Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.02
    0.023967117 = product of:
      0.047934234 = sum of:
        0.047934234 = product of:
          0.07190135 = sum of:
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
            0.036492907 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036492907 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  2. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.02
    0.019972598 = product of:
      0.039945196 = sum of:
        0.039945196 = product of:
          0.059917793 = sum of:
            0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029507035 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
            0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030410757 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Feinberg, M.: Expressive bibliography : personal collections in public space (2011) 0.02
    0.016463611 = product of:
      0.032927223 = sum of:
        0.032927223 = product of:
          0.09878167 = sum of:
            0.09878167 = weight(_text_:i in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09878167 = score(doc=4561,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.58340967 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines collections of citations that individual users contribute to social tagging systems such as Delicious and LibraryThing. I characterize these personal collections, furnished with various forms of metadata and arranged for Web display, as a means of communication, where a particular sensibility molds guiding principles for resource selection, description, and categorization. Using several analytic frameworks from museum studies, I present three brief case studies that interrogate both the substance and the means of expression achieved in such collections, which I term "expressive bibliographies." In considering these case studies, I explore how an explicit rhetorical perspective might inform purposeful design of expressive bibliography.
  4. Peters, I.: Benutzerzentrierte Erschließungsverfahren (2013) 0.01
    0.011759723 = product of:
      0.023519445 = sum of:
        0.023519445 = product of:
          0.07055833 = sum of:
            0.07055833 = weight(_text_:i in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07055833 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.41672117 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Raban, D.R.; Ronen, I.; Guy, I.: Acting or reacting? : Preferential attachment in a people-tagging system (2011) 0.01
    0.0099784555 = product of:
      0.019956911 = sum of:
        0.019956911 = product of:
          0.05987073 = sum of:
            0.05987073 = weight(_text_:i in 4371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05987073 = score(doc=4371,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 4371, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4371)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.01
    0.009407777 = product of:
      0.018815555 = sum of:
        0.018815555 = product of:
          0.056446664 = sum of:
            0.056446664 = weight(_text_:i in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056446664 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Huang, S.-L.; Lin, S.-C.; Chan, Y.-C.: Investigating effectiveness and user acceptance of semantic social tagging for knowledge sharing (2012) 0.01
    0.008345851 = product of:
      0.016691701 = sum of:
        0.016691701 = product of:
          0.050075103 = sum of:
            0.050075103 = weight(_text_:c in 2732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050075103 = score(doc=2732,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 2732, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2732)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Peters, I.; Schumann, L.; Terliesner, J.: Folksonomy-basiertes Information Retrieval unter der Lupe (2012) 0.01
    0.008231806 = product of:
      0.016463611 = sum of:
        0.016463611 = product of:
          0.049390834 = sum of:
            0.049390834 = weight(_text_:i in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049390834 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.29170483 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Fried, M.; Toma, I.; Yan, E.; Foo, S.; Milojevicacute, S.: Upper tag ontology for integrating social tagging data (2010) 0.01
    0.0070558335 = product of:
      0.014111667 = sum of:
        0.014111667 = product of:
          0.042335 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Fox, M.J.: Communities of practice, gender and social tagging (2012) 0.01
    0.0070558335 = product of:
      0.014111667 = sum of:
        0.014111667 = product of:
          0.042335 = sum of:
            0.042335 = weight(_text_:i in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042335 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.25003272 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Social or collaborative tagging enables users to organize and label resources on the web. Libraries and other information environments hope that tagging can complement professional subject access with user-created terms. But who are the taggers, and does their language represent that of the user population? Some language theorists believe that inherent variables, such as gender or race, can be responsible for language use, whereas other researchers endorse more multiply-influenced practice-based approaches, where interactions with others affect language use more than a single variable. To explore whether linguistic variation in tagging is influenced more by gender or context, in this exploratory study, I will analyze the content and quantity of tags used on LibraryThing. This study seeks to dismantle stereotypical views of women's language use and to suggest a community of practice-based approach to analyzing social tags.
  11. Xu, C.; Ma, B.; Chen, X.; Ma, F.: Social tagging in the scholarly world (2013) 0.01
    0.0069548762 = product of:
      0.0139097525 = sum of:
        0.0139097525 = product of:
          0.041729257 = sum of:
            0.041729257 = weight(_text_:c in 1091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041729257 = score(doc=1091,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 1091, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1091)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The number of research studies on social tagging has increased rapidly in the past years, but few of them highlight the characteristics and research trends in social tagging. A set of 862 academic documents relating to social tagging and published from 2005 to 2011 was thus examined using bibliometric analysis as well as the social network analysis technique. The results show that social tagging, as a research area, develops rapidly and attracts an increasing number of new entrants. There are no key authors, publication sources, or research groups that dominate the research domain of social tagging. Research on social tagging appears to focus mainly on the following three aspects: (a) components and functions of social tagging (e.g., tags, tagging objects, and tagging network), (b) taggers' behaviors and interface design, and (c) tags' organization and usage in social tagging. The trend suggest that more researchers turn to the latter two integrated with human computer interface and information retrieval, although the first aspect is the fundamental one in social tagging. Also, more studies relating to social tagging pay attention to multimedia tagging objects and not only text tagging. Previous research on social tagging was limited to a few subject domains such as information science and computer science. As an interdisciplinary research area, social tagging is anticipated to attract more researchers from different disciplines. More practical applications, especially in high-tech companies, is an encouraging research trend in social tagging.
  12. Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.01
    0.006884975 = product of:
      0.01376995 = sum of:
        0.01376995 = product of:
          0.04130985 = sum of:
            0.04130985 = weight(_text_:c in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04130985 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Frohner, H.: Social Tagging : Grundlagen, Anwendungen, Auswirkungen auf Wissensorganisation und soziale Strukturen der User (2010) 0.01
    0.0058798613 = product of:
      0.011759723 = sum of:
        0.011759723 = product of:
          0.035279166 = sum of:
            0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035279166 = score(doc=4723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Teilw. zugl.: Wien, Techn. Univ., Masterarb., 2009. Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.5, S.268269 (I. Peters)
  14. Sun, A.; Bhowmick, S.S.; Nguyen, K.T.N.; Bai, G.: Tag-based social image retrieval : an empirical evaluation (2011) 0.01
    0.0058798613 = product of:
      0.011759723 = sum of:
        0.011759723 = product of:
          0.035279166 = sum of:
            0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035279166 = score(doc=4938,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Tags associated with social images are valuable information source for superior image search and retrieval experiences. Although various heuristics are valuable to boost tag-based search for images, there is a lack of general framework to study the impact of these heuristics. Specifically, the task of ranking images matching a given tag query based on their associated tags in descending order of relevance has not been well studied. In this article, we take the first step to propose a generic, flexible, and extensible framework for this task and exploit it for a systematic and comprehensive empirical evaluation of various methods for ranking images. To this end, we identified five orthogonal dimensions to quantify the matching score between a tagged image and a tag query. These five dimensions are: (i) tag relatedness to measure the degree of effectiveness of a tag describing the tagged image; (ii) tag discrimination to quantify the degree of discrimination of a tag with respect to the entire tagged image collection; (iii) tag length normalization analogous to document length normalization in web search; (iv) tag-query matching model for the matching score computation between an image tag and a query tag; and (v) query model for tag query rewriting. For each dimension, we identify a few implementations and evaluate their impact on NUS-WIDE dataset, the largest human-annotated dataset consisting of more than 269K tagged images from Flickr. We evaluated 81 single-tag queries and 443 multi-tag queries over 288 search methods and systematically compare their performances using standard metrics including Precision at top-K, Mean Average Precision (MAP), Recall, and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG).
  15. Kipp, M.E.; Beak, J.; Choi, I.: Motivations and intentions of flickr users in enriching flick records for Library of Congress photos (2017) 0.01
    0.0058798613 = product of:
      0.011759723 = sum of:
        0.011759723 = product of:
          0.035279166 = sum of:
            0.035279166 = weight(_text_:i in 3828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035279166 = score(doc=3828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.20836058 = fieldWeight in 3828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3828)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.01
    0.0050684595 = product of:
      0.010136919 = sum of:
        0.010136919 = product of:
          0.030410757 = sum of:
            0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030410757 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  17. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.01
    0.0050684595 = product of:
      0.010136919 = sum of:
        0.010136919 = product of:
          0.030410757 = sum of:
            0.030410757 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030410757 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15720168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
  18. Nov, O.; Naaman, M.; Ye, C.: Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community : a multidimensional perspective (2010) 0.00
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.009835679 = sum of:
        0.009835679 = product of:
          0.029507035 = sum of:
            0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 3424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029507035 = score(doc=3424,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3424, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3424)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Huang, C.; Fu, T.; Chen, H.: Text-based video content classification for online video-sharing sites (2010) 0.00
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.009835679 = sum of:
        0.009835679 = product of:
          0.029507035 = sum of:
            0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 3452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029507035 = score(doc=3452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 3452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3452)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Stvilia, B.; Jörgensen, C.: Member activities and quality of tags in a collection of historical photographs in Flickr (2010) 0.00
    0.0049178395 = product of:
      0.009835679 = sum of:
        0.009835679 = product of:
          0.029507035 = sum of:
            0.029507035 = weight(_text_:c in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029507035 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)