Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007)
0.01
0.011891923 = product of:
0.04756769 = sum of:
0.04756769 = weight(_text_:description in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04756769 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.20547508 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Therefore our main research questions are as follows: - Is it possible to discover regular patterns in tag usage and to establish a stable category model? - Does a specific tagging language comparable to internet slang or chatspeak evolve? - How do social tags differ from traditional (author / expert) keywords? - To what degree are social tags taken from or findable in the full text of the tagged resource? - Do tags in a research literature context go beyond simple content description (e.g. tags indicating time or task-related information, cf. Kipp et al. 2006)?
