-
Nicholson, D.M.; Dawson, A.; Shiri, A.: HILT: a pilot terminology mapping service with a DDC spine (2006)
0.02
0.0224336 = product of:
0.0336504 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
0.023091538 = product of:
0.046183076 = sum of:
0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046183076 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The role of DDC in the ongoing HILT (High-level Thesaurus) project is discussed. A phased initiative, funded by JISC in the UK, HILT addresses an issue of likely interest to anyone serving users wishing to cross-search or cross-browse groups of networked information services, whether at regional, national or international level - the problem of subject-based retrieval from multiple sources using different subject schemes for resource description. Although all three phases of HILT to date are covered, the primary concern is with the subject interoperability solution piloted in phase II, and with the use of DDC as a spine in that approach.
-
Zeng, M.L.; Chan, L.M.: Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems (2004)
0.02
0.0224336 = product of:
0.0336504 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=2224,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
0.023091538 = product of:
0.046183076 = sum of:
0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 2224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046183076 = score(doc=2224,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2224, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2224)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This report analyzes the methodologies used in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems (KOS) such as controlled vocabularies and classification schemes that present the organized interpretation of knowledge structures. The development and trends of KOS are discussed with reference to the online era and the Internet era. Selected current projects and activities addressing KOS interoperability issues are reviewed in terms of the languages and structures involved. The methodological analysis encompasses both conventional and new methods that have proven to be widely accepted, including derivation/modeling, translation/adaptation, satellite and leaf node linking, direct mapping, co-occurrence mapping, switching, linking through a temporary union list, and linking through a thesaurus server protocol. Methods used in link storage and management, as weIl as common issues regarding mapping and methodological options, are also presented. It is concluded that interoperability of KOS is an unavoidable issue and process in today's networked environment. There have been and will be many multilingual products and services, with many involving various structured systems. Results from recent efforts are encouraging.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.5, S.377-395
-
McCulloch, E.; Macgregor, G.: Analysis of equivalence mapping for terminology services (2008)
0.02
0.0224336 = product of:
0.0336504 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
0.023091538 = product of:
0.046183076 = sum of:
0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046183076 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 34(2008) no.1, S.70-92
-
Garcia Marco, F.J.: Compatibility & heterogeneity in knowledge organization : some reflections around a case study in the field of consumer information (2008)
0.02
0.021831427 = product of:
0.03274714 = sum of:
0.015240406 = weight(_text_:information in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015240406 = score(doc=1678,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
0.017506734 = product of:
0.035013467 = sum of:
0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035013467 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A case study in compatibility and heterogeneity of knowledge organization (KO) systems and processes is presented. It is based in the experience of the author in the field of information for consumer protection, a good example of the emerging transdisciplinary applied social sciences. The activities and knowledge organization problems and solutions of the Aragonian Consumers' Information and Documentation Centre are described and analyzed. Six assertions can be concluded: a) heterogeneity and compatibility are certainly an inherent problem in knowledge organization and also in practical domains; b) knowledge organization is also a social task, not only a lögical one; c) knowledge organization is affected by economical and efficiency considerations; d) knowledge organization is at the heart of Knowledge Management; e) identifying and maintaining the focus in interdisciplinary fields is a must; f the different knowledge organization tools of a institution must be considered as an integrated system, pursuing a unifying model.
- Date
- 16. 3.2008 18:22:50
-
Kempf, A.O.; Zapilko, B.: Normdatenpflege in Zeiten der Automatisierung : Erstellung und Evaluation automatisch aufgebauter Thesaurus-Crosskonkordanzen (2013)
0.02
0.021044627 = product of:
0.03156694 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=1021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
0.02100808 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04201616 = score(doc=1021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 18. 8.2013 12:53:22
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.4, S.199-208
-
Lauser, B.; Johannsen, G.; Caracciolo, C.; Hage, W.R. van; Keizer, J.; Mayr, P.: Comparing human and automatic thesaurus mapping approaches in the agricultural domain (2008)
0.02
0.01996698 = product of:
0.02995047 = sum of:
0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012443737 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.017506734 = product of:
0.035013467 = sum of:
0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035013467 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organization systems (KOS), like thesauri and other controlled vocabularies, are used to provide subject access to information systems across the web. Due to the heterogeneity of these systems, mapping between vocabularies becomes crucial for retrieving relevant information. However, mapping thesauri is a laborious task, and thus big efforts are being made to automate the mapping process. This paper examines two mapping approaches involving the agricultural thesaurus AGROVOC, one machine-created and one human created. We are addressing the basic question "What are the pros and cons of human and automatic mapping and how can they complement each other?" By pointing out the difficulties in specific cases or groups of cases and grouping the sample into simple and difficult types of mappings, we show the limitations of current automatic methods and come up with some basic recommendations on what approach to use when.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008)
0.02
0.01753719 = product of:
0.026305784 = sum of:
0.008799051 = weight(_text_:information in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008799051 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.017506734 = product of:
0.035013467 = sum of:
0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035013467 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009)
0.02
0.01753719 = product of:
0.026305784 = sum of:
0.008799051 = weight(_text_:information in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008799051 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.017506734 = product of:
0.035013467 = sum of:
0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035013467 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Die Verwendung von Erschließungsinstrumenten zur Beschreibung von Informationsressourcen kann Effizienz und Effektivität thematischer Recherchen wesentlich steigern: standardisierte Begriffe unterstützen Recall und Precision begrifflicher Suchen; Ausweisung von Relationen bietet die Grundlage für explorative Suchprozesse. Eine zusätzliche Steigerung der Funktionalitäten des Retrievals kann mittels einer Ausdifferenzierung und Spezifizierung der in Normdaten enthaltenen semantischen Informationen erreicht werden, die über die in Thesauri und Klassifikationen verbreiteten grundlegenden Relationstypen (äquivalent, hierarchisch, assoziativ) hinausgehen. In modernen Informationsräumen, in denen Daten verschiedener Institutionen über eine Plattform zeit- und ortsunabhängig zugänglich gemacht werden, können einzelne Wissenssysteme indes nur unzureichend das Information Retrieval unterstützen. Zu unterschiedlich sind die für thematische Suchanfragen relevanten Indexierungsdaten. Eine Verbesserung kann mittels Herstellung von Interoperabilität zwischen den verschiedenen Dokumentationssprachen erreicht werden. Im Vortrag wird dargelegt, in welcher Art und Weise die in Wissenssystemen enthaltenen semantischen Informationen zur Unterstützung thematischer Recherchen optimiert werden können und inwiefern Interoperabilität zwischen Systemen geschaffen werden kann, die gleichwertige Funktionalitäten in heterogenen Informationsräumen gewährleisten. In diesem Zusammenhang wird auch auf aktuelle Mappingprojekte wie das DFG-Projekt CrissCross oder das RESEDA-Projekt, welches sich mit den Möglichkeiten der semantischen Anreicherung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen befasst, eingegangen.
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
-
Gracy, K.F.; Zeng, M.L.; Skirvin, L.: Exploring methods to improve access to Music resources by aligning library Data with Linked Data : a report of methodologies and preliminary findings (2013)
0.02
0.01746514 = product of:
0.026197711 = sum of:
0.012192324 = weight(_text_:information in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012192324 = score(doc=1096,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.014005387 = product of:
0.028010774 = sum of:
0.028010774 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028010774 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- As a part of a research project aiming to connect library data to the unfamiliar data sets available in the Linked Data (LD) community's CKAN Data Hub (thedatahub.org), this project collected, analyzed, and mapped properties used in describing and accessing music recordings, scores, and music-related information used by selected music LD data sets, library catalogs, and various digital collections created by libraries and other cultural institutions. This article reviews current efforts to connect music data through the Semantic Web, with an emphasis on the Music Ontology (MO) and ontology alignment approaches; it also presents a framework for understanding the life cycle of a musical work, focusing on the central activities of composition, performance, and use. The project studied metadata structures and properties of 11 music-related LD data sets and mapped them to the descriptions commonly used in the library cataloging records for sound recordings and musical scores (including MARC records and their extended schema.org markup), and records from 20 collections of digitized music recordings and scores (featuring a variety of metadata structures). The analysis resulted in a set of crosswalks and a unified crosswalk that aligns these properties. The paper reports on detailed methodologies used and discusses research findings and issues. Topics of particular concern include (a) the challenges of mapping between the overgeneralized descriptions found in library data and the specialized, music-oriented properties present in the LD data sets; (b) the hidden information and access points in library data; and (c) the potential benefits of enriching library data through the mapping of properties found in library catalogs to similar properties used by LD data sets.
- Date
- 28.10.2013 17:22:17
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.10, S.2078-2099
-
Burstein, M.; McDermott, D.V.: Ontology translation for interoperability among Semantic Web services (2005)
0.01
0.014342847 = product of:
0.04302854 = sum of:
0.04302854 = product of:
0.08605708 = sum of:
0.08605708 = weight(_text_:services in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08605708 = score(doc=2661,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.45351148 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Research on semantic web services promises greater interoperability among software agents and web services by enabling content-based automated service discovery and interaction and by utilizing. Although this is to be based on use of shared ontologies published on the semantic web, services produced and described by different developers may well use different, perhaps partly overlapping, sets of ontologies. Interoperability will depend on ontology mappings and architectures supporting the associated translation processes. The question we ask is, does the traditional approach of introducing mediator agents to translate messages between requestors and services work in such an open environment? This article reviews some of the processing assumptions that were made in the development of the semantic web service modeling ontology OWL-S and argues that, as a practical matter, the translation function cannot always be isolated in mediators. Ontology mappings need to be published on the semantic web just as ontologies themselves are. The translation for service discovery, service process model interpretation, task negotiation, service invocation, and response interpretation may then be distributed to various places in the architecture so that translation can be done in the specific goal-oriented informational contexts of the agents performing these processes. We present arguments for assigning translation responsibility to particular agents in the cases of service invocation, response translation, and match- making.
-
Woldering, B.: ¬Die Europäische Digitale Bibliothek nimmt Gestalt an (2007)
0.01
0.014029752 = product of:
0.021044629 = sum of:
0.007039241 = weight(_text_:information in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007039241 = score(doc=2439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
0.014005387 = product of:
0.028010774 = sum of:
0.028010774 = weight(_text_:22 in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028010774 = score(doc=2439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 19:10:56
- Theme
- Information Gateway
-
Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008)
0.01
0.014005387 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = product of:
0.08403232 = sum of:
0.08403232 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08403232 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.2008 19:30:41
-
Golub, K.: Subject access in Swedish discovery services (2018)
0.01
0.012828632 = product of:
0.038485896 = sum of:
0.038485896 = product of:
0.07697179 = sum of:
0.07697179 = weight(_text_:services in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07697179 = score(doc=4379,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.405633 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- While support for subject searching has been traditionally advocated for in library catalogs, often in the form of a catalog objective to find everything that a library has on a certain topic, research has shown that subject access has not been satisfactory. Many existing online catalogs and discovery services do not seem to make good use of the intellectual effort invested into assigning controlled subject index terms and classes. For example, few support hierarchical browsing of classification schemes and other controlled vocabularies with hierarchical structures, few provide end-user-friendly options to choose a more specific concept to increase precision, a broader concept or related concepts to increase recall, to disambiguate homonyms, or to find which term is best used to name a concept. Optimum subject access in library catalogs and discovery services is analyzed from the perspective of earlier research as well as contemporary conceptual models and cataloguing codes. Eighteen proposed features of what this should entail in practice are drawn. In an exploratory qualitative study, the three most common discovery services used in Swedish academic libraries are analyzed against these features. In line with previous research, subject access in contemporary interfaces is demonstrated to less than optimal. This is in spite of the fact that individual collections have been indexed with controlled vocabularies and a significant number of controlled vocabularies have been mapped to each other and are available in interoperable standards. Strategic action is proposed to build research-informed (inter)national standards and guidelines.
-
Schreur, P.E.: ¬The use of Linked Data and artificial intelligence as key elements in the transformation of technical services (2020)
0.01
0.012699697 = product of:
0.03809909 = sum of:
0.03809909 = product of:
0.07619818 = sum of:
0.07619818 = weight(_text_:services in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07619818 = score(doc=125,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Library Technical Services have benefited from numerous stimuli. Although initially looked at with suspicion, transitions such as the move from catalog cards to the MARC formats have proven enormously helpful to libraries and their patrons. Linked data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the same promise. Through the conversion of metadata surrogates (cataloging) to linked open data, libraries can represent their resources on the Semantic Web. But in order to provide some form of controlled access to unstructured data, libraries must reach beyond traditional cataloging to new tools such as AI to provide consistent access to a growing world of full-text resources.
