Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.09
    0.086779 = product of:
      0.173558 = sum of:
        0.173558 = sum of:
          0.07351384 = weight(_text_:k in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07351384 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.10004415 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10004415 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
    Source
    Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
  2. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005) 0.06
    0.06114716 = product of:
      0.12229432 = sum of:
        0.12229432 = sum of:
          0.07277499 = weight(_text_:k in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07277499 = score(doc=1852,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:58
    Object
    K-Infinity
  3. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.06
    0.06114716 = product of:
      0.12229432 = sum of:
        0.12229432 = sum of:
          0.07277499 = weight(_text_:k in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07277499 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
    Object
    K-Infinity
  4. Lund, K.; Burgess, C.; Atchley, R.A.: Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space (1995) 0.05
    0.050489508 = product of:
      0.100979015 = sum of:
        0.100979015 = sum of:
          0.051459692 = weight(_text_:k in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051459692 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: July 22 - 25, 1995, University of Pittsburgh / ed. by Johanna D. Moore and Jill Fain Lehmann
  5. Salaba, A.; Zeng, M.L.: Extending the "Explore" user task beyond subject authority data into the linked data sphere (2014) 0.05
    0.045740776 = sum of:
      0.02098111 = product of:
        0.08392444 = sum of:
          0.08392444 = weight(_text_:authors in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08392444 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024759663 = product of:
        0.049519327 = sum of:
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    "Explore" is a user task introduced in the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. Through various case scenarios, the authors discuss how structured data, presented based on Linked Data principles and using knowledge organisation systems (KOS) as the backbone, extend the explore task within and beyond subject authority data.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  6. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.04
    0.04327672 = product of:
      0.08655344 = sum of:
        0.08655344 = sum of:
          0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044108305 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
          0.042445138 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042445138 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
  7. Baofu, P.: ¬The future of information architecture : conceiving a better way to understand taxonomy, network, and intelligence (2008) 0.04
    0.04097758 = sum of:
      0.0149865085 = product of:
        0.059946034 = sum of:
          0.059946034 = weight(_text_:authors in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059946034 = score(doc=2257,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02599107 = product of:
        0.05198214 = sum of:
          0.05198214 = weight(_text_:k in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05198214 = score(doc=2257,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Future of Information Architecture examines issues surrounding why information is processed, stored and applied in the way that it has, since time immemorial. Contrary to the conventional wisdom held by many scholars in human history, the recurrent debate on the explanation of the most basic categories of information (eg space, time causation, quality, quantity) has been misconstrued, to the effect that there exists some deeper categories and principles behind these categories of information - with enormous implications for our understanding of reality in general. To understand this, the book is organised in to four main parts: Part I begins with the vital question concerning the role of information within the context of the larger theoretical debate in the literature. Part II provides a critical examination of the nature of data taxonomy from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part III constructively invesitgates the world of information network from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part IV proposes six main theses in the authors synthetic theory of information architecture, namely, (a) the first thesis on the simpleness-complicatedness principle, (b) the second thesis on the exactness-vagueness principle (c) the third thesis on the slowness-quickness principle (d) the fourth thesis on the order-chaos principle, (e) the fifth thesis on the symmetry-asymmetry principle, and (f) the sixth thesis on the post-human stage.
    Classification
    BBV (FH K)
    GHBS
    BBV (FH K)
  8. Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014) 0.04
    0.03920638 = sum of:
      0.017983811 = product of:
        0.071935244 = sum of:
          0.071935244 = weight(_text_:authors in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.071935244 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021222569 = product of:
        0.042445138 = sum of:
          0.042445138 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042445138 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper attempts to explore an approach of using an automatic semantic analysis tool to enhance the "subject" access to materials that are not included in the usual library subject cataloging process. Using two research samples the authors analyzed the access points supplied by OpenCalais, a semantic analysis tool. As an aid in understanding how computerized subject analysis might be approached, this paper suggests using the three-layer framework that has been accepted and applied in image analysis, developed by Erwin Panofsky.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  9. Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014) 0.03
    0.026137587 = sum of:
      0.011989206 = product of:
        0.047956824 = sum of:
          0.047956824 = weight(_text_:authors in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047956824 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01414838 = product of:
        0.02829676 = sum of:
          0.02829676 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02829676 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The growing volumes of semantic data available in the web result in the need for handling the information overload phenomenon. The potential of this amount of data is enormous but in most cases it is very difficult for users to visualize, explore and use this data, especially for lay-users without experience with Semantic Web technologies. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The Visual Information-Seeking Mantra "Overview first, zoom and filter, then details-on-demand" proposed by Shneiderman describes how data should be presented in different stages to achieve an effective exploration. The overview is the first user task when dealing with a data set. The objective is that the user is capable of getting an idea about the overall structure of the data set. Different information architecture (IA) components supporting the overview tasks have been developed, so they are automatically generated from semantic data, and evaluated with end-users. Findings - The chosen IA components are well known to web users, as they are present in most web pages: navigation bars, site maps and site indexes. The authors complement them with Treemaps, a visualization technique for displaying hierarchical data. These components have been developed following an iterative User-Centered Design methodology. Evaluations with end-users have shown that they get easily used to them despite the fact that they are generated automatically from structured data, without requiring knowledge about the underlying semantic technologies, and that the different overview components complement each other as they focus on different information search needs. Originality/value - Obtaining semantic data sets overviews cannot be easily done with the current semantic web browsers. Overviews become difficult to achieve with large heterogeneous data sets, which is typical in the Semantic Web, because traditional IA techniques do not easily scale to large data sets. There is little or no support to obtain overview information quickly and easily at the beginning of the exploration of a new data set. This can be a serious limitation when exploring a data set for the first time, especially for lay-users. The proposal is to reuse and adapt existing IA components to provide this overview to users and show that they can be generated automatically from the thesaurus and ontologies that structure semantic data while providing a comparable user experience to traditional web sites.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.024759663 = product of:
      0.049519327 = sum of:
        0.049519327 = product of:
          0.09903865 = sum of:
            0.09903865 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09903865 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  11. Thenmalar, S.; Geetha, T.V.: Enhanced ontology-based indexing and searching (2014) 0.02
    0.022870388 = sum of:
      0.010490555 = product of:
        0.04196222 = sum of:
          0.04196222 = weight(_text_:authors in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04196222 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.012379832 = product of:
        0.024759663 = sum of:
          0.024759663 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024759663 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to improve the conceptual-based search by incorporating structural ontological information such as concepts and relations. Generally, Semantic-based information retrieval aims to identify relevant information based on the meanings of the query terms or on the context of the terms and the performance of semantic information retrieval is carried out through standard measures-precision and recall. Higher precision leads to the (meaningful) relevant documents obtained and lower recall leads to the less coverage of the concepts. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper, the authors enhance the existing ontology-based indexing proposed by Kohler et al., by incorporating sibling information to the index. The index designed by Kohler et al., contains only super and sub-concepts from the ontology. In addition, in our approach, we focus on two tasks; query expansion and ranking of the expanded queries, to improve the efficiency of the ontology-based search. The aforementioned tasks make use of ontological concepts, and relations existing between those concepts so as to obtain semantically more relevant search results for a given query. Findings - The proposed ontology-based indexing technique is investigated by analysing the coverage of concepts that are being populated in the index. Here, we introduce a new measure called index enhancement measure, to estimate the coverage of ontological concepts being indexed. We have evaluated the ontology-based search for the tourism domain with the tourism documents and tourism-specific ontology. The comparison of search results based on the use of ontology "with and without query expansion" is examined to estimate the efficiency of the proposed query expansion task. The ranking is compared with the ORank system to evaluate the performance of our ontology-based search. From these analyses, the ontology-based search results shows better recall when compared to the other concept-based search systems. The mean average precision of the ontology-based search is found to be 0.79 and the recall is found to be 0.65, the ORank system has the mean average precision of 0.62 and the recall is found to be 0.51, while the concept-based search has the mean average precision of 0.56 and the recall is found to be 0.42. Practical implications - When the concept is not present in the domain-specific ontology, the concept cannot be indexed. When the given query term is not available in the ontology then the term-based results are retrieved. Originality/value - In addition to super and sub-concepts, we incorporate the concepts present in same level (siblings) to the ontological index. The structural information from the ontology is determined for the query expansion. The ranking of the documents depends on the type of the query (single concept query, multiple concept queries and concept with relation queries) and the ontological relations that exists in the query and the documents. With this ontological structural information, the search results showed us better coverage of concepts with respect to the query.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  12. Gauch, S.; Chong, M.K.: Automatic word similarity detection for TREC 4 query expansion (1996) 0.02
    0.022054153 = product of:
      0.044108305 = sum of:
        0.044108305 = product of:
          0.08821661 = sum of:
            0.08821661 = weight(_text_:k in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08821661 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
  13. Smeaton, A.F.; Kelledy, L.; O'Donnell, R.: TREC-4 experiments at Dublin City University : thresholding posting lists, query expansion with WordNet and POS tagging of Spanish (1996) 0.02
    0.01837846 = product of:
      0.03675692 = sum of:
        0.03675692 = product of:
          0.07351384 = sum of:
            0.07351384 = weight(_text_:k in 7000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07351384 = score(doc=7000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 7000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
  14. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.02
    0.017685475 = product of:
      0.03537095 = sum of:
        0.03537095 = product of:
          0.0707419 = sum of:
            0.0707419 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0707419 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  15. Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016) 0.02
    0.017685475 = product of:
      0.03537095 = sum of:
        0.03537095 = product of:
          0.0707419 = sum of:
            0.0707419 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0707419 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  16. Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016) 0.02
    0.017685475 = product of:
      0.03537095 = sum of:
        0.03537095 = product of:
          0.0707419 = sum of:
            0.0707419 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0707419 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  17. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.02
    0.017685475 = product of:
      0.03537095 = sum of:
        0.03537095 = product of:
          0.0707419 = sum of:
            0.0707419 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0707419 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  18. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.02
    0.017507726 = product of:
      0.035015453 = sum of:
        0.035015453 = product of:
          0.070030905 = sum of:
            0.070030905 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070030905 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
  19. Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996) 0.01
    0.014702768 = product of:
      0.029405536 = sum of:
        0.029405536 = product of:
          0.058811072 = sum of:
            0.058811072 = weight(_text_:k in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058811072 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994) 0.01
    0.01414838 = product of:
      0.02829676 = sum of:
        0.02829676 = product of:
          0.05659352 = sum of:
            0.05659352 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05659352 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052213363 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:35:22

Years

Languages

  • e 47
  • d 7

Types

Classifications