Search (64 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.01
    0.011462957 = product of:
      0.03438887 = sum of:
        0.03438887 = product of:
          0.06877774 = sum of:
            0.06877774 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06877774 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  2. Veltman, K.H.: Syntactic and semantic interoperability : new approaches to knowledge and the Semantic Web (2001) 0.01
    0.011263715 = product of:
      0.033791143 = sum of:
        0.033791143 = product of:
          0.06758229 = sum of:
            0.06758229 = weight(_text_:web in 3883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06758229 = score(doc=3883,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 3883, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    At VVWW-7 (Brisbane, 1997), Tim Berners-Lee outlined his vision of a global reasoning web. At VVWW- 8 (Toronto, May 1998), he developed this into a vision of a semantic web, where one Gould search not just for isolated words, but for meaning in the form of logically provable claims. In the past four years this vision has spread with amazing speed. The semantic web has been adopted by the European Commission as one of the important goals of the Sixth Framework Programme. In the United States it has become linked with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). While this quest to achieve a semantic web is new, the quest for meaning in language has a history that is almost as old as language itself. Accordingly this paper opens with a survey of the historical background. The contributions of the Dublin Core are reviewed briefly. To achieve a semantic web requires both syntactic and semantic interoperability. These challenges are outlined. A basic contention of this paper is that semantic interoperability requires much more than a simple agreement concerning the static meaning of a term. Different levels of agreement (local, regional, national and international) are involved and these levels have their own history. Hence, one of the larger challenges is to create new systems of knowledge organization, which identify and connect these different levels. With respect to meaning or semantics, early twentieth century pioneers such as Wüster were hopeful that it might be sufficient to limit oneself to isolated terms and words without reference to the larger grammatical context: to concept systems rather than to propositional logic. While a fascination with concept systems implicitly dominates many contemporary discussions, this paper suggests why this approach is not sufficient. The final section of this paper explores how an approach using propositional logic could lead to a new approach to universals and particulars. This points to a re-organization of knowledge, and opens the way for a vision of a semantic web with all the historical and cultural richness and complexity of language itself.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  3. Budin, G.: Kommunikation in Netzwerken : Terminologiemanagement (2006) 0.01
    0.011263715 = product of:
      0.033791143 = sum of:
        0.033791143 = product of:
          0.06758229 = sum of:
            0.06758229 = weight(_text_:web in 5700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06758229 = score(doc=5700,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 5700, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5700)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Dieses Kapitel gibt einen Überblick über Ziele, Methoden, und Anwendungskontexte des Terminologiemanagements. Eine Definition von "Terminologie" leitet über zu einem terminologischen Wissensmodell, mit dem die Dynamik und Komplexität von begrifflichen Wissensstrukturen und entsprechenden lexikalischen Repräsentationsformen beschrieben werden kann. Ziel der terminologischen Wissensmodellierung ist die Erarbeitung von sprachlichen und begrifflichen Voraussetzungen für präzise Fachkommunikation sowie für die semantische Interoperabilität im künftigen "Semantic Web".
    Source
    Semantic Web: Wege zur vernetzten Wissensgesellschaft. Hrsg.: T. Pellegrini, u. A. Blumauer
  4. Isaac, A.; Schlobach, S.; Matthezing, H.; Zinn, C.: Integrated access to cultural heritage resources through representation and alignment of controlled vocabularies (2008) 0.01
    0.01053624 = product of:
      0.03160872 = sum of:
        0.03160872 = product of:
          0.06321744 = sum of:
            0.06321744 = weight(_text_:web in 3398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06321744 = score(doc=3398,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.38159183 = fieldWeight in 3398, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3398)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To show how semantic web techniques can help address semantic interoperability issues in the broad cultural heritage domain, allowing users an integrated and seamless access to heterogeneous collections. Design/methodology/approach - This paper presents the heterogeneity problems to be solved. It introduces semantic web techniques that can help in solving them, focusing on the representation of controlled vocabularies and their semantic alignment. It gives pointers to some previous projects and experiments that have tried to address the problems discussed. Findings - Semantic web research provides practical technical and methodological approaches to tackle the different issues. Two contributions of interest are the simple knowledge organisation system model and automatic vocabulary alignment methods and tools. These contributions were demonstrated to be usable for enabling semantic search and navigation across collections. Research limitations/implications - The research aims at designing different representation and alignment methods for solving interoperability problems in the context of controlled subject vocabularies. Given the variety and technical richness of current research in the semantic web field, it is impossible to provide an in-depth account or an exhaustive list of references. Every aspect of the paper is, however, given one or several pointers for further reading. Originality/value - This article provides a general and practical introduction to relevant semantic web techniques. It is of specific value for the practitioners in the cultural heritage and digital library domains who are interested in applying these methods in practice.
    Content
    This paper is based on a talk given at "Information Access for the Global Community, An International Seminar on the Universal Decimal Classification" held on 4-5 June 2007 in The Hague, The Netherlands. An abstract of this talk will be published in Extensions and Corrections to the UDC, an annual publication of the UDC consortium. Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Digital libraries and the semantic web: context, applications and research".
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  5. Liang, A.; Salokhe, G.; Sini, M.; Keizer, J.: Towards an infrastructure for semantic applications : methodologies for semantic integration of heterogeneous resources (2006) 0.01
    0.010346383 = product of:
      0.031039147 = sum of:
        0.031039147 = product of:
          0.062078293 = sum of:
            0.062078293 = weight(_text_:web in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062078293 = score(doc=241,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The semantic heterogeneity presented by Web information in the Agricultural domain presents tremendous information retrieval challenges. This article presents work taking place at the Food and Agriculture Organizations (FAO) which addresses this challenge. Based on the analysis of resources in the domain of agriculture, this paper proposes (a) an application profile (AP) for dealing with the problem of heterogeneity originating from differences in terminologies, domain coverage, and domain modelling, and (b) a root application ontology (AAO) based on the application profile which can serve as a basis for extending knowledge of the domain. The paper explains how even a small investment in the enhancement of relations between vocabularies, both metadata and domain-specific, yields a relatively large return on investment.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Knitting the Semantic Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  6. Koutsomitropoulos, D.A.; Solomou, G.D.; Alexopoulos, A.D.; Papatheodorou, T.S.: Semantic metadata interoperability and inference-based querying in digital repositories (2009) 0.01
    0.010346383 = product of:
      0.031039147 = sum of:
        0.031039147 = product of:
          0.062078293 = sum of:
            0.062078293 = weight(_text_:web in 3731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062078293 = score(doc=3731,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 3731, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata applications have evolved in time into highly structured "islands of information" about digital resources, often bearing a strong semantic interpretation. Scarcely however are these semantics being communicated in machine readable and understandable ways. At the same time, the process for transforming the implied metadata knowledge into explicit Semantic Web descriptions can be problematic and is not always evident. In this article we take upon the well-established Dublin Core metadata standard as well as other metadata schemata, which often appear in digital repositories set-ups, and suggest a proper Semantic Web OWL ontology. In this process the authors cope with discrepancies and incompatibilities, indicative of such attempts, in novel ways. Moreover, we show the potential and necessity of this approach by demonstrating inferences on the resulting ontology, instantiated with actual metadata records. The authors conclude by presenting a working prototype that provides for inference-based querying on top of digital repositories.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  7. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (2004) 0.01
    0.00995581 = product of:
      0.029867431 = sum of:
        0.029867431 = product of:
          0.059734862 = sum of:
            0.059734862 = weight(_text_:web in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059734862 = score(doc=3152,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Table of Contents Part I: Accepted Papers Christoph Tempich and Raphael Volz: Towards a benchmark for Semantic Web reasoners - an analysis of the DAML ontology library M. Carmen Suarez-Figueroa and Asuncion Gomez-Perez: Results of Taxonomic Evaluation of RDF(S) and DAML+OIL ontologies using RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Validation Tools and Ontology Platforms import services Volker Haarslev and Ralf Möller: Racer: A Core Inference Engine for the Semantic Web Mikhail Kazakov and Habib Abdulrab: DL-workbench: a metamodeling approach to ontology manipulation Thorsten Liebig and Olaf Noppens: OntoTrack: Fast Browsing and Easy Editing of Large Ontologie Frederic Fürst, Michel Leclere, and Francky Trichet: TooCoM : a Tool to Operationalize an Ontology with the Conceptual Graph Model Naoki Sugiura, Masaki Kurematsu, Naoki Fukuta, Noriaki Izumi, and Takahira Yamaguchi: A domain ontology engineering tool with general ontologies and text corpus Howard Goldberg, Alfredo Morales, David MacMillan, and Matthew Quinlan: An Ontology-Driven Application to Improve the Prescription of Educational Resources to Parents of Premature Infants Part II: Experiment Contributions Domain natural language description for the experiment Raphael Troncy, Antoine Isaac, and Veronique Malaise: Using XSLT for Interoperability: DOE and The Travelling Domain Experiment Christian Fillies: SemTalk EON2003 Semantic Web Export / Import Interface Test Óscar Corcho, Asunción Gómez-Pérez, Danilo José Guerrero-Rodríguez, David Pérez-Rey, Alberto Ruiz-Cristina, Teresa Sastre-Toral, M. Carmen Suárez-Figueroa: Evaluation experiment of ontology tools' interoperability with the WebODE ontology engineering workbench Holger Knublauch: Case Study: Using Protege to Convert the Travel Ontology to UML and OWL Franz Calvo and John Gennari: Interoperability of Protege 2.0 beta and OilEd 3.5 in the Domain Knowledge of Osteoporosis
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  8. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Houghton, A.; Childress, E.: Web services for controlled vocabularies (2006) 0.01
    0.00995581 = product of:
      0.029867431 = sum of:
        0.029867431 = product of:
          0.059734862 = sum of:
            0.059734862 = weight(_text_:web in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059734862 = score(doc=1171,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Amid the debates about whether folksonomies will supplant controlled vocabularies and whether the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system have outlived their usefulness, libraries, museums and other organizations continue to require efficient, effective access to controlled vocabularies for creating consistent metadata for their collections . In this article, we present an approach for using Web services to interact with controlled vocabularies. Services are implemented within a service-oriented architecture (SOA) framework. SOA is an approach to distributed computing where services are loosely coupled and discoverable on the network. A set of experimental services for controlled vocabularies is provided through the Microsoft Office (MS) Research task pane (a small window or sidebar that opens up next to Internet Explorer (IE) and other Microsoft Office applications). The research task pane is a built-in feature of IE when MS Office 2003 is loaded. The research pane enables a user to take advantage of a number of research and reference services accessible over the Internet. Web browsers, such as Mozilla Firefox and Opera, also provide sidebars which could be used to deliver similar, loosely-coupled Web services.
  9. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Toward terminology services : experiences with a pilot Web service thesaurus browser (2006) 0.01
    0.009754662 = product of:
      0.029263986 = sum of:
        0.029263986 = product of:
          0.058527973 = sum of:
            0.058527973 = weight(_text_:web in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058527973 = score(doc=1955,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.35328537 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Dublin Core recommends controlled terminology for the subject of a resource. Knowledge organization systems (KOS), such as classifications, gazetteers, taxonomies and thesauri, provide controlled vocabularies that organize and structure concepts for indexing, classifying, browsing and search. For example, a thesaurus employs a set of standard semantic relationships (ISO 2788, ISO 5964), and major thesauri have a large entry vocabulary of terms considered equivalent for retrieval purposes. Many KOS have been made available for Web-based access. However, they are often not fully integrated into indexing and search systems and the full potential for networked and programmatic access remains untapped. The lack of standardized access and interchange formats impedes wider use of KOS resources. We developed a Web demonstrator (www.comp.glam.ac.uk/~FACET/webdemo/) for the FACET project (www.comp.glam.ac.uk/~facet/facetproject.html) that explored thesaurus-based query expansion with the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A Web demonstrator was implemented via Active Server Pages (ASP) with server-side scripting and compiled server-side components for database access, and cascading style sheets for presentation. The browser-based interactive interface permits dynamic control of query term expansion. However, being based on a custom thesaurus representation and API, the techniques cannot be applied directly to thesauri in other formats on the Web. General programmatic access requires commonly agreed protocols, for example, building on Web and Grid services. The development of common KOS representation formats and service protocols are closely linked. Linda Hill and colleagues argued in 2002 for a general KOS service protocol from which protocols for specific types of KOS can be derived. Thus, in the future, a combination of thesaurus and query protocols might permit a thesaurus to be used with a choice of search tools on various kinds of databases. Service-oriented architectures bring an opportunity for moving toward a clearer separation of interface components from the underlying data sources. In our view, basing distributed protocol services on the atomic elements of thesaurus data structures and relationships is not necessarily the best approach because client operations that require multiple client-server calls would carry too much overhead. This would limit the interfaces that could be offered by applications following such a protocol. Advanced interactive interfaces require protocols that group primitive thesaurus data elements (via their relationships) into composites to achieve reasonable response.
  10. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Marinai, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Report on execution and results of the interoperability tests (2008) 0.01
    0.0091703655 = product of:
      0.027511096 = sum of:
        0.027511096 = product of:
          0.05502219 = sum of:
            0.05502219 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05502219 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  11. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.01
    0.0091703655 = product of:
      0.027511096 = sum of:
        0.027511096 = product of:
          0.05502219 = sum of:
            0.05502219 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05502219 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  12. Hubrich, J.: CrissCross: SWD-DDC-Mapping (2008) 0.01
    0.0091703655 = product of:
      0.027511096 = sum of:
        0.027511096 = product of:
          0.05502219 = sum of:
            0.05502219 = weight(_text_:22 in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05502219 = score(doc=2175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 10:35:21
  13. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Thesauri KOS analysis and selected thesaurus mapping methodology on the project case-study (2007) 0.01
    0.0091703655 = product of:
      0.027511096 = sum of:
        0.027511096 = product of:
          0.05502219 = sum of:
            0.05502219 = weight(_text_:22 in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05502219 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  14. Svensson, L.G.: Unified access : a semantic Web based model for multilingual navigation in heterogeneous data sources (2008) 0.01
    0.008447785 = product of:
      0.025343355 = sum of:
        0.025343355 = product of:
          0.05068671 = sum of:
            0.05068671 = weight(_text_:web in 2191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05068671 = score(doc=2191,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2191, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  15. Si, L.: Encoding formats and consideration of requirements for mapping (2007) 0.01
    0.0080240695 = product of:
      0.024072208 = sum of:
        0.024072208 = product of:
          0.048144415 = sum of:
            0.048144415 = weight(_text_:22 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048144415 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:27
  16. Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Building a Terminology Network for Search : the KoMoHe project (2008) 0.01
    0.0080240695 = product of:
      0.024072208 = sum of:
        0.024072208 = product of:
          0.048144415 = sum of:
            0.048144415 = weight(_text_:22 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048144415 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17776565 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  17. Mayr, P.; Walter, A.-K.: Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Crosskonkordanzen (2007) 0.01
    0.007964648 = product of:
      0.023893945 = sum of:
        0.023893945 = product of:
          0.04778789 = sum of:
            0.04778789 = weight(_text_:web in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04778789 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag stellt Einsatzmöglichkeiten und spezifische Problembereiche von Crosskonkordanzen (CK) im Projekt "Kompetenznetzwerk Modellbildung und Heterogenitätsbehand lung" (KoMoHe) so wie das Netz der bis dato entstandenen Terminologie-Überstiege vor. Die am IZ entstandenen CK sollen künftig über einen Terminologie-Service als Web Service genutzt werden, dieser wird im Beitrag exemplarisch vorgestellt. Des Weiteren wird ein Testszenario samt Evaluationsdesign beschrieben über das der Mehrwert von Crosskonkordanzen empirisch untersucht werden kann.
  18. Isaac, A.: Aligning thesauri for an integrated access to Cultural Heritage Resources (2007) 0.01
    0.007791654 = product of:
      0.023374962 = sum of:
        0.023374962 = product of:
          0.046749923 = sum of:
            0.046749923 = weight(_text_:web in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046749923 = score(doc=553,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.28219095 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, a number of efforts are being carried out to integrate collections from different institutions and containing heterogeneous material. Examples of such projects are The European Library [1] and the Memory of the Netherlands [2]. A crucial point for the success of these is the availability to provide a unified access on top of the different collections, e.g. using one single vocabulary for querying or browsing the objects they contain. This is made difficult by the fact that the objects from different collections are often described using different vocabularies - thesauri, classification schemes - and are therefore not interoperable at the semantic level. To solve this problem, one can turn to semantic links - mappings - between the elements of the different vocabularies. If one knows that a concept C from a vocabulary V is semantically equivalent to a concept to a concept D from vocabulary W, then an appropriate search engine can return all the objects that were indexed against D for a query for objects described using C. We thus have an access to other collections, using a single one vocabulary. This is however an ideal situation, and hard alignment work is required to reach it. Several projects in the past have tried to implement such a solution, like MACS [3] and Renardus [4]. They have demonstrated very interesting results, but also highlighted the difficulty of aligning manually all the different vocabularies involved in practical cases, which sometimes contain hundreds of thousands of concepts. To alleviate this problem, a number of tools have been proposed in order to provide with candidate mappings between two input vocabularies, making alignment a (semi-) automatic task. Recently, the Semantic Web community has produced a lot of these alignment tools'. Several techniques are found, depending on the material they exploit: labels of concepts, structure of vocabularies, collection objects and external knowledge sources. Throughout our presentation, we will present a concrete heterogeneity case where alignment techniques have been applied to build a (pilot) browser, developed in the context of the STITCH project [5]. This browser enables a unified access to two collections of illuminated manuscripts, using the description vocabulary used in the first collection, Mandragore [6], or the one used by the second, Iconclass [7]. In our talk, we will also make the point for using unified representations the vocabulary semantic and lexical information. Additionally to ease the use of the alignment tools that have these vocabularies as input, turning to a standard representation format helps designing applications that are more generic, like the browser we demonstrate. We give pointers to SKOS [8], an open and web-enabled format currently developed by the Semantic Web community.
    References [1] http:// www.theeuropeanlibrary.org [2] http://www.geheugenvannederland.nl [3] http://macs.cenl.org [4] Day, M., Koch, T., Neuroth, H.: Searching and browsing multiple subject gateways in the Renardus service. In Proceedings of the RC33 Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Amsterdam , 2005. [5] http://stitch.cs.vu.nl [6] http://mandragore.bnf.fr [7] http://www.iconclass.nl [8] www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/ 1 The Semantic Web vision supposes sharing data using different conceptualizations (ontologies), and therefore implies to tackle the semantic interoperability problem
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  19. Sigel, A.: Wissensorganisation, Topic Maps und Ontology Engineering : Die Verbindung bewährter Begriffsstrukturen mit aktueller XML Technologie (2004) 0.01
    0.0070398217 = product of:
      0.021119464 = sum of:
        0.021119464 = product of:
          0.04223893 = sum of:
            0.04223893 = weight(_text_:web in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04223893 = score(doc=3236,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Wie können begriffliche Strukturen an Topic Maps angebunden werden? Allgemeiner. Wie kann die Wissensorganisation dazu beitragen, dass im Semantic Web eine begriffsbasierte Infrastruktur verfügbar ist? Dieser Frage hat sich die Wissensorganisation bislang noch nicht wirklich angenommen. Insgesamt ist die Berührung zwischen semantischen Wissenstechnologien und wissensorganisatorischen Fragestellungen noch sehr gering, obwohl Begriffsstrukturen, Ontologien und Topic Maps grundsätzlich gut zusammenpassen und ihre gemeinsame Betrachtung Erkenntnisse für zentrale wissensorganisatorische Fragestellungen wie z.B. semantische Interoperabilität und semantisches Retrieval erwarten lässt. Daher motiviert und skizziert dieser Beitrag die Grundidee, nach der es möglich sein müsste, eine Sprache zur Darstellung von Begriffsstrukturen in der Wissensorganisation geeignet mit Topic Maps zu verbinden. Eine genauere Untersuchung und Implementation stehen allerdings weiterhin aus. Speziell wird vermutet, dass sich der Concepto zugrunde liegende Formalismus CLF (Concept Language Formalism) mit Topic Maps vorteilhaft abbilden lässt 3 Damit können Begriffs- und Themennetze realisiert werden, die auf expliziten Begriffssystemen beruhen. Seitens der Wissensorganisation besteht die Notwendigkeit, sich mit aktuellen Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet des Semantic Web und ontology engineering vertraut zu machen, aber auch die eigene Kompetenz stärker aktiv in diese Gebiete einzubringen. Damit dies geschehen kann, führt dieser Beitrag zum besseren Verständnis zunächst aus Sicht der Wissensorganisation knapp in Ontologien und Topic Maps ein und diskutiert wichtige Überschneidungsbereiche.
  20. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.: Reducing semantic complexity in distributed digital libraries : Treatment of term vagueness and document re-ranking (2008) 0.01
    0.0070398217 = product of:
      0.021119464 = sum of:
        0.021119464 = product of:
          0.04223893 = sum of:
            0.04223893 = weight(_text_:web in 1909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04223893 = score(doc=1909,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1656677 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050763648 = queryNorm
                0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 1909, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Digital libraries and the semantic web: context, applications and research".
    Theme
    Semantic Web

Languages

  • e 50
  • d 13

Types

  • a 41
  • el 24
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • More… Less…