Search (65 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Andrade, J. de; Lopes Ginez de Lara, M.: Interoperability and mapping between knowledge organization systems : metathesaurus - Unified Medical Language System of the National Library of Medicine (2016) 0.00 
    0.0022861264 = product of:
  0.0068583786 = sum of:
    0.0068583786 = product of:
      0.034291893 = sum of:
        0.034291893 = weight(_text_:2 in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034291893 = score(doc=2826,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.32742465 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper is aimed at assessing the potential of interoperable knowledge organization systems to respond to search strategies in order to retrieve information from databases in the areas of health and biomedicine. An analysis was done on the semantic consistency of synonym grouping of a term selected from the Metathesaurus, the Unified Medical Language System of the National Library of Medicine, based on the characteristics of equivalence proposed in ISO 25964: 2: 2011 and based on the following categories: semantic, morphological, syntactic and typographical variations. This paper highlights the importance of understanding the results of automatic mapping as well as the need for characterization, evaluation and selection of equivalences for preparation of consistent search strategies and presentation of search results in scientific work methodologies.
    Date
    2. 9.2014 19:19:40
    Object
    ISO 25964-2
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.2, S.102-106
  2. ISO 25964-2: Der Standard für die Interoperabilität von Thesauri (2013) 0.00 
    0.0021085653 = product of:
  0.0063256957 = sum of:
    0.0063256957 = product of:
      0.03162848 = sum of:
        0.03162848 = weight(_text_:2 in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03162848 = score(doc=772,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.3019939 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Anfang März 2013 veröffentlicht, behandelt ISO 25964-2 die Interoperabilität zwischen Thesauri und anderen Vokabularien. Es geht dabei hauptsächlich um die theoretischen Grundlagen und die praktische Durchführung von Thesaurusföderationen. Zu den behandelten Vokabulartypen zählen Klassifikationen, Aktenpläne für die Schriftgutverwaltung, Taxonomien, Schlagwortlisten, Normdateien für Individualnamen, Ontologien, Terminologiedatenbanken und Synonymringe.
    Content
    "Interoperabilität bedeutet, dass zwei oder mehrere Systeme oder Systemkomponenten Informationen austauschen und nutzen können. Diese Fähigkeit ist von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung für Informationsnetzwerke, auf die wir alle angewiesen sind, und mehr noch für die Entwicklung des Semantischen Web. Bei Thesauri gibt es zwei Ebenen der Interoperabilität: 1. Erstellung des Thesaurus in einer standardisierten Form, um den Import und die Nutzung des Thesaurus in anderen Systemen zu gewährleisten (dies wurde in ISO 25964-1 behandelt und 2011 publiziert). 2. Ergänzende Nutzung von weiteren Vokabularien und zwar durch die Erstellung von Mappings zwischen den Begriffen eines Thesaurus und denen eines anderen Vokabulars (Thema von ISO 25964-2). Nur wenn Mappings mit der empfohlenen Sorgfalt von ISO 25964-2 durchgeführt werden, kann sichergestellt werden, dass die auf ihnen basierenden Verknüpfungen im Semantic Web den nichtsahnenden Netzsurfer nicht zu irreführenden Ergebnissen führen.
    Der vollständige Titel von Teil 2 lautet "Information and documentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Teil 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies". Wichtige Themen, die der Standard behandelt, sind Strukturmodelle für das Mapping, Richtlinien für Mappingtypen und der Umgang mit Präkombination, die besonders bei Klassifikationen, Taxonomien und Schlagwortsystemen vorkommt. Das primäre Augenmerk von ISO 25964 gilt den Thesauri, und mit Ausnahme von Terminologien existieren keine vergleichbaren Standards für die anderen Vokabulartypen. Statt zu versuchen, diese normativ darzustellen, behandelt Teil 2 ausschließlich die Interoperabilität zwischen ihnen und den Thesauri. Die Kapitel für die einzelnen Vokabulartypen decken jeweils folgende Sachverhalte ab: - Schlüsseleigenschaften des Vokabulars (deskriptiv, nicht normativ) - Semantische Komponenten/Beziehungen (deskriptiv, nicht normativ) Sofern anwendbar, Empfehlungen für das Mapping zwischen Vokabular und Thesaurus (normativ).
    Im Fall von Ontologien, Terminologien und Synonymringen ist das Mapping in oder aus einem Thesaurus nicht immer nützlich. Hier sind andere Formen sich gegenseitig befruchtender Nutzung zu empfehlen. Dies gilt besonders für Ontologien, die im Kontext des Semantischen Web kombiniert mit Thesauri eingesetzt werden können. ISO 25964-2 zeigt die Unterschiede zwischen Thesauri und Ontologien auf und gibt Beispiele für die Möglichkeiten interoperabler Funktionen. Praktische Implementation und weiterführende Arbeiten Und was bedeutet dies für SKOS, dem W3C-Standard für die Veröffentlichung von Simple Knowledge Organization Systems im Web? Die Arbeitsgruppen von SKOS und ISO 25964 haben glücklicherweise eng zusammengearbeitet, was sich in einer guten Kompatibilität der beiden Standards äußert. Gemeinsam haben sie eine Tabelle erarbeitet, die die Übereinstimmungen zwischen den Datenmodellen von ISO 25964 und SKOS/SKOS-XL aufzeigt und nun beim ISO 25964-Sekretariat unter http://www.niso.org/schemas/iso25964/frei zugänglich ist. Die Tabelle ist formal kein Bestandteil der beiden Standards, aber von beiden abhängig. Das macht sie zu einem Beispiel für die Entwicklung praktischer Tools für das sich erweiternde Semantische Web durch die Gemeinschaft seiner Nutzer."
    Object
    ISO 25964-2
  3. Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011) 0.00 
    0.0016165356 = product of:
  0.0048496067 = sum of:
    0.0048496067 = product of:
      0.024248032 = sum of:
        0.024248032 = weight(_text_:2 in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024248032 = score(doc=649,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.2315242 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper is about a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of science and the usage of these insights for compensating the typical problems that arises in metadata-driven Digital Libraries. Three science model driven retrieval services are presented: co-word analysis based query expansion, re-ranking via Bradfordizing and author centrality. The services are evaluated with relevance assessments from which two important implications emerge: (1) precision values of the retrieval services are the same or better than the tf-idf retrieval baseline and (2) each service retrieved a disjoint set of documents. The different services each favor quite other - but still relevant - documents than pure term-frequency based rankings. The proposed models and derived retrieval services therefore open up new viewpoints on the scientific knowledge space and provide an alternative framework to structure scholarly information systems.
    Date
    2. 3.2013 11:42:37
  4. Gaona-García, P.A.; Stoitsis, G.; Sánchez-Alonso, S.; Biniari, K.: ¬An exploratory study of user perception in visual search interfaces based on SKOS (2016) 0.00 
    0.0016165356 = product of:
  0.0048496067 = sum of:
    0.0048496067 = product of:
      0.024248032 = sum of:
        0.024248032 = weight(_text_:2 in 2965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024248032 = score(doc=2965,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.2315242 = fieldWeight in 2965, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2965)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 9.2014 19:19:40
    2. 6.2016 17:55:16
  5. Gödert, W.: Semantische Wissensrepräsentation und Interoperabilität : Teil 2: Ein formales Modell semantischer Interoperabilität (2010) 0.00 
    0.0015240842 = product of:
  0.0045722527 = sum of:
    0.0045722527 = product of:
      0.022861263 = sum of:
        0.022861263 = weight(_text_:2 in 1530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022861263 = score(doc=1530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 1530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1530)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  6. Boteram, F.; Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.: Semantic interoperability and retrieval paradigms (2010) 0.00 
    0.0015240842 = product of:
  0.0045722527 = sum of:
    0.0045722527 = product of:
      0.022861263 = sum of:
        0.022861263 = weight(_text_:2 in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022861263 = score(doc=3362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 3.2013 12:24:16
  7. Hubrich, J.: Intersystem relations : Characteristics and functionalities (2011) 0.00 
    0.0015240842 = product of:
  0.0045722527 = sum of:
    0.0045722527 = product of:
      0.022861263 = sum of:
        0.022861263 = weight(_text_:2 in 4780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022861263 = score(doc=4780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 4780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4780)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 3.2013 11:39:08
  8. Jacobs, J.-H.; Mengel, T.; Müller, K.: Benefits of the CrissCross project for conceptual interoperability and retrieval (2010) 0.00 
    0.0013335737 = product of:
  0.004000721 = sum of:
    0.004000721 = product of:
      0.020003606 = sum of:
        0.020003606 = weight(_text_:2 in 3038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020003606 = score(doc=3038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 3038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3038)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 3.2013 12:33:28
  9. Jacobs, J.-H.; Mengel, T.; Müller, K.: Insights and Outlooks : a retrospective view on the CrissCross project (2011) 0.00 
    0.0013335737 = product of:
  0.004000721 = sum of:
    0.004000721 = product of:
      0.020003606 = sum of:
        0.020003606 = weight(_text_:2 in 4785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020003606 = score(doc=4785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 4785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4785)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 3.2013 11:40:36
  10. Shepherd, M.; Sampalli, T.: Ontology as boundary object (2012) 0.00 
    0.0013335737 = product of:
  0.004000721 = sum of:
    0.004000721 = product of:
      0.020003606 = sum of:
        0.020003606 = weight(_text_:2 in 837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020003606 = score(doc=837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=837)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:16:51
  11. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic-Web-Technologie (2015) 0.00 
    0.0013335737 = product of:
