-
Di Maio, P.: Linked data beyond libraries : towards universal interfaces and knowledge unification (2015)
0.03
0.029761516 = product of:
0.05952303 = sum of:
0.05952303 = product of:
0.1785691 = sum of:
0.1785691 = weight(_text_:universal in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1785691 = score(doc=2553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.6985484 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.03
0.025686286 = product of:
0.051372573 = sum of:
0.051372573 = product of:
0.15411772 = sum of:
0.15411772 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15411772 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.411333 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Willer, M.; Dunsire, G.: ISBD, the UNIMARC bibliographic format, and RDA : interoperability issues in namespaces and the linked data environment (2014)
0.02
0.017360885 = product of:
0.03472177 = sum of:
0.03472177 = product of:
0.10416531 = sum of:
0.10416531 = weight(_text_:universal in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10416531 = score(doc=1999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.40748656 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The article is an updated and expanded version of a paper presented to International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions in 2013. It describes recent work involving the representation of International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) and UNIMARC (UNIversal MARC) in Resource Description Framework (RDF), the basis of the Semantic Web and linked data. The UNIMARC Bibliographic format is used to illustrate issues arising from the development of a bibliographic element set and its semantic alignment with ISBD. The article discusses the use of such alignments in the automated processing of linked data for interoperability, using examples from ISBD, UNIMARC, and Resource Description and Access.
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007)
0.02
0.015338095 = product of:
0.03067619 = sum of:
0.03067619 = product of:
0.092028566 = sum of:
0.092028566 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092028566 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Tillett, B.B.: AACR2 and metadata : library opportunities in the global semantic Web (2003)
0.01
0.014880758 = product of:
0.029761516 = sum of:
0.029761516 = product of:
0.08928455 = sum of:
0.08928455 = weight(_text_:universal in 5510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08928455 = score(doc=5510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.3492742 = fieldWeight in 5510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5510)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Explores the opportunities for libraries to contribute to the proposed global "Semantic Web." Library name and subject authority files, including work that IFLA has done related to a new view of "Universal Bibliographic Control" in the Internet environment and the work underway in the U.S. and Europe, are making a reality of the virtual international authority file on the Web. The bibliographic and authority records created according to AACR2 reflect standards for metadata that libraries have provided for years. New opportunities for using these records in the digital world are described (interoperability), including mapping with Dublin Core metadata. AACR2 recently updated Chapter 9 on Electronic Resources. That process and highlights of the changes are described, including Library of Congress' rule interpretations.
-
Engels, R.H.P.; Lech, T.Ch.: Generating ontologies for the Semantic Web : OntoBuilder (2004)
0.01
0.014029714 = product of:
0.028059429 = sum of:
0.028059429 = product of:
0.084178284 = sum of:
0.084178284 = weight(_text_:universal in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084178284 = score(doc=4404,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.32929888 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Significant progress has been made in technologies for publishing and distributing knowledge and information on the web. However, much of the published information is not organized, and it is hard to find answers to questions that require more than a keyword search. In general, one can say that the web is organizing itself. Information is often published in relatively ad hoc fashion. Typically, concern about the presentation of content has been limited to purely layout issues. This, combined with the fact that the representation language used on the World Wide Web (HTML) is mainly format-oriented, makes publishing on the WWW easy, giving it an enormous expressiveness. People add private, educational or organizational content to the web that is of an immensely diverse nature. Content on the web is growing closer to a real universal knowledge base, with one problem relatively undefined; the problem of the interpretation of its contents. Although widely acknowledged for its general and universal advantages, the increasing popularity of the web also shows us some major drawbacks. The developments of the information content on the web during the last year alone, clearly indicates the need for some changes. Perhaps one of the most significant problems with the web as a distributed information system is the difficulty of finding and comparing information.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.01
0.013146939 = product of:
0.026293878 = sum of:
0.026293878 = product of:
0.07888163 = sum of:
0.07888163 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07888163 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007)
0.01
0.013146939 = product of:
0.026293878 = sum of:
0.026293878 = product of:
0.07888163 = sum of:
0.07888163 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07888163 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Waltinger, U.; Mehler, A.; Lösch, M.; Horstmann, W.: Hierarchical classification of OAI metadata using the DDC taxonomy (2011)
0.01
0.012400633 = product of:
0.024801265 = sum of:
0.024801265 = product of:
0.07440379 = sum of:
0.07440379 = weight(_text_:universal in 4841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07440379 = score(doc=4841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 4841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4841)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the area of digital library services, the access to subject-specific metadata of scholarly publications is of utmost interest. One of the most prevalent approaches for metadata exchange is the XML-based Open Archive Initiative (OAI) Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). However, due to its loose requirements regarding metadata content there is no strict standard for consistent subject indexing specified, which is furthermore needed in the digital library domain. This contribution addresses the problem of automatic enhancement of OAI metadata by means of the most widely used universal classification schemes in libraries-the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). To be more specific, we automatically classify scientific documents according to the DDC taxonomy within three levels using a machine learning-based classifier that relies solely on OAI metadata records as the document representation. The results show an asymmetric distribution of documents across the hierarchical structure of the DDC taxonomy and issues of data sparseness. However, the performance of the classifier shows promising results on all three levels of the DDC.
-
Linked data and user interaction : the road ahead (2015)
0.01
0.012400633 = product of:
0.024801265 = sum of:
0.024801265 = product of:
0.07440379 = sum of:
0.07440379 = weight(_text_:universal in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07440379 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.29106182 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- H. Frank Cervone: Linked data and user interaction : an introduction -- Paola Di Maio: Linked Data Beyond Libraries Towards Universal Interfaces and Knowledge Unification -- Emmanuelle Bermes: Following the user's flow in the Digital Pompidou -- Patrick Le Bceuf: Customized OPACs on the Semantic Web : the OpenCat prototype -- Ryan Shaw, Patrick Golden and Michael Buckland: Using linked library data in working research notes -- Timm Heuss, Bernhard Humm.Tilman Deuschel, Torsten Frohlich, Thomas Herth and Oliver Mitesser: Semantically guided, situation-aware literature research -- Niklas Lindstrom and Martin Malmsten: Building interfaces on a networked graph -- Natasha Simons, Arve Solland and Jan Hettenhausen: Griffith Research Hub. Vgl.: http://d-nb.info/1032799889.
-
Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016)
0.01
0.010955783 = product of:
0.021911565 = sum of:
0.021911565 = product of:
0.06573469 = sum of:
0.06573469 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06573469 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Legg, C.: Ontologies on the Semantic Web (2007)
0.01
0.009920506 = product of:
0.019841012 = sum of:
0.019841012 = product of:
0.059523035 = sum of:
0.059523035 = weight(_text_:universal in 1979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059523035 = score(doc=1979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.23284946 = fieldWeight in 1979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1979)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As an informational technology, the World Wide Web has enjoyed spectacular success. In just ten years it has transformed the way information is produced, stored, and shared in arenas as diverse as shopping, family photo albums, and high-level academic research. The "Semantic Web" is touted by its developers as equally revolutionary, although it has not yet achieved anything like the Web's exponential uptake. It seeks to transcend a current limitation of the Web - that it largely requires indexing to be accomplished merely on specific character strings. Thus, a person searching for information about "turkey" (the bird) receives from current search engines many irrelevant pages about "Turkey" (the country) and nothing about the Spanish "pavo" even if he or she is a Spanish-speaker able to understand such pages. The Semantic Web vision is to develop technology to facilitate retrieval of information via meanings, not just spellings. For this to be possible, most commentators believe, Semantic Web applications will have to draw on some kind of shared, structured, machine-readable conceptual scheme. Thus, there has been a convergence between the Semantic Web research community and an older tradition with roots in classical Artificial Intelligence (AI) research (sometimes referred to as "knowledge representation") whose goal is to develop a formal ontology. A formal ontology is a machine-readable theory of the most fundamental concepts or "categories" required in order to understand information pertaining to any knowledge domain. A review of the attempts that have been made to realize this goal provides an opportunity to reflect in interestingly concrete ways on various research questions such as the following: - How explicit a machine-understandable theory of meaning is it possible or practical to construct? - How universal a machine-understandable theory of meaning is it possible or practical to construct? - How much (and what kind of) inference support is required to realize a machine-understandable theory of meaning? - What is it for a theory of meaning to be machine-understandable anyway?
-
Isaac, A.; Schlobach, S.; Matthezing, H.; Zinn, C.: Integrated access to cultural heritage resources through representation and alignment of controlled vocabularies (2008)
0.01
0.009920506 = product of:
0.019841012 = sum of:
0.019841012 = product of:
0.059523035 = sum of:
0.059523035 = weight(_text_:universal in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059523035 = score(doc=3398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.23284946 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- This paper is based on a talk given at "Information Access for the Global Community, An International Seminar on the Universal Decimal Classification" held on 4-5 June 2007 in The Hague, The Netherlands. An abstract of this talk will be published in Extensions and Corrections to the UDC, an annual publication of the UDC consortium. Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Digital libraries and the semantic web: context, applications and research".
-
Singh, A.; Sinha, U.; Sharma, D.k.: Semantic Web and data visualization (2020)
0.01
0.009920506 = product of:
0.019841012 = sum of:
0.019841012 = product of:
0.059523035 = sum of:
0.059523035 = weight(_text_:universal in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059523035 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.23284946 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- With the terrific growth of data volume and data being produced every second on millions of devices across the globe, there is a desperate need to manage the unstructured data available on web pages efficiently. Semantic Web or also known as Web of Trust structures the scattered data on the Internet according to the needs of the user. It is an extension of the World Wide Web (WWW) which focuses on manipulating web data on behalf of Humans. Due to the ability of the Semantic Web to integrate data from disparate sources and hence makes it more user-friendly, it is an emerging trend. Tim Berners-Lee first introduced the term Semantic Web and since then it has come a long way to become a more intelligent and intuitive web. Data Visualization plays an essential role in explaining complex concepts in a universal manner through pictorial representation, and the Semantic Web helps in broadening the potential of Data Visualization and thus making it an appropriate combination. The objective of this chapter is to provide fundamental insights concerning the semantic web technologies and in addition to that it also elucidates the issues as well as the solutions regarding the semantic web. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the semantic web architecture in detail while also comparing it with the traditional search system. It classifies the semantic web architecture into three major pillars i.e. RDF, Ontology, and XML. Moreover, it describes different semantic web tools used in the framework and technology. It attempts to illustrate different approaches of the semantic web search engines. Besides stating numerous challenges faced by the semantic web it also illustrates the solutions.
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.01
0.008764626 = product of:
0.017529253 = sum of:
0.017529253 = product of:
0.052587755 = sum of:
0.052587755 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587755 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
-
Eckert, K.: SKOS: eine Sprache für die Übertragung von Thesauri ins Semantic Web (2011)
0.01
0.008764626 = product of:
0.017529253 = sum of:
0.017529253 = product of:
0.052587755 = sum of:
0.052587755 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587755 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 3.2011 19:21:22
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.008764626 = product of:
0.017529253 = sum of:
0.017529253 = product of:
0.052587755 = sum of:
0.052587755 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587755 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003)
0.01
0.0076690475 = product of:
0.015338095 = sum of:
0.015338095 = product of:
0.046014283 = sum of:
0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046014283 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008)
0.01
0.0076690475 = product of:
0.015338095 = sum of:
0.015338095 = product of:
0.046014283 = sum of:
0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046014283 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Schneider, R.: Web 3.0 ante portas? : Integration von Social Web und Semantic Web (2008)
0.01
0.0076690475 = product of:
0.015338095 = sum of:
0.015338095 = product of:
0.046014283 = sum of:
0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046014283 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04851763 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 10:38:28
