Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Jahns, Y.: 20 years SWD : German subject authority data prepared for the future (2011) 0.04
    0.04126194 = product of:
      0.16504776 = sum of:
        0.042055245 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042055245 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.29474765 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
        0.026979093 = product of:
          0.053958185 = sum of:
            0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053958185 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.042055245 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042055245 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.29474765 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
        0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053958185 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    The German subject headings authority file - SWD - provides a terminologically controlled vocabulary, covering all fields of knowledge. The subject headings are determined by the German Rules for the Subject Catalogue. The authority file is produced and updated daily by participating libraries from around Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Over the last twenty years, it grew to an online-accessible database with about 550.000 headings. They are linked to other thesauri, also to French and English equivalents and with notations of the Dewey Decimal Classification. Thus, it allows multilingual access and searching in dispersed, heterogeneously indexed catalogues. The vocabulary is not only used for cataloguing library materials, but also web-resources and objects in archives and museums.
  2. Golub, K.: Subject access in Swedish discovery services (2018) 0.02
    0.01728776 = product of:
      0.09220138 = sum of:
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
        0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035046037 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
        0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035046037 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    While support for subject searching has been traditionally advocated for in library catalogs, often in the form of a catalog objective to find everything that a library has on a certain topic, research has shown that subject access has not been satisfactory. Many existing online catalogs and discovery services do not seem to make good use of the intellectual effort invested into assigning controlled subject index terms and classes. For example, few support hierarchical browsing of classification schemes and other controlled vocabularies with hierarchical structures, few provide end-user-friendly options to choose a more specific concept to increase precision, a broader concept or related concepts to increase recall, to disambiguate homonyms, or to find which term is best used to name a concept. Optimum subject access in library catalogs and discovery services is analyzed from the perspective of earlier research as well as contemporary conceptual models and cataloguing codes. Eighteen proposed features of what this should entail in practice are drawn. In an exploratory qualitative study, the three most common discovery services used in Swedish academic libraries are analyzed against these features. In line with previous research, subject access in contemporary interfaces is demonstrated to less than optimal. This is in spite of the fact that individual collections have been indexed with controlled vocabularies and a significant number of controlled vocabularies have been mapped to each other and are available in interoperable standards. Strategic action is proposed to build research-informed (inter)national standards and guidelines.
    Date
    1. 8.2018 12:26:30
  3. Vlachidis, A.; Tudhope, D.: ¬A knowledge-based approach to information extraction for semantic interoperability in the archaeology domain (2016) 0.01
    0.011923187 = product of:
      0.0953855 = sum of:
        0.031795166 = product of:
          0.06359033 = sum of:
            0.06359033 = weight(_text_:rules in 2895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06359033 = score(doc=2895,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.39346188 = fieldWeight in 2895, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06359033 = weight(_text_:rules in 2895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06359033 = score(doc=2895,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.39346188 = fieldWeight in 2895, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2895)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The article presents a method for automatic semantic indexing of archaeological grey-literature reports using empirical (rule-based) Information Extraction techniques in combination with domain-specific knowledge organization systems. The semantic annotation system (OPTIMA) performs the tasks of Named Entity Recognition, Relation Extraction, Negation Detection, and Word-Sense Disambiguation using hand-crafted rules and terminological resources for associating contextual abstractions with classes of the standard ontology CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM) for cultural heritage and its archaeological extension, CRM-EH. Relation Extraction (RE) performance benefits from a syntactic-based definition of RE patterns derived from domain oriented corpus analysis. The evaluation also shows clear benefit in the use of assistive natural language processing (NLP) modules relating to Word-Sense Disambiguation, Negation Detection, and Noun Phrase Validation, together with controlled thesaurus expansion. The semantic indexing results demonstrate the capacity of rule-based Information Extraction techniques to deliver interoperable semantic abstractions (semantic annotations) with respect to the CIDOC CRM and archaeological thesauri. Major contributions include recognition of relevant entities using shallow parsing NLP techniques driven by a complimentary use of ontological and terminological domain resources and empirical derivation of context-driven RE rules for the recognition of semantic relationships from phrases of unstructured text.
  4. Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Mapping derivative relationships from RDA to BIBFRAME 2 (2019) 0.01
    0.011803353 = product of:
      0.094426826 = sum of:
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Semantic interoperability between Resource Description and Access (RDA) and BIBFRAME models is of great interest to the library community. In this context, this work investigates the mapping of core entities, inherent and derivative relationships from RDA to BIBFRAME, and proposes mapping rules assessed using two gold datasets. Findings indicate that RDA core entities and inherent relationships can be successfully mapped to BIBFRAME using the bf:hasExpression property, while extending bf:hasExpression as transitive simplifies BIBFRAME representations. Moreover, mapping derivative relationships between RDA Expressions was successful with loss of specificity in non-translation cases. The mapping of derivative relationships between RDA Works produced "noisy" bf:hasDerivative occurrences in BIBFRAME.
  5. Gracy, K.F.: Enriching and enhancing moving images with Linked Data : an exploration in the alignment of metadata models (2018) 0.01
    0.009688189 = product of:
      0.077505514 = sum of:
        0.033013538 = weight(_text_:author in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033013538 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.21322623 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
        0.044491973 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044491973 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.24753433 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to examine the current state of Linked Data (LD) in archival moving image description, and propose ways in which current metadata records can be enriched and enhanced by interlinking such metadata with relevant information found in other data sets. Design/methodology/approach Several possible metadata models for moving image production and archiving are considered, including models from records management, digital curation, and the recent BIBFRAME AV Modeling Study. This research also explores how mappings between archival moving image records and relevant external data sources might be drawn, and what gaps exist between current vocabularies and what is needed to record and make accessible the full lifecycle of archiving through production, use, and reuse. Findings The author notes several major impediments to implementation of LD for archival moving images. The various pieces of information about creators, places, and events found in moving image records are not easily connected to relevant information in other sources because they are often not semantically defined within the record and can be hidden in unstructured fields. Libraries, archives, and museums must work on aligning the various vocabularies and schemas of potential value for archival moving image description to enable interlinking between vocabularies currently in use and those which are used by external data sets. Alignment of vocabularies is often complicated by mismatches in granularity between vocabularies. Research limitations/implications The focus is on how these models inform functional requirements for access and other archival activities, and how the field might benefit from having a common metadata model for critical archival descriptive activities. Practical implications By having a shared model, archivists may more easily align current vocabularies and develop new vocabularies and schemas to address the needs of moving image data creators and scholars. Originality/value Moving image archives, like other cultural institutions with significant heritage holdings, can benefit tremendously from investing in the semantic definition of information found in their information databases. While commercial entities such as search engines and data providers have already embraced the opportunities that semantic search provides for resource discovery, most non-commercial entities are just beginning to do so. Thus, this research addresses the benefits and challenges of enriching and enhancing archival moving image records with semantically defined information via LD.
  6. Isaac, A.; Baker, T.: Linked data practice at different levels of semantic precision : the perspective of libraries, archives and museums (2015) 0.01
    0.008430966 = product of:
      0.06744773 = sum of:
        0.022482576 = product of:
          0.04496515 = sum of:
            0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04496515 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 2026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04496515 = score(doc=2026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 2026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2026)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries, archives and museums rely on structured schemas and vocabularies to indicate classes in which a resource may belong. In the context of linked data, key organizational components are the RDF data model, element schemas and value vocabularies, with simple ontologies having minimally defined classes and properties in order to facilitate reuse and interoperability. Simplicity over formal semantics is a tenet of the open-world assumption underlying ontology languages central to the Semantic Web, but the result is a lack of constraints, data quality checks and validation capacity. Inconsistent use of vocabularies and ontologies that do not follow formal semantics rules and logical concept hierarchies further complicate the use of Semantic Web technologies. The Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) helps make existing value vocabularies available in the linked data environment, but it exchanges precision for simplicity. Incompatibilities between simple organized vocabularies, Resource Description Framework Schemas and OWL ontologies and even basic notions of subjects and concepts prevent smooth translations and challenge the conversion of cultural institutions' unique legacy vocabularies for linked data. Adopting the linked data vision requires accepting loose semantic interpretations. To avoid semantic inconsistencies and illogical results, cultural organizations following the linked data path must be careful to choose the level of semantics that best suits their domain and needs.
  7. Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016) 0.01
    0.008244708 = product of:
      0.065957665 = sum of:
        0.044218604 = weight(_text_:26 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044218604 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3901819 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
        0.021739064 = product of:
          0.043478128 = sum of:
            0.043478128 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043478128 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    19.12.2014 19:26:51
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  8. Lange, C.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Kutz, O.: Making heterogeneous ontologies interoperable through standardisation : a Meta Ontology Language to be standardised: Ontology Integration and Interoperability (OntoIOp) (2011) 0.00
    0.0041880067 = product of:
      0.06700811 = sum of:
        0.06700811 = weight(_text_:2nd in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06700811 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.37205225 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of AEGIS 2nd International Conference 'Accessibility Reaching Everywhere', Brussels, November 28-30, 2011
  9. Ahn, J.-w.; Soergel, D.; Lin, X.; Zhang, M.: Mapping between ARTstor terms and the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus (2014) 0.00
    0.0033116818 = product of:
      0.05298691 = sum of:
        0.05298691 = sum of:
          0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026900033 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
          0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026086876 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  10. Gracy, K.F.; Zeng, M.L.; Skirvin, L.: Exploring methods to improve access to Music resources by aligning library Data with Linked Data : a report of methodologies and preliminary findings (2013) 0.00
    0.0031475653 = product of:
      0.025180522 = sum of:
        0.016484896 = weight(_text_:american in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016484896 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.15067379 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
        0.008695626 = product of:
          0.017391251 = sum of:
            0.017391251 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017391251 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    28.10.2013 17:22:17
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.10, S.2078-2099
  11. Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011) 0.00
    0.0030950191 = product of:
      0.049520306 = sum of:
        0.049520306 = weight(_text_:author in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049520306 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31983936 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is about a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of science and the usage of these insights for compensating the typical problems that arises in metadata-driven Digital Libraries. Three science model driven retrieval services are presented: co-word analysis based query expansion, re-ranking via Bradfordizing and author centrality. The services are evaluated with relevance assessments from which two important implications emerge: (1) precision values of the retrieval services are the same or better than the tf-idf retrieval baseline and (2) each service retrieved a disjoint set of documents. The different services each favor quite other - but still relevant - documents than pure term-frequency based rankings. The proposed models and derived retrieval services therefore open up new viewpoints on the scientific knowledge space and provide an alternative framework to structure scholarly information systems.
  12. Lumsden, J.; Hall, H.; Cruickshank, P.: Ontology definition and construction, and epistemological adequacy for systems interoperability : a practitioner analysis (2011) 0.00
    0.0025791824 = product of:
      0.04126692 = sum of:
        0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 4801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04126692 = score(doc=4801,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 4801, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4801)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Ontology development is considered to be a useful approach to the design and implementation of interoperable systems. This literature review and commentary examines the current state of knowledge in this field with particular reference to processes involved in assuring epistemological adequacy. It takes the perspective of the information systems practitioner keen to adopt a systematic approach to in-house ontology design, taking into consideration previously published work. The study arises from author involvement in an integration/interoperability project on systems that support Scottish Common Housing Registers in which, ultimately, ontological modelling was not deployed. Issues concerning the agreement of meaning, and the implications for the creation of interoperable systems, are discussed. The extent to which those theories, methods and frameworks provide practitioners with a usable set of tools is explored, and examples of practical applications of ontological modelling are noted. The findings from the review of the literature demonstrate a number of difficulties faced by information systems practitioners keen to develop and deploy domain ontologies. A major problem is deciding which broad approach to take: to rely on automatic ontology construction techniques, or to rely on key words and domain experts to develop ontologies.
  13. Boteram, F.; Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.: Semantic interoperability and retrieval paradigms (2010) 0.00
    0.0022109302 = product of:
      0.035374884 = sum of:
        0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035374884 = score(doc=3362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi
  14. Jacobs, J.-H.; Mengel, T.; Müller, K.: Benefits of the CrissCross project for conceptual interoperability and retrieval (2010) 0.00
    0.001934564 = product of:
      0.030953024 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 3038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=3038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 3038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3038)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi
  15. Szostak, R.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Comparative approaches to interdisciplinary KOSs : use cases of converting UDC to BCC (2017) 0.00
    0.0018030355 = product of:
      0.028848568 = sum of:
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=3874,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Content
    Beitrag bei: NASKO 2017: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities. The sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2017), June 15-16, 2017, in Champaign, IL, USA.
  16. Borst, T.: Repositorien auf ihrem Weg in das Semantic Web : semantisch hergeleitete Interoperabilität als Zielstellung für künftige Repository-Entwicklungen (2014) 0.00
    0.0016581976 = product of:
      0.026531162 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=1555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    23.11.2014 17:26:20
  17. Khiat, A.; Benaissa, M.: Approach for instance-based ontology alignment : using argument and event structures of generative lexicon (2014) 0.00
    0.0016581976 = product of:
      0.026531162 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    19.12.2014 19:26:51
  18. Amarger, F.; Chanet, J.-P.; Haemmerlé, O.; Hernandez, N.; Roussey, C.: SKOS sources transformations for ontology engineering : agronomical taxonomy use case (2014) 0.00
    0.0016581976 = product of:
      0.026531162 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    19.12.2014 19:26:51
  19. Bellotto, A.; Bekesi, J.: Enriching metadata for a university repository by modelling and infrastructure : a new vocabulary server for Phaidra (2019) 0.00
    0.0016581976 = product of:
      0.026531162 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2016 17:23:26
  20. Baca, M.; Gill, M.: Encoding multilingual knowledge systems in the digital age : the Getty vocabularies (2015) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Content
    Papers from the Fifth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2015), sponsored by ISKO-Canada/US, June 18-19, 2015, Los Angeles, California. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_4.pdf.