  0.004000721 = sum of:
    0.004000721 = product of:
      0.020003606 = sum of:
        0.020003606 = weight(_text_:2 in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020003606 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 2(2015) Nr.4, S.161-175
  12. Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Mapping derivative relationships from RDA to BIBFRAME 2 (2019) 0.00 
    0.0013335737 = product of:
  0.004000721 = sum of:
    0.004000721 = product of:
      0.020003606 = sum of:
        0.020003606 = weight(_text_:2 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020003606 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.19099772 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  13. Huckstorf, A.; Petras, V.: Mind the lexical gap : EuroVoc Building Block of the Semantic Web (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=2782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.2/3, S.125-126
  14. Soergel, D.: Conceptual foundations for semantic mapping and semantic search (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=3939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 3.2013 11:39:57
  15. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: In pursuit of interoperability : can we standardize mapping types? (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 4788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=4788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 4788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4788)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 3.2013 11:42:02
  16. Panzer, M.: Two tales of a concept : aligning FRSAD with SKOS (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 4789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=4789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 4789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4789)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 3.2013 11:44:17
  17. Boteram, F.: Integrating semantic interoperability into FRSAD (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 4791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=4791,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 4791, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4791)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    2. 3.2013 11:43:01
  18. Lange, C.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Kutz, O.: Making heterogeneous ontologies interoperable through standardisation : a Meta Ontology Language to be standardised: Ontology Integration and Interoperability (OntoIOp) (2011) 0.00 
    0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Assistive technology, especially for persons with disabilities, increasingly relies on electronic communication among users, between users and their devices, and among these devices. Making such ICT accessible and inclusive often requires remedial programming, which tends to be costly or even impossible. We, therefore, aim at more interoperable devices, services accessing these devices, and content delivered by these services, at the levels of 1. data and metadata, 2. datamodels and data modelling methods and 3. metamodels as well as a meta ontology language. Even though ontologies are widely being used to enable content interoperability, there is currently no unified framework for ontology interoperability itself. This paper outlines the design considerations underlying OntoIOp (Ontology Integration and Interoperability), a new standardisation activity in ISO/TC 37/SC 3 to become an international standard, which aims at filling this gap.
  19. Borst, T.: Repositorien auf ihrem Weg in das Semantic Web : semantisch hergeleitete Interoperabilität als Zielstellung für künftige Repository-Entwicklungen (2014) 0.00 
    0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=1555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 38(2014) H.2, S.257-265
  20. EDUG's recommendations for best practice in mapping involving Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) (2015) 0.00 
    0.0011430632 = product of:
  0.0034291893 = sum of:
    0.0034291893 = product of:
      0.017145947 = sum of:
        0.017145947 = weight(_text_:2 in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017145947 = score(doc=2113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10473217 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042408705 = queryNorm
            0.16371232 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    For some years mapping has been one of the main tasks in the EDUG member countries. While the ISO standard on mapping and interoperability with other vocabularies (ISO 25964-2) gives some advice on creating mappings between a thesaurus and e.g. a classification system, it does not deal with Dewey Decimal Classification specifically. The EDUG members have felt a growing need to discuss and record the knowledge acquired in mapping projects where either the source or the target vocabulary is DDC. The recommendations below are the result of a seminar on mapping in connection with the EDUG annual meeting in April 2015. The recommendations are not exhaustive and will be subject to change as EDUG members gain more experience in this field of work. We still hope that institutions planning to embark on a mapping project to/from DDC, may find the guidelines helpful.

Authors

Languages

  • e 48
  • d 17

Types

  • a 49
  • el 11
  • m 6
  • s 4
  • r 2
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications