Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016) 0.00 
    0.0042063976 = product of:
  0.01682559 = sum of:
    0.01682559 = weight(_text_:m in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01682559 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  2. Feinberg, M.: Expressive bibliography : personal collections in public space (2011) 0.00 
    0.003680598 = product of:
  0.014722392 = sum of:
    0.014722392 = weight(_text_:m in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014722392 = score(doc=4561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  3. Bundza, M.: ¬The choice is yours! : researchers assign subject metadata to their own materials in institutional repositories (2014) 0.00 
    0.003680598 = product of:
  0.014722392 = sum of:
    0.014722392 = weight(_text_:m in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014722392 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  4. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Fried, M.; Toma, I.; Yan, E.; Foo, S.; Milojevicacute, S.: Upper tag ontology for integrating social tagging data (2010) 0.00 
    0.0031547982 = product of:
  0.012619193 = sum of:
    0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012619193 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  5. Antin, J.; Earp, M.: With a little help from my friends : self-interested and prosocial behavior on MySpace Music (2010) 0.00 
    0.0031547982 = product of:
  0.012619193 = sum of:
    0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012619193 = score(doc=3458,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  6. Wang, J.; Clements, M.; Yang, J.; Vries, A.P. de; Reinders, M.J.T.: Personalization of tagging systems (2010) 0.00 
    0.0031547982 = product of:
  0.012619193 = sum of:
    0.012619193 = weight(_text_:m in 4229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012619193 = score(doc=4229,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4229, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4229)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  7. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.00 
    0.0031237355 = product of:
  0.012494942 = sum of:
    0.012494942 = product of:
      0.024989884 = sum of:
        0.024989884 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024989884 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030740997 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  8. Golub, K.; Lykke, M.; Tudhope, D.: Enhancing social tagging with automated keywords from the Dewey Decimal Classification (2014) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  9. Nov, O.; Naaman, M.; Ye, C.: Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community : a multidimensional perspective (2010) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 3424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=3424,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3424, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3424)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  10. Bar-Ilan, J.; Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Miller, Y.; Shoham, S.: ¬The effects of background information and social interaction on image tagging (2010) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 3453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=3453,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3453, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3453)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  11. Hsu, M.-H.; Chen, H.-H.: Efficient and effective prediction of social tags to enhance Web search (2011) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 4625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=4625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4625)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  12. Estrada, L.M.; Hildebrand, M.; Boer, V. de; Ossenbruggen, J. van: Time-based tags for fiction movies : comparing experts to novices using a video labeling game (2017) 0.00 
    0.0026289986 = product of:
  0.010515994 = sum of:
    0.010515994 = weight(_text_:m in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010515994 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07649739 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030740997 = queryNorm
        0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.00 
    0.002603113 = product of:
  0.010412452 = sum of:
    0.010412452 = product of:
      0.020824904 = sum of:
        0.020824904 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020824904 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030740997 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  14. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.00 
    0.002603113 = product of:
  0.010412452 = sum of:
    0.010412452 = product of:
      0.020824904 = sum of:
        0.020824904 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020824904 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030740997 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
  15. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.00 
    0.002603113 = product of:
  0.010412452 = sum of:
    0.010412452 = product of:
      0.020824904 = sum of:
        0.020824904 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020824904 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.107649736 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030740997 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  16. Hänger, C.; Krätzsch, C.; Niemann, C.: Was vom Tagging übrig blieb : Erkenntnisse und Einsichten aus zwei Jahren Projektarbeit (2011) 0.00 
    0.0024435692 = product of:
  0.009774277 = sum of:
    0.009774277 = product of:
      0.019548554 = sum of:
        0.019548554 = weight(_text_:da in 4519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019548554 = score(doc=4519,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1475006 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030740997 = queryNorm
            0.13253203 = fieldWeight in 4519, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7981725 = idf(docFreq=990, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4519)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    - Struktur der Tags Der Vergleich von zwei großen Tagging-Systemen hat große Ähnlichkeiten in der grammatikalischen Struktur der Tagging-Daten ergeben. Es werden mehrheitlich Substantive bzw. Eigennamen zur Erschließung sowie auch Verben zur Organisation der Quellen eingesetzt. Systembedingt kann außerdem eine große Menge von Wortkombinationen und Wortneuschöpfungen konstatiert werden, die aus den unterschiedlichsten Beweggründen und für sehr unterschiedliche Zwecke gebildet werden. Nur ein geringer Teil der Tags entspricht den formalen Kriterien kontrollierter Vokabulare. Eine besondere Hierarchisierung der Tags innerhalb eines Tagging-Systems über den Indikator der Häufigkeit der Nutzung hinaus hat sich nicht ergeben. In inhaltlicher Hinsicht hat sich eine klare Dominanz informatiknaher bzw. naturwissenschaftlicher Disziplinen gezeigt, wobei es sich hierbei um systemspezifische Präferenzen handelt. Insgesamt ist eine klare Tendenz zu zunehmender inhaltlicher Diversifikation in den Tagging-Systemen zu erkennen, was mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit der wachsenden Akzeptanz durch breitere Nutzergruppen zuzuschreiben ist. - Qualität der Tags Bei der Evaluation der Qualität der Tags bestätigte sich die Einschätzung, dass sich die Verschlagwortung mittels Tagging von jener durch Fachreferenten grundsätzlich unterscheidet. Nur ein kleiner Teil der Konzepte wurde in den beiden Systemen semantisch identisch oder wenigstens analog vergeben. Grundsätzlich liegen für eine Ressource fast immer mehr Tags als Schlagwörter vor, die zudem wesentlich häufiger exklusiv im Tagging-System zu finden sind. Diese Tatsache berührt jedoch nicht den inhaltlichen Erschließungsgrad einer Quelle, der sich trotz einer geringeren Anzahl an SWD-Schlagwörtern pro Ressource in beiden Systemen als gleichwertig gezeigt hat. Dennoch ist das Ausmaß der semantischen Abdeckung des Taggings überraschend, da sie der allgemeinen Erwartungshaltung von einer deutlich höheren Qualität der Verschlagwortung durch die professionelle Inhaltserschließung teilweise widerspricht. Diese Erwartung ist zumindest bezüglich der inhaltlichen Dimension zu relativieren.

Authors

Languages

  • e 14
  • d 2

Themes