Search (52 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.03 
    0.02980162 = product of:
  0.1490081 = sum of:
    0.1490081 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1490081 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1848467 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030401835 = queryNorm
        0.8061172 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  2. Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996) 0.01 
    0.01490081 = product of:
  0.07450405 = sum of:
    0.07450405 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07450405 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1848467 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030401835 = queryNorm
        0.4030586 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  3. Ingwersen, P.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The turn : integration of information seeking and retrieval in context (2005) 0.01 
    0.009665817 = product of:
  0.024164543 = sum of:
    0.011569494 = product of:
      0.03470848 = sum of:
        0.03470848 = weight(_text_:themes in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03470848 = score(doc=1323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19545428 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.17757851 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.012595049 = product of:
      0.050380196 = sum of:
        0.050380196 = weight(_text_:auge in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050380196 = score(doc=1323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23548178 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.2139452 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Turn analyzes the research of information seeking and retrieval (IS&R) and proposes a new direction of integrating research in these two areas: the fields should turn off their separate and narrow paths and construct a new avenue of research. An essential direction for this avenue is context as given in the subtitle Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Other essential themes in the book include: IS&R research models, frameworks and theories; search and works tasks and situations in context; interaction between humans and machines; information acquisition, relevance and information use; research design and methodology based on a structured set of explicit variables - all set into the holistic cognitive approach. The present monograph invites the reader into a construction project - there is much research to do for a contextual understanding of IS&R. The Turn represents a wide-ranging perspective of IS&R by providing a novel unique research framework, covering both individual and social aspects of information behavior, including the generation, searching, retrieval and use of information. Regarding traditional laboratory information retrieval research, the monograph proposes the extension of research toward actors, search and work tasks, IR interaction and utility of information. Regarding traditional information seeking research, it proposes the extension toward information access technology and work task contexts. The Turn is the first synthesis of research in the broad area of IS&R ranging from systems oriented laboratory IR research to social science oriented information seeking studies. TOC:Introduction.- The Cognitive Framework for Information.- The Development of Information Seeking Research.- Systems-Oriented Information Retrieval.- Cognitive and User-Oriented Information Retrieval.- The Integrated IS&R Research Framework.- Implications of the Cognitive Framework for IS&R.- Towards a Research Program.- Conclusion.- Definitions.- References.- Index.
    Footnote
    - Kapitel fünf enthält einen entsprechenden Überblick über die kognitive und benutzerorientierte IR-Tradition. Es zeigt, welche anderen (als nur die labororientierten) IR-Studien durchgeführt werden können, wobei sich die Betrachtung von frühen Modellen (z.B. Taylor) über Belkins ASK-Konzept bis zu Ingwersens Modell der Polyrepräsentation, und von Bates Berrypicking-Ansatz bis zu Vakkaris "taskbased" IR-Modell erstreckt. Auch Web-IR, OKAPI und Diskussionen zum Relevanzbegriff werden hier thematisiert. - Im folgenden Kapitel schlagen die Autoren ein integriertes IS&R Forschungsmodell vor, bei dem die vielfältigen Beziehungen zwischen Informationssuchenden, Systementwicklern, Oberflächen und anderen beteiligten Aspekten berücksichtigt werden. Ihr Ansatz vereint die traditionelle Laborforschung mit verschiedenen benutzerorientierten Traditionen aus IS&R, insbesondere mit den empirischen Ansätzen zu IS und zum interaktiven IR, in einem holistischen kognitiven Modell. - Kapitel sieben untersucht die Implikationen dieses Modells für IS&R, wobei besonders ins Auge fällt, wie komplex die Anfragen von Informationssuchenden im Vergleich mit der relativen Einfachheit der Algorithmen zum Auffinden relevanter Dokumente sind. Die Abbildung der vielfältig variierenden kognitiven Zustände der Anfragesteller im Rahmen der der Systementwicklung ist sicherlich keine triviale Aufgabe. Wie dabei das Problem der Einbeziehung des zentralen Aspektes der Bedeutung gelöst werden kann, sei dahingestellt. - Im achten Kapitel wird der Versuch unternommen, die zuvor diskutierten Punkte in ein IS&R-Forschungsprogramm (Prozesse - Verhalten - Systemfunktionalität - Performanz) umzusetzen, wobei auch einige kritische Anmerkungen zur bisherigen Forschungspraxis getroffen werden. - Das abschliessende neunte Kapitel fasst das Buch kurz zusammen und kann somit auch als Einstieg in dieThematik gelesen werden. Darauffolgen noch ein sehr nützliches Glossar zu allen wichtigen Begriffen, die in dem Buch Verwendung finden, eine Bibliographie und ein Sachregister. Ingwersen und Järvelin haben hier ein sehr anspruchsvolles und dennoch lesbares Buch vorgelegt. Die gebotenen Übersichtskapitel und Diskussionen sind zwar keine Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft, decken aber einen grossen Teil der heute in dieser Disziplin aktuellen und durch laufende Forschungsaktivitäten und Publikationen berührten Teilbereiche ab. Man könnte es auch - vielleicht ein wenig überspitzt - so formulieren: Was hier thematisiert wird, ist eigentlich die moderne Informationswissenschaft. Der Versuch, die beiden Forschungstraditionen zu vereinen, wird diesem Werk sicherlich einen Platz in der Geschichte der Disziplin sichern. Nicht ganz glücklich erscheint der Titel des Buches. "The Turn" soll eine Wende bedeuten, nämlich jene hin zu einer integrierten Sicht von IS und IR. Das geht vermutlich aus dem Untertitel besser hervor, doch dieser erschien den Autoren wohl zu trocken. Schade, denn "The Turn" gibt es z.B. in unserem Verbundkatalog bereits, allerdings mit dem Zusatz "from the Cold War to a new era; the United States and the Soviet Union 1983-1990". Der Verlag, der abgesehen davon ein gediegenes (wenn auch nicht gerade wohlfeiles) Produkt vorgelegt hat, hätte derlei unscharfe Duplizierend besser verhindert. Ungeachtet dessen empfehle ich dieses wichtige Buch ohne Vorbehalt zur Anschaffung; es sollte in keiner grösseren Bibliothek fehlen."
  4. Zhang, W.; Yoshida, T.; Tang, X.: ¬A comparative study of TF*IDF, LSI and multi-words for text classification (2011) 0.01 
    0.0055533573 = product of:
  0.027766787 = sum of:
    0.027766787 = product of:
      0.08330036 = sum of:
        0.08330036 = weight(_text_:themes in 1165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08330036 = score(doc=1165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19545428 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 1165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1165)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    One of the main themes in text mining is text representation, which is fundamental and indispensable for text-based intellegent information processing. Generally, text representation inludes two tasks: indexing and weighting. This paper has comparatively studied TF*IDF, LSI and multi-word for text representation. We used a Chinese and an English document collection to respectively evaluate the three methods in information retreival and text categorization. Experimental results have demonstrated that in text categorization, LSI has better performance than other methods in both document collections. Also, LSI has produced the best performance in retrieving English documents. This outcome has shown that LSI has both favorable semantic and statistical quality and is different with the claim that LSI can not produce discriminative power for indexing.
  5. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.00 
    0.0029125933 = product of:
  0.014562966 = sum of:
    0.014562966 = product of:
      0.058251865 = sum of:
        0.058251865 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058251865 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
  6. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.00 
    0.0028833204 = product of:
  0.0144166015 = sum of:
    0.0144166015 = product of:
      0.057666406 = sum of:
        0.057666406 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057666406 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  7. Zarri, G.P.: Utilisation de structures conceptuelles complexes pour représenter le "contenu sémantique" de textes narratifs (1999) 0.00 
    0.002845978 = product of:
  0.014229889 = sum of:
    0.014229889 = product of:
      0.042689666 = sum of:
        0.042689666 = weight(_text_:f in 6168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042689666 = score(doc=6168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 6168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6168)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    f
  8. Celik, I.; Abel, F.; Siehndel, P.: Adaptive faceted search on Twitter (2011) 0.00 
    0.002845978 = product of:
  0.014229889 = sum of:
    0.014229889 = product of:
      0.042689666 = sum of:
        0.042689666 = weight(_text_:f in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042689666 = score(doc=2221,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  9. Case, D.O.: Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2002) 0.00 
    0.0027766787 = product of:
  0.013883393 = sum of:
    0.013883393 = product of:
      0.04165018 = sum of:
        0.04165018 = weight(_text_:themes in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04165018 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19545428 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.21309422 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.7, S.695-697 (R. Savolainen): "Donald O. Case has written an ambitious book to create an overall picture of the major approaches to information needs and seeking (INS) studies. The aim to write an extensive review is reflected in the list of references containing about 700 items. The high ambitions are explained an p. 14, where Case states that he is aiming at a multidisciplinary understanding of the concept of information seeking. In the Preface, the author characterizes his book as an introduction to the topic for students at the graduate level, as well as as a review and handbook for scholars engagged in information behavior research. In my view, Looking for Information is particularly welcome as an academic textbook because the field of INS studies suffers from the lack of monographs. Along with the continuous growth of the number of journal articles and conference papers, there is a genuine need for a book that picks up the numerous pieces and puts them together. The use of the study as a textbook is facilitated by clearly delineated sections an major themes and the wealth of concrete examples of information seeking in everyday contexts. The book is lucidly written and it is accessible to novice readers, too. At first glance, the idea of providing a comprehensive review of INS studies may seem a mission impossible because the current number of articles, papers, and other contributions in this field is nearing the 10,000 range (p. 224). Donald Case is not alone in the task of coming to grips with an increasing number of studies; similar problems have been faced by those writing INS-related chapters for the Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST). Case has solved the problem of "too many publications to be reviewed" by concentrating an the INS literature published during the last two decades. Secondly, studies an library use and information retrieval are discussed only to a limited extent. In addition, Case is highly selective as to studies focusing an the use of specific sources and channels such as WWW. These delineations are reasonable, even though they beg some questions. First, how should one draw the line between studies an information seeking and information retrieval? Case does not discuss this question in greater detail, although in recent years, the overlapping areas of information seeking and retrieval studies have been broadened, along with the growing importance of WWW in information seeking/retrieval. Secondly, how can one define the concept of information searching (or, more specifically, Internet or Web searching) in relation to information seeking and information retrieval? In the field of Web searching studies, there is an increasing number of contributions that are of direct relevance to information-seeking studies. Clearly, the advent of the Internet, particularly, the Web, has blurred the previous lines between INS and IR literature, making them less clear cut. The book consists of five main sections, and comprises 13 chapters. There is an Appendix serving the needs of an INS textbook (questions for discussion and application). The structure of the book is meticulously planned and, as a whole, it offers a sufficiently balanced contribution to theoretical, methodological, and empirical issues of INS. The title, Looking for Information: A Survey of Research an Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior aptly describes the main substance of the book. . . . It is easy to agree with Case about the significance of the problem of specialization and fragmentation. This problem seems to be concomitant with the broadening field of INS research. In itself, Case's book can be interpreted as a struggle against this fragmentation. His book suggests that this struggle is not hopeless and that it is still possible to draw an overall picture of the evolving research field. The major pieces of the puzzle were found and the book will provide a useful overview of INS studies for many years."
  10. Shapiro, C.D.; Yan, P.-F.: Generous tools : thesauri in digital libraries (1996) 0.00 
    0.0024902306 = product of:
  0.012451152 = sum of:
    0.012451152 = product of:
      0.037353456 = sum of:
        0.037353456 = weight(_text_:f in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037353456 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. Colace, F.; Santo, M. De; Greco, L.; Napoletano, P.: Weighted word pairs for query expansion (2015) 0.00 
    0.0024902306 = product of:
  0.012451152 = sum of:
    0.012451152 = product of:
      0.037353456 = sum of:
        0.037353456 = weight(_text_:f in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037353456 = score(doc=2687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. Scholer, F.; Williams, H.E.; Turpin, A.: Query association surrogates for Web search (2004) 0.00 
    0.0021344833 = product of:
  0.010672417 = sum of:
    0.010672417 = product of:
      0.03201725 = sum of:
        0.03201725 = weight(_text_:f in 2236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03201725 = score(doc=2236,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 2236, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2236)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  13. Menczer, F.: Lexical and semantic clustering by Web links (2004) 0.00 
    0.0021344833 = product of:
  0.010672417 = sum of:
    0.010672417 = product of:
      0.03201725 = sum of:
        0.03201725 = weight(_text_:f in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03201725 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  14. Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011) 0.00 
    0.0021344833 = product of:
  0.010672417 = sum of:
    0.010672417 = product of:
      0.03201725 = sum of:
        0.03201725 = weight(_text_:f in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03201725 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
  15. Colace, F.; Santo, M. de; Greco, L.; Napoletano, P.: Improving relevance feedback-based query expansion by the use of a weighted word pairs approach (2015) 0.00 
    0.0021344833 = product of:
  0.010672417 = sum of:
    0.010672417 = product of:
      0.03201725 = sum of:
        0.03201725 = weight(_text_:f in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03201725 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.00 
    0.0020595144 = product of:
  0.010297572 = sum of:
    0.010297572 = product of:
      0.04119029 = sum of:
        0.04119029 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04119029 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  17. Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016) 0.00 
    0.0020595144 = product of:
  0.010297572 = sum of:
    0.010297572 = product of:
      0.04119029 = sum of:
        0.04119029 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04119029 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  18. Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016) 0.00 
    0.0020595144 = product of:
  0.010297572 = sum of:
    0.010297572 = product of:
      0.04119029 = sum of:
        0.04119029 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04119029 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  19. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.00 
    0.0020595144 = product of:
  0.010297572 = sum of:
    0.010297572 = product of:
      0.04119029 = sum of:
        0.04119029 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04119029 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  20. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.00 
    0.0020388155 = product of:
  0.010194077 = sum of:
    0.010194077 = product of:
      0.04077631 = sum of:
        0.04077631 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077631 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 5
  • f 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 42
  • m 6
  • el 5
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications