Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Semantische Umfeldsuche im Information Retrieval (1998) 0.01 
    0.0056620096 = product of:
  0.04246507 = sum of:
    0.018668294 = weight(_text_:und in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018668294 = score(doc=606,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06287808 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
    0.023796773 = weight(_text_:des in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023796773 = score(doc=606,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07856494 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.302893 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Sachliche Suchen in bibliothekarischen Online-Katalogen enden häufig mit unbefriedigenden Ergebnissen. Als eine Ursache dafür kann angesehen werden, daß die Gestaltung des Suchprozesses das semantische Umfeld einer Suchanfrage nicht mit einbezieht, daß in Übertragung der Verhältnisse in konventionellen Katalogen am Paradigma des Wort-Matching zwischen Suchwort und Indexat festgehalten wird. Es wird statt dessen das Konzept einer semantischen Umfeldsuche entwickelt und gezeigt, welche Rolle die Verwendung strukturierten Vokabulars dafür spielen kann. Insbesondere wird dargestellt, welche Möglichkeiten Verfahren der wörterbuchgestützten maschinellen Indexierung in diesem Zusammenhang spielen können. Die Ausführungen werden durch Beispiele illustriert
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 45(1998) H.4, S.401-423
  2. Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997) 0.01 
    0.0052580964 = product of:
  0.039435722 = sum of:
    0.01539735 = weight(_text_:und in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01539735 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06287808 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
    0.02403837 = weight(_text_:des in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02403837 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07856494 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996) 0.00 
    0.0042064767 = product of:
  0.031548575 = sum of:
    0.01231788 = weight(_text_:und in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01231788 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06287808 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
    0.019230695 = weight(_text_:des in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019230695 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07856494 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Shapiro, C.D.; Yan, P.-F.: Generous tools : thesauri in digital libraries (1996) 0.00 
    0.0036806674 = product of:
  0.027605005 = sum of:
    0.010778145 = weight(_text_:und in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010778145 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06287808 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
    0.016826859 = weight(_text_:des in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016826859 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07856494 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Otto, A.: Ordnungssysteme als Wissensbasis für die Suche in textbasierten Datenbeständen : dargestellt am Beispiel einer soziologischen Bibliographie (1998) 0.00 
    0.0032935478 = product of:
  0.024701606 = sum of:
    0.01508626 = weight(_text_:und in 6625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01508626 = score(doc=6625,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06287808 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.23992877 = fieldWeight in 6625, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6625)
    0.009615348 = weight(_text_:des in 6625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009615348 = score(doc=6625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07856494 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 6625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6625)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Es wird eine Methode vorgestellt, wie sich Ordnungssysteme für die Suche in textbasierten Datenbeständen verwenden lassen. "Ordnungssystem" wird hier als Oberbegriff für beliebige geordnete Begriffssammlungen verwendet. Dies sind beispielsweise Thesauri, Klassifikationen und formale Systematiken. Weil Thesauri dabei die leistungsfähigsten Ordnungssysteme sind, finden sie eine besondere Berücksichtigung. Der Beitrag ist streng praxisbezogenen und auf die Nutzerschnittstelle konzentriert. Die Basis für die Nutzerschnittstelle bilden Ordnungssysteme, die über eine WWW-Schnittstelle angeboten werden. Je nach Fachgebiet kann der Nutzer ein spezielles Ordnungssystem für die Suche auswählen. Im Unterschied zu klassischen Verfahren werden die Ordnungssysteme nicht zur ausschließlichen Suche in Deskriptorenfeldern, sondern für die Suche in einem Basic Index verwendet. In der Anwendung auf den Basic Index sind die Ordnungssysteme quasi "entkoppelt" von der ursprünglichen Datenbank und den Deskriptorenfeldern, für die das Ordnungssystem entwickelt wurde. Die Inhalte einer Datenbank spielen bei der Wahl der Ordnungssysteme zunächst keine Rolle. Sie machen sich erst bei der Suche in der Anzahl der Treffer bemerkbar: so findet ein rechtswissenschaftlicher Thesaurus natürlicherweise in einer Medizin-Datenbank weniger relevante Dokumente als in einer Rechts-Datenbank, weil das im Rechts-Thesaurus abgebildete Begriffsgut eher in einer Rechts-Datenbank zu finden ist. Das Verfahren ist modular aufgebaut und sieht in der Konzeption nachgeordnete semantische Retrievalverfahren vor, die zu einer Verbesserung von Retrievaleffektivität und -effizienz führen werden. So werden aus einer Ergebnismenge, die ausschließlich durch exakten Zeichenkettenabgleich gefunden wurde, in einem nachfolgenden Schritt durch eine semantische Analyse diejenigen Dokumente herausgefiltert, die für die Suchfrage relevant sind. Die WWW-Nutzerschnittstelle und die Verwendung bereits bestehender Ordnungssysteme führen zu einer Minimierung des Arbeitsaufwands auf Nutzerseite. Die Kosten für eine Suche lassen sich sowohl auf der Input-Seite verringern, indem eine aufwendige "manuelle" Indexierung entfällt, als auch auf der Output-Seite, indem den Nutzern leicht bedienbare Suchoptionen zur Verfügung gestellt werden
  6. Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998) 0.00 
    0.0031548575 = product of:
  0.02366143 = sum of:
    0.00923841 = weight(_text_:und in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00923841 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06287808 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
    0.014423022 = weight(_text_:des in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014423022 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07856494 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  7. Spiteri, L.F.: ¬The essential elements of faceted thesauri (1999) 0.00 
    0.0031548575 = product of:
  0.02366143 = sum of:
    0.00923841 = weight(_text_:und in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00923841 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06287808 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
    0.014423022 = weight(_text_:des in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014423022 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07856494 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.00 
    0.0030686297 = product of:
  0.04602944 = sum of:
    0.04602944 = sum of:
      0.019123346 = weight(_text_:internet in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019123346 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.0837547 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028369885 = queryNorm
          0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
      0.026906094 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026906094 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.0993465 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028369885 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Theme
    Internet
  9. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.00 
    0.0018403337 = product of:
  0.013802502 = sum of:
    0.0053890725 = weight(_text_:und in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0053890725 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06287808 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
    0.008413429 = weight(_text_:des in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008413429 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07856494 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.10708885 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  10. Zarri, G.P.: Utilisation de structures conceptuelles complexes pour représenter le "contenu sémantique" de textes narratifs (1999) 0.00 
    0.0012820464 = product of:
  0.019230695 = sum of:
    0.019230695 = weight(_text_:des in 6168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019230695 = score(doc=6168,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07856494 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 6168, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6168)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Organisation des connaissances en vue de leur intégration dans les systèmes de représentation et de recherche d'information. Ed.: J. Maniez, et al
  11. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Dokumenterschließung, Information Retrieval und Navigation in Informationsräumen (1995) 0.00 
    0.001161341 = product of:
  0.017420113 = sum of:
    0.017420113 = weight(_text_:und in 4438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017420113 = score(doc=4438,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06287808 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 4438, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4438)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 42(1995) H.2, S.137-155
  12. Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994) 0.00 
    0.0010249941 = product of:
  0.015374911 = sum of:
    0.015374911 = product of:
      0.030749822 = sum of:
        0.030749822 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030749822 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0993465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028369885 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:35:22
  13. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.00 
    8.968698E-4 = product of:
  0.013453047 = sum of:
    0.013453047 = product of:
      0.026906094 = sum of:
        0.026906094 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026906094 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0993465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028369885 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  14. Lund, K.; Burgess, C.; Atchley, R.A.: Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space (1995) 0.00 
    8.968698E-4 = product of:
  0.013453047 = sum of:
    0.013453047 = product of:
      0.026906094 = sum of:
        0.026906094 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026906094 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0993465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028369885 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: July 22 - 25, 1995, University of Pittsburgh / ed. by Johanna D. Moore and Jill Fain Lehmann
  15. Rudolph, S.; Hemmje, M.: Visualisierung von Thesauri zur interaktiven Unterstüzung von visuellen Anfragen an Textdatenbanken (1994) 0.00 
    8.889665E-4 = product of:
  0.013334497 = sum of:
    0.013334497 = weight(_text_:und in 2382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013334497 = score(doc=2382,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06287808 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028369885 = queryNorm
        0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 2382, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2382)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    In der folgenden Studie wird eine Komponente für eine visuelle Benutzerschnittstelle zu Textdatenbanken entworfen. Mit Hilfe einer Terminologievisualisierung wird dem Benutzer eine Hilfestellung bei der Relevanzbewertung von Dokumenten und bei der Erweiterung seiner visuellen Anfrage an das Retrieval-System gegeben. Dazu werden zuerst die grundlegenden Information-Retrieval-Modelle eingehender vorgestellt, d.h., generelle Retrieval-Modelle, Retrievaloperationen und spezielle Retrieval-Modelle wie Text-Retrieval werden erläutert. Die Funktionalität eines Text-Retrieval-Systems wird vorgestellt. Darüber hinaus werden bereits existierende Implementierungen visueller Information-Retrieval-Benutzerschnittstellen vorgestellt. Im weiteren Verlauf der Arbeit werden mögliche Visualisierungen der mit Hilfe eines Text-Retrieval-Systems gefundenen Dokumente aufgezeigt. Es werden mehrere Vorschläge zur Visualisierung von Thesauri diskutiert. Es wird gezeigt, wie neuronale Netze zur Kartierung eines Eingabebereiches benutzt werden können. Klassifikationsebenen einer objekt-orientierten Annäherung eines Information-Retrieval-Systems werden vorgestellt. In diesem Zusammenhang werden auch die Eigenschaften von Thesauri sowie die Architektur und Funktion eines Parsersystems erläutert. Mit diesen Voraussetzung wird die Implementierung einer visuellen Terminologierunterstützung realisiert. Abschließend wird ein Fazit zur vorgestellten Realisierung basierend auf einem Drei-Schichten-Modell von [Agosti et al. 1990] gezogen.
  16. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.00 
    7.6874555E-4 = product of:
  0.011531183 = sum of:
    0.011531183 = product of:
      0.023062365 = sum of:
        0.023062365 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023062365 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0993465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028369885 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
  17. Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995) 0.00 
    6.406213E-4 = product of:
  0.009609319 = sum of:
    0.009609319 = product of:
      0.019218639 = sum of:
        0.019218639 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019218639 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0993465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028369885 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10
  18. Schwartz, C.: Web search engines (1998) 0.00 
    5.4638134E-4 = product of:
  0.00819572 = sum of:
    0.00819572 = product of:
      0.01639144 = sum of:
        0.01639144 = weight(_text_:internet in 5700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01639144 = score(doc=5700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0837547 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028369885 = queryNorm
            0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 5700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5700)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    This reviews looks briefly at the history of WWW search engine development, considers the current state of affairs, and reflects on the future. Networked discovery tools have evolved along with Internet resource availability. WWW search engines display some complexity in their variety, content, resource acquisition strategies, and in the array of tools the deploy to assist users. A small but growing body of evaluation literature, much of it not systematic in nature, indicates that performance effectiveness is difficult to assess in this setting. Significant improvements in general-content search engine retrieval and ranking performance may not be possible, and are probalby not worth the effort, although search engine providers have introduced some rudimentary attempts at personalization, summarization, and query expansion. The shift to distributed search across multitype database systems could extend general networked discovery and retrieval to include smaller resource collections with rich metadata and navigation tools
  19. Oard, D.W.: Alternative approaches for cross-language text retrieval (1997) 0.00 
    3.1872245E-4 = product of:
  0.0047808364 = sum of:
    0.0047808364 = product of:
      0.009561673 = sum of:
        0.009561673 = weight(_text_:internet in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009561673 = score(doc=1164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0837547 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028369885 = queryNorm
            0.11416282 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    The explosive growth of the Internet and other sources of networked information have made automatic mediation of access to networked information sources an increasingly important problem. Much of this information is expressed as electronic text, and it is becoming practical to automatically convert some printed documents and recorded speech to electronic text as well. Thus, automated systems capable of detecting useful documents are finding widespread application. With even a small number of languages it can be inconvenient to issue the same query repeatedly in every language, so users who are able to read more than one language will likely prefer a multilingual text retrieval system over a collection of monolingual systems. And since reading ability in a language does not always imply fluent writing ability in that language, such users will likely find cross-language text retrieval particularly useful for languages in which they are less confident of their ability to express their information needs effectively. The use of such systems can be also be beneficial if the user is able to read only a single language. For example, when only a small portion of the document collection will ever be examined by the user, performing retrieval before translation can be significantly more economical than performing translation before retrieval. So when the application is sufficiently important to justify the time and effort required for translation, those costs can be minimized if an effective cross-language text retrieval system is available. Even when translation is not available, there are circumstances in which cross-language text retrieval could be useful to a monolingual user. For example, a researcher might find a paper published in an unfamiliar language useful if that paper contains references to works by the same author that are in the researcher's native language.

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes