Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.02 
    0.01587441 = product of:
  0.039686024 = sum of:
    0.02918537 = weight(_text_:management in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02918537 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
    0.010500654 = product of:
      0.03150196 = sum of:
        0.03150196 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03150196 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  2. Santini, M.: Zero, single, or multi? : genre of web pages through the users' perspective (2008) 0.01 
    0.013260448 = product of:
  0.03315112 = sum of:
    0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 2059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02432114 = score(doc=2059,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2059, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2059)
    0.008829977 = product of:
      0.02648993 = sum of:
        0.02648993 = weight(_text_:29 in 2059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02648993 = score(doc=2059,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2059, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2059)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    30. 7.2008 10:29:54
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.702-737
  3. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01 
    0.011251533 = product of:
  0.056257665 = sum of:
    0.056257665 = product of:
      0.0843865 = sum of:
        0.042383887 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042383887 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
        0.042002615 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042002615 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 9:55:29
    Pages
    S.15-22
  4. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Flack, M.: Social bookmarking tools (II) : a case study - Connotea (2005) 0.01 
    0.008425091 = product of:
  0.042125456 = sum of:
    0.042125456 = weight(_text_:management in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042125456 = score(doc=1189,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Connotea is a free online reference management and social bookmarking service for scientists created by Nature Publishing Group. While somewhat experimental in nature, Connotea already has a large and growing number of users, and is a real, fully functioning service. The label 'experimental' is not meant to imply that the service is any way ephemeral or esoteric, rather that the concept of social bookmarking itself and the application of that concept to reference management are both recent developments. Connotea is under active development, and we are still in the process of discovering how people will use it. In addition to Connotea being a free and public service, the core code is freely available under an open source license. Connotea was conceived from the outset as an online, social tool. Seeing the possibilities that del.icio.us was opening up for its users in the area of general web linking, we realised that scholarly reference management was a similar problem space. Connotea was designed and developed late in 2004, and soft-launched at the end of December 2004. Usage has grown over the past several months, to the point where there is now enough data in the system for interesting second-order effects to emerge. This paper will start by giving an overview of Connotea, and will outline the key concepts and describe its main features. We will then take the reader on a brief guided tour, show some of the aforementioned second-order effects, and end with a discussion of Connotea's likely future direction.
  5. Kuchler, T.; Pawlowski, J.M.; Zimmermann, V.: Social Tagging and Open Content : a concept for the future of e-learning and knowledge management? (2008) 0.01 
    0.00825487 = product of:
  0.04127435 = sum of:
    0.04127435 = weight(_text_:management in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04127435 = score(doc=2892,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Open Content is a promising concept for e-learning and knowledge management. It can improve sharing and re-using educational resources and create new business opportunities. However, in contrast to open source software, these opportunities have not yet been adopted by a wide community. This article discusses barriers and opportunities. The Content Explosion Model shows how content can be re-used and adapted to increase sharing and distributing Open Content. Social tagging is discussed, on the basis of an implementation example (SLIDESTAR), as a means of fostering content exchange on a content community platform.
  6. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01 
    0.007032209 = product of:
  0.035161044 = sum of:
    0.035161044 = product of:
      0.052741565 = sum of:
        0.02648993 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02648993 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
        0.026251635 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026251635 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:07
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  7. Komus, A.; Wauch, F.: Wikimanagement : was Unternehmen von Social-Software und Web 2.0 lernen können (2008) 0.01 
    0.006740073 = product of:
  0.033700366 = sum of:
    0.033700366 = weight(_text_:management in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033700366 = score(doc=508,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.25800878 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Inhalt: I. Wie funktionieren Social Software-Angebote? II. Welchen Erklärungsbeitrag leisten bestehende Organisationsansätze und welche Schlüsse muss die Organisationslehre aus den Erfahrungen ziehen? III. Welches sind die Erfolgsfaktoren von Social Software und wie lassen sich Technologie und Erfolgsfaktoren in das Management übertragen und in Unternehmen nutzen?
