabler for fully exploiting the Semantic Web in the area of knowledge management and argue that the ability to combine searching and browsing behaviours more fully supports a typical information-seeking task. The approach is characterised as "low threshold, high ceiling" in the sense that where RDF annotations exist they are exploited for an improved information-seeking experience but where they do not yet exist, a search capability is still available.
  5. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.01
    0.0122134425 = product of:
      0.024426885 = sum of:
        0.024426885 = product of:
          0.04885377 = sum of:
            0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04885377 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
  6. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.01
    0.010468665 = product of:
      0.02093733 = sum of:
        0.02093733 = product of:
          0.04187466 = sum of:
            0.04187466 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04187466 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  7. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.01
    0.008723888 = product of:
      0.017447775 = sum of:
        0.017447775 = product of:
          0.03489555 = sum of:
            0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03489555 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051511593 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01