-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.08
0.081808284 = product of:
0.122712426 = sum of:
0.095772296 = product of:
0.2873169 = sum of:
0.2873169 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2873169 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43819162 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.02694013 = product of:
0.05388026 = sum of:
0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05388026 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Nicholson, D.: Help us make HILT's terminology services useful in your information service (2008)
0.06
0.06062308 = product of:
0.09093462 = sum of:
0.021553185 = weight(_text_:information in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021553185 = score(doc=3654,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
0.06938143 = product of:
0.13876286 = sum of:
0.13876286 = weight(_text_:services in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13876286 = score(doc=3654,freq=26.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.73126525 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The JISC-funded HILT project is looking to make contact with staff in information services or projects interested in helping it test and refine its developing terminology services. The project is currently working to create pilot web services that will deliver machine-readable terminology and cross-terminology mappings data likely to be useful to information services wishing to extend or enhance the efficacy of their subject search or browse services. Based on SRW/U, SOAP, and SKOS, the HILT facilities, when fully operational, will permit such services to improve their own subject search and browse mechanisms by using HILT data in a fashion transparent to their users. On request, HILT will serve up machine-processable data on individual subject schemes (broader terms, narrower terms, hierarchy information, preferred and non-preferred terms, and so on) and interoperability data (usually intellectual or automated mappings between schemes, but the architecture allows for the use of other methods) - data that can be used to enhance user services. The project is also developing an associated toolkit that will help service technical staff to embed HILT-related functionality into their services. The primary aim is to serve JISC funded information services or services at JISC institutions, but information services outside the JISC domain may also find the proposed services useful and wish to participate in the test and refine process.
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.; Houghton, A.; Childress, E.: Web services for controlled vocabularies (2006)
0.04
0.039807405 = product of:
0.059711106 = sum of:
0.008799051 = weight(_text_:information in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008799051 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.050912056 = product of:
0.10182411 = sum of:
0.10182411 = weight(_text_:services in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10182411 = score(doc=1171,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.536602 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Amid the debates about whether folksonomies will supplant controlled vocabularies and whether the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system have outlived their usefulness, libraries, museums and other organizations continue to require efficient, effective access to controlled vocabularies for creating consistent metadata for their collections . In this article, we present an approach for using Web services to interact with controlled vocabularies. Services are implemented within a service-oriented architecture (SOA) framework. SOA is an approach to distributed computing where services are loosely coupled and discoverable on the network. A set of experimental services for controlled vocabularies is provided through the Microsoft Office (MS) Research task pane (a small window or sidebar that opens up next to Internet Explorer (IE) and other Microsoft Office applications). The research task pane is a built-in feature of IE when MS Office 2003 is loaded. The research pane enables a user to take advantage of a number of research and reference services accessible over the Internet. Web browsers, such as Mozilla Firefox and Opera, also provide sidebars which could be used to deliver similar, loosely-coupled Web services.
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 33(2006) no.5, S.xx-xx
-
Sieglerschmidt, J.: Convergence of internet services in the cultural heritage sector : the long way to common vocabularies, metadata formats, ontologies (2008)
0.03
0.031134581 = product of:
0.04670187 = sum of:
0.023610333 = weight(_text_:information in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023610333 = score(doc=1686,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
0.023091538 = product of:
0.046183076 = sum of:
0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046183076 = score(doc=1686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Since several years it has been observed that information offered by different knowledge producing institutions on the internet is more and more interlinked. This tendency will increase, because the fragmented information offers on the internet make the retrieval of information difficult as even impossible. At the same time the quantity of information offered on the internet grows exponentially in Europe - and elsewhere - due to many digitization projects. Insofar as funding institutions base the acceptance of projects on the observation of certain documentation standards the knowledge created will be retrievable and will remain so for a longer time. Otherwise the retrieval of information will become a matter of chance due to the limits of fragmented, knowledge producing social groups.
-
Wake, S.; Nicholson, D.: HILT: High-Level Thesaurus Project : building consensus for interoperable subject access across communities (2001)
0.03
0.031076772 = product of:
0.046615157 = sum of:
0.012192324 = weight(_text_:information in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012192324 = score(doc=1224,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
0.034422833 = product of:
0.06884567 = sum of:
0.06884567 = weight(_text_:services in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06884567 = score(doc=1224,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.36280918 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article provides an overview of the work carried out by the HILT Project <http://hilt.cdlr.strath.ac.uk> in making recommendations towards interoperable subject access, or cross-searching and browsing distributed services amongst the archives, libraries, museums and electronic services sectors. The article details consensus achieved at the 19 June 2001 HILT Workshop and discusses the HILT Stakeholder Survey. In 1999 Péter Jascó wrote that "savvy searchers" are asking for direction. Three years later the scenario he describes, that of searchers cross-searching databases where the subject vocabulary used in each case is different, still rings true. Jascó states that, in many cases, databases do not offer the necessary aids required to use the "preferred terms of the subject-controlled vocabulary". The databases to which Jascó refers are Dialog and DataStar. However, the situation he describes applies as well to the area that HILT is researching: that of cross-searching and browsing by subject across databases and catalogues in archives, libraries, museums and online information services. So how does a user access information on a particular subject when it is indexed across a multitude of services under different, but quite often similar, subject terms? Also, if experienced searchers are having problems, what about novice searchers? As information professionals, it is our role to investigate such problems and recommend solutions. Although there is no hard empirical evidence one way or another, HILT participants agree that the problem for users attempting to search across databases is real. There is a strong likelihood that users are disadvantaged by the use of different subject terminology combined with a multitude of different practices taking place within the archive, library, museums and online communities. Arguably, failure to address this problem of interoperability undermines the value of cross-searching and browsing facilities, and wastes public money because relevant resources are 'hidden' from searchers. HILT is charged with analysing this broad problem through qualitative methods, with the main aim of presenting a set of recommendations on how to make it easier to cross-search and browse distributed services. Because this is a very large problem composed of many strands, HILT recognizes that any proposed solutions must address a host of issues. Recommended solutions must be affordable, sustainable, politically acceptable, useful, future-proof and international in scope. It also became clear to the HILT team that progress toward finding solutions to the interoperability problem could only be achieved through direct dialogue with other parties keen to solve this problem, and that the problem was as much about consensus building as it was about finding a solution. This article describes how HILT approached the cross-searching problem; how it investigated the nature of the problem, detailing results from the HILT Stakeholder Survey; and how it achieved consensus through the recent HILT Workshop.
-
Nicholson, D.; Wake, S.: HILT: subject retrieval in a distributed environment (2003)
0.03
0.028810155 = product of:
0.04321523 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 3810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=3810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3810)
0.032656368 = product of:
0.065312736 = sum of:
0.065312736 = weight(_text_:services in 3810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065312736 = score(doc=3810,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.344191 = fieldWeight in 3810, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3810)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The HILT High Level Thesaurus Project aims to study and report an the problern of cross-searching and browsing by subject across a range of communities, services, and service or resource types in the UK given the wide range of subject schemes and associated practices in place in the communities in question (Libraries, Museums, Archives, and Internet Services) and taking the international context into consideration. The paper reports an progess to date, focusing particularly an the inter-community consensus reached at a recent Stakeholder Workshop.
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006)
0.03
0.028083868 = product of:
0.042125802 = sum of:
0.021117723 = weight(_text_:information in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021117723 = score(doc=4820,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.02100808 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04201616 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
- Date
- 3.12.2016 18:39:22
-
Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000)
0.02
0.024552068 = product of:
0.0368281 = sum of:
0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012318673 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.024509426 = product of:
0.049018852 = sum of:
0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049018852 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- XML will have a profound impact on the way data is exchanged on the Internet. An important feature of this language is the separation of content from presentation, which makes it easier to select and/or reformat the data. However, due to the likelihood of numerous industry and domain specific DTDs, those who wish to integrate information will still be faced with the problem of semantic interoperability. In this paper we discuss why this problem is not solved by XML, and then discuss why the Resource Description Framework is only a partial solution. We then present the SHOE language, which we feel has many of the features necessary to enable a semantic web, and describe an existing set of tools that make it easy to use the language.
- Date
- 11. 5.2013 19:22:18
-
Levergood, B.; Farrenkopf, S.; Frasnelli, E.: ¬The specification of the language of the field and interoperability : cross-language access to catalogues and online libraries (CACAO) (2008)
0.02
0.023960378 = product of:
0.035940565 = sum of:
0.014932485 = weight(_text_:information in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014932485 = score(doc=2646,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.02100808 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04201616 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The CACAO Project (Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries) has been designed to implement natural language processing and cross-language information retrieval techniques to provide cross-language access to information in libraries, a critical issue in the linguistically diverse European Union. This project report addresses two metadata-related challenges for the library community in this context: "false friends" (identical words having different meanings in different languages) and term ambiguity. The possible solutions involve enriching the metadata with attributes specifying language or the source authority file, or associating potential search terms to classes in a classification system. The European Library will evaluate an early implementation of this work in late 2008.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.: Reducing semantic complexity in distributed digital libraries : Treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking (2008)
0.02
0.022988904 = product of:
0.034483355 = sum of:
0.015240406 = weight(_text_:information in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015240406 = score(doc=1909,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
0.019242948 = product of:
0.038485896 = sum of:
0.038485896 = weight(_text_:services in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038485896 = score(doc=1909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The general science portal "vascoda" merges structured, high-quality information collections from more than 40 providers on the basis of search engine technology (FAST) and a concept which treats semantic heterogeneity between different controlled vocabularies. First experiences with the portal show some weaknesses of this approach which come out in most metadata-driven Digital Libraries (DLs) or subject specific portals. The purpose of the paper is to propose models to reduce the semantic complexity in heterogeneous DLs. The aim is to introduce value-added services (treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking) that gain a certain quality in DLs if they are combined with heterogeneity components established in the project "Competence Center Modeling and Treatment of Semantic Heterogeneity". Design/methodology/approach - Two methods, which are derived from scientometrics and network analysis, will be implemented with the objective to re-rank result sets by the following structural properties: the ranking of the results by core journals (so-called Bradfordizing) and ranking by centrality of authors in co-authorship networks. Findings - The methods, which will be implemented, focus on the query and on the result side of a search and are designed to positively influence each other. Conceptually, they will improve the search quality and guarantee that the most relevant documents in result sets will be ranked higher. Originality/value - The central impact of the paper focuses on the integration of three structural value-adding methods, which aim at reducing the semantic complexity represented in distributed DLs at several stages in the information retrieval process: query construction, search and ranking and re-ranking.
- Theme
- Information Gateway
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Toward terminology services : experiences with a pilot Web service thesaurus browser (2006)
0.02
0.022468705 = product of:
0.033703055 = sum of:
0.007039241 = weight(_text_:information in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007039241 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.026663814 = product of:
0.053327627 = sum of:
0.053327627 = weight(_text_:services in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053327627 = score(doc=1955,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2810308 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Dublin Core recommends controlled terminology for the subject of a resource. Knowledge organization systems (KOS), such as classifications, gazetteers, taxonomies and thesauri, provide controlled vocabularies that organize and structure concepts for indexing, classifying, browsing and search. For example, a thesaurus employs a set of standard semantic relationships (ISO 2788, ISO 5964), and major thesauri have a large entry vocabulary of terms considered equivalent for retrieval purposes. Many KOS have been made available for Web-based access. However, they are often not fully integrated into indexing and search systems and the full potential for networked and programmatic access remains untapped. The lack of standardized access and interchange formats impedes wider use of KOS resources. We developed a Web demonstrator (www.comp.glam.ac.uk/~FACET/webdemo/) for the FACET project (www.comp.glam.ac.uk/~facet/facetproject.html) that explored thesaurus-based query expansion with the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A Web demonstrator was implemented via Active Server Pages (ASP) with server-side scripting and compiled server-side components for database access, and cascading style sheets for presentation. The browser-based interactive interface permits dynamic control of query term expansion. However, being based on a custom thesaurus representation and API, the techniques cannot be applied directly to thesauri in other formats on the Web. General programmatic access requires commonly agreed protocols, for example, building on Web and Grid services. The development of common KOS representation formats and service protocols are closely linked. Linda Hill and colleagues argued in 2002 for a general KOS service protocol from which protocols for specific types of KOS can be derived. Thus, in the future, a combination of thesaurus and query protocols might permit a thesaurus to be used with a choice of search tools on various kinds of databases. Service-oriented architectures bring an opportunity for moving toward a clearer separation of interface components from the underlying data sources. In our view, basing distributed protocol services on the atomic elements of thesaurus data structures and relationships is not necessarily the best approach because client operations that require multiple client-server calls would carry too much overhead. This would limit the interfaces that could be offered by applications following such a protocol. Advanced interactive interfaces require protocols that group primitive thesaurus data elements (via their relationships) into composites to achieve reasonable response.
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 33(2006) no.5, S.xx-xx
-
Nicholson, D.M.; Dawson, A.; Shiri, A.: HILT: a pilot terminology mapping service with a DDC spine (2006)
0.02
0.0224336 = product of:
0.0336504 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
0.023091538 = product of:
0.046183076 = sum of:
0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046183076 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The role of DDC in the ongoing HILT (High-level Thesaurus) project is discussed. A phased initiative, funded by JISC in the UK, HILT addresses an issue of likely interest to anyone serving users wishing to cross-search or cross-browse groups of networked information services, whether at regional, national or international level - the problem of subject-based retrieval from multiple sources using different subject schemes for resource description. Although all three phases of HILT to date are covered, the primary concern is with the subject interoperability solution piloted in phase II, and with the use of DDC as a spine in that approach.
-
Zeng, M.L.; Chan, L.M.: Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems (2004)
0.02
0.0224336 = product of:
0.0336504 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=2224,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
0.023091538 = product of:
0.046183076 = sum of:
0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046183076 = score(doc=2224,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This report analyzes the methodologies used in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems (KOS) such as controlled vocabularies and classification schemes that present the organized interpretation of knowledge structures. The development and trends of KOS are discussed with reference to the online era and the Internet era. Selected current projects and activities addressing KOS interoperability issues are reviewed in terms of the languages and structures involved. The methodological analysis encompasses both conventional and new methods that have proven to be widely accepted, including derivation/modeling, translation/adaptation, satellite and leaf node linking, direct mapping, co-occurrence mapping, switching, linking through a temporary union list, and linking through a thesaurus server protocol. Methods used in link storage and management, as weIl as common issues regarding mapping and methodological options, are also presented. It is concluded that interoperability of KOS is an unavoidable issue and process in today's networked environment. There have been and will be many multilingual products and services, with many involving various structured systems. Results from recent efforts are encouraging.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.5, S.377-395
-
McCulloch, E.; Macgregor, G.: Analysis of equivalence mapping for terminology services (2008)
0.02
0.0224336 = product of:
0.0336504 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
0.023091538 = product of:
0.046183076 = sum of:
0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046183076 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 34(2008) no.1, S.70-92
-
Garcia Marco, F.J.: Compatibility & heterogeneity in knowledge organization : some reflections around a case study in the field of consumer information (2008)
0.02
0.021831427 = product of:
0.03274714 = sum of:
0.015240406 = weight(_text_:information in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015240406 = score(doc=1678,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
0.017506734 = product of:
0.035013467 = sum of:
0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035013467 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A case study in compatibility and heterogeneity of knowledge organization (KO) systems and processes is presented. It is based in the experience of the author in the field of information for consumer protection, a good example of the emerging transdisciplinary applied social sciences. The activities and knowledge organization problems and solutions of the Aragonian Consumers' Information and Documentation Centre are described and analyzed. Six assertions can be concluded: a) heterogeneity and compatibility are certainly an inherent problem in knowledge organization and also in practical domains; b) knowledge organization is also a social task, not only a lögical one; c) knowledge organization is affected by economical and efficiency considerations; d) knowledge organization is at the heart of Knowledge Management; e) identifying and maintaining the focus in interdisciplinary fields is a must; f the different knowledge organization tools of a institution must be considered as an integrated system, pursuing a unifying model.