-
Lange, C.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Kutz, O.: Making heterogeneous ontologies interoperable through standardisation : a Meta Ontology Language to be standardised: Ontology Integration and Interoperability (OntoIOp) (2011)
0.01
0.010885457 = product of:
0.032656368 = sum of:
0.032656368 = product of:
0.065312736 = sum of:
0.065312736 = weight(_text_:services in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065312736 = score(doc=50,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.344191 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Assistive technology, especially for persons with disabilities, increasingly relies on electronic communication among users, between users and their devices, and among these devices. Making such ICT accessible and inclusive often requires remedial programming, which tends to be costly or even impossible. We, therefore, aim at more interoperable devices, services accessing these devices, and content delivered by these services, at the levels of 1. data and metadata, 2. datamodels and data modelling methods and 3. metamodels as well as a meta ontology language. Even though ontologies are widely being used to enable content interoperability, there is currently no unified framework for ontology interoperability itself. This paper outlines the design considerations underlying OntoIOp (Ontology Integration and Interoperability), a new standardisation activity in ISO/TC 37/SC 3 to become an international standard, which aims at filling this gap.
-
Hubrich, J.: Concepts in Context - Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization : Internationale Fachtagung und Abschlussworkshop des DFGProjekts CrissCross in Köln (2010)
0.01
0.010562229 = product of:
0.015843343 = sum of:
0.0062218686 = weight(_text_:information in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062218686 = score(doc=4315,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.068573356 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
0.009621474 = product of:
0.019242948 = sum of:
0.019242948 = weight(_text_:services in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019242948 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.10140825 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Der zweite Tag begann mit einer Keynote von Dagobert Soergel von der University at Buffalo mit dem Thema Conceptual Foundations for Semantic Mapping and Semantic Search. Im Zentrum stand die Idee eines Hubs, einer semantischen Verbindungsstruktur in Form einer Kernklassifikation, die elementare Begriffe sowie semantische Relationen enthält und über die ein Mapping zwischen unterschiedlichen Wissensorganisationssystemen erfolgen soll. Die Methode wurde durch zahlreiche Beispiele veranschaulicht. Die erste Session des zweiten Tages war dem Thema Interoperabilität und Standardisierung gewidmet. Stella Dextre Clarke aus Großbritannien berichtete - ausgehend von den in zentralen Mappingprojekten erstellten Relationen zwischen Begriffen unterschiedlicher Dokumentationssprachen - über Herausforderungen und Fragestellungen bei der Entwicklung des neuen ISO-Standards 25964-2, der als Leitfaden zur Herstellung von Interoperabilität zwischen Thesauri und anderen Vokabularien fungieren soll. In dem Folgevortrag von Philipp Mayr vom GESIS Leipniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften wurd mit KoMoHe (Kompetenzzentrum Modellbildung und Heterogenitätsbehandlung) ein bereits abgeschlossenes Projekt vorgestellt, dessen Mehrwert für das Retrieval in heterogen erschlossenen Informationsräumen mittels eines Information-Retrieval-Tests bestätigt werden konnte. Unpräzise Trefferresultate motivierten indes zu dem Nachfolgeprojekt IRM (Value-Added Services for Information Retrieval), in dem Möglichkeiten von Suchexpansion und Re-Ranking untersucht werden.
-
Chen, H.: Semantic research for digital libraries (1999)
0.01
0.010558861 = product of:
0.031676583 = sum of:
0.031676583 = weight(_text_:information in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031676583 = score(doc=1247,freq=18.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this era of the Internet and distributed, multimedia computing, new and emerging classes of information systems applications have swept into the lives of office workers and people in general. From digital libraries, multimedia systems, geographic information systems, and collaborative computing to electronic commerce, virtual reality, and electronic video arts and games, these applications have created tremendous opportunities for information and computer science researchers and practitioners. As applications become more pervasive, pressing, and diverse, several well-known information retrieval (IR) problems have become even more urgent. Information overload, a result of the ease of information creation and transmission via the Internet and WWW, has become more troublesome (e.g., even stockbrokers and elementary school students, heavily exposed to various WWW search engines, are versed in such IR terminology as recall and precision). Significant variations in database formats and structures, the richness of information media (text, audio, and video), and an abundance of multilingual information content also have created severe information interoperability problems -- structural interoperability, media interoperability, and multilingual interoperability.
-
Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010)
0.01
0.009903305 = product of:
0.029709915 = sum of:
0.029709915 = product of:
0.05941983 = sum of:
0.05941983 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05941983 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 15:06:54
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.01
0.009903305 = product of:
0.029709915 = sum of:
0.029709915 = product of:
0.05941983 = sum of:
0.05941983 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05941983 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Hubrich, J.: CrissCross: SWD-DDC-Mapping (2008)
0.01
0.009336925 = product of:
0.028010774 = sum of:
0.028010774 = product of:
0.05602155 = sum of:
0.05602155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05602155 = score(doc=2175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 10:35:21
