Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006) 0.06
    0.05782348 = product of:
      0.11564696 = sum of:
        0.11564696 = sum of:
          0.08119681 = weight(_text_:90 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08119681 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.29699144 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
          0.034450155 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034450155 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:43
  2. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.02
    0.024359938 = product of:
      0.048719876 = sum of:
        0.048719876 = product of:
          0.09743975 = sum of:
            0.09743975 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09743975 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
  3. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: End-user interaction with thesauri : an evaluation of cognitive overlap in search term selection (2004) 0.02
    0.02435904 = product of:
      0.04871808 = sum of:
        0.04871808 = product of:
          0.09743616 = sum of:
            0.09743616 = weight(_text_:90 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09743616 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.3563897 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The use of thesaurus-enhanced search tools is an the increase. This paper provides an insight into end-users interaction with and perceptions of such tools. In particular the overlap between users' initial query formulation and thesaurus structures is investigated. This investigation involved the performance of genuine search tasks an the CAB Abstracts database by academic users in the domain of veterinary medicine. The perception of these users regarding the nature and usefulness of the terms suggested from the thesaurus during the search interaction is reported. The results indicated that around 80% of terms entered were matched either exactly or partially to thesaurus terms. Users found over 90% of the terms suggested to be close to their search topics and where terms were selected they indicated that around 50% were to support a 'narrowing down' activity. These findings have implications for the design of thesaurus-enhanced interfaces.
  4. Hauer, M: Silicon Valley Vorarlberg : Maschinelle Indexierung und semantisches Retrieval verbessert den Katalog der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (2004) 0.02
    0.020299202 = product of:
      0.040598404 = sum of:
        0.040598404 = product of:
          0.08119681 = sum of:
            0.08119681 = weight(_text_:90 in 2489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08119681 = score(doc=2489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.29699144 = fieldWeight in 2489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    10 Jahre Internet haben die WeIt um die Bibliotheken herum stark geändert. Der Web-OPAC war eine Antwort der Bibliotheken. Doch reicht ein Web-OPAC im Zeitalter des Internets noch aus? Außer Web ist es doch der alte Katalog. Ca. 90% aller Bibliotheksrecherchen durch Benutzer sind Themenrecherchen. Ein Anteil dieser Recherchen bringt kein Ergebnis. Es kann leicht gemessen werden, dass null Medien gefunden wurden. Die Gründe hierfür wurden auch immer wieder untersucht: Plural- anstelle Singularformen, zu spezifische Suchbegriffe, Schreib- oder Bedienungsfehler. Zu wenig untersucht sind aber die Recherchen, die nicht mit einer Ausleihe enden, denn auch dann kann man in vielen Fällen von einem Retrieval-Mangel ausgehen. Schließlich: Von den ausgeliehenen Büchern werden nach Einschätzung vieler Bibliothekare 80% nicht weiter als bis zum Inhaltsverzeichnis gelesen (außer in Präsenzbibliotheken) - und erst nach Wochen zurückgegeben. Ein Politiker würde dies neudeutsch als "ein Vermittlungsproblem" bezeichnen. Ein Controller als nicht hinreichende Kapitalnutzung. Einfacher machen es sich immer mehr Studenten und Wissenschaftler, ihr Wissensaustausch vollzieht sich zunehmend an anderen Orten. Bibliotheken (als Funktion) sind unverzichtbar für die wissenschaftliche Kommunikation. Deshalb geht es darum, Wege zu finden und auch zu beschreiten, welche die Schätze von Bibliotheken (als Institution) effizienter an die Zielgruppe bringen. Der Einsatz von Information Retrieval-Technologie, neue Erschließungsmethoden und neuer Content sind Ansätze dazu. Doch die bisherigen Verbundstrukturen und Abhängigkeit haben das hier vorgestellte innovative Projekt keineswegs gefördert. Innovation entsteht wie die Innvoationsforschung zeigt eigentlich immer an der Peripherie: in Bregenz fing es an.
  5. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.02
    0.017051958 = product of:
      0.034103915 = sum of:
        0.034103915 = product of:
          0.06820783 = sum of:
            0.06820783 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06820783 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
  6. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.01
    0.012057554 = product of:
      0.024115108 = sum of:
        0.024115108 = product of:
          0.048230216 = sum of:
            0.048230216 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048230216 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  7. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005) 0.01
    0.012057554 = product of:
      0.024115108 = sum of:
        0.024115108 = product of:
          0.048230216 = sum of:
            0.048230216 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048230216 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:58
  8. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.01
    0.012057554 = product of:
      0.024115108 = sum of:
        0.024115108 = product of:
          0.048230216 = sum of:
            0.048230216 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048230216 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
  9. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.01
    0.010335046 = product of:
      0.020670092 = sum of:
        0.020670092 = product of:
          0.041340183 = sum of:
            0.041340183 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041340183 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
  10. Song, D.; Bruza, P.D.: Towards context sensitive information inference (2003) 0.01
    0.008612539 = product of:
      0.017225077 = sum of:
        0.017225077 = product of:
          0.034450155 = sum of:
            0.034450155 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034450155 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:35:46
  11. Bradford, R.B.: Relationship discovery in large text collections using Latent Semantic Indexing (2006) 0.01
    0.0068900306 = product of:
      0.013780061 = sum of:
        0.013780061 = product of:
          0.027560122 = sum of:
            0.027560122 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027560122 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism, and Security, SIAM Data Mining Conference, Bethesda, MD, 20-22 April, 2006. [http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm06/workproceed/Link%20Analysis/15.pdf]