Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.03
    0.034406595 = sum of:
      0.020880999 = product of:
        0.083523996 = sum of:
          0.083523996 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.083523996 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23689525 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051964227 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.013525597 = product of:
        0.04057679 = sum of:
          0.04057679 = weight(_text_:j in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04057679 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051964227 = queryNorm
              0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
  2. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.01
    0.0058670295 = product of:
      0.011734059 = sum of:
        0.011734059 = product of:
          0.035202175 = sum of:
            0.035202175 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035202175 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18196987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051964227 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  3. Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007) 0.01
    0.005796685 = product of:
      0.01159337 = sum of:
        0.01159337 = product of:
          0.034780107 = sum of:
            0.034780107 = weight(_text_:j in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034780107 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051964227 = queryNorm
                0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Trant, J.; Bearman, D.: Social terminology enhancement through vernacular engagement : exploring collaborative annotation to encourage interaction with museum collections (2005) 0.00
    0.0038644564 = product of:
      0.007728913 = sum of:
        0.007728913 = product of:
          0.023186738 = sum of:
            0.023186738 = weight(_text_:j in 1185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023186738 = score(doc=1185,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051964227 = queryNorm
                0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 1185, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1185)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005) 0.00
    0.0033813992 = product of:
      0.0067627984 = sum of:
        0.0067627984 = product of:
          0.020288395 = sum of:
            0.020288395 = weight(_text_:j in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020288395 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16511615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051964227 = queryNorm
                0.12287348 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)