Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Köstlbacher, A. (Übers.): OWL Web Ontology Language Überblick (2004) 0.04
    0.037357815 = product of:
      0.07471563 = sum of:
        0.07471563 = product of:
          0.14943126 = sum of:
            0.14943126 = weight(_text_:semantik in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14943126 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33508807 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04981186 = queryNorm
                0.44594622 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.727074 = idf(docFreq=143, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die OWL Web Ontology Language wurde entwickelt, um es Anwendungen zu ermöglichen den Inhalt von Informationen zu verarbeiten anstatt die Informationen dem Anwender nur zu präsentieren. OWL erleichtert durch zusätzliches Vokabular in Verbindung mit formaler Semantik stärkere Interpretationsmöglichkeiten von Web Inhalten als dies XML, RDF und RDFS ermöglichen. OWL besteht aus drei Untersprachen mit steigender Ausdrucksmächtigkeit: OWL Lite, OWL DL and OWL Full. Dieses Dokument wurde für Leser erstellt, die einen ersten Eindruck von den Möglichkeiten bekommen möchten, die OWL bietet. Es stellt eine Einführung in OWL anhand der Beschreibung der Merkmale der drei Untersprachen von OWL dar. Kenntnisse von RDF Schema sind hilfreich für das Verständnis, aber nicht unbedingt erforderlich. Nach der Lektüre dieses Dokuments können sich interessierte Leser für detailliertere Beschreibungen und ausführliche Beispiele der Merkmale von OWL dem OWL Guide zuwenden. Die normative formale Definition von OWL findet sich unter OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax.
  2. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.02
    0.023620866 = product of:
      0.047241732 = sum of:
        0.047241732 = product of:
          0.094483465 = sum of:
            0.094483465 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094483465 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17443264 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04981186 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  3. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.020246455 = product of:
      0.04049291 = sum of:
        0.04049291 = product of:
          0.08098582 = sum of:
            0.08098582 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08098582 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17443264 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04981186 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  4. Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007) 0.02
    0.020246455 = product of:
      0.04049291 = sum of:
        0.04049291 = product of:
          0.08098582 = sum of:
            0.08098582 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08098582 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17443264 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04981186 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  5. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01
    0.013497638 = product of:
      0.026995275 = sum of:
        0.026995275 = product of:
          0.05399055 = sum of:
            0.05399055 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05399055 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17443264 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04981186 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  6. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.01
    0.011810433 = product of:
      0.023620866 = sum of:
        0.023620866 = product of:
          0.047241732 = sum of:
            0.047241732 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047241732 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17443264 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04981186 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18