Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × type_ss:"r"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Dellschaft, K.; Hachenberg, C.: Repräsentation von Wissensorganisationssystemen im Semantic Web : ein Best Practice Guide (2011) 0.00
    0.003296084 = product of:
      0.029664757 = sum of:
        0.029664757 = product of:
          0.059329513 = sum of:
            0.059329513 = weight(_text_:web in 4782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059329513 = score(doc=4782,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 4782, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4782)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Dokument sollen Begriffe, Prinzipien und Methoden vorgestellt werden, die sich als hilfreich bei der Erstellung von Semantic Web konformen Repräsentationen von Wissensorganisationssystemen (KOS) erwiesen haben, wie z. B. Thesauri und Klassifikationssysteme. Das Dokument richtet sich an Organisationen wie z. B. Bibliotheken, die ihre traditionellen Wissensorganisationssysteme im Rahmen des Semantic Web veröffentlichen wollen. Die in diesem Dokument beschriebenen Vorgehensweisen und Prinzipien sind nicht als normativ anzusehen. Sie sollen nur dabei helfen, von bisher gemachten Erfahrungen zu profitieren und einen leichteren Einstieg in die wichtigsten Begriffichkeiten und Techniken des Semantic Web zu bekommen. An vielen Stellen wird zudem auf weiterführende Literatur zum Thema und auf relevante Standards und Spezifikationen aus dem Bereich des Semantic Web hingewiesen.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  2. Knowledge graphs : new directions for knowledge representation on the Semantic Web (2019) 0.00
    0.0027185641 = product of:
      0.024467077 = sum of:
        0.024467077 = product of:
          0.048934154 = sum of:
            0.048934154 = weight(_text_:web in 51) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048934154 = score(doc=51,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02940506 = queryNorm
                0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 51, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=51)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    The increasingly pervasive nature of the Web, expanding to devices and things in everydaylife, along with new trends in Artificial Intelligence call for new paradigms and a new look onKnowledge Representation and Processing at scale for the Semantic Web. The emerging, but stillto be concretely shaped concept of "Knowledge Graphs" provides an excellent unifying metaphorfor this current status of Semantic Web research. More than two decades of Semantic Webresearch provides a solid basis and a promising technology and standards stack to interlink data,ontologies and knowledge on the Web. However, neither are applications for Knowledge Graphsas such limited to Linked Open Data, nor are instantiations of Knowledge Graphs in enterprises- while often inspired by - limited to the core Semantic Web stack. This report documents theprogram and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 18371 "Knowledge Graphs: New Directions forKnowledge Representation on the Semantic Web", where a group of experts from academia andindustry discussed fundamental questions around these topics for a week in early September 2018,including the following: what are knowledge graphs? Which applications do we see to emerge?Which open research questions still need be addressed and which technology gaps still need tobe closed?
    Theme
    Semantic Web