- Date
- 16. 3.2008 18:22:50
-
Lauser, B.; Johannsen, G.; Caracciolo, C.; Hage, W.R. van; Keizer, J.; Mayr, P.: Comparing human and automatic thesaurus mapping approaches in the agricultural domain (2008)
0.02
0.01996698 = product of:
0.02995047 = sum of:
0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012443737 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.017506734 = product of:
0.035013467 = sum of:
0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035013467 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization systems (KOS), like thesauri and other controlled vocabularies, are used to provide subject access to information systems across the web. Due to the heterogeneity of these systems, mapping between vocabularies becomes crucial for retrieving relevant information. However, mapping thesauri is a laborious task, and thus big efforts are being made to automate the mapping process. This paper examines two mapping approaches involving the agricultural thesaurus AGROVOC, one machine-created and one human created. We are addressing the basic question "What are the pros and cons of human and automatic mapping and how can they complement each other?" By pointing out the difficulties in specific cases or groups of cases and grouping the sample into simple and difficult types of mappings, we show the limitations of current automatic methods and come up with some basic recommendations on what approach to use when.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008)
0.02
0.01753719 = product of:
0.026305784 = sum of:
0.008799051 = weight(_text_:information in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008799051 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.017506734 = product of:
0.035013467 = sum of:
0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035013467 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.02
0.01753719 = product of:
0.026305784 = sum of:
0.008799051 = weight(_text_:information in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008799051 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.017506734 = product of:
0.035013467 = sum of:
0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035013467 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Die Verwendung von Erschließungsinstrumenten zur Beschreibung von Informationsressourcen kann Effizienz und Effektivität thematischer Recherchen wesentlich steigern: standardisierte Begriffe unterstützen Recall und Precision begrifflicher Suchen; Ausweisung von Relationen bietet die Grundlage für explorative Suchprozesse. Eine zusätzliche Steigerung der Funktionalitäten des Retrievals kann mittels einer Ausdifferenzierung und Spezifizierung der in Normdaten enthaltenen semantischen Informationen erreicht werden, die über die in Thesauri und Klassifikationen verbreiteten grundlegenden Relationstypen (äquivalent, hierarchisch, assoziativ) hinausgehen. In modernen Informationsräumen, in denen Daten verschiedener Institutionen über eine Plattform zeit- und ortsunabhängig zugänglich gemacht werden, können einzelne Wissenssysteme indes nur unzureichend das Information Retrieval unterstützen. Zu unterschiedlich sind die für thematische Suchanfragen relevanten Indexierungsdaten. Eine Verbesserung kann mittels Herstellung von Interoperabilität zwischen den verschiedenen Dokumentationssprachen erreicht werden. Im Vortrag wird dargelegt, in welcher Art und Weise die in Wissenssystemen enthaltenen semantischen Informationen zur Unterstützung thematischer Recherchen optimiert werden können und inwiefern Interoperabilität zwischen Systemen geschaffen werden kann, die gleichwertige Funktionalitäten in heterogenen Informationsräumen gewährleisten. In diesem Zusammenhang wird auch auf aktuelle Mappingprojekte wie das DFG-Projekt CrissCross oder das RESEDA-Projekt, welches sich mit den Möglichkeiten der semantischen Anreicherung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen befasst, eingegangen.
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Burstein, M.; McDermott, D.V.: Ontology translation for interoperability among Semantic Web services (2005)
0.01
0.014342847 = product of:
0.04302854 = sum of:
0.04302854 = product of:
0.08605708 = sum of:
0.08605708 = weight(_text_:services in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08605708 = score(doc=2661,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.45351148 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Research on semantic web services promises greater interoperability among software agents and web services by enabling content-based automated service discovery and interaction and by utilizing. Although this is to be based on use of shared ontologies published on the semantic web, services produced and described by different developers may well use different, perhaps partly overlapping, sets of ontologies. Interoperability will depend on ontology mappings and architectures supporting the associated translation processes. The question we ask is, does the traditional approach of introducing mediator agents to translate messages between requestors and services work in such an open environment? This article reviews some of the processing assumptions that were made in the development of the semantic web service modeling ontology OWL-S and argues that, as a practical matter, the translation function cannot always be isolated in mediators. Ontology mappings need to be published on the semantic web just as ontologies themselves are. The translation for service discovery, service process model interpretation, task negotiation, service invocation, and response interpretation may then be distributed to various places in the architecture so that translation can be done in the specific goal-oriented informational contexts of the agents performing these processes. We present arguments for assigning translation responsibility to particular agents in the cases of service invocation, response translation, and match- making.
-
Woldering, B.: ¬Die Europäische Digitale Bibliothek nimmt Gestalt an (2007)
0.01
0.014029752 = product of:
0.021044629 = sum of:
0.007039241 = weight(_text_:information in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007039241 = score(doc=2439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
0.014005387 = product of:
0.028010774 = sum of:
0.028010774 = weight(_text_:22 in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028010774 = score(doc=2439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 19:10:56
- Theme
- Information Gateway