    RSWK
    Management / Soziale Software / Leitbild
    Subject
    Management / Soziale Software / Leitbild
  8. Hänger, C.: Knowledge management in the digital age : the possibilities of user generated content (2009) 0.00 
    0.0048642284 = product of:
  0.02432114 = sum of:
    0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 2813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02432114 = score(doc=2813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2813)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  9. Heckner, M.: Tagging, rating, posting : studying forms of user contribution for web-based information management and information retrieval (2009) 0.00 
    0.0048642284 = product of:
  0.02432114 = sum of:
    0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02432114 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  10. Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007) 0.00 
    0.0038913828 = product of:
  0.019456914 = sum of:
    0.019456914 = weight(_text_:management in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019456914 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. Yoon, J.W.: Towards a user-oriented thesaurus for non-domain-specific image collections (2009) 0.00 
    0.0038913828 = product of:
  0.019456914 = sum of:
    0.019456914 = weight(_text_:management in 4221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019456914 = score(doc=4221,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 4221, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4221)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.4, S.452-468
  12. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005) 0.00 
    0.0034049598 = product of:
  0.017024798 = sum of:
    0.017024798 = weight(_text_:management in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017024798 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.13034125 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Because, to paraphrase a pop music lyric from a certain rock and roll band of yesterday, "the Web is old, the Web is new, the Web is all, the Web is you", it seems like we might have to face up to some of these stark realities. With the introduction of new social software applications such as blogs, wikis, newsfeeds, social networks, and bookmarking tools (the subject of this paper), the claim that Shelley Powers makes in a Burningbird blog entry seems apposite: "This is the user's web now, which means it's my web and I can make the rules." Reinvention is revolution - it brings us always back to beginnings. We are here going to remind you of hyperlinks in all their glory, sell you on the idea of bookmarking hyperlinks, point you at other folks who are doing the same, and tell you why this is a good thing. Just as long as those hyperlinks (or let's call them plain old links) are managed, tagged, commented upon, and published onto the Web, they represent a user's own personal library placed on public record, which - when aggregated with other personal libraries - allows for rich, social networking opportunities. Why spill any ink (digital or not) in rewriting what someone else has already written about instead of just pointing at the original story and adding the merest of titles, descriptions and tags for future reference? More importantly, why not make these personal 'link playlists' available to oneself and to others from whatever browser or computer one happens to be using at the time? This paper reviews some current initiatives, as of early 2005, in providing public link management applications on the Web - utilities that are often referred to under the general moniker of 'social bookmarking tools'. There are a couple of things going on here: 1) server-side software aimed specifically at managing links with, crucially, a strong, social networking flavour, and 2) an unabashedly open and unstructured approach to tagging, or user classification, of those links.
  13. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.00 
    0.0024750277 = product of:
  0.012375139 = sum of:
    0.012375139 = product of:
      0.037125416 = sum of:
        0.037125416 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037125416 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  14. Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008) 0.00 
    0.0024723937 = product of:
  0.012361968 = sum of:
    0.012361968 = product of:
      0.037085902 = sum of:
        0.037085902 = weight(_text_:29 in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037085902 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
  15. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.00 
    0.0024501525 = product of:
  0.012250762 = sum of:
    0.012250762 = product of:
      0.036752287 = sum of:
        0.036752287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036752287 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  16. Good tags - bad tags : Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.00 
    0.0024321142 = product of:
  0.01216057 = sum of:
    0.01216057 = weight(_text_:management in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01216057 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038751747 = queryNorm
        0.09310089 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    - Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Untersuchungen Stefanie Panke & Birgit Gaiser: "With my head up in the clouds" - Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht Christoph Held& Ulrike Cress: Social Tagging aus kognitionspsychologischer Sicht Michael Derntl, Thorsten Hampel, Renate Motschnig & Tomas Pitner: Social Tagging und Inclusive Universal Access - Einsatz von Tagging in Hochschulen und Bibliotheken Christian Hänger: Good tags or bad tags? Tagging im Kontext der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung Mandy Schiefner: Social Tagging in der universitären Lehre Michael Blank, Thomas Bopp, Thorsten Hampel & Jonas Schulte: Social Tagging = Soziale Suche? Andreas Harrer & Steffen Lohmann: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse Harald Sack & Jörg Waitelonis: Zeitbezogene kollaborative Annotation zur Verbesserung der inhaltsbasierten Videosuche - Kommerzielle Anwendungen von Tagging Karl Tschetschonig, Roland Ladengruber, Thorsten Hampel & Jonas Schulte: Kollaborative Tagging-Systeme im Electronic Commerce Tilman Küchler, Jan M. Pawlowski & Volker Zimmermann: Social Tagging and Open Content: A Concept for the Future of E-Learning and Knowledge Management? Stephan Schillenvein: Der .Business Case' für die Nutzung von Social Tagging in Intranets und internen Informationssystemen
  17. Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007) 0.00 
    0.0021191945 = product of:
  0.010595973 = sum of:
    0.010595973 = product of:
      0.031787917 = sum of:
        0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031787917 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:29:31
  18. Corrado, E.; Moulaison, H.L.: Social tagging and communities of practice : two case studies (2008) 0.00 
    0.0021191945 = product of:
  0.010595973 = sum of:
    0.010595973 = product of:
      0.031787917 = sum of:
        0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031787917 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:20:29
  19. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.00 
    0.0021001308 = product of:
  0.010500654 = sum of:
    0.010500654 = product of:
      0.03150196 = sum of:
        0.03150196 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03150196 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.00 
    0.0021001308 = product of:
  0.010500654 = sum of:
    0.010500654 = product of:
      0.03150196 = sum of:
        0.03150196 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03150196 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Languages

  • e 20
  • d 4
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications