Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.011588706 = product of:
  0.023177411 = sum of:
    0.023177411 = product of:
      0.046354823 = sum of:
        0.046354823 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046354823 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17115787 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0488767 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

11. 5.2013 19:22:18

0.009820162 = product of:
  0.019640325 = sum of:
    0.019640325 = product of:
      0.0785613 = sum of:
        0.0785613 = weight(_text_:authors in 4329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0785613 = score(doc=4329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22281978 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0488767 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 4329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4329)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Plenty of contemporary attempts to search exist that are associated with the area of Semantic Web. But which of them qualify as information retrieval for the Semantic Web? Do such approaches exist? To answer these questions we take a look at the nature of the Semantic Web and Semantic Desktop and at definitions for information and data retrieval. We survey current approaches referred to by their authors as information retrieval for the Semantic Web or that use Semantic Web technology for search.

0.008417282 = product of:
  0.016834565 = sum of:
    0.016834565 = product of:
      0.06733826 = sum of:
        0.06733826 = weight(_text_:authors in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06733826 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22281978 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0488767 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

DBpedia is a community effort to extract structured information from Wikipedia and to make this information available on the Web. DBpedia allows you to ask sophisticated queries against datasets derived from Wikipedia and to link other datasets on the Web to Wikipedia data. We describe the extraction of the DBpedia datasets, and how the resulting information is published on the Web for human- and machineconsumption. We describe some emerging applications from the DBpedia community and show how website authors can facilitate DBpedia content within their sites. Finally, we present the current status of interlinking DBpedia with other open datasets on the Web and outline how DBpedia could serve as a nucleus for an emerging Web of open data.

0.008277647 = product of:
  0.016555294 = sum of:
    0.016555294 = product of:
      0.03311059 = sum of:
        0.03311059 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03311059 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17115787 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0488767 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

16.11.2018 14:22:01

0.007014402 = product of:
  0.014028804 = sum of:
    0.014028804 = product of:
      0.056115218 = sum of:
        0.056115218 = weight(_text_:authors in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056115218 = score(doc=3297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22281978 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0488767 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Ontologies have proven to be an essential element in many applications. They are used in agent systems, knowledge management systems, and e-commerce platforms. They can also generate natural language, integrate intelligent information, provide semantic-based access to the Internet, and extract information from texts in addition to being used in many other applications to explicitly declare the knowledge embedded in them. However, not only are ontologies useful for applications in which knowledge plays a key role, but they can also trigger a major change in current Web contents. This change is leading to the third generation of the Web-known as the Semantic Web-which has been defined as "the conceptual structuring of the Web in an explicit machine-readable way."1 This definition does not differ too much from the one used for defining an ontology: "An ontology is an explicit, machinereadable specification of a shared conceptualization."2 In fact, new ontology-based applications and knowledge architectures are developing for this new Web. A common claim for all of these approaches is the need for languages to represent the semantic information that this Web requires-solving the heterogeneous data exchange in this heterogeneous environment. Here, we don't decide which language is best of the Semantic Web. Rather, our goal is to help developers find the most suitable language for their representation needs. The authors analyze the most representative ontology languages created for the Web and compare them using a common framework.