Search (97 results, page 5 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Bizer, C.; Mendes, P.N.; Jentzsch, A.: Topology of the Web of Data (2012) 0.00
    2.8018325E-4 = product of:
      0.0064442144 = sum of:
        0.0064442144 = product of:
          0.012888429 = sum of:
            0.012888429 = weight(_text_:29 in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012888429 = score(doc=425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Pages
    S.3-29
  2. Hogan, A.; Harth, A.; Umbrich, J.; Kinsella, S.; Polleres, A.; Decker, S.: Searching and browsing Linked Data with SWSE : the Semantic Web Search Engine (2011) 0.00
    2.7806804E-4 = product of:
      0.0063955644 = sum of:
        0.0063955644 = weight(_text_:und in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063955644 = score(doc=438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://swse.deri.org/ und http://swse.org/.
  3. Martínez-González, M.M.; Alvite-Díez, M.L.: Thesauri and Semantic Web : discussion of the evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web (2019) 0.00
    2.7806804E-4 = product of:
      0.0063955644 = sum of:
        0.0063955644 = weight(_text_:und in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063955644 = score(doc=5997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014) 0.00
    2.776628E-4 = product of:
      0.006386244 = sum of:
        0.006386244 = product of:
          0.012772488 = sum of:
            0.012772488 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012772488 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014) 0.00
    2.776628E-4 = product of:
      0.006386244 = sum of:
        0.006386244 = product of:
          0.012772488 = sum of:
            0.012772488 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012772488 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Zenz, G.; Zhou, X.; Minack, E.; Siberski, W.; Nejdl, W.: Interactive query construction for keyword search on the Semantic Web (2012) 0.00
    2.4153895E-4 = product of:
      0.0055553955 = sum of:
        0.0055553955 = product of:
          0.011110791 = sum of:
            0.011110791 = weight(_text_:1 in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011110791 = score(doc=430,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    With the advance of the semantic Web, increasing amounts of data are available in a structured and machine-understandable form. This opens opportunities for users to employ semantic queries instead of simple keyword-based ones to accurately express the information need. However, constructing semantic queries is a demanding task for human users [11]. To compose a valid semantic query, a user has to (1) master a query language (e.g., SPARQL) and (2) acquire sufficient knowledge about the ontology or the schema of the data source. While there are systems which support this task with visual tools [21, 26] or natural language interfaces [3, 13, 14, 18], the process of query construction can still be complex and time consuming. According to [24], users prefer keyword search, and struggle with the construction of semantic queries although being supported with a natural language interface. Several keyword search approaches have already been proposed to ease information seeking on semantic data [16, 32, 35] or databases [1, 31]. However, keyword queries lack the expressivity to precisely describe the user's intent. As a result, ranking can at best put query intentions of the majority on top, making it impossible to take the intentions of all users into consideration.
  7. Gómez-Pérez, A.; Corcho, O.: Ontology languages for the Semantic Web (2015) 0.00
    2.4153895E-4 = product of:
      0.0055553955 = sum of:
        0.0055553955 = product of:
          0.011110791 = sum of:
            0.011110791 = weight(_text_:1 in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011110791 = score(doc=3297,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies have proven to be an essential element in many applications. They are used in agent systems, knowledge management systems, and e-commerce platforms. They can also generate natural language, integrate intelligent information, provide semantic-based access to the Internet, and extract information from texts in addition to being used in many other applications to explicitly declare the knowledge embedded in them. However, not only are ontologies useful for applications in which knowledge plays a key role, but they can also trigger a major change in current Web contents. This change is leading to the third generation of the Web-known as the Semantic Web-which has been defined as "the conceptual structuring of the Web in an explicit machine-readable way."1 This definition does not differ too much from the one used for defining an ontology: "An ontology is an explicit, machinereadable specification of a shared conceptualization."2 In fact, new ontology-based applications and knowledge architectures are developing for this new Web. A common claim for all of these approaches is the need for languages to represent the semantic information that this Web requires-solving the heterogeneous data exchange in this heterogeneous environment. Here, we don't decide which language is best of the Semantic Web. Rather, our goal is to help developers find the most suitable language for their representation needs. The authors analyze the most representative ontology languages created for the Web and compare them using a common framework.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://oa.upm.es/2646/1/JCR01.pdf.
  8. Glimm, B.; Hogan, A.; Krötzsch, M.; Polleres, A.: OWL: Yet to arrive on the Web of Data? (2012) 0.00
    2.0495258E-4 = product of:
      0.0047139092 = sum of:
        0.0047139092 = product of:
          0.0094278185 = sum of:
            0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 4798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0094278185 = score(doc=4798,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4798, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4798)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Seven years on from OWL becoming a W3C recommendation, and two years on from the more recent OWL 2 W3C recommendation, OWL has still experienced only patchy uptake on the Web. Although certain OWL features (like owl:sameAs) are very popular, other features of OWL are largely neglected by publishers in the Linked Data world. This may suggest that despite the promise of easy implementations and the proposal of tractable profiles suggested in OWL's second version, there is still no "right" standard fragment for the Linked Data community. In this paper, we (1) analyse uptake of OWL on the Web of Data, (2) gain insights into the OWL fragment that is actually used/usable on the Web, where we arrive at the conclusion that this fragment is likely to be a simplified profile based on OWL RL, (3) propose and discuss such a new fragment, which we call OWL LD (for Linked Data).
  9. Bizer, C.; Heath, T.: Linked Data : evolving the web into a global data space (2011) 0.00
    1.9323116E-4 = product of:
      0.0044443165 = sum of:
        0.0044443165 = product of:
          0.008888633 = sum of:
            0.008888633 = weight(_text_:1 in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008888633 = score(doc=4725,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.15353142 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Isbn
    978-1-60845-430-3
    Series
    Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology ; 1
  10. ¬The Semantic Web: latest advances and new domains : 12th European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2015 Portoroz, Slovenia, May 31 -- June 4, 2015. Proceedings (2015) 0.00
    1.9323116E-4 = product of:
      0.0044443165 = sum of:
        0.0044443165 = product of:
          0.008888633 = sum of:
            0.008888633 = weight(_text_:1 in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008888633 = score(doc=2028,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.15353142 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2015 10:52:42
    Isbn
    978-3-319-18817-1
  11. Auer, S.; Lehmann, J.: Making the Web a data washing machine : creating knowledge out of interlinked data (2010) 0.00
    1.707938E-4 = product of:
      0.0039282576 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Semantic Web journal. 0(2010), no.1
  12. Maltese, V.; Farazi, F.: Towards the integration of knowledge organization systems with the linked data cloud (2011) 0.00
    1.707938E-4 = product of:
      0.0039282576 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/2214/1/techRep466.pdf
  13. Smith, D.A.; Shadbolt, N.R.: FacetOntology : expressive descriptions of facets in the Semantic Web (2012) 0.00
    1.707938E-4 = product of:
      0.0039282576 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=2208,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Footnote
    Volltext unter: ..\http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/345363/1/paper.pdf.
  14. Chaudhury, S.; Mallik, A.; Ghosh, H.: Multimedia ontology : representation and applications (2016) 0.00
    1.707938E-4 = product of:
      0.0039282576 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 2801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=2801,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2801, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Isbn
    978-1-4822-3635-4
  15. Hyvönen, E.; Leskinen, P.; Tamper, M.; Keravuori, K.; Rantala, H.; Ikkala, E.; Tuominen, J.: BiographySampo - publishing and enriching biographies on the Semantic Web for digital humanities research (2019) 0.00
    1.707938E-4 = product of:
      0.0039282576 = sum of:
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 5799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=5799,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 5799, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5799)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    This paper argues for making a paradigm shift in publishing and using biographical dictionaries on the web, based on Linked Data. The idea is to provide the user with enhanced reading experience of biographies by enriching contents with data linking and reasoning. In addition, versatile tooling for 1) biographical research of individual persons as well as for 2) prosopographical research on groups of people are provided. To demonstrate and evaluate the new possibilities,we present the semantic portal "BiographySampo - Finnish Biographies on theSemantic Web". The system is based on a knowledge graph extracted automatically from a collection of 13.100 textual biographies, enriched with data linking to 16 external data sources, and by harvesting external collection data from libraries, museums, and archives. The portal was released in September 2018 for free public use at: http://biografiasampo.fi.
  16. Hitzler, P.; Krötzsch, M.; Rudolph, S.: Foundations of Semantic Web technologies (2010) 0.00
    1.3663506E-4 = product of:
      0.0031426062 = sum of:
        0.0031426062 = product of:
          0.0062852125 = sum of:
            0.0062852125 = weight(_text_:1 in 359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062852125 = score(doc=359,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 359, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=359)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Isbn
    978-1-420-09050-5
  17. Semantic search over the Web (2012) 0.00
    1.3663506E-4 = product of:
      0.0031426062 = sum of:
        0.0031426062 = product of:
          0.0062852125 = sum of:
            0.0062852125 = weight(_text_:1 in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0062852125 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Isbn
    978-3-642-25007-1

Languages

  • e 65
  • d 32

Types

  • a 63
  • m 24
  • el 15
  • s 11
  • x 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects