-
Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006)
0.06
0.05830004 = sum of:
0.035309322 = product of:
0.10592797 = sum of:
0.10592797 = weight(_text_:objects in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10592797 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.022990717 = product of:
0.045981433 = sum of:
0.045981433 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045981433 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Integrated digital access to multiple collections is a prominent issue for many Cultural Heritage institutions. The metadata describing diverse collections must be interoperable, which requires aligning the controlled vocabularies that are used to annotate objects from these collections. In this paper, we present an experiment where we match the vocabularies of two collections by applying the Knowledge Representation techniques established in recent Semantic Web research. We discuss the steps that are required for such matching, namely formalising the initial resources using Semantic Web languages, and running ontology mapping tools on the resulting representations. In addition, we present a prototype that enables the user to browse the two collections using the obtained alignment while still providing her with the original vocabulary structures.
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Subirats, I.; Prasad, A.R.D.; Keizer, J.; Bagdanov, A.: Implementation of rich metadata formats and demantic tools using DSpace (2008)
0.04
0.03886669 = sum of:
0.023539549 = product of:
0.070618644 = sum of:
0.070618644 = weight(_text_:objects in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070618644 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.015327144 = product of:
0.030654289 = sum of:
0.030654289 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030654289 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This poster explores the customization of DSpace to allow the use of the AGRIS Application Profile metadata standard and the AGROVOC thesaurus. The objective is the adaptation of DSpace, through the least invasive code changes either in the form of plug-ins or add-ons, to the specific needs of the Agricultural Sciences and Technology community. Metadata standards such as AGRIS AP, and Knowledge Organization Systems such as the AGROVOC thesaurus, provide mechanisms for sharing information in a standardized manner by recommending the use of common semantics and interoperable syntax (Subirats et al., 2007). AGRIS AP was created to enhance the description, exchange and subsequent retrieval of agricultural Document-like Information Objects (DLIOs). It is a metadata schema which draws from Metadata standards such as Dublin Core (DC), the Australian Government Locator Service Metadata (AGLS) and the Agricultural Metadata Element Set (AgMES) namespaces. It allows sharing of information across dispersed bibliographic systems (FAO, 2005). AGROVOC68 is a multilingual structured thesaurus covering agricultural and related domains. Its main role is to standardize the indexing process in order to make searching simpler and more efficient. AGROVOC is developed by FAO (Lauser et al., 2006). The customization of the DSpace is taking place in several phases. First, the AGRIS AP metadata schema was mapped onto the metadata DSpace model, with several enhancements implemented to support AGRIS AP elements. Next, AGROVOC will be integrated as a controlled vocabulary accessed through a local SKOS or OWL file. Eventually the system will be configurable to access AGROVOC through local files or remotely via webservices. Finally, spell checking and tooltips will be incorporated in the user interface to support metadata editing. Adapting DSpace to support AGRIS AP and annotation using the semantically-rich AGROVOC thesaurus transform DSpace into a powerful, domain-specific system for annotation and exchange of bibliographic metadata in the agricultural domain.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.03
0.02994594 = product of:
0.05989188 = sum of:
0.05989188 = product of:
0.17967564 = sum of:
0.17967564 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17967564 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.47954592 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007)
0.03
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = product of:
0.107290015 = sum of:
0.107290015 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107290015 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Isaac, A.: Aligning thesauri for an integrated access to Cultural Heritage Resources (2007)
0.02
0.023028266 = product of:
0.04605653 = sum of:
0.04605653 = product of:
0.13816959 = sum of:
0.13816959 = weight(_text_:objects in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13816959 = score(doc=553,freq=10.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.4595864 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Currently, a number of efforts are being carried out to integrate collections from different institutions and containing heterogeneous material. Examples of such projects are The European Library [1] and the Memory of the Netherlands [2]. A crucial point for the success of these is the availability to provide a unified access on top of the different collections, e.g. using one single vocabulary for querying or browsing the objects they contain. This is made difficult by the fact that the objects from different collections are often described using different vocabularies - thesauri, classification schemes - and are therefore not interoperable at the semantic level. To solve this problem, one can turn to semantic links - mappings - between the elements of the different vocabularies. If one knows that a concept C from a vocabulary V is semantically equivalent to a concept to a concept D from vocabulary W, then an appropriate search engine can return all the objects that were indexed against D for a query for objects described using C. We thus have an access to other collections, using a single one vocabulary. This is however an ideal situation, and hard alignment work is required to reach it. Several projects in the past have tried to implement such a solution, like MACS [3] and Renardus [4]. They have demonstrated very interesting results, but also highlighted the difficulty of aligning manually all the different vocabularies involved in practical cases, which sometimes contain hundreds of thousands of concepts. To alleviate this problem, a number of tools have been proposed in order to provide with candidate mappings between two input vocabularies, making alignment a (semi-) automatic task. Recently, the Semantic Web community has produced a lot of these alignment tools'. Several techniques are found, depending on the material they exploit: labels of concepts, structure of vocabularies, collection objects and external knowledge sources. Throughout our presentation, we will present a concrete heterogeneity case where alignment techniques have been applied to build a (pilot) browser, developed in the context of the STITCH project [5]. This browser enables a unified access to two collections of illuminated manuscripts, using the description vocabulary used in the first collection, Mandragore [6], or the one used by the second, Iconclass [7]. In our talk, we will also make the point for using unified representations the vocabulary semantic and lexical information. Additionally to ease the use of the alignment tools that have these vocabularies as input, turning to a standard representation format helps designing applications that are more generic, like the browser we demonstrate. We give pointers to SKOS [8], an open and web-enabled format currently developed by the Semantic Web community.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.022990717 = product of:
0.045981433 = sum of:
0.045981433 = product of:
0.09196287 = sum of:
0.09196287 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09196287 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007)
0.02
0.022990717 = product of:
0.045981433 = sum of:
0.045981433 = product of:
0.09196287 = sum of:
0.09196287 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09196287 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Cahier, J.-P.; Ma, X.; Zaher, L'H.: Document and item-based modeling : a hybrid method for a socio-semantic web (2010)
0.02
0.020597104 = product of:
0.041194208 = sum of:
0.041194208 = product of:
0.123582624 = sum of:
0.123582624 = weight(_text_:objects in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.123582624 = score(doc=62,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the challenges of categorising documents and "items of the world" to promote knowledge sharing in large communities of interest. We present the DOCMA method (Document and Item-based Model for Action) dedicated to end-users who have minimal or no knowledge of information science. Community members can elicit structure and indexed business items stemming from their query including projects, actors, products, places of interest, and geo-situated objects. This hybrid method was applied in a collaborative Web portal in the field of sustainability for the past two years.
-
Cahier, J.-P.; Zaher, L'H.; Isoard , G.: Document et modèle pour l'action, une méthode pour le web socio-sémantique : application à un web 2.0 en développement durable (2010)
0.02
0.020597104 = product of:
0.041194208 = sum of:
0.041194208 = product of:
0.123582624 = sum of:
0.123582624 = weight(_text_:objects in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.123582624 = score(doc=4836,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We present the DOCMA method (DOCument and Model for Action) focused to Socio-Semantic web applications in large communities of interest. DOCMA is dedicated to end-users without any knowledge in Information Science. Community Members can elicit, structure and index shared business items emerging from their inquiry (such as projects, actors, products, geographically situated objects of interest.). We apply DOCMA to an experiment in the field of Sustainable Development: the Cartodd-Map21 collaborative Web portal.
-
Bianchini, C.; Willer, M.: ISBD resource and Its description in the context of the Semantic Web (2014)
0.02
0.020597104 = product of:
0.041194208 = sum of:
0.041194208 = product of:
0.123582624 = sum of:
0.123582624 = weight(_text_:objects in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.123582624 = score(doc=1998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article explores the question "What is an International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) resource in the context of the Semantic Web, and what is the relationship of its description to the linked data?" This question is discussed against the background of the dichotomy between the description and access using the Semantic Web differentiation of the three logical layers: real-world objects, web of data, and special purpose (bibliographic) data. The representation of bibliographic data as linked data is discussed, distinguishing the description of a resource from the iconic/objective and the informational/subjective viewpoints. In the conclusion, the authors give views on possible directions of future development of the ISBD.
-
Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016)
0.02
0.019158931 = product of:
0.038317863 = sum of:
0.038317863 = product of:
0.076635726 = sum of:
0.076635726 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076635726 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Devedzic, V.: Semantic Web and education (2006)
0.02
0.017654661 = product of:
0.035309322 = sum of:
0.035309322 = product of:
0.10592797 = sum of:
0.10592797 = weight(_text_:objects in 5995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10592797 = score(doc=5995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5995)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The first section of "Semantic Web and Education" surveys the basic aspects and features of the Semantic Web. After this basic review, the book turns its focus to its primary topic of how Semantic Web developments can be used to build attractive and more successful education applications. The book analytically discusses the technical areas of architecture, metadata, learning objects, software engineering trends, and more. Integrated with these technical topics are the examinations of learning-oriented topics such as learner modeling, collaborative learning, learning management, learning communities, ontological engineering of web-based learning, and related topics. The result is a thorough and highly useful presentation on the confluence of the technical aspects of the Semantic Web and the field of Education or the art of teaching. The book will be of considerable interest to researchers and students in the fields Information Systems, Computer Science, and Education.
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.02
0.015327144 = product of:
0.030654289 = sum of:
0.030654289 = product of:
0.061308578 = sum of:
0.061308578 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061308578 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
-
Eckert, K.: SKOS: eine Sprache für die Übertragung von Thesauri ins Semantic Web (2011)
0.02
0.015327144 = product of:
0.030654289 = sum of:
0.030654289 = product of:
0.061308578 = sum of:
0.061308578 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061308578 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 3.2011 19:21:22
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.02
0.015327144 = product of:
0.030654289 = sum of:
0.030654289 = product of:
0.061308578 = sum of:
0.061308578 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061308578 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Call, A.; Gottlob, G.; Pieris, A.: ¬The return of the entity-relationship model : ontological query answering (2012)
0.01
0.014712218 = product of:
0.029424436 = sum of:
0.029424436 = product of:
0.08827331 = sum of:
0.08827331 = weight(_text_:objects in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08827331 = score(doc=434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Entity-Relationship (ER) model is a fundamental formalism for conceptual modeling in database design; it was introduced by Chen in his milestone paper, and it is now widely used, being flexible and easily understood by practitioners. With the rise of the Semantic Web, conceptual modeling formalisms have gained importance again as ontology formalisms, in the Semantic Web parlance. Ontologies and conceptual models are aimed at representing, rather than the structure of data, the domain of interest, that is, the fragment of the real world that is being represented by the data and the schema. A prominent formalism for modeling ontologies are Description Logics (DLs), which are decidable fragments of first-order logic, particularly suitable for ontological modeling and querying. In particular, DL ontologies are sets of assertions describing sets of objects and (usually binary) relations among such sets, exactly in the same fashion as the ER model. Recently, research on DLs has been focusing on the problem of answering queries under ontologies, that is, given a query q, an instance B, and an ontology X, answering q under B and amounts to compute the answers that are logically entailed from B by using the assertions of X. In this context, where data size is usually large, a central issue the data complexity of query answering, i.e., the computational complexity with respect to the data set B only, while the ontology X and the query q are fixed.
-
Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003)
0.01
0.013411252 = product of:
0.026822504 = sum of:
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053645007 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008)
0.01
0.013411252 = product of:
0.026822504 = sum of:
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053645007 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Schneider, R.: Web 3.0 ante portas? : Integration von Social Web und Semantic Web (2008)
0.01
0.013411252 = product of:
0.026822504 = sum of:
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053645007 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 10:38:28
-
Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval
0.01
0.013411252 = product of:
0.026822504 = sum of:
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053645007 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 2.2011 17:35:22
