Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.03 
    0.028627703 = sum of:
  0.021247318 = product of:
    0.08498927 = sum of:
      0.08498927 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08498927 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.007380385 = product of:
    0.01476077 = sum of:
      0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01476077 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
  2. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.01 
    0.008954933 = product of:
  0.017909866 = sum of:
    0.017909866 = product of:
      0.03581973 = sum of:
        0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03581973 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  3. Trant, J.; Bearman, D.: Social terminology enhancement through vernacular engagement : exploring collaborative annotation to encourage interaction with museum collections (2005) 0.00 
    0.002982126 = product of:
  0.005964252 = sum of:
    0.005964252 = product of:
      0.011928504 = sum of:
        0.011928504 = weight(_text_:d in 1185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011928504 = score(doc=1185,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.118742 = fieldWeight in 1185, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 11(2005) no.9, x S
  4. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Flack, M.: Social bookmarking tools (II) : a case study - Connotea (2005) 0.00 
    0.002635852 = product of:
  0.005271704 = sum of:
    0.005271704 = product of:
      0.010543408 = sum of:
        0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010543408 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 11(2005) no.4, x S
  5. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005) 0.00 
    0.0018450962 = product of:
  0.0036901925 = sum of:
    0.0036901925 = product of:
      0.007380385 = sum of:
        0.007380385 = weight(_text_:d in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007380385 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.07346786 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 11(2005) no.4, x S

Authors

Themes