-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.05
0.050112747 = product of:
0.13363399 = sum of:
0.07861602 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07861602 = score(doc=2134,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.024603218 = product of:
0.049206436 = sum of:
0.049206436 = weight(_text_:system in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049206436 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.03041474 = product of:
0.06082948 = sum of:
0.06082948 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06082948 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005)
0.03
0.03381897 = product of:
0.13527589 = sum of:
0.032094855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032094855 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.10318103 = sum of:
0.07276629 = weight(_text_:etc in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07276629 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.41891038 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.03041474 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03041474 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:25
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005)
0.03
0.03146888 = product of:
0.12587552 = sum of:
0.02269449 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02269449 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.10318103 = sum of:
0.07276629 = weight(_text_:etc in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07276629 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.41891038 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.03041474 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03041474 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:58
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996)
0.03
0.03125659 = product of:
0.083350904 = sum of:
0.050746426 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050746426 = score(doc=6958,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.017397102 = product of:
0.034794204 = sum of:
0.034794204 = weight(_text_:system in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034794204 = score(doc=6958,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01520737 = product of:
0.03041474 = sum of:
0.03041474 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03041474 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.03
0.026894717 = product of:
0.071719244 = sum of:
0.032420702 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032420702 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.017573725 = product of:
0.03514745 = sum of:
0.03514745 = weight(_text_:system in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03514745 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.021724815 = product of:
0.04344963 = sum of:
0.04344963 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04344963 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Oard, D.W.: Alternative approaches for cross-language text retrieval (1997)
0.03
0.026564179 = product of:
0.07083781 = sum of:
0.043947693 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043947693 = score(doc=1164,freq=30.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.45303512 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
0.008698551 = product of:
0.017397102 = sum of:
0.017397102 = weight(_text_:system in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017397102 = score(doc=1164,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.17224117 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.018191572 = product of:
0.036383145 = sum of:
0.036383145 = weight(_text_:etc in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036383145 = score(doc=1164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.20945519 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- The explosive growth of the Internet and other sources of networked information have made automatic mediation of access to networked information sources an increasingly important problem. Much of this information is expressed as electronic text, and it is becoming practical to automatically convert some printed documents and recorded speech to electronic text as well. Thus, automated systems capable of detecting useful documents are finding widespread application. With even a small number of languages it can be inconvenient to issue the same query repeatedly in every language, so users who are able to read more than one language will likely prefer a multilingual text retrieval system over a collection of monolingual systems. And since reading ability in a language does not always imply fluent writing ability in that language, such users will likely find cross-language text retrieval particularly useful for languages in which they are less confident of their ability to express their information needs effectively. The use of such systems can be also be beneficial if the user is able to read only a single language. For example, when only a small portion of the document collection will ever be examined by the user, performing retrieval before translation can be significantly more economical than performing translation before retrieval. So when the application is sufficiently important to justify the time and effort required for translation, those costs can be minimized if an effective cross-language text retrieval system is available. Even when translation is not available, there are circumstances in which cross-language text retrieval could be useful to a monolingual user. For example, a researcher might find a paper published in an unfamiliar language useful if that paper contains references to works by the same author that are in the researcher's native language.
Multilingual text retrieval can be defined as selection of useful documents from collections that may contain several languages (English, French, Chinese, etc.). This formulation allows for the possibility that individual documents might contain more than one language, a common occurrence in some applications. Both cross-language and within-language retrieval are included in this formulation, but it is the cross-language aspect of the problem which distinguishes multilingual text retrieval from its well studied monolingual counterpart. At the SIGIR 96 workshop on "Cross-Linguistic Information Retrieval" the participants discussed the proliferation of terminology being used to describe the field and settled on "Cross-Language" as the best single description of the salient aspect of the problem. "Multilingual" was felt to be too broad, since that term has also been used to describe systems able to perform within-language retrieval in more than one language but that lack any cross-language capability. "Cross-lingual" and "cross-linguistic" were felt to be equally good descriptions of the field, but "crosslanguage" was selected as the preferred term in the interest of standardization. Unfortunately, at about the same time the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) introduced "translingual" as their preferred term, so we are still some distance from reaching consensus on this matter.
I will not attempt to draw a sharp distinction between retrieval and filtering in this survey. Although my own work on adaptive cross-language text filtering has led me to make this distinction fairly carefully in other presentations (c.f., (Oard 1997b)), such an proach does little to help understand the fundamental techniques which have been applied or the results that have been obtained in this case. Since it is still common to view filtering (detection of useful documents in dynamic document streams) as a kind of retrieval, will simply adopt that perspective here.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Atanassova, I.; Bertin, M.: Semantic facets for scientific information retrieval (2014)
0.03
0.02619826 = product of:
0.10479304 = sum of:
0.03930801 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03930801 = score(doc=4471,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
0.06548503 = sum of:
0.034794204 = weight(_text_:system in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034794204 = score(doc=4471,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
0.030690823 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030690823 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- We present an Information Retrieval System for scientific publications that provides the possibility to filter results according to semantic facets. We use sentence-level semantic annotations that identify specific semantic relations in texts, such as methods, definitions, hypotheses, that correspond to common information needs related to scientific literature. The semantic annotations are obtained using a rule-based method that identifies linguistic clues organized into a linguistic ontology. The system is implemented using Solr Search Server and offers efficient search and navigation in scientific papers.
- Source
- Semantic Web Evaluation Challenge. SemWebEval 2014 at ESWC 2014, Anissaras, Crete, Greece, May 25-29, 2014, Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: V. Presutti et al
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Järvelin, K.; Niemi, T.: Deductive information retrieval based on classifications (1993)
0.03
0.025505807 = product of:
0.10202323 = sum of:
0.043496937 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043496937 = score(doc=2229,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 2229, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2229)
0.058526292 = product of:
0.117052585 = sum of:
0.117052585 = weight(_text_:manuals in 2229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.117052585 = score(doc=2229,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23796216 = queryWeight, product of:
7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.4918958 = fieldWeight in 2229, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2229)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Modern fact databses contain abundant data classified through several classifications. Typically, users msut consult these classifications in separate manuals or files, thus making their effective use difficult. Contemporary database systems do little support deductive use of classifications. In this study we show how deductive data management techniques can be applied to the utilization of data value classifications. Computation of transitive class relationships is of primary importance here. We define a representation of classifications which supports transitive computation and present an operation-oriented deductive query language tailored for classification-based deductive information retrieval. The operations of this language are on the same abstraction level as relational algebra operations and can be integrated with these to form a powerful and flexible query language for deductive information retrieval. We define the integration of these operations and demonstrate the usefulness of the language in terms of several sample queries
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004)
0.02
0.02205297 = product of:
0.058807917 = sum of:
0.027509877 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027509877 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.018263152 = product of:
0.036526304 = sum of:
0.036526304 = weight(_text_:system in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036526304 = score(doc=2419,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013034889 = product of:
0.026069777 = sum of:
0.026069777 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026069777 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
- Date
- 16.11.2008 16:22:48
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Vallet, D.; Fernández, M.; Castells, P.: ¬An ontology-based information retrieval model (2005)
0.02
0.021574933 = product of:
0.08629973 = sum of:
0.038904842 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038904842 = score(doc=4708,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4708, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4708)
0.047394894 = sum of:
0.021088472 = weight(_text_:system in 4708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021088472 = score(doc=4708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 4708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4708)
0.02630642 = weight(_text_:29 in 4708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02630642 = score(doc=4708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4708)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Semantic search has been one of the motivations of the Semantic Web since it was envisioned. We propose a model for the exploitation of ontologybased KBs to improve search over large document repositories. Our approach includes an ontology-based scheme for the semi-automatic annotation of documents, and a retrieval system. The retrieval model is based on an adaptation of the classic vector-space model, including an annotation weighting algorithm, and a ranking algorithm. Semantic search is combined with keyword-based search to achieve tolerance to KB incompleteness. Our proposal is illustrated with sample experiments showing improvements with respect to keyword-based search, and providing ground for further research and discussion.
- Source
- The Semantic Web: research and applications ; second European Semantic WebConference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29 - June 1, 2005 ; proceedings. Eds.: A. Gómez-Pérez u. J. Euzenat
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Ross, J.: ¬A new way of information retrieval : 3-D indexing and concept mapping (2000)
0.02
0.020331543 = product of:
0.08132617 = sum of:
0.055019755 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055019755 = score(doc=6171,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 6171, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6171)
0.02630642 = product of:
0.05261284 = sum of:
0.05261284 = weight(_text_:29 in 6171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05261284 = score(doc=6171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Date
- 25. 2.1997 10:29:16
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002)
0.02
0.020331543 = product of:
0.08132617 = sum of:
0.055019755 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055019755 = score(doc=3807,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.02630642 = product of:
0.05261284 = sum of:
0.05261284 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05261284 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Date
- 18. 5.2002 17:29:00
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Srinivasan, P.: Query expansion and MEDLINE (1996)
0.02
0.018013723 = product of:
0.07205489 = sum of:
0.057995915 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057995915 = score(doc=8453,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 8453, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8453)
0.014058981 = product of:
0.028117962 = sum of:
0.028117962 = weight(_text_:system in 8453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028117962 = score(doc=8453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 8453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Evaluates the retrieval effectiveness of query expansion strategies on a test collection of the medical database MEDLINE using Cornell University's SMART retrieval system. Tests 3 expansion strategies for their ability to identify appropriate MeSH terms for user queries. Compares retrieval effectiveness using the original unexpanded and the alternative expanded user queries on a collection of 75 queries and 2.334 Medline citations. Recommends query expansions using retrieval feedback for adding MeSH search terms to a user's initial query
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Beaulieu, M.; Jones, S.: Interactive searching and interface issues in the Okapi best match probabilistic retrieval system (1998)
0.02
0.01801336 = product of:
0.07205344 = sum of:
0.050746426 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050746426 = score(doc=430,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.021307012 = product of:
0.042614024 = sum of:
0.042614024 = weight(_text_:system in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042614024 = score(doc=430,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.42190298 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Explores interface design raised by the development and evaluation of Okapi, a highly interactive information retrieval system based on a probabilistic retrieval model with relevance feedback. It uses terms frequency weighting functions to display retrieved items in a best match ranked order; it can also find additional items similar to those marked as relevant by the searcher. Compares the effectiveness of automatic and interactive query expansion in different user interface environments. focuses on the nature of interaction in information retrieval and the interrelationship between functional visibility, the user's cognitive loading and the balance of control between user and system
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Brezillon, P.; Saker, I.: Modeling context in information seeking (1999)
0.02
0.01796216 = product of:
0.047899093 = sum of:
0.018339919 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018339919 = score(doc=276,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 276, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=276)
0.008768807 = product of:
0.017537614 = sum of:
0.017537614 = weight(_text_:29 in 276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017537614 = score(doc=276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020790368 = product of:
0.041580737 = sum of:
0.041580737 = weight(_text_:etc in 276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041580737 = score(doc=276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.23937736 = fieldWeight in 276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Context plays an important role in a number of domains where reasoning intervenes as in understanding, interpretation, diagnosis, etc. The reason is that reasoning activities heavily rely on a background (or experience) that is generally not made explicit and that gives a contextual dimension to knowledge. On the Web in December 1996, AItaVista gave more than 710000 pages containing the word context, when concept gives only 639000 references. A clear definition of this word stays to be found. There are several formal definitions of this concept (references are given in Brézillon, 1996): a set of preferences and/or beliefs, an infinite and only partially known collection of assumptions, a list of attributes, the product of an interpretation, possible worlds, assumptions under which a statement is true or false. One faces the same situation at the programming level: a collection of context schemas; a path in information retrieval; slots in object-oriented languages; a special, buffer-like data structure; a window on the screen, buttons which are functional customisable and shareable; an interpreter which controls the system's activity; the characteristics of the situation and the goals of the knowledge use; or entities (things or events) related in a certain way that permits to listen what is said and what is not said. Context is often assimilated at a set of restrictions (e.g., preconditions) that limit access to parts of the applications. The first works considering context explicitly are in Natural Language. Researchers in this domain focus on the linguistic context, sometimes associated with other types of contexts as: semantic context, cognitive context, physical and perceptual context, and social context (Bunt, 1997).
- Date
- 21. 3.2002 19:29:27
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996)
0.02
0.017352685 = product of:
0.06941074 = sum of:
0.051873125 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051873125 = score(doc=5625,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.017537614 = product of:
0.03507523 = sum of:
0.03507523 = weight(_text_:29 in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03507523 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Describes a deductive data model based on 3 abstraction levels for representing vocabularies for information retrieval: conceptual level; expression level; and occurrence level. The proposed data model can be used for the representation and navigation of indexing and retrieval thesauri and as a vocabulary source for concept based query expansion in heterogeneous retrieval environments
- Date
- 2. 3.1997 17:29:07
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Caro Castro, C.; Travieso Rodríguez, C.: Ariadne's thread : knowledge structures for browsing in OPAC's (2003)
0.02
0.01683469 = product of:
0.044892505 = sum of:
0.016047427 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016047427 = score(doc=2768,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
0.010653506 = product of:
0.021307012 = sum of:
0.021307012 = weight(_text_:system in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021307012 = score(doc=2768,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.21095149 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.018191572 = product of:
0.036383145 = sum of:
0.036383145 = weight(_text_:etc in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036383145 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.20945519 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Subject searching is the most common but also the most conflictive searching for end user. The aim of this paper is to check how users expressions match subject headings and to prove if knowledge structure used in online catalogs enhances searching effectiveness. A bibliographic revision about difficulties in subject access and proposed methods to improve it is also presented. For the empirical analysis, transaction logs from two university libraries, online catalogs (CISNE and FAMA) were collected. Results show that more than a quarter of user queries are effective due to an alphabetical subject index approach and browsing through hypertextual links. 1. Introduction Since the 1980's, online public access catalogs (OPAC's) have become usual way to access bibliographic information. During the last two decades the technological development has helped to extend their use, making feasible the access for a whole of users that is getting more and more extensive and heterogeneous, and also to incorporate information resources in electronic formats and to interconnect systems. However, technology seems to have developed faster than our knowledge about the tasks where it has been applied and than the evolution of our capacities for adapting to it. The conceptual model of OPAC has been hardly modified recently, and for interacting with them, users still need to combine the same skills and basic knowledge than at the beginning of its introduction (Borgman, 1986, 2000): a) conceptual knowledge to translate the information need into an appropriate query because of a well-designed mental model of the system, b) semantic and syntactic knowledge to be able to implement that query (access fields, searching type, Boolean logic, etc.) and c) basic technical skills in computing. At present many users have the essential technical skills to make use, with more or less expertise, of a computer. This number is substantially reduced when it is referred to the conceptual, semantic and syntactic knowledge that is necessary to achieve a moderately satisfactory search. An added difficulty arises in subject searching, as users should concrete their unknown information needs in terms that the information retrieval system can understand. Many researches have focused an unskilled searchers' difficulties to enter an effective query. The mental models influence, users assumption about characteristics, structure, contents and operation of the system they interact with have been analysed (Dillon, 2000; Dimitroff, 2000). Another issue that implies difficulties is vocabulary: how to find the right terms to implement a query and to modify it as the case may be. Terminology and expressions characteristics used in searching (Bates, 1993), the match between user terms and the subject headings from the catalog (Carlyle, 1989; Drabensttot, 1996; Drabensttot & Vizine-Goetz, 1994), the incidence of spelling errors (Drabensttot and Weller, 1996; Ferl and Millsap, 1996; Walker and Jones, 1987), users problems
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Magennis, M.: Expert rule-based query expansion (1995)
0.02
0.016673999 = product of:
0.066695996 = sum of:
0.04538898 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04538898 = score(doc=5181,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.021307012 = product of:
0.042614024 = sum of:
0.042614024 = weight(_text_:system in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042614024 = score(doc=5181,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.42190298 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Examines how, for term based free text retrieval, Interactive Query Expansion (IQE) provides better retrieval performance tahn Automatic Query Expansion (AQE) but the performance of IQE depends on the strategy employed by the user to select expansion terms. The aim is to build an expert query expansion system using term selection rules based on expert users' strategies. It is expected that such a system will achieve better performance for novice or inexperienced users that either AQE or IQE. The procedure is to discover expert IQE users' term selection strategies through observation and interrogation, to construct a rule based query expansion (RQE) system based on these and to compare the resulting retrieval performance with that of comparable AQE and IQE systems
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: ¬The effects of topic complexity and familiarity on cognitive and physical moves in a thesaurus-enhanced search environment (2003)
0.02
0.016302817 = product of:
0.06521127 = sum of:
0.038904842 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038904842 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
0.02630642 = product of:
0.05261284 = sum of:
0.05261284 = weight(_text_:29 in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05261284 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.6, S.517-
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Jun, W.: ¬A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurus and metadata in a digital library (2003)
0.02
0.01608755 = product of:
0.0643502 = sum of:
0.022461722 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022461722 = score(doc=1254,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.23154683 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.041888483 = sum of:
0.02435087 = weight(_text_:system in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02435087 = score(doc=1254,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.24108742 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.017537614 = weight(_text_:29 in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017537614 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Knowledge management in digital libraries is a universal problem. Keyword-based searching is applied everywhere no matter whether the resources are indexed databases or full-text Web pages. In keyword matching, the valuable content description and indexing of the metadata, such as the subject descriptors and the classification notations, are merely treated as common keywords to be matched with the user query. Without the support of vocabulary control tools, such as classification systems and thesauri, the intelligent labor of content analysis, description and indexing in metadata production are seriously wasted. New retrieval paradigms are needed to exploit the potential of the metadata resources. Could classification and thesauri, which contain the condensed intelligence of generations of librarians, be used in a digital library to organize the networked information, especially metadata, to facilitate their usability and change the digital library into a knowledge management environment? To examine that question, we designed and implemented a new paradigm that incorporates a classification system, a thesaurus and metadata. The classification and the thesaurus are merged into a concept network, and the metadata are distributed into the nodes of the concept network according to their subjects. The abstract concept node instantiated with the related metadata records becomes a knowledge node. A coherent and consistent knowledge network is thus formed. It is not only a framework for resource organization but also a structure for knowledge navigation, retrieval and learning. We have built an experimental system based on the Chinese Classification and Thesaurus, which is the most comprehensive and authoritative in China, and we have incorporated more than 5000 bibliographic records in the computing domain from the Peking University Library. The result is encouraging. In this article, we review the tools, the architecture and the implementation of our experimental system, which is called Vision.
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.24-28
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
