Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Nagao, M.: Knowledge and inference (1990) 0.00
    0.004855863 = product of:
      0.024279313 = sum of:
        0.024279313 = product of:
          0.048558626 = sum of:
            0.048558626 = weight(_text_:problems in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048558626 = score(doc=3304,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.322459 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge and Inference discusses an important problem for software systems: How do we treat knowledge and ideas on a computer and how do we use inference to solve problems on a computer? The book talks about the problems of knowledge and inference for the purpose of merging artificial intelligence and library science. The book begins by clarifying the concept of ""knowledge"" from many points of view, followed by a chapter on the current state of library science and the place of artificial intelligence in library science. Subsequent chapters cover central topics in the artificial intelligence: search and problem solving, methods of making proofs, and the use of knowledge in looking for a proof. There is also a discussion of how to use the knowledge system. The final chapter describes a popular expert system. It describes tools for building expert systems using an example based on Expert Systems-A Practical Introduction by P. Sell (Macmillian, 1985). This type of software is called an ""expert system shell."" This book was written as a textbook for undergraduate students covering only the basics but explaining as much detail as possible.
  2. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Fieldhouse, M.; Do, T.: ¬A graphical interface for OKAPI : the design and evaluation of an online catalogue system with direct manipulation interaction for subject access (1994) 0.00
    0.0048070587 = product of:
      0.024035294 = sum of:
        0.024035294 = product of:
          0.048070587 = sum of:
            0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 1318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048070587 = score(doc=1318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 1318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1318)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A project to design a graphical user interface for the OKAPI online catalogue search system which uses the basic term weighting probabilistic search engine. Presents a research context of the project with a discussion of interface and functionality issues relating to the design of OPACs. Describes the design methodology and evaluation methodology. Presents the preliminary results of the field trial evaluation. Considers problems encountered in the field trial and discusses contributory factors to the effectiveness of interactive query expansion. Highlights the tension between usability and functionality in highly interactive retrieval and suggests further areas of research
  3. Brezillon, P.; Saker, I.: Modeling context in information seeking (1999) 0.00
    0.0047305166 = product of:
      0.023652581 = sum of:
        0.023652581 = product of:
          0.047305163 = sum of:
            0.047305163 = weight(_text_:etc in 276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047305163 = score(doc=276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.23937736 = fieldWeight in 276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Context plays an important role in a number of domains where reasoning intervenes as in understanding, interpretation, diagnosis, etc. The reason is that reasoning activities heavily rely on a background (or experience) that is generally not made explicit and that gives a contextual dimension to knowledge. On the Web in December 1996, AItaVista gave more than 710000 pages containing the word context, when concept gives only 639000 references. A clear definition of this word stays to be found. There are several formal definitions of this concept (references are given in Brézillon, 1996): a set of preferences and/or beliefs, an infinite and only partially known collection of assumptions, a list of attributes, the product of an interpretation, possible worlds, assumptions under which a statement is true or false. One faces the same situation at the programming level: a collection of context schemas; a path in information retrieval; slots in object-oriented languages; a special, buffer-like data structure; a window on the screen, buttons which are functional customisable and shareable; an interpreter which controls the system's activity; the characteristics of the situation and the goals of the knowledge use; or entities (things or events) related in a certain way that permits to listen what is said and what is not said. Context is often assimilated at a set of restrictions (e.g., preconditions) that limit access to parts of the applications. The first works considering context explicitly are in Natural Language. Researchers in this domain focus on the linguistic context, sometimes associated with other types of contexts as: semantic context, cognitive context, physical and perceptual context, and social context (Bunt, 1997).
  4. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.00
    0.0041392017 = product of:
      0.020696009 = sum of:
        0.020696009 = product of:
          0.041392017 = sum of:
            0.041392017 = weight(_text_:etc in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041392017 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.20945519 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
  5. Oard, D.W.: Alternative approaches for cross-language text retrieval (1997) 0.00
    0.0041392017 = product of:
      0.020696009 = sum of:
        0.020696009 = product of:
          0.041392017 = sum of:
            0.041392017 = weight(_text_:etc in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041392017 = score(doc=1164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.20945519 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Multilingual text retrieval can be defined as selection of useful documents from collections that may contain several languages (English, French, Chinese, etc.). This formulation allows for the possibility that individual documents might contain more than one language, a common occurrence in some applications. Both cross-language and within-language retrieval are included in this formulation, but it is the cross-language aspect of the problem which distinguishes multilingual text retrieval from its well studied monolingual counterpart. At the SIGIR 96 workshop on "Cross-Linguistic Information Retrieval" the participants discussed the proliferation of terminology being used to describe the field and settled on "Cross-Language" as the best single description of the salient aspect of the problem. "Multilingual" was felt to be too broad, since that term has also been used to describe systems able to perform within-language retrieval in more than one language but that lack any cross-language capability. "Cross-lingual" and "cross-linguistic" were felt to be equally good descriptions of the field, but "crosslanguage" was selected as the preferred term in the interest of standardization. Unfortunately, at about the same time the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) introduced "translingual" as their preferred term, so we are still some distance from reaching consensus on this matter.
  6. Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994) 0.00
    0.003954508 = product of:
      0.019772539 = sum of:
        0.019772539 = product of:
          0.039545078 = sum of:
            0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039545078 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:35:22
  7. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.00
    0.0034601947 = product of:
      0.017300973 = sum of:
        0.017300973 = product of:
          0.034601945 = sum of:
            0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034601945 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  8. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.00
    0.0034601947 = product of:
      0.017300973 = sum of:
        0.017300973 = product of:
          0.034601945 = sum of:
            0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034601945 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  9. Lund, K.; Burgess, C.; Atchley, R.A.: Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space (1995) 0.00
    0.0034601947 = product of:
      0.017300973 = sum of:
        0.017300973 = product of:
          0.034601945 = sum of:
            0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034601945 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: July 22 - 25, 1995, University of Pittsburgh / ed. by Johanna D. Moore and Jill Fain Lehmann
  10. Tseng, Y.-H.: Solving vocabulary problems with interactive query expansion (1998) 0.00
    0.0034336136 = product of:
      0.017168067 = sum of:
        0.017168067 = product of:
          0.034336135 = sum of:
            0.034336135 = weight(_text_:problems in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034336135 = score(doc=5159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.22801295 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  11. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.00
    0.002965881 = product of:
      0.014829405 = sum of:
        0.014829405 = product of:
          0.02965881 = sum of:
            0.02965881 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02965881 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
  12. Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995) 0.00
    0.0024715676 = product of:
      0.0123578375 = sum of:
        0.0123578375 = product of:
          0.024715675 = sum of:
            0.024715675 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024715675 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10