Search (68 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.10 
    0.10138532 = product of:
  0.15207797 = sum of:
    0.015240406 = weight(_text_:information in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015240406 = score(doc=4066,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
    0.13683757 = sum of:
      0.10182411 = weight(_text_:services in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10182411 = score(doc=4066,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.536602 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
      0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035013467 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The focus of this paper is the provision of terminology- and classification-based terminologies interoperability data via web services, initially using interoperability data based on the use of a Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) spine, but with an aim to explore other possibilities in time, including the use of other spines. The High-Level Thesaurus Project (HILT) Phase IV developed pilot web services based on SRW/U, SOAP, and SKOS to deliver machine-readable terminology and crossterminology mappings data likely to be useful to information services wishing to enhance their subject search or browse services. It also developed an associated toolkit to help information services technical staff to embed HILT-related functionality within service interfaces. Several UK information services have created illustrative user interface enhancements using HILT functionality and these will demonstrate what is possible. HILT currently has the following subject schemes mounted and available: DDC, CAB, GCMD, HASSET, IPSV, LCSH, MeSH, NMR, SCAS, UNESCO, and AAT. It also has high level mappings between some of these schemes and DDC and some deeper pilot mappings available.
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48
  2. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.08 
    0.081507586 = product of:
  0.122261375 = sum of:
    0.014932485 = weight(_text_:information in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014932485 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
    0.10732889 = sum of:
      0.065312736 = weight(_text_:services in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.065312736 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.344191 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04201616 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Terminology registries (TRs) are a crucial element of the infrastructure required for resource discovery services, digital libraries, Linked Data, and semantic interoperability generally. They can make the content of knowledge organization systems (KOS) available both for human and machine access. The paper describes the attributes and functionality for a TR, based on a review of published literature, existing TRs, and a survey of experts. A domain model based on user tasks is constructed and a set of core metadata elements for use in TRs is proposed. Ideally, the TR should allow searching as well as browsing for a KOS, matching a user's search while also providing information about existing terminology services, accessible to both humans and machines. The issues surrounding metadata for KOS are also discussed, together with the rationale for different aspects and the importance of a core set of KOS metadata for future machine-based access; a possible core set of metadata elements is proposed. This is dealt with in terms of practical experience and in relation to the Dublin Core Application Profile.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1901-1916
  3. Dunsire, G.: Enhancing information services using machine-to-machine terminology services (2011) 0.06 
    0.059132077 = product of:
  0.08869811 = sum of:
    0.017421233 = weight(_text_:information in 1805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017421233 = score(doc=1805,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1805, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1805)
    0.07127688 = product of:
      0.14255376 = sum of:
        0.14255376 = weight(_text_:services in 1805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14255376 = score(doc=1805,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.7512428 = fieldWeight in 1805, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1805)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper describes the basic concepts of terminology services and their role in information retrieval interfaces. Terminology services are consumed by other software applications using machine-to-machine protocols, rather than directly by end-users. An example of a terminology service is the pilot developed by the High Level Thesaurus (HILT) project which has successfully demonstrated its potential for enhancing subject retrieval in operational services. Examples of enhancements in three such services are given. The paper discusses the future development of terminology services in relation to the Semantic Web.
  4. Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011) 0.04 
    0.041462075 = product of:
  0.06219311 = sum of:
    0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010558861 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
    0.05163425 = product of:
      0.1032685 = sum of:
        0.1032685 = weight(_text_:services in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1032685 = score(doc=649,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.5442138 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper is about a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of science and the usage of these insights for compensating the typical problems that arises in metadata-driven Digital Libraries. Three science model driven retrieval services are presented: co-word analysis based query expansion, re-ranking via Bradfordizing and author centrality. The services are evaluated with relevance assessments from which two important implications emerge: (1) precision values of the retrieval services are the same or better than the tf-idf retrieval baseline and (2) each service retrieved a disjoint set of documents. The different services each favor quite other - but still relevant - documents than pure term-frequency based rankings. The proposed models and derived retrieval services therefore open up new viewpoints on the scientific knowledge space and provide an alternative framework to structure scholarly information systems.
  5. Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016) 0.04 
    0.03507438 = product of:
  0.052611567 = sum of:
    0.017598102 = weight(_text_:information in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017598102 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
    0.035013467 = product of:
      0.070026934 = sum of:
        0.070026934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070026934 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  6. Coen, G.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Toward better interoperability of the NARCIS classification (2019) 0.03 
    0.02719742 = product of:
  0.04079613 = sum of:
    0.021553185 = weight(_text_:information in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021553185 = score(doc=5399,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
    0.019242948 = product of:
      0.038485896 = sum of:
        0.038485896 = weight(_text_:services in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038485896 = score(doc=5399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Research information can be useful to science stake-holders for discovering, evaluating and planning research activities. In the Netherlands, the institute tasked with the stewardship of national research information is DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services). DANS is the home of NARCIS, the national portal for research information, which uses a similarly named national research classification. The NARCIS Classification assigns symbols to represent the knowledge bases of contributing scholars. A recent research stream in knowledge organization known as comparative classification uses two or more classifications experimentally to generate empirical evidence about coverage of conceptual content, population of the classes, and economy of classification. This paper builds on that research in order to further understand the comparative impact of the NARCIS Classification alongside a classification designed specifically for information resources. Our six cases come from the DANS project Knowledge Organization System Observatory (KOSo), which itself is classified using the Information Coding Classification (ICC) created in 1982 by Ingetraut Dahlberg. ICC is considered to have the merits of universality, faceting, and a top-down approach. Results are exploratory, indicating that both classifications provide fairly precise coverage. The inflexibility of the NARCIS Classification makes it difficult to express complex concepts. The meta-ontological, epistemic stance of the ICC is apparent in all aspects of this study. Using the two together in the DANS KOS Observatory will provide users with both clarity of scientific positioning and ontological relativity.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: Research Information Systems and Science Classifications; including papers from "Trajectories for Research: Fathoming the Promise of the NARCIS Classification," 27-28 September 2018, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  7. Kutz, O.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Lange, C.: Towards a standard for heterogeneous ontology integration and interoperability (2011) 0.03 
    0.026172534 = product of:
  0.0392588 = sum of:
    0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012318673 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
    0.02694013 = product of:
      0.05388026 = sum of:
        0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05388026 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Even though ontologies are widely being used to enable interoperability in information-rich endeavours, there is currently no united framework for ontology interoperability itself. Surprisingly little of the state of the art in modularity and structuring, e.g. in software engineering, has been applied to ontology engineering so far. However, application areas like Ambient Assisted Living (AAL), which require synchronization and orchestration of interoperable services, are in dire need of safe and secure ontology interoperability. OntoIOp (Ontology Integration and Interoperability), a new international standard proposed in ISO/TC 37/SC 3, aims at filling this gap.
  8. Takhirov, N.; Aalberg, T.; Duchateau, F.; Zumer, M.: FRBR-ML: a FRBR-based framework for semantic interoperability (2012) 0.03 
    0.025904093 = product of:
  0.038856138 = sum of:
    0.012192324 = weight(_text_:information in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012192324 = score(doc=134,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
    0.026663814 = product of:
      0.053327627 = sum of:
        0.053327627 = weight(_text_:services in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053327627 = score(doc=134,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.2810308 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Metadata related to cultural items such as literature, music and movies is a valuable resource that is currently exploited in many applications and services based on semantic web technologies. A vast amount of such information has been created by memory institutions in the last decades using different standard or ad hoc schemas, and a main challenge is to make this legacy data accessible as reusable semantic data. On one hand, this is a syntactic problem that can be solved by transforming to formats that are compatible with the tools and services used for semantic aware services. On the other hand, this is a semantic problem. Simply transforming from one format to another does not automatically enable semantic interoperability and legacy data often needs to be reinterpreted as well as transformed. The conceptual model in the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, initially developed as a conceptual framework for library standards and systems, is a major step towards a shared semantic model of the products of artistic and intellectual endeavor of mankind. The model is generally accepted as sufficiently generic to serve as a conceptual framework for a broad range of cultural heritage metadata. Unfortunately, the existing large body of legacy data makes a transition to this model difficult. For instance, most bibliographic data is still only available in various MARC-based formats which is hard to render into reusable and meaningful semantic data. Making legacy bibliographic data accessible as semantic data is a complex problem that includes interpreting and transforming the information. In this article, we present our work on transforming and enhancing legacy bibliographic information into a representation where the structure and semantics of the FRBR model is explicit.
  9. Kempf, A.O.; Zapilko, B.: Normdatenpflege in Zeiten der Automatisierung : Erstellung und Evaluation automatisch aufgebauter Thesaurus-Crosskonkordanzen (2013) 0.02 
    0.021044627 = product of:
  0.03156694 = sum of:
    0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010558861 = score(doc=1021,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
    0.02100808 = product of:
      0.04201616 = sum of:
        0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04201616 = score(doc=1021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    18. 8.2013 12:53:22
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.4, S.199-208
  10. Gracy, K.F.; Zeng, M.L.; Skirvin, L.: Exploring methods to improve access to Music resources by aligning library Data with Linked Data : a report of methodologies and preliminary findings (2013) 0.02 
    0.01746514 = product of:
  0.026197711 = sum of:
    0.012192324 = weight(_text_:information in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012192324 = score(doc=1096,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
    0.014005387 = product of:
      0.028010774 = sum of:
        0.028010774 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028010774 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    As a part of a research project aiming to connect library data to the unfamiliar data sets available in the Linked Data (LD) community's CKAN Data Hub (thedatahub.org), this project collected, analyzed, and mapped properties used in describing and accessing music recordings, scores, and music-related information used by selected music LD data sets, library catalogs, and various digital collections created by libraries and other cultural institutions. This article reviews current efforts to connect music data through the Semantic Web, with an emphasis on the Music Ontology (MO) and ontology alignment approaches; it also presents a framework for understanding the life cycle of a musical work, focusing on the central activities of composition, performance, and use. The project studied metadata structures and properties of 11 music-related LD data sets and mapped them to the descriptions commonly used in the library cataloging records for sound recordings and musical scores (including MARC records and their extended schema.org markup), and records from 20 collections of digitized music recordings and scores (featuring a variety of metadata structures). The analysis resulted in a set of crosswalks and a unified crosswalk that aligns these properties. The paper reports on detailed methodologies used and discusses research findings and issues. Topics of particular concern include (a) the challenges of mapping between the overgeneralized descriptions found in library data and the specialized, music-oriented properties present in the LD data sets; (b) the hidden information and access points in library data; and (c) the potential benefits of enriching library data through the mapping of properties found in library catalogs to similar properties used by LD data sets.
    Date
    28.10.2013 17:22:17
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.10, S.2078-2099
  11. Golub, K.: Subject access in Swedish discovery services (2018) 0.01 
    0.012828632 = product of:
  0.038485896 = sum of:
    0.038485896 = product of:
      0.07697179 = sum of:
        0.07697179 = weight(_text_:services in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07697179 = score(doc=4379,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.405633 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    While support for subject searching has been traditionally advocated for in library catalogs, often in the form of a catalog objective to find everything that a library has on a certain topic, research has shown that subject access has not been satisfactory. Many existing online catalogs and discovery services do not seem to make good use of the intellectual effort invested into assigning controlled subject index terms and classes. For example, few support hierarchical browsing of classification schemes and other controlled vocabularies with hierarchical structures, few provide end-user-friendly options to choose a more specific concept to increase precision, a broader concept or related concepts to increase recall, to disambiguate homonyms, or to find which term is best used to name a concept. Optimum subject access in library catalogs and discovery services is analyzed from the perspective of earlier research as well as contemporary conceptual models and cataloguing codes. Eighteen proposed features of what this should entail in practice are drawn. In an exploratory qualitative study, the three most common discovery services used in Swedish academic libraries are analyzed against these features. In line with previous research, subject access in contemporary interfaces is demonstrated to less than optimal. This is in spite of the fact that individual collections have been indexed with controlled vocabularies and a significant number of controlled vocabularies have been mapped to each other and are available in interoperable standards. Strategic action is proposed to build research-informed (inter)national standards and guidelines.
  12. Lange, C.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Kutz, O.: Making heterogeneous ontologies interoperable through standardisation : a Meta Ontology Language to be standardised: Ontology Integration and Interoperability (OntoIOp) (2011) 0.01 
    0.010885457 = product of:
  0.032656368 = sum of:
    0.032656368 = product of:
      0.065312736 = sum of:
        0.065312736 = weight(_text_:services in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065312736 = score(doc=50,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.344191 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Assistive technology, especially for persons with disabilities, increasingly relies on electronic communication among users, between users and their devices, and among these devices. Making such ICT accessible and inclusive often requires remedial programming, which tends to be costly or even impossible. We, therefore, aim at more interoperable devices, services accessing these devices, and content delivered by these services, at the levels of 1. data and metadata, 2. datamodels and data modelling methods and 3. metamodels as well as a meta ontology language. Even though ontologies are widely being used to enable content interoperability, there is currently no unified framework for ontology interoperability itself. This paper outlines the design considerations underlying OntoIOp (Ontology Integration and Interoperability), a new standardisation activity in ISO/TC 37/SC 3 to become an international standard, which aims at filling this gap.
  13. Hubrich, J.: Concepts in Context - Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization : Internationale Fachtagung und Abschlussworkshop des DFGProjekts CrissCross in Köln (2010) 0.01 
    0.010562229 = product of:
  0.015843343 = sum of:
    0.0062218686 = weight(_text_:information in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062218686 = score(doc=4315,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.068573356 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
    0.009621474 = product of:
      0.019242948 = sum of:
        0.019242948 = weight(_text_:services in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019242948 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.10140825 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Der zweite Tag begann mit einer Keynote von Dagobert Soergel von der University at Buffalo mit dem Thema Conceptual Foundations for Semantic Mapping and Semantic Search. Im Zentrum stand die Idee eines Hubs, einer semantischen Verbindungsstruktur in Form einer Kernklassifikation, die elementare Begriffe sowie semantische Relationen enthält und über die ein Mapping zwischen unterschiedlichen Wissensorganisationssystemen erfolgen soll. Die Methode wurde durch zahlreiche Beispiele veranschaulicht. Die erste Session des zweiten Tages war dem Thema Interoperabilität und Standardisierung gewidmet. Stella Dextre Clarke aus Großbritannien berichtete - ausgehend von den in zentralen Mappingprojekten erstellten Relationen zwischen Begriffen unterschiedlicher Dokumentationssprachen - über Herausforderungen und Fragestellungen bei der Entwicklung des neuen ISO-Standards 25964-2, der als Leitfaden zur Herstellung von Interoperabilität zwischen Thesauri und anderen Vokabularien fungieren soll. In dem Folgevortrag von Philipp Mayr vom GESIS Leipniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften wurd mit KoMoHe (Kompetenzzentrum Modellbildung und Heterogenitätsbehandlung) ein bereits abgeschlossenes Projekt vorgestellt, dessen Mehrwert für das Retrieval in heterogen erschlossenen Informationsräumen mittels eines Information-Retrieval-Tests bestätigt werden konnte. Unpräzise Trefferresultate motivierten indes zu dem Nachfolgeprojekt IRM (Value-Added Services for Information Retrieval), in dem Möglichkeiten von Suchexpansion und Re-Ranking untersucht werden.
  14. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01 
    0.009903305 = product of:
  0.029709915 = sum of:
    0.029709915 = product of:
      0.05941983 = sum of:
        0.05941983 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05941983 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  15. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01 
    0.009903305 = product of:
  0.029709915 = sum of:
    0.029709915 = product of:
      0.05941983 = sum of:
        0.05941983 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05941983 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  16. Prongué, N.; Schneider, R.: Modelling library linked data in practice (2015) 0.01 
    0.008295825 = product of:
  0.024887474 = sum of:
    0.024887474 = weight(_text_:information in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024887474 = score(doc=2985,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  17. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.01 
    0.008252754 = product of:
  0.02475826 = sum of:
    0.02475826 = product of:
      0.04951652 = sum of:
        0.04951652 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04951652 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  18. Petras, V.: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen : eine Fallstudie (2010) 0.01 
    0.008169809 = product of:
  0.024509426 = sum of:
    0.024509426 = product of:
      0.049018852 = sum of:
        0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049018852 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  19. Panzer, M.: Increasing patient findability of medical research : annotating clinical trials using standard vocabularies (2017) 0.01 
    0.007039241 = product of:
  0.021117723 = sum of:
    0.021117723 = weight(_text_:information in 2783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021117723 = score(doc=2783,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2783, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2783)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Multiple groups at Mayo Clinic organize knowledge with the aid of metadata for a variety of purposes. The ontology group focuses on consumer-oriented health information using several controlled vocabularies to support and coordinate care providers, consumers, clinical knowledge and, as part of its research management, information on clinical trials. Poor findability, inconsistent indexing and specialized language undermined the goal of increasing trial participation. The ontology group designed a metadata framework addressing disorders and procedures, investigational drugs and clinical departments, adopted and translated the clinical terminology of SNOMED CT and RxNorm vocabularies to consumer language and coordinated terminology with Mayo's Consumer Health Vocabulary. The result enables retrieval of clinical trial information from multiple access points including conditions, procedures, drug names, organizations involved and trial phase. The jump in inquiries since the search site was revised and vocabularies were modified show evidence of success.
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 43(2017) no.2, S.40-43
  20. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Specifying intersystem relations : requirements, strategies, and issues (2010) 0.01 
    0.0070026936 = product of:
  0.02100808 = sum of:
    0.02100808 = product of:
      0.04201616 = sum of:
        0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04201616 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 7.2010 17:11:51

Authors

Languages

  • e 54
  • d 14

Themes