Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

0.017274221 = product of:
  0.08637111 = sum of:
    0.055382192 = weight(_text_:r in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055382192 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
    0.030988915 = product of:
      0.06197783 = sum of:
        0.06197783 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06197783 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11442167 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032674827 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)

Date

22. 6.2015 16:08:38

0.009797683 = product of:
  0.048988413 = sum of:
    0.027691096 = weight(_text_:r in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027691096 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
    0.021297317 = product of:
      0.042594634 = sum of:
        0.042594634 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042594634 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1341475 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032674827 = queryNorm
            0.31752092 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)

Abstract

Der vorliegende Artikel möchte einen Ansatz vorstellen, der aufzeigt, wie die Bibliothek der Universität Konstanz - und andere Bibliotheken mit einer Haussystematik - bei ihrer eigenen Systematik bleiben und trotzdem von der Sacherschließungsarbeit anderer Bibliotheken profitieren können. Vorgestellt wird ein Konzept, das zeigt, wie mithilfe von Semantic-Web-Technologie Ähnlichkeitsrelationen zwischen verbaler Sacherschließung, RVK, DDC und hauseigenen Systematiken erstellt werden können, die das Übersetzen von Sacherschließungsinformationen in andere Ordnungssysteme erlauben und damit Automatisierung in der Sacherschließung möglich machen.

0.0063293935 = product of:
  0.063293934 = sum of:
    0.063293934 = weight(_text_:r in 2435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063293934 = score(doc=2435,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 2435, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2435)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

0.0027691096 = product of:
  0.027691096 = sum of:
    0.027691096 = weight(_text_:r in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027691096 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

0.0027691096 = product of:
  0.027691096 = sum of:
    0.027691096 = weight(_text_:r in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027691096 = score(doc=3874,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

0.0023735226 = product of:
  0.023735225 = sum of:
    0.023735225 = weight(_text_:r in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023735225 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

0.0019779354 = product of:
  0.019779354 = sum of:
    0.019779354 = weight(_text_:r in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019779354 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

0.0018782121 = product of:
  0.01878212 = sum of:
    0.01878212 = product of:
      0.03756424 = sum of:
        0.03756424 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03756424 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11442167 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032674827 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Abstract

This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.

0.0015823484 = product of:
  0.015823483 = sum of:
    0.015823483 = weight(_text_:r in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015823483 = score(doc=3109,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Abstract

This proposal presents the methodology of indexing with images suggested by De Brito and Caribé (2015). The imagetic model is used as a compatible mechanism with FRSAD for a global information share and use of subject data, both within the library sector and beyond. The conceptual model of imagetic indexing shows how images are related to topics and 'key-images' are interpreted as nomens to implement the FRSAD model. Indexing with images consists of using images instead of key-words or descriptors, to represent and organize information. Implementing the imaged navigation in OPACs denotes multiple advantages derived from this rethinking the OPAC anew, since we are looking forward to sharing concepts within the subject authority data. Images, carrying linguistic objects, permeate inter-social and cultural concepts. In practice it includes translated metadata, symmetrical multilingual thesaurus, or any traditional indexing tools. iOPAC embodies efforts focused on conceptual levels as expected from librarians. Imaged interfaces are more intuitive since users do not need specific training for information retrieval, offering easier comprehension of indexing codes, larger conceptual portability of descriptors (as images), and a better interoperability between discourse codes and indexing competences affecting positively social and cultural interoperability. The imagetic methodology deploys R&D fields for more suitable interfaces taking into consideration users with specific needs such as deafness and illiteracy. This methodology arouse questions about the paradigms of the primacy of orality in information systems and pave the way to a legitimacy of multiple perspectives in document indexing by suggesting a more universal communication system based on images. Interdisciplinarity in neurosciences, linguistics and information sciences would be desirable competencies for further investigations about he nature of cognitive processes in information organization and classification while developing assistive KOS for individuals with communication problems, such autism and deafness.

0.0013845548 = product of:
  0.013845548 = sum of:
    0.013845548 = weight(_text_:r in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013845548 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.12800737 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Type

r