Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Schwartz, C.: Web search engines (1998) 0.04
    0.036013078 = product of:
      0.14405231 = sum of:
        0.14405231 = weight(_text_:assess in 5700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14405231 = score(doc=5700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.39077166 = fieldWeight in 5700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5700)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This reviews looks briefly at the history of WWW search engine development, considers the current state of affairs, and reflects on the future. Networked discovery tools have evolved along with Internet resource availability. WWW search engines display some complexity in their variety, content, resource acquisition strategies, and in the array of tools the deploy to assist users. A small but growing body of evaluation literature, much of it not systematic in nature, indicates that performance effectiveness is difficult to assess in this setting. Significant improvements in general-content search engine retrieval and ranking performance may not be possible, and are probalby not worth the effort, although search engine providers have introduced some rudimentary attempts at personalization, summarization, and query expansion. The shift to distributed search across multitype database systems could extend general networked discovery and retrieval to include smaller resource collections with rich metadata and navigation tools
  2. Jiang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Y.; Nie, R.: Feature-based approaches to semantic similarity assessment of concepts using Wikipedia (2015) 0.03
    0.030010901 = product of:
      0.120043606 = sum of:
        0.120043606 = weight(_text_:assess in 2682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120043606 = score(doc=2682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.32564306 = fieldWeight in 2682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2682)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Semantic similarity assessment between concepts is an important task in many language related applications. In the past, several approaches to assess similarity by evaluating the knowledge modeled in an (or multiple) ontology (or ontologies) have been proposed. However, there are some limitations such as the facts of relying on predefined ontologies and fitting non-dynamic domains in the existing measures. Wikipedia provides a very large domain-independent encyclopedic repository and semantic network for computing semantic similarity of concepts with more coverage than usual ontologies. In this paper, we propose some novel feature based similarity assessment methods that are fully dependent on Wikipedia and can avoid most of the limitations and drawbacks introduced above. To implement similarity assessment based on feature by making use of Wikipedia, firstly a formal representation of Wikipedia concepts is presented. We then give a framework for feature based similarity based on the formal representation of Wikipedia concepts. Lastly, we investigate several feature based approaches to semantic similarity measures resulting from instantiations of the framework. The evaluation, based on several widely used benchmarks and a benchmark developed in ourselves, sustains the intuitions with respect to human judgements. Overall, several methods proposed in this paper have good human correlation and constitute some effective ways of determining similarity between Wikipedia concepts.
  3. Athukorala, K.; Glowacka, D.; Jacucci, G.; Oulasvirta, A.; Vreeken, J.: Is exploratory search different? : a comparison of information search behavior for exploratory and lookup tasks (2016) 0.03
    0.030010901 = product of:
      0.120043606 = sum of:
        0.120043606 = weight(_text_:assess in 3150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120043606 = score(doc=3150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.32564306 = fieldWeight in 3150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3150)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Exploratory search is an increasingly important activity yet challenging for users. Although there exists an ample amount of research into understanding exploration, most of the major information retrieval (IR) systems do not provide tailored and adaptive support for such tasks. One reason is the lack of empirical knowledge on how to distinguish exploratory and lookup search behaviors in IR systems. The goal of this article is to investigate how to separate the 2 types of tasks in an IR system using easily measurable behaviors. In this article, we first review characteristics of exploratory search behavior. We then report on a controlled study of 6 search tasks with 3 exploratory-comparison, knowledge acquisition, planning-and 3 lookup tasks-fact-finding, navigational, question answering. The results are encouraging, showing that IR systems can distinguish the 2 search categories in the course of a search session. The most distinctive indicators that characterize exploratory search behaviors are query length, maximum scroll depth, and task completion time. However, 2 tasks are borderline and exhibit mixed characteristics. We assess the applicability of this finding by reporting on several classification experiments. Our results have valuable implications for designing tailored and adaptive IR systems.
  4. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.03
    0.029955769 = product of:
      0.119823076 = sum of:
        0.119823076 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119823076 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
  5. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.03
    0.029654698 = product of:
      0.118618794 = sum of:
        0.118618794 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118618794 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  6. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.02
    0.021181928 = product of:
      0.08472771 = sum of:
        0.08472771 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08472771 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  7. Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016) 0.02
    0.021181928 = product of:
      0.08472771 = sum of:
        0.08472771 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08472771 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  8. Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016) 0.02
    0.021181928 = product of:
      0.08472771 = sum of:
        0.08472771 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08472771 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  9. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.02
    0.021181928 = product of:
      0.08472771 = sum of:
        0.08472771 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08472771 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  10. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.02
    0.02100763 = product of:
      0.08403052 = sum of:
        0.08403052 = weight(_text_:assess in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08403052 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.22795013 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
  11. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.02
    0.020969039 = product of:
      0.083876155 = sum of:
        0.083876155 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083876155 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
  12. Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994) 0.02
    0.016945543 = product of:
      0.06778217 = sum of:
        0.06778217 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06778217 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:35:22
  13. Zhang, J.; Mostafa, J.; Tripathy, H.: Information retrieval by semantic analysis and visualization of the concept space of D-Lib® magazine (2002) 0.02
    0.015005451 = product of:
      0.060021803 = sum of:
        0.060021803 = weight(_text_:assess in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060021803 = score(doc=1211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36863554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.16282153 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    From the user's perspective, however, it is still difficult to use current information retrieval systems. Users frequently have problems expressing their information needs and translating those needs into queries. This is partly due to the fact that information needs cannot be expressed appropriately in systems terms. It is not unusual for users to input search terms that are different from the index terms information systems use. Various methods have been proposed to help users choose search terms and articulate queries. One widely used approach is to incorporate into the information system a thesaurus-like component that represents both the important concepts in a particular subject area and the semantic relationships among those concepts. Unfortunately, the development and use of thesauri is not without its own problems. The thesaurus employed in a specific information system has often been developed for a general subject area and needs significant enhancement to be tailored to the information system where it is to be used. This thesaurus development process, if done manually, is both time consuming and labor intensive. Usage of a thesaurus in searching is complex and may raise barriers for the user. For illustration purposes, let us consider two scenarios of thesaurus usage. In the first scenario the user inputs a search term and the thesaurus then displays a matching set of related terms. Without an overview of the thesaurus - and without the ability to see the matching terms in the context of other terms - it may be difficult to assess the quality of the related terms in order to select the correct term. In the second scenario the user browses the whole thesaurus, which is organized as in an alphabetically ordered list. The problem with this approach is that the list may be long, and neither does it show users the global semantic relationship among all the listed terms.
  14. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.01
    0.014827349 = product of:
      0.059309397 = sum of:
        0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059309397 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  15. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.014827349 = product of:
      0.059309397 = sum of:
        0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059309397 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  16. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.01
    0.014827349 = product of:
      0.059309397 = sum of:
        0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059309397 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  17. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005) 0.01
    0.014827349 = product of:
      0.059309397 = sum of:
        0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059309397 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:58
  18. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.01
    0.014827349 = product of:
      0.059309397 = sum of:
        0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059309397 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
  19. Salaba, A.; Zeng, M.L.: Extending the "Explore" user task beyond subject authority data into the linked data sphere (2014) 0.01
    0.014827349 = product of:
      0.059309397 = sum of:
        0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059309397 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. Mlodzka-Stybel, A.: Towards continuous improvement of users' access to a library catalogue (2014) 0.01
    0.014827349 = product of:
      0.059309397 = sum of:
        0.059309397 = weight(_text_:22 in 1466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059309397 = score(doc=1466,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21899058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.062536046 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1466, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1466)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik