Search (260 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Hemmje, M.: LyberWorld : eine 3D-basierte Benutzerschnittstelle für die computerunterstützte Informationssuche in Dokumentmengen (1993) 0.07
    0.06500076 = product of:
      0.16250189 = sum of:
        0.008533326 = weight(_text_:a in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008533326 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
        0.15396856 = weight(_text_:63 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15396856 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.75759465 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    GMD-Spiegel. 1993. H.1, S.56-63
    Type
    a
  2. Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2012) 0.05
    0.04642911 = product of:
      0.11607277 = sum of:
        0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 3802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006095233 = score(doc=3802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3802)
        0.109977536 = weight(_text_:63 in 3802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109977536 = score(doc=3802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.541139 = fieldWeight in 3802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3802)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 63(2012) no.12, S.2557-2558 (Heidi Julien)
  3. Magennis, M.: Expert rule-based query expansion (1995) 0.03
    0.03374974 = product of:
      0.08437435 = sum of:
        0.0073900777 = weight(_text_:a in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073900777 = score(doc=5181,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
        0.07698428 = weight(_text_:63 in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07698428 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.37879732 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines how, for term based free text retrieval, Interactive Query Expansion (IQE) provides better retrieval performance tahn Automatic Query Expansion (AQE) but the performance of IQE depends on the strategy employed by the user to select expansion terms. The aim is to build an expert query expansion system using term selection rules based on expert users' strategies. It is expected that such a system will achieve better performance for novice or inexperienced users that either AQE or IQE. The procedure is to discover expert IQE users' term selection strategies through observation and interrogation, to construct a rule based query expansion (RQE) system based on these and to compare the resulting retrieval performance with that of comparable AQE and IQE systems
    Source
    New review of document and text management. 1995, no.1, S.63-83
    Type
    a
  4. Huang, L.; Milne, D.; Frank, E.; Witten, I.H.: Learning a concept-based document similarity measure (2012) 0.03
    0.028928353 = product of:
      0.07232088 = sum of:
        0.0063343523 = weight(_text_:a in 372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063343523 = score(doc=372,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 372, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=372)
        0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06598653 = score(doc=372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=372)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Document similarity measures are crucial components of many text-analysis tasks, including information retrieval, document classification, and document clustering. Conventional measures are brittle: They estimate the surface overlap between documents based on the words they mention and ignore deeper semantic connections. We propose a new measure that assesses similarity at both the lexical and semantic levels, and learns from human judgments how to combine them by using machine-learning techniques. Experiments show that the new measure produces values for documents that are more consistent with people's judgments than people are with each other. We also use it to classify and cluster large document sets covering different genres and topics, and find that it improves both classification and clustering performance.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1593-1608
    Type
    a
  5. Green, R.: See-also relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification (2011) 0.03
    0.027515382 = product of:
      0.068788454 = sum of:
        0.0073900777 = weight(_text_:a in 4615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073900777 = score(doc=4615,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4615, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4615)
        0.061398376 = product of:
          0.12279675 = sum of:
            0.12279675 = weight(_text_:dewey in 4615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12279675 = score(doc=4615,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.56892735 = fieldWeight in 4615, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4615)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper investigates the semantics of topical, associative see-also relationships in schedule and table entries of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system. Based on the see-also relationships in a random sample of 100 classes containing one or more of these relationships, a semi-structured inventory of sources of see-also relationships is generated, of which the most important are lexical similarity, complementarity, facet difference, and relational configuration difference. The premise that see-also relationships based on lexical similarity may be language-specific is briefly examined. The paper concludes with recommendations on the continued use of see-also relationships in the DDC.
    Type
    a
  6. Nagao, M.: Knowledge and inference (1990) 0.03
    0.025443492 = product of:
      0.06360873 = sum of:
        0.008619961 = weight(_text_:a in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008619961 = score(doc=3304,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
        0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054988768 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge and Inference discusses an important problem for software systems: How do we treat knowledge and ideas on a computer and how do we use inference to solve problems on a computer? The book talks about the problems of knowledge and inference for the purpose of merging artificial intelligence and library science. The book begins by clarifying the concept of ""knowledge"" from many points of view, followed by a chapter on the current state of library science and the place of artificial intelligence in library science. Subsequent chapters cover central topics in the artificial intelligence: search and problem solving, methods of making proofs, and the use of knowledge in looking for a proof. There is also a discussion of how to use the knowledge system. The final chapter describes a popular expert system. It describes tools for building expert systems using an example based on Expert Systems-A Practical Introduction by P. Sell (Macmillian, 1985). This type of software is called an ""expert system shell."" This book was written as a textbook for undergraduate students covering only the basics but explaining as much detail as possible.
    Signature
    63 TXX 155
  7. Baofu, P.: ¬The future of information architecture : conceiving a better way to understand taxonomy, network, and intelligence (2008) 0.02
    0.024106959 = product of:
      0.060267396 = sum of:
        0.005278627 = weight(_text_:a in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005278627 = score(doc=2257,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
        0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054988768 = score(doc=2257,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Future of Information Architecture examines issues surrounding why information is processed, stored and applied in the way that it has, since time immemorial. Contrary to the conventional wisdom held by many scholars in human history, the recurrent debate on the explanation of the most basic categories of information (eg space, time causation, quality, quantity) has been misconstrued, to the effect that there exists some deeper categories and principles behind these categories of information - with enormous implications for our understanding of reality in general. To understand this, the book is organised in to four main parts: Part I begins with the vital question concerning the role of information within the context of the larger theoretical debate in the literature. Part II provides a critical examination of the nature of data taxonomy from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part III constructively invesitgates the world of information network from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part IV proposes six main theses in the authors synthetic theory of information architecture, namely, (a) the first thesis on the simpleness-complicatedness principle, (b) the second thesis on the exactness-vagueness principle (c) the third thesis on the slowness-quickness principle (d) the fourth thesis on the order-chaos principle, (e) the fifth thesis on the symmetry-asymmetry principle, and (f) the sixth thesis on the post-human stage.
    Signature
    63 BBV 1310
  8. Gnoli, C.; Santis, R. de; Pusterla, L.: Commerce, see also Rhetoric : cross-discipline relationships as authority data for enhanced retrieval (2015) 0.02
    0.021199534 = product of:
      0.052998833 = sum of:
        0.00914285 = weight(_text_:a in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00914285 = score(doc=2299,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
        0.043855984 = product of:
          0.08771197 = sum of:
            0.08771197 = weight(_text_:dewey in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08771197 = score(doc=2299,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.4063767 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Subjects in a classification scheme are often related to other subjects belonging to different hierarchies. This problem was identified already by Hugh of Saint Victor (1096?-1141). Still with present-time bibliographic classifications, a user browsing the class of architecture under the hierarchy of arts may miss relevant items classified in building or in civil engineering under the hierarchy of applied sciences. To face these limitations we have developed SciGator, a browsable interface to explore the collections of all scientific libraries at the University of Pavia. Besides showing subclasses of a given class, the interface points users to related classes in the Dewey Decimal Classification, or in other local schemes, and allows for expanded queries that include them. This is made possible by using a special field for related classes in the database structure which models classification authority data. Ontologically, many relationships between classes in different hierarchies are cases of existential dependence. Dependence can occur between disciplines in such disciplinary classifications as Dewey (e.g. architecture existentially depends on building), or between phenomena in such phenomenon-based classifications as the Integrative Levels Classification (e.g. fishing as a human activity existentially depends on fish as a class of organisms). We provide an example of its representation in OWL and discuss some details of it.
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
    Type
    a
  9. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.020568617 = product of:
      0.05142154 = sum of:
        0.012067947 = weight(_text_:a in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012067947 = score(doc=2134,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
        0.039353594 = product of:
          0.07870719 = sum of:
            0.07870719 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07870719 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
    Type
    a
  10. Semantic search over the Web (2012) 0.02
    0.019285569 = product of:
      0.04821392 = sum of:
        0.0042229015 = weight(_text_:a in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0042229015 = score(doc=411,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
        0.043991018 = weight(_text_:63 in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043991018 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.21645561 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Web has become the world's largest database, with search being the main tool that allows organizations and individuals to exploit its huge amount of information. Search on the Web has been traditionally based on textual and structural similarities, ignoring to a large degree the semantic dimension, i.e., understanding the meaning of the query and of the document content. Combining search and semantics gives birth to the idea of semantic search. Traditional search engines have already advertised some semantic dimensions. Some of them, for instance, can enhance their generated result sets with documents that are semantically related to the query terms even though they may not include these terms. Nevertheless, the exploitation of the semantic search has not yet reached its full potential. In this book, Roberto De Virgilio, Francesco Guerra and Yannis Velegrakis present an extensive overview of the work done in Semantic Search and other related areas. They explore different technologies and solutions in depth, making their collection a valuable and stimulating reading for both academic and industrial researchers. The book is divided into three parts. The first introduces the readers to the basic notions of the Web of Data. It describes the different kinds of data that exist, their topology, and their storing and indexing techniques. The second part is dedicated to Web Search. It presents different types of search, like the exploratory or the path-oriented, alongside methods for their efficient and effective implementation. Other related topics included in this part are the use of uncertainty in query answering, the exploitation of ontologies, and the use of semantics in mashup design and operation. The focus of the third part is on linked data, and more specifically, on applying ideas originating in recommender systems on linked data management, and on techniques for the efficiently querying answering on linked data.
    Content
    Inhalt: Introduction.- Part I Introduction to Web of Data.- Topology of the Web of Data.- Storing and Indexing Massive RDF Data Sets.- Designing Exploratory Search Applications upon Web Data Sources.- Part II Search over the Web.- Path-oriented Keyword Search query over RDF.- Interactive Query Construction for Keyword Search on the SemanticWeb.- Understanding the Semantics of Keyword Queries on Relational DataWithout Accessing the Instance.- Keyword-Based Search over Semantic Data.- Semantic Link Discovery over Relational Data.- Embracing Uncertainty in Entity Linking.- The Return of the Entity-Relationship Model: Ontological Query Answering.- Linked Data Services and Semantics-enabled Mashup.- Part III Linked Data Search engines.- A Recommender System for Linked Data.- Flint: from Web Pages to Probabilistic Semantic Data.- Searching and Browsing Linked Data with SWSE.
    Signature
    63 TVK 296
  11. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.02
    0.018339347 = product of:
      0.045848366 = sum of:
        0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006095233 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
        0.03975313 = product of:
          0.07950626 = sum of:
            0.07950626 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07950626 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
    Type
    a
  12. Gnoli, C.; Pusterla, L.; Bendiscioli, A.; Recinella, C.: Classification for collections mapping and query expansion (2016) 0.02
    0.01815626 = product of:
      0.04539065 = sum of:
        0.008177614 = weight(_text_:a in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008177614 = score(doc=3102,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
        0.037213035 = product of:
          0.07442607 = sum of:
            0.07442607 = weight(_text_:dewey in 3102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07442607 = score(doc=3102,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.34482205 = fieldWeight in 3102, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification has been used to organize materials owned by the three scientific libraries at the University of Pavia, and to allow integrated browsing in their union catalogue through SciGator, a home built web-based user interface. Classification acts as a bridge between collections located in different places and shelved according to different local schemes. Furthermore, cross-discipline relationships recorded in the system allow for expanded queries that increase recall. Advantages and possible improvements of such a system are discussed.
    Type
    a
  13. Wang, Z.; Khoo, C.S.G.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Evaluation of the navigation effectiveness of an organizational taxonomy built on a general classification scheme and domain thesauri (2014) 0.02
    0.017418956 = product of:
      0.04354739 = sum of:
        0.0063343523 = weight(_text_:a in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063343523 = score(doc=1251,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
        0.037213035 = product of:
          0.07442607 = sum of:
            0.07442607 = weight(_text_:dewey in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07442607 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.34482205 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an evaluation study of the navigation effectiveness of a multifaceted organizational taxonomy that was built on the Dewey Decimal Classification and several domain thesauri in the area of library and information science education. The objective of the evaluation was to detect deficiencies in the taxonomy and to infer problems of applied construction steps from users' navigation difficulties. The evaluation approach included scenario-based navigation exercises and postexercise interviews. Navigation exercise errors and underlying reasons were analyzed in relation to specific components of the taxonomy and applied construction steps. Guidelines for the construction of the hierarchical structure and categories of an organizational taxonomy using existing general classification schemes and domain thesauri were derived from the evaluation results.
    Type
    a
  14. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.02
    0.015466786 = product of:
      0.038666964 = sum of:
        0.010557254 = weight(_text_:a in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010557254 = score(doc=3280,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
        0.02810971 = product of:
          0.05621942 = sum of:
            0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05621942 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  15. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.01
    0.014947097 = product of:
      0.037367743 = sum of:
        0.0095405495 = weight(_text_:a in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0095405495 = score(doc=5295,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
        0.027827194 = product of:
          0.055654388 = sum of:
            0.055654388 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055654388 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
    Type
    a
  16. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.01
    0.013681978 = product of:
      0.034204945 = sum of:
        0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006095233 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
        0.02810971 = product of:
          0.05621942 = sum of:
            0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05621942 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Type
    a
  17. Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016) 0.01
    0.013681978 = product of:
      0.034204945 = sum of:
        0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006095233 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
        0.02810971 = product of:
          0.05621942 = sum of:
            0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05621942 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Type
    a
  18. Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016) 0.01
    0.013681978 = product of:
      0.034204945 = sum of:
        0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006095233 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
        0.02810971 = product of:
          0.05621942 = sum of:
            0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05621942 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  19. Ingwersen, P.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The turn : integration of information seeking and retrieval in context (2005) 0.01
    0.0128263235 = product of:
      0.03206581 = sum of:
        0.004571425 = weight(_text_:a in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004571425 = score(doc=1323,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.09554617 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
        0.027494384 = weight(_text_:63 in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027494384 = score(doc=1323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.13528475 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Turn analyzes the research of information seeking and retrieval (IS&R) and proposes a new direction of integrating research in these two areas: the fields should turn off their separate and narrow paths and construct a new avenue of research. An essential direction for this avenue is context as given in the subtitle Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Other essential themes in the book include: IS&R research models, frameworks and theories; search and works tasks and situations in context; interaction between humans and machines; information acquisition, relevance and information use; research design and methodology based on a structured set of explicit variables - all set into the holistic cognitive approach. The present monograph invites the reader into a construction project - there is much research to do for a contextual understanding of IS&R. The Turn represents a wide-ranging perspective of IS&R by providing a novel unique research framework, covering both individual and social aspects of information behavior, including the generation, searching, retrieval and use of information. Regarding traditional laboratory information retrieval research, the monograph proposes the extension of research toward actors, search and work tasks, IR interaction and utility of information. Regarding traditional information seeking research, it proposes the extension toward information access technology and work task contexts. The Turn is the first synthesis of research in the broad area of IS&R ranging from systems oriented laboratory IR research to social science oriented information seeking studies. TOC:Introduction.- The Cognitive Framework for Information.- The Development of Information Seeking Research.- Systems-Oriented Information Retrieval.- Cognitive and User-Oriented Information Retrieval.- The Integrated IS&R Research Framework.- Implications of the Cognitive Framework for IS&R.- Towards a Research Program.- Conclusion.- Definitions.- References.- Index.
    Footnote
    - Kapitel fünf enthält einen entsprechenden Überblick über die kognitive und benutzerorientierte IR-Tradition. Es zeigt, welche anderen (als nur die labororientierten) IR-Studien durchgeführt werden können, wobei sich die Betrachtung von frühen Modellen (z.B. Taylor) über Belkins ASK-Konzept bis zu Ingwersens Modell der Polyrepräsentation, und von Bates Berrypicking-Ansatz bis zu Vakkaris "taskbased" IR-Modell erstreckt. Auch Web-IR, OKAPI und Diskussionen zum Relevanzbegriff werden hier thematisiert. - Im folgenden Kapitel schlagen die Autoren ein integriertes IS&R Forschungsmodell vor, bei dem die vielfältigen Beziehungen zwischen Informationssuchenden, Systementwicklern, Oberflächen und anderen beteiligten Aspekten berücksichtigt werden. Ihr Ansatz vereint die traditionelle Laborforschung mit verschiedenen benutzerorientierten Traditionen aus IS&R, insbesondere mit den empirischen Ansätzen zu IS und zum interaktiven IR, in einem holistischen kognitiven Modell. - Kapitel sieben untersucht die Implikationen dieses Modells für IS&R, wobei besonders ins Auge fällt, wie komplex die Anfragen von Informationssuchenden im Vergleich mit der relativen Einfachheit der Algorithmen zum Auffinden relevanter Dokumente sind. Die Abbildung der vielfältig variierenden kognitiven Zustände der Anfragesteller im Rahmen der der Systementwicklung ist sicherlich keine triviale Aufgabe. Wie dabei das Problem der Einbeziehung des zentralen Aspektes der Bedeutung gelöst werden kann, sei dahingestellt. - Im achten Kapitel wird der Versuch unternommen, die zuvor diskutierten Punkte in ein IS&R-Forschungsprogramm (Prozesse - Verhalten - Systemfunktionalität - Performanz) umzusetzen, wobei auch einige kritische Anmerkungen zur bisherigen Forschungspraxis getroffen werden. - Das abschliessende neunte Kapitel fasst das Buch kurz zusammen und kann somit auch als Einstieg in dieThematik gelesen werden. Darauffolgen noch ein sehr nützliches Glossar zu allen wichtigen Begriffen, die in dem Buch Verwendung finden, eine Bibliographie und ein Sachregister. Ingwersen und Järvelin haben hier ein sehr anspruchsvolles und dennoch lesbares Buch vorgelegt. Die gebotenen Übersichtskapitel und Diskussionen sind zwar keine Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft, decken aber einen grossen Teil der heute in dieser Disziplin aktuellen und durch laufende Forschungsaktivitäten und Publikationen berührten Teilbereiche ab. Man könnte es auch - vielleicht ein wenig überspitzt - so formulieren: Was hier thematisiert wird, ist eigentlich die moderne Informationswissenschaft. Der Versuch, die beiden Forschungstraditionen zu vereinen, wird diesem Werk sicherlich einen Platz in der Geschichte der Disziplin sichern. Nicht ganz glücklich erscheint der Titel des Buches. "The Turn" soll eine Wende bedeuten, nämlich jene hin zu einer integrierten Sicht von IS und IR. Das geht vermutlich aus dem Untertitel besser hervor, doch dieser erschien den Autoren wohl zu trocken. Schade, denn "The Turn" gibt es z.B. in unserem Verbundkatalog bereits, allerdings mit dem Zusatz "from the Cold War to a new era; the United States and the Soviet Union 1983-1990". Der Verlag, der abgesehen davon ein gediegenes (wenn auch nicht gerade wohlfeiles) Produkt vorgelegt hat, hätte derlei unscharfe Duplizierend besser verhindert. Ungeachtet dessen empfehle ich dieses wichtige Buch ohne Vorbehalt zur Anschaffung; es sollte in keiner grösseren Bibliothek fehlen."
    Signature
    63 BCA 2089
  20. Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994) 0.01
    0.012373429 = product of:
      0.030933572 = sum of:
        0.008445803 = weight(_text_:a in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008445803 = score(doc=5693,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
        0.022487769 = product of:
          0.044975538 = sum of:
            0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044975538 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494574 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The process of term selection for query expansion by end-users is discussed within the context of a study of interactive query expansion in a relevance feedback environment. This user study focuses on how users' perceive and understand term relationships, such as hierarchical and associative relationships, in their searches
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:35:22
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

  • e 221
  • d 34
  • f 2
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 235
  • el 25
  • m 14
  • r 4
  • p 2
  • x 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…