-
Salaba, A.; Zeng, M.L.: Extending the "Explore" user task beyond subject authority data into the linked data sphere (2014)
0.05
0.04632113 = sum of:
0.021247318 = product of:
0.08498927 = sum of:
0.08498927 = weight(_text_:authors in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08498927 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025073813 = product of:
0.050147627 = sum of:
0.050147627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050147627 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- "Explore" is a user task introduced in the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. Through various case scenarios, the authors discuss how structured data, presented based on Linked Data principles and using knowledge organisation systems (KOS) as the backbone, extend the explore task within and beyond subject authority data.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014)
0.04
0.039703824 = sum of:
0.018211987 = product of:
0.07284795 = sum of:
0.07284795 = weight(_text_:authors in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07284795 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021491839 = product of:
0.042983677 = sum of:
0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042983677 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper attempts to explore an approach of using an automatic semantic analysis tool to enhance the "subject" access to materials that are not included in the usual library subject cataloging process. Using two research samples the authors analyzed the access points supplied by OpenCalais, a semantic analysis tool. As an aid in understanding how computerized subject analysis might be approached, this paper suggests using the three-layer framework that has been accepted and applied in image analysis, developed by Erwin Panofsky.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003)
0.03
0.0324542 = product of:
0.0649084 = sum of:
0.0649084 = sum of:
0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01476077 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
0.050147627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050147627 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005)
0.03
0.0324542 = product of:
0.0649084 = sum of:
0.0649084 = sum of:
0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01476077 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.050147627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050147627 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:58
- Language
- d
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005)
0.03
0.0324542 = product of:
0.0649084 = sum of:
0.0649084 = sum of:
0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01476077 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.050147627 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050147627 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:25
- Language
- d
-
Lund, K.; Burgess, C.; Atchley, R.A.: Semantic and associative priming in high-dimensional semantic space (1995)
0.03
0.0324542 = product of:
0.0649084 = sum of:
0.0649084 = sum of:
0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01476077 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
0.050147627 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050147627 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: July 22 - 25, 1995, University of Pittsburgh / ed. by Johanna D. Moore and Jill Fain Lehmann
-
Blocks, D.; Cunliffe, D.; Tudhope, D.: ¬A reference model for user-system interaction in thesaurus-based searching (2006)
0.03
0.02916902 = sum of:
0.018211987 = product of:
0.07284795 = sum of:
0.07284795 = weight(_text_:authors in 202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07284795 = score(doc=202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=202)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0109570315 = product of:
0.021914063 = sum of:
0.021914063 = weight(_text_:d in 202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021914063 = score(doc=202,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.21814299 = fieldWeight in 202, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=202)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors present a model of information searching in thesaurus-enhanced search systems, intended as a reference model for system developers. The model focuses on user-system interaction and charts the specific stages of searching an indexed collection with a thesaurus. It was developed based on literature, findings from empirical studies, and analysis of existing systems. The model describes in detail the entities, processes, and decisions when interacting with a search system augmented with a thesaurus. A basic search scenario illustrates this process through the model. Graphical and textual depictions of the model are complemented by a concise matrix representation for evaluation purposes. Potential problems at different stages of the search process are discussed, together with possibilities for system developers. The aim is to set out a framework of processes, decisions, and risks involved in thesaurus-based search, within which system developers can consider potential avenues for support.
-
Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014)
0.03
0.026469218 = sum of:
0.012141325 = product of:
0.0485653 = sum of:
0.0485653 = weight(_text_:authors in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0485653 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014327893 = product of:
0.028655786 = sum of:
0.028655786 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028655786 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The growing volumes of semantic data available in the web result in the need for handling the information overload phenomenon. The potential of this amount of data is enormous but in most cases it is very difficult for users to visualize, explore and use this data, especially for lay-users without experience with Semantic Web technologies. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The Visual Information-Seeking Mantra "Overview first, zoom and filter, then details-on-demand" proposed by Shneiderman describes how data should be presented in different stages to achieve an effective exploration. The overview is the first user task when dealing with a data set. The objective is that the user is capable of getting an idea about the overall structure of the data set. Different information architecture (IA) components supporting the overview tasks have been developed, so they are automatically generated from semantic data, and evaluated with end-users. Findings - The chosen IA components are well known to web users, as they are present in most web pages: navigation bars, site maps and site indexes. The authors complement them with Treemaps, a visualization technique for displaying hierarchical data. These components have been developed following an iterative User-Centered Design methodology. Evaluations with end-users have shown that they get easily used to them despite the fact that they are generated automatically from structured data, without requiring knowledge about the underlying semantic technologies, and that the different overview components complement each other as they focus on different information search needs. Originality/value - Obtaining semantic data sets overviews cannot be easily done with the current semantic web browsers. Overviews become difficult to achieve with large heterogeneous data sets, which is typical in the Semantic Web, because traditional IA techniques do not easily scale to large data sets. There is little or no support to obtain overview information quickly and easily at the beginning of the exploration of a new data set. This can be a serious limitation when exploring a data set for the first time, especially for lay-users. The proposal is to reuse and adapt existing IA components to provide this overview to users and show that they can be generated automatically from the thesaurus and ontologies that structure semantic data while providing a comparable user experience to traditional web sites.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002)
0.03
0.025328375 = product of:
0.05065675 = sum of:
0.05065675 = product of:
0.1013135 = sum of:
0.1013135 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1013135 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:17:40
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.03
0.025073813 = product of:
0.050147627 = sum of:
0.050147627 = product of:
0.10029525 = sum of:
0.10029525 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10029525 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
-
Song, D.; Bruza, P.D.: Towards context sensitive information inference (2003)
0.02
0.023181569 = product of:
0.046363138 = sum of:
0.046363138 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03581973 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:35:46
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006)
0.02
0.023181569 = product of:
0.046363138 = sum of:
0.046363138 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03581973 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:32:43
-
Thenmalar, S.; Geetha, T.V.: Enhanced ontology-based indexing and searching (2014)
0.02
0.023160566 = sum of:
0.010623659 = product of:
0.042494636 = sum of:
0.042494636 = weight(_text_:authors in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042494636 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.012536907 = product of:
0.025073813 = sum of:
0.025073813 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025073813 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to improve the conceptual-based search by incorporating structural ontological information such as concepts and relations. Generally, Semantic-based information retrieval aims to identify relevant information based on the meanings of the query terms or on the context of the terms and the performance of semantic information retrieval is carried out through standard measures-precision and recall. Higher precision leads to the (meaningful) relevant documents obtained and lower recall leads to the less coverage of the concepts. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper, the authors enhance the existing ontology-based indexing proposed by Kohler et al., by incorporating sibling information to the index. The index designed by Kohler et al., contains only super and sub-concepts from the ontology. In addition, in our approach, we focus on two tasks; query expansion and ranking of the expanded queries, to improve the efficiency of the ontology-based search. The aforementioned tasks make use of ontological concepts, and relations existing between those concepts so as to obtain semantically more relevant search results for a given query. Findings - The proposed ontology-based indexing technique is investigated by analysing the coverage of concepts that are being populated in the index. Here, we introduce a new measure called index enhancement measure, to estimate the coverage of ontological concepts being indexed. We have evaluated the ontology-based search for the tourism domain with the tourism documents and tourism-specific ontology. The comparison of search results based on the use of ontology "with and without query expansion" is examined to estimate the efficiency of the proposed query expansion task. The ranking is compared with the ORank system to evaluate the performance of our ontology-based search. From these analyses, the ontology-based search results shows better recall when compared to the other concept-based search systems. The mean average precision of the ontology-based search is found to be 0.79 and the recall is found to be 0.65, the ORank system has the mean average precision of 0.62 and the recall is found to be 0.51, while the concept-based search has the mean average precision of 0.56 and the recall is found to be 0.42. Practical implications - When the concept is not present in the domain-specific ontology, the concept cannot be indexed. When the given query term is not available in the ontology then the term-based results are retrieved. Originality/value - In addition to super and sub-concepts, we incorporate the concepts present in same level (siblings) to the ontological index. The structural information from the ontology is determined for the query expansion. The ranking of the documents depends on the type of the query (single concept query, multiple concept queries and concept with relation queries) and the ontological relations that exists in the query and the documents. With this ontological structural information, the search results showed us better coverage of concepts with respect to the query.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Wolfram, D.; Xie, H.I.: Traditional IR for web users : a context for general audience digital libraries (2002)
0.02
0.02044836 = sum of:
0.015176657 = product of:
0.060706627 = sum of:
0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060706627 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.005271704 = product of:
0.010543408 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The emergence of general audience digital libraries (GADLs) defines a context that represents a hybrid of both "traditional" IR, using primarily bibliographic resources provided by database vendors, and "popular" IR, exemplified by public search systems available on the World Wide Web. Findings of a study investigating end-user searching and response to a GADL are reported. Data collected from a Web-based end-user survey and data logs of resource usage for a Web-based GADL were analyzed for user characteristics, patterns of access and use, and user feedback. Cross-tabulations using respondent demographics revealed several key differences in how the system was used and valued by users of different age groups. Older users valued the service more than younger users and engaged in different searching and viewing behaviors. The GADL more closely resembles traditional retrieval systems in terms of content and purpose of use, but is more similar to popular IR systems in terms of user behavior and accessibility. A model that defines the dual context of the GADL environment is derived from the data analysis and existing IR models in general and other specific contexts. The authors demonstrate the distinguishing characteristics of this IR context, and discuss implications for the development and evaluation of future GADLs to accommodate a variety of user needs and expectations.
-
Baofu, P.: ¬The future of information architecture : conceiving a better way to understand taxonomy, network, and intelligence (2008)
0.02
0.02044836 = sum of:
0.015176657 = product of:
0.060706627 = sum of:
0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060706627 = score(doc=2257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.005271704 = product of:
0.010543408 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=2257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Future of Information Architecture examines issues surrounding why information is processed, stored and applied in the way that it has, since time immemorial. Contrary to the conventional wisdom held by many scholars in human history, the recurrent debate on the explanation of the most basic categories of information (eg space, time causation, quality, quantity) has been misconstrued, to the effect that there exists some deeper categories and principles behind these categories of information - with enormous implications for our understanding of reality in general. To understand this, the book is organised in to four main parts: Part I begins with the vital question concerning the role of information within the context of the larger theoretical debate in the literature. Part II provides a critical examination of the nature of data taxonomy from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part III constructively invesitgates the world of information network from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part IV proposes six main theses in the authors synthetic theory of information architecture, namely, (a) the first thesis on the simpleness-complicatedness principle, (b) the second thesis on the exactness-vagueness principle (c) the third thesis on the slowness-quickness principle (d) the fourth thesis on the order-chaos principle, (e) the fifth thesis on the symmetry-asymmetry principle, and (f) the sixth thesis on the post-human stage.
-
Gillitzer, B.: Yewno (2017)
0.02
0.018545255 = product of:
0.03709051 = sum of:
0.03709051 = sum of:
0.008434726 = weight(_text_:d in 3447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008434726 = score(doc=3447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 3447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3447)
0.028655786 = weight(_text_:22 in 3447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028655786 = score(doc=3447,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3447, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3447)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2017 10:16:49
- Language
- d
-
Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016)
0.02
0.017909866 = product of:
0.03581973 = sum of:
0.03581973 = product of:
0.07163946 = sum of:
0.07163946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163946 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016)
0.02
0.017909866 = product of:
0.03581973 = sum of:
0.03581973 = product of:
0.07163946 = sum of:
0.07163946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163946 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016)
0.02
0.017909866 = product of:
0.03581973 = sum of:
0.03581973 = product of:
0.07163946 = sum of:
0.07163946 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163946 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.02
0.017909866 = product of:
0.03581973 = sum of:
0.03581973 = product of:
0.07163946 = sum of:
0.07163946 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163946 